Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Dell AppSync vs NetApp SnapMirror comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Dell AppSync
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
Copy Data Management (4th)
NetApp SnapMirror
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
26
Ranking in other categories
Data Replication (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

Dell AppSync and NetApp SnapMirror aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Dell AppSync is designed for Copy Data Management and holds a mindshare of 17.6%, down 20.3% compared to last year.
NetApp SnapMirror, on the other hand, focuses on Data Replication, holds 6.8% mindshare, down 18.5% since last year.
Copy Data Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Dell AppSync17.6%
IBM Storage Defender Copy Data Management18.8%
Hitachi Ops Center Protector14.4%
Other49.199999999999996%
Copy Data Management
Data Replication Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
NetApp SnapMirror6.8%
NetApp Snapshot5.3%
Vision Solutions Double-Take5.0%
Other82.9%
Data Replication
 

Featured Reviews

Rhett Waldock - PeerSpot reviewer
Programmer Analyst at Mankato Clinic, Ltd.
Simple to install, reliable, and has good technical support
There were some limitations in the product that prompted us to shift away from it. You could only have one AppSync profile per server to target where the data could be replicated to. There were a few specific feature limitations in terms of flexibility that required the development of an alternative. However, that was the only flaw. In relation to, the replication destinations. We wanted to collect data from multiple systems and then replicate it on a single system. AppSync was based on a one-to-one replication footprint, which was the limitation that we had encountered. We needed to combine several systems into one. That was one of the scenarios provided by the solution. I would like to have the ability to bit the same system with multiple AppSync replications would definitely be beneficial to us. And general flexibility enhancements.
GP
Storage IT Specialist at a tech vendor with 201-500 employees
Achieves seamless business continuity with robust scalability
The features of NetApp SnapMirror that I have found most valuable include the possibility to stop synchronization in case of high network latency and to limit the bandwidth throttle. This means limiting bandwidth when less connectivity occurs or opening wide the throttling to use the full speed of network connectivity, which we can adjust according to our needs or the needs of our customers. All of this is done without limiting business continuity, so business continuity is always guaranteed. NetApp SnapMirror's data replication feature supports disaster recovery strategies, as it is incorporated into the business continuity feature. SnapMirror is strictly related to snapshot features, a core part of ONTAP, so it's very flexible. It allows us to start with just two snapshots as a simple backup and then use them as a replication point or base for both backup and business continuity. There is no right or wrong answer, it just depends on how it works for specific needs.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The EMC RM is a very useful technology for consistent data replicas for a significant application portfolio like MS SQL, MS Exchange, Oracle DB etc."
"The automation of the replication process is the most valuable feature, as we just configure or schedule the replication process once and the work is done automatically."
"Simple to use and great product to provide application consistent replica."
"However if you wanted a reliable product to work with new or existing EMC products then I would recommend taking a look at Replication Manager."
"We have application consistent snaps of SQL mounted to development VM’s daily."
"It gave us enough time to do the backup for big databases and mount them in a certain location, from there on tapes."
"This solution is very helpful and easy to use."
"In few steps you can configure your replicas without using auxiliary scripts."
"We have migrated data from old and expiring Netapp hardware using Snapmirror, thereby allowing us to decommission the old hardware and save power, maintenance, and cost."
"It has been 100% stable."
"A NetApp storage solution allows a company to architect a disaster recovery plan that protects all company data."
"Overall, the product is very good. It's an easy to use tool."
"NetApp SnapMirror's compatibility with NetApp products has helped my storage management efforts immensely, as it is part of ONTAP and all architectures based on ONTAP, including ONTAP 8 and 9."
"The synchronous and real-time replication are the most vital features of NetApp SnapMirror"
"NetApp SnapMirror stands out for its ease of management, efficiency, and scalability, which align well with our operational needs."
"NetApp is one of the best products in this field of storage solutions."
 

Cons

"The product needs to be less complex (compatibility, solution enabler etc.)."
"Simplify implementation."
"Mount replica function through EMC RM needs to be faster because when you are using Veritas volumes with mirrors the mount routine is too late (the mount process time is directly proportional the volume size when you are using Veritas Volume Manager (vxvm))."
"I would like to have the ability to bit the same system with multiple AppSync replications would definitely be beneficial to us. And general flexibility enhancements."
"When I deployed the Replication Manager and detected issues, I found that the technical support was not really helpful because they spent a lot of time to found a hotfix which resolved my problem."
"Each replication manager installation can only handle so many records. If you have over a certain number of bookmarks or snaps, the GUI becomes un-usable."
"It would be helpful if this product has features for transferring to the cloud."
"Yes. Periodically I needed to restart the agent on the client side and sometimes on the server side."
"If they can make the application free like other vendors or include it in all the packages, it would be great."
"We must be able to integrate Flash Pool with SnapMirror."
"At the moment, we are not using the synchronous mirror, but we can implement the synchronous mirror. The only thing is that it needs another license. This is the same issue we have with business continuity. It needs another license to be implemented. You need too many separate licenses for the features. They should add some of the aspects of the premium bundle into the basic bundle. Sometimes our customers choose other replication services because of the initial cost of the licenses."
"Synchronous replication with read-write on both sides in both data centers is powerful but risky since it is greatly affected by high network latency."
"The new coursework models need to be improved. The bandwidth monitoring could also be better."
"In the next release, I would like to get an active IP number solution."
"In the next release, I would like to see Data reduction included and WAN optimization."
"About a year now we have faced random issues related to power supply or auto failover failback issues which were related to bugs in the firmware."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I believe we paid them on a yearly basis."
"The pricing can be improved."
"The product price is reasonable."
"It's a highly cost-effective solution"
"It's part of the NetApp Firewall, so it's free."
"The pricing could be improved."
"SnapMirror is extremely expensive. We had a hard time adjusting to our budget. If rated on a scale of one to ten, with ten being the most expensive, I would definitely rate it ten out of ten."
"The solution has monthly and yearly licensing options."
"The cost is low compared to different vendors."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Copy Data Management solutions are best for your needs.
884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Healthcare Company
8%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Government
7%
Performing Arts
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise6
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business6
Midsize Enterprise10
Large Enterprise10
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What needs improvement with NetApp SnapMirror?
Some areas of NetApp SnapMirror that could be improved or enhanced include synchronous SnapMirror, which needs improvement as it suffers significantly from network latency. In particular, synchrono...
What is your primary use case for NetApp SnapMirror?
My usual use cases for NetApp SnapMirror are primarily for business continuity reasons, allowing me to offer customers the chance to fail back services to another data center, from Milan to Rome an...
 

Also Known As

AppSync, Replication Manager
SnapMirror
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Getronics
University at Albany, City of Houston, Yahoo Japan, Washington Employment Security Department, DG Khan Cement Co. Ltd., AmTrust Financial Services, Sheridan College
Find out what your peers are saying about Perforce, IBM, Hitachi Vantara and others in Copy Data Management. Updated: March 2026.
884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.