Collibra Platform vs SAP Information Steward comparison

Collibra and SAP are both solutions in the Metadata Management category. Collibra is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.2, while SAP is ranked #10. Collibra holds a 16.4% mindshare in MM, compared to SAP’s 3.3% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Collibra users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of SAP users who would recommend it.

Collibra Platform

Read 89 Collibra Platform reviews

14,104 Views
4,090 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

SAP Information Steward

Read 9 SAP Information Steward reviews

1,703 Views
698 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Collibra Platform

SAP Information Steward

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 15, 2026

SAP Information Steward and Collibra Platform are competing products in the data management space. Collibra Platform appears to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive features that users feel justify its price, despite SAP Information Steward's favorable pricing and support.

Features: SAP Information Steward offers data profiling, metadata management, and data quality monitoring. Collibra Platform includes strong data governance, lineage tracking, and collaboration functionalities, offering a more integrated approach to data governance with a broader array of features.

Room for Improvement: SAP Information Steward could enhance its integration capabilities, user interface, and reporting functionalities. Collibra Platform may improve its data quality features, streamline integration with third-party tools, and reduce learning curve for new users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SAP Information Steward offers a straightforward deployment model with services aligned to industry standards. Collibra Platform also provides a user-friendly deployment experience, emphasizing strong customer service and support, making it a more attractive option for a seamless deployment.

Pricing and ROI: SAP Information Steward is known for its lower setup cost, offering good ROI for budget-conscious organizations. Collibra Platform, though more expensive, delivers robust ROI due to its advanced features, providing extensive long-term value. SAP Information Steward offers immediate cost benefits, while Collibra's toolset may yield greater returns over time.

To learn more, read our detailed Collibra Platform vs. SAP Information Steward Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Collibra Platform vs. SAP Information Steward

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,747 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Collibra Platform

Ranking in Metadata Management

1st

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Governance (1st), AI Governance (1st)

SAP Information Steward

Ranking in Metadata Management

10th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Quality (18th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Metadata Management category, the mindshare of Collibra Platform is 16.4%, down from 23.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP Information Steward is 3.3%, up from 2.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Metadata Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Collibra Platform	16.4%
SAP Information Steward	3.3%
Other	80.3%

Metadata Management

Featured Reviews

Aditi Kamra

Senior Consultant at Morgan Stanley

Data governance has transformed business glossaries and now drives AI-ready insights

I think it's a great platform. Searching can be made a little better. The data marketplace which it provides is also great, but sometimes when we are searching an element and we know we are not sure if we can find it or if we have missed it. Listing data domains in one place for quick visibility will be an add-on. I am not a hardcore coder. For a coder to create workflows and automate the process, I needed to learn Groovy script and create some workflows. In the automation part, I think it can also introduce a low-code, no-code platform where we can connect different connectors and we can quickly create some automated workflows, if at basic level only, because the next big thing is automation and AI. Low-code, no-code platforms are being used by everyone. I think that will be useful. When I look for a data domain, I'm not able to find it very quickly. For a business owner to know data domains and search data domains, it could be made a little easier. Also, the automation part needs improvement. We are only able to enter the data manually or connect to a data source, but now we want to create some workflows as well. That's why I've chosen a rating of eight. Otherwise, it's really great.

Read full review

FranciscoSantos

Director at Pixel Studio PTY

Provides accurate data that is validated against a personalized reference tool

For most SAP customers, Information Steward is enough because it is able to build quality data rules to detect issues in the source systems like SAP HANA, Business Warehouse, or other systems. A business user can first organize their data into several data domains. For example, procurement, human resources, and logistics setup. The domains can build data quality dimensions where you can describe the kind of rule that you are going to use. The user then can immediately see if something is wrong with their data using traffic lights. Another great feature of SAP Information Steward is the accuracy that the content is followed by validating against the reference tool. With the solution, you are creating data quality dimensions. Within these dimensions, you are creating business data quality rules that are looking for specific fields. From these rules, you can create a scorecard. The scorecard will highlight the percentage of good data and ensure the user can feel confident that the data is accurate within predetermined limits. SAP tables have field names that are very cryptic, making them hard to understand the meaning of the fields. Metapedia helps describe these fields in business terms.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Collibra Platform has positively impacted my organization by increasing data usage and helping teams build data products."

"I would recommend Collibra Governance depending on the needs of the company."

"The workflows allow the creation of custom workflows based on needs."

"It helps us build a powerful workflow mechanism where there can be any stewardship, including issue management governing assets using policies, regulations, or business rules."

"The most valuable features of Collibra are the workflows and the data lineage capabilities, as they help improve the client's existing processes by allowing you to map those into workflows so the processes can be directly executed on Collibra."

"The catalog feature is definitely valuable because it makes ingesting the metadata of any application quite simple. You don't have to do things manually. You can just schedule an import, and it will just refresh the metadata of whatever application you want. That's what I like. I usually work on the technical side, and other than that, I usually create integrations. I integrate Collibra with different environments or applications. I'm a developer, so I cannot vouch for the business, but for me, it is quite developer-friendly with the Java API interface and the REST API interface that they have provided. It is good for creating dashboards based on the needs of each and every role. It can be user-specific or group-specific. We usually create dashboards and give them to our business users, and they are quite happy with that."

"The solution has very good online assistance."

"It is user-friendly."

More Collibra Platform pros

"The most valuable features are data quality insight, metadata management, and metadata dictionary."

"The solution is very fast."

"The Data Cleansing and the scorecard dashboard are very valuable. Additionally, the financial aspect of SAP Information Steward is very good. When a rule is incorrect then it will show how much is it costing the business. These features are very valuable."

"The product has improved company efficiency because we're able to categorize the need for user access at the folder level across storage enterprise wide."

"Setup is straightforward."

"The solution is very fast, very stable, and very easy to use and straightforward."

"Data integration is much easier with Information Steward - irrespective of the data sources, integration is very smooth and easy."

"Initial setup was straightforward."

More SAP Information Steward pros

Cons

"The UI is good if you happen to be an administrator and are familiar with the technical side of the administration. If you're a business user, the UI is not good. It is hard to learn. It is hard for those who are administering it to teach to end-users and it can take hours of training to do it. Because it is difficult and non-intuitive, business users resist using it. It is a battle to get them on board and to keep them engaged because of the UI."

"I think they can bring a few more features and align better with other quality products."

"If someone changes the metadata, we can't see who changed it."

"They could simplify the platform's setup and design process. It requires significant IT involvement and expertise, which can be a barrier for smaller organizations."

"Data discovery would be the major area that requires improvement across the landscape and I'd also like to see data redundancies."

"Every time you change or publish a new questionnaire for certification, you have to basically go into the code and update the new version of the questionnaire."

"I experience occasional downtime, bugs, and some glitches."

"Where it isn't great is on older technologies that you'll typically find in finance or insurance industries, such as older types of data with VSAM or ISAM, or those types of older technologies. It just doesn't connect with them very easily."

More Collibra Platform cons

"SAP Information Steward is an expensive solution compared to others."

"The solution could improve by incorporating other applications, such as Power BI to show more visualization. More interaction with other solutions would be a good benefit."

"From a performance perspective, sometimes it behaves weirdly. When we are connecting with the file-based system, it doesn't give us the correct results, or it somehow shows us there is this issue with the data or the file connectivity."

"SAP Information Steward could be improved by offering a cloud version of the product."

"Performance could be improved."

"SAP is a bit pricey, and better tools are available for a lower price."

"The user experience of metapedia could be improved."

"We'd like to see some manipulation techniques included in SAP Information Steward."

More SAP Information Steward cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Collibra Governance is extremely expensive"

"I am not so much aware of price details. Initially, there was an add-on NuSoft license to use the DVC connector that NuSoft gives to create integrations, but Collibra is now phasing out of it slowly. Collibra is cutting ties with them is what we have been led to believe, and we have started developing on Spring Boot, which is open source."

"Collibra Governance is an expensive solution."

"Generally, it is a rather expensive solution compared to some other tools in the market, but I found it to be fair-priced for its capabilities."

"We purchase its annual license. There is an extra cost for additional users."

"The solution's pricing is moderate and not very expensive."

"I rate the pricing a three on a scale of one to ten, where one is expensive, and ten is cheap."

"I think they can bring a few more features and align better with other quality products."

More Collibra Platform pricing and cost advice

"SAP Information Steward is an expensive solution compared to others."

"A bit pricey, and better tools are available for a lower price."

"I do not know if there were additional costs beyond the standard licensing fees."

"Smaller-sized organizations may not be able to invest in SAP Information Steward because of the cost."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Metadata Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

18%

Government

15%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	24
Midsize Enterprise	14
Large Enterprise	62

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Collibra Data Intelligence Platform?

The UI of Collibra Platform can be improved, as can some APIs such as the import API. Improving the UI and documentation would bring it closer to a perfect score for me, making it more accessible.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Collibra Data Intelligence Platform?

Collibra Platform is used for data governance, bridging business and technical data. I used Collibra Platform to import metadata from GCP projects by utilizing Collibra import APIs. Importing metad...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Collibra Data Intelligence Platform?

I would advise others looking into using Collibra Platform to get some training and develop a culture around data governance. I have no idea about Collibra Platform's AI capabilities regarding gove...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Microsoft Purview Data Governance vs Collibra Platform

Compared 20% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs Collibra Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Alation Data Catalog vs Collibra Platform

Compared 4% of the time

erwin Data Intelligence vs Collibra Platform

Compared 4% of the time

Palantir Foundry vs Collibra Platform

Compared 2% of the time

More Collibra Platform Competitors

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs SAP Information Steward

Compared 12% of the time

SAP PowerDesigner vs SAP Information Steward

Compared 12% of the time

SAP Data Quality Management vs SAP Information Steward

Compared 9% of the time

Oracle Enterprise Data Quality (EDQ) vs SAP Information Steward

Compared 8% of the time

Karini.AI vs SAP Information Steward

Compared 5% of the time

More SAP Information Steward Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Collibra Platform

June 2026

Download Collibra Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

SAP Information Steward

May 2026

Download SAP Information Steward product report

Also Known As

Data Intelligence Platform, Collibra AI Governance, Collibra Catalog, Collibra Governance, Collibra Lineage, Collibra Privacy & Risk

Information Steward, SAP Data Insight

Overview

Collibra Platform is preferred for workflows, data lineage, and a user-friendly interface. It enhances metadata management with robust collaboration, flexible customization, and powerful reporting, aiding organizations in effective data management.

Collibra Platform provides dependable solutions for metadata management, data lineage, and governance. It strengthens data governance with cataloging, glossaries, automation, and integration, supporting compliance and data quality management. Despite challenges with integration and metadata ingestion, the platform is vital for data governance programs, offering comprehensive AI capabilities and streamlined processes for enterprise data management.

What are Collibra Platform's key features?

Workflows: Enhances process efficiency with customizable workflows.
Data Lineage: Tracks data movement across systems for accountability.
User-friendly Interface: Simplifies interaction with intuitive design.
Metadata Management: Manages and organizes metadata for better insights.
Collaboration Features: Fosters teamwork with integrated tools.
Cataloging and Glossary: Improves governance and traceability.

What benefits should be sought in reviews?

Improved Business Processes: Drives efficiency with automation and customization.
Enhanced Data Governance: Facilitates compliance with comprehensive traceability tools.
Robust Integration: Ensures seamless data flow across various systems.
Advanced Reporting: Provides insights for data-driven decisions.

In industries, Collibra Platform supports IT teams through metadata management and data quality assurance. It is widely used for compliance initiatives like GDPR, speeding up digital transformation and enforcing policy management. Organizations employ it to consolidate business and technical metadata, ensuring effective enterprise-scale data management in diverse sectors.

Collibra

SAP Information Steward offers data quality insights, metadata management, and data validation scorecards, ensuring accurate data validation through scorecards and dashboards, making it user-friendly and efficient for businesses seeking clarity and effective data profiling.

SAP Information Steward provides a comprehensive approach to managing data quality and governance. It is designed to simplify deployment and streamline data profiling and cleansing with ease. Businesses leverage its capabilities to create data quality rules and detect issues in source systems, enhancing business clarity and accurate data validation. Centralizing cloud data and offering business-friendly metadata descriptions with Metapedia, it supports better metadata management and data profiling. However, it requires improvements in data export capabilities, integration for data manipulation, data filtering features, and enhanced support responsiveness.

What are the key features of SAP Information Steward?

Data Quality Insight: Provides tools for insightful data quality assessments.
Metadata Management: Allows centralized management of metadata through Metapedia.
Scorecard for Data Validation: Offers intuitive scorecards and dashboards for validating data accuracy.
Data Profiling and Cleansing: Facilitates effective profiling and cleansing processes.
Cloud Data Centralization: Centralizes cloud data for effective management.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Ease of Deployment: Simplifies the integration into existing systems ensuring swift usage.
User-friendly Interface: Enhances usability for efficient operations.
Accurate Data Validation: Improves the accuracy of business data.
Comprehensive Metadata Descriptions: Offers detailed business-friendly descriptions.
Integrated Data Profiling: Enhances the quality and accuracy of data management.

Industries implement SAP Information Steward widely, notably in global enterprises for S/4HANA business processes and historical reporting, prioritizing data profiling, data quality assessments, and business rules for managing customer information and transformations. Its Metapedia component supports data governance initiatives within these businesses.

SAP

Sample Customers

AXA XL, DNB, Adobe, PMI, Holland America Line, UC Davis Health, Cox Automotive

American Water, Graphic Packaging International, OSRAM Licht AG, Maxim Integrated

Buyer's Guide

Collibra Platform vs. SAP Information Steward

June 2026

Free Report: Collibra Platform vs. SAP Information Steward

Find out what your peers are saying about Collibra Platform vs. SAP Information Steward and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Collibra Platform vs. SAP Information Steward report.

See our list of best Metadata Management vendors.

We monitor all Metadata Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.