No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

SAP Information Steward vs dbt comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

dbt
Ranking in Data Quality
6th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
11
Ranking in other categories
Data Integration (15th)
SAP Information Steward
Ranking in Data Quality
19th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
9
Ranking in other categories
Metadata Management (12th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Data Quality category, the mindshare of dbt is 2.5%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP Information Steward is 2.8%, up from 2.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Data Quality Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
dbt2.5%
SAP Information Steward2.8%
Other94.7%
Data Quality
 

Featured Reviews

Harshwardhan Gullapalli - PeerSpot reviewer
AI Engineer at a educational organization with 51-200 employees
Data pipelines have improved financial accuracy and now build transparent audit-ready reports
As for something I wish we had, dbt's native support for Python transformations came later, and we did some complex financial classification calculations that felt clunky in pure SQL. We ended up writing Python in our n8n workflows and then fed the results back into dbt, which created a bit of a split-brain situation. If we would have had dbt Python models earlier, we could have kept that logic unified. Managing multiple reporting standards was our biggest operational pain point with dbt. We were running UAE corporate tax compliance and IFRS disclosure workflows simultaneously for different clients, and dbt does not have a native concept of multi-tenant or multi-standard project organization. Everything lives in one flat structure, so we had to build more conventions: separate schema folders for IFRS models versus UACT models, custom macros to tag models by compliance regime, and environment variables to control which set of transformations run for which client.
FranciscoSantos - PeerSpot reviewer
Director at Pixel Studio PTY
Provides accurate data that is validated against a personalized reference tool
For most SAP customers, Information Steward is enough because it is able to build quality data rules to detect issues in the source systems like SAP HANA, Business Warehouse, or other systems. A business user can first organize their data into several data domains. For example, procurement, human resources, and logistics setup. The domains can build data quality dimensions where you can describe the kind of rule that you are going to use. The user then can immediately see if something is wrong with their data using traffic lights. Another great feature of SAP Information Steward is the accuracy that the content is followed by validating against the reference tool. With the solution, you are creating data quality dimensions. Within these dimensions, you are creating business data quality rules that are looking for specific fields. From these rules, you can create a scorecard. The scorecard will highlight the percentage of good data and ensure the user can feel confident that the data is accurate within predetermined limits. SAP tables have field names that are very cryptic, making them hard to understand the meaning of the fields. Metapedia helps describe these fields in business terms.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"There is operational efficiency achieved, and data quality and governance have also been achieved with modular SQL and version controlling, which reduced duplication of data and data errors."
"Since we migrated from SSIS to dbt model architecture, it takes around four hours only to complete a full refresh, and the client is now happy because our downtime was drastically reduced when we perform a complete refresh of the data."
"It is very convenient because at the end, I have the opportunity to orchestrate all my transformations in just one single place, rather than having them spread out."
"I would say the best feature or the most desirable feature for dbt is the ability to write everything in code."
"From a developer point of view, I find the ease of development and the code to be the most useful capabilities of dbt."
"The most concrete outcome was a significant reduction in data errors reaching our downstream AI models, and after implementing dbt's testing layer, we caught roughly 70% of those issues at the transformation stage itself, before they ever touched the model."
"dbt has positively impacted my organization by allowing us to expand the ceiling of complexity because once we have written the SQL, we can manage significantly more complexity since we are not spending all of our time doing it ourselves."
"Overall, I find dbt to be optimized compared to other tools."
"I am very happy with the product."
"The ability to analyze the data even before we start the transformation of it, and generating the user-friendly interface, giving analytical reports, and helping create the transformation rules before we proceed with the data migration part was the most helpful part of the solution for our company."
"The product has improved company efficiency because we're able to categorize the need for user access at the folder level across storage enterprise wide."
"Initial setup was straightforward."
"The most valuable features are data quality insight, metadata management, and metadata dictionary."
"Setup is straightforward."
"The solution is very fast, very stable, and very easy to use and straightforward."
"Ability to collect information, monitor user access and to plan storage capacity."
 

Cons

"Since dbt has a license cost, if a company is small and does not have much budget, they can explore other tools because there are other tools that provide the same functionality at a lower cost."
"Managing multiple reporting standards was our biggest operational pain point with dbt."
"Dbt is not as stable as preferred, as it has had a few outages in the current year itself, so improvement should be made in the outages section as it is not stable."
"If I needed to name a few areas for improvement, I would mention the migration of code to Git and GitHub, which sometimes fails and can be confusing for developers during handover."
"The main issue I have had with dbt is that when I start a project inside dbt, the structure I have to use is somewhat strict."
"dbt can be improved as I find the co-pilot in dbt is not very good, and my team has tried using it but opted to move off it and use other co-pilots such as GitHub."
"The solution must add more Python-based implementations."
"Every upgrade is a little bit of a risk for us because we do not know if the workarounds that we developed will be available for the next version."
"Needs to be more powerful on rules."
"SAP Information Steward is an expensive solution compared to others."
"We'd like to see some manipulation techniques included in SAP Information Steward."
"From a performance perspective, sometimes it behaves weirdly. When we are connecting with the file-based system, it doesn't give us the correct results, or it somehow shows us there is this issue with the data or the file connectivity."
"In some cases they have given extraneous or erroneous information, which is completely useless."
"The support team is not very responsive."
"Performance could be improved."
"SAP is a bit pricey, and better tools are available for a lower price."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution’s pricing is affordable."
"SAP Information Steward is an expensive solution compared to others."
"I do not know if there were additional costs beyond the standard licensing fees."
"A bit pricey, and better tools are available for a lower price."
"Smaller-sized organizations may not be able to invest in SAP Information Steward because of the cost."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Quality solutions are best for your needs.
913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
16%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Outsourcing Company
7%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Manufacturing Company
16%
Government
11%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Outsourcing Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business2
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise6
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business1
Large Enterprise7
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for dbt?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for dbt is that dbt is open source for its core modules, so the pricing, setup, and everything was really good.
What needs improvement with dbt?
dbt can be improved by introducing Python. Ideally, I would want to be able to orchestrate across the DAG and have both Python and SQL combined. The last time I used it, it was not able to visualiz...
What is your primary use case for dbt?
My main use case for dbt is data pipelines. I build data transformations and usually construct analytics pipelines.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

No data available
Information Steward, SAP Data Insight
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
American Water, Graphic Packaging International, OSRAM Licht AG, Maxim Integrated
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP Information Steward vs. dbt and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.
913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.