Discover the top alternatives and competitors to SAP Information Steward based on the interviews we conducted with its users.
The top alternative solutions include Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC), Collibra Platform, and Ataccama ONE Platform.
The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.
SAP Alternatives Report
Learn what solutions real users are comparing with SAP, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Informatica IDMC offers seamless integration across various cloud environments, making it ideal for scalable and flexible business operations. In comparison, SAP Information Steward enhances data quality and security but may pose challenges in cost, limiting its appeal to smaller organizations.
SAP Information Steward attracts tech buyers with its strong data profiling and monitoring capabilities. In comparison, Collibra Platform, ideal for integration and automation, appeals to those seeking advanced governance features despite higher initial costs. SAP offers efficiency; Collibra promises comprehensive long-term value.
SAP Information Steward has a higher setup cost compared to the Collibra Platform, which offers a more cost-effective entry point. Collibra is likely more appealing to organizations with budget constraints during the implementation phase.
SAP Information Steward has a higher setup cost compared to the Collibra Platform, which offers a more cost-effective entry point. Collibra is likely more appealing to organizations with budget constraints during the implementation phase.
SAP Information Steward offers seamless integration within SAP ecosystems and emphasizes metadata management. In comparison, Ataccama ONE Platform provides comprehensive data management features with flexible deployment options. Tech buyers seeking ease within SAP might prefer Steward, whereas those needing versatility could choose Ataccama.
SAP Information Steward has a straightforward setup cost, while Ataccama ONE Platform features a competitive pricing model. Users may find the clear setup approach of SAP beneficial, whereas Ataccama offers cost-effectiveness for diverse data needs.
SAP Information Steward has a straightforward setup cost, while Ataccama ONE Platform features a competitive pricing model. Users may find the clear setup approach of SAP beneficial, whereas Ataccama offers cost-effectiveness for diverse data needs.
SAP Information Steward is favored for its integration within SAP environments and strong analytics. In comparison, Syniti Data Quality attracts buyers with its adaptable features suited for complex data needs, offering flexibility in non-SAP infrastructures and competitive pricing, reducing long-term maintenance costs.
SAP Information Steward has a lower setup cost compared to Syniti Data Quality, making it a more budget-friendly option. Users who prioritize cost efficiency may find SAP Information Steward appealing.
SAP Information Steward has a lower setup cost compared to Syniti Data Quality, making it a more budget-friendly option. Users who prioritize cost efficiency may find SAP Information Steward appealing.
Oracle EDQ is known for strong customer support and affordable pricing, making it suitable for those prioritizing efficient deployment and ROI. In comparison, SAP Information Steward attracts businesses needing comprehensive data governance and metadata management, justifying its higher costs with detailed lineage tools.
Syniti Information Management unlocks the obscurity in data with DeepGuidance and automatically discovers the critical relationships, dependencies and lineage that every business needs to run their business with the confidence of trusted data.
