Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Dell AppSync vs NetApp SnapMirror comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Dell AppSync
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
Copy Data Management (4th)
NetApp SnapMirror
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
26
Ranking in other categories
Data Replication (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

Dell AppSync and NetApp SnapMirror aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Dell AppSync is designed for Copy Data Management and holds a mindshare of 17.4%, up 17.3% compared to last year.
NetApp SnapMirror, on the other hand, focuses on Data Replication, holds 10.7% mindshare, down 20.6% since last year.
Copy Data Management Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Dell AppSync17.4%
IBM Storage Defender Copy Data Management24.6%
Perforce Delphix17.8%
Other40.2%
Copy Data Management
Data Replication Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
NetApp SnapMirror10.7%
NetApp Snapshot12.0%
Hitachi TrueCopy7.1%
Other70.2%
Data Replication
 

Featured Reviews

Rhett Waldock - PeerSpot reviewer
Simple to install, reliable, and has good technical support
There were some limitations in the product that prompted us to shift away from it. You could only have one AppSync profile per server to target where the data could be replicated to. There were a few specific feature limitations in terms of flexibility that required the development of an alternative. However, that was the only flaw. In relation to, the replication destinations. We wanted to collect data from multiple systems and then replicate it on a single system. AppSync was based on a one-to-one replication footprint, which was the limitation that we had encountered. We needed to combine several systems into one. That was one of the scenarios provided by the solution. I would like to have the ability to bit the same system with multiple AppSync replications would definitely be beneficial to us. And general flexibility enhancements.
Abdul-Salam - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides great data loss recovery and real time replication
Deployment was very smooth and took around two weeks. Following that, we carried out our data migration which took time. We previously used a Windows file independent server with its own local disk and Windows OS. It's not compatible with NetApp so data had to be physically migrated. We also took extra time integrating with our antivirus software and configuring external tape libraries with NetApp. We had one staff member involved in the deployment and an engineer from our partners. We have close to 900 users. The solution requires routine tasks as opposed to maintenance. We have three or four people with access to this storage.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"I believe one of the advantages we saw was that the configuration was manageable."
"This solution is very helpful and easy to use."
"With SnapMirror, the solution is the feature itself that is most valuable. It just replicates the data. It's very difficult to speak about, in the sense that it's similar to the features of a wheel. It is round and it's a part of an automobile."
"NetApp is one of the best products in this field of storage solutions."
"The product has good performance."
"The user interface is very easy to manage. The replication is also very easy to set up."
"They have a very effective dashboard and good reports."
"The synchronous and real-time replication are the most vital features of NetApp SnapMirror"
"The tool seamlessly moves data over the network without putting pressure on the network."
"NetApp SnapMirror stands out for its ease of management, efficiency, and scalability, which align well with our operational needs."
 

Cons

"It would be helpful if this product has features for transferring to the cloud."
"I would like to have the ability to bit the same system with multiple AppSync replications would definitely be beneficial to us. And general flexibility enhancements."
"At the moment, we are not using the synchronous mirror, but we can implement the synchronous mirror. The only thing is that it needs another license. This is the same issue we have with business continuity. It needs another license to be implemented. You need too many separate licenses for the features. They should add some of the aspects of the premium bundle into the basic bundle. Sometimes our customers choose other replication services because of the initial cost of the licenses."
"The solution's dashboard and reporting could be improved."
"The GUI can be improved to perform complex tasks"
"The price needs to be improved."
"They could make continued enhancements in integration with diverse platforms for the product."
"The user interface could be simplified. They might want to have fewer options on it, to make it less complicated. There are a lot of options we never use ourselves. They're often very specialized and don't apply to us."
"There is probably some limitations when it comes to the scalability of the solution."
"The tool should also work on third-party solutions."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I believe we paid them on a yearly basis."
"The product price is reasonable."
"SnapMirror is extremely expensive. We had a hard time adjusting to our budget. If rated on a scale of one to ten, with ten being the most expensive, I would definitely rate it ten out of ten."
"The solution has monthly and yearly licensing options."
"The cost is low compared to different vendors."
"It's part of the NetApp Firewall, so it's free."
"The pricing can be improved."
"It's a highly cost-effective solution"
"The pricing could be improved."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Copy Data Management solutions are best for your needs.
868,759 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
12%
Healthcare Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Retailer
8%
Manufacturing Company
17%
Computer Software Company
14%
Educational Organization
7%
Financial Services Firm
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise6
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business6
Midsize Enterprise10
Large Enterprise10
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about NetApp SnapMirror?
The performance and stability are valuable features. It seems to fulfill all the requirements.
What needs improvement with NetApp SnapMirror?
Some areas of NetApp SnapMirror that could be improved or enhanced include synchronous SnapMirror, which needs improvement as it suffers significantly from network latency. In particular, synchrono...
 

Also Known As

AppSync, Replication Manager
SnapMirror
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Getronics
University at Albany, City of Houston, Yahoo Japan, Washington Employment Security Department, DG Khan Cement Co. Ltd., AmTrust Financial Services, Sheridan College
Find out what your peers are saying about Perforce, IBM, Hitachi Vantara and others in Copy Data Management. Updated: September 2025.
868,759 professionals have used our research since 2012.