Devo vs ExtremeAnalytics comparison

Devo and Extreme Networks are both solutions in the IT Operations Analytics category. Devo is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.3, while Extreme Networks is ranked #15. Devo holds a 4.6% mindshare in IOA, compared to Extreme Networks’s 2.4% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Devo users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Extreme Networks users who would recommend it.

Devo

Read 26 Devo reviews

6,972 Views
1,464 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

ExtremeAnalytics

Read 3 ExtremeAnalytics reviews

1,547 Views
743 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Devo

ExtremeAnalytics

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 1, 2025

ExtremeAnalytics and Devo compete in the data analytics solutions category. Data comparisons suggest Devo has the upper hand in comprehensive features and perceived value, while ExtremeAnalytics performs better in pricing strategies and support satisfaction.

Features: ExtremeAnalytics provides real-time data insights, robust network visibility, and intuitive dashboard configurations. Devo offers expansive integration capabilities, advanced security features, and in-depth threat intelligence. Devo's features are seen as more versatile, particularly in security contexts.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Devo offers cloud-native deployment, facilitating rapid implementation and scalability, with responsive customer service. ExtremeAnalytics ensures a streamlined deployment for existing infrastructures and is praised for its hands-on support model. Devo’s services are considered more adaptive to evolving needs.

Pricing and ROI: ExtremeAnalytics attracts with competitive pricing and cost-effective operational management, showing favorable ROI in network-focused deployments. Devo, though with higher initial costs, provides notable returns through enhanced analytics and security capabilities, justifying the investment for data-centric organizations seeking comprehensive insights.

To learn more, read our detailed Devo vs. ExtremeAnalytics Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Devo vs. ExtremeAnalytics

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,800 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Devo

Ranking in IT Operations Analytics

7th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Log Management (18th), Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (18th), AIOps (13th)

ExtremeAnalytics

Ranking in IT Operations Analytics

15th

Average Rating

0.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Management Applications (26th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the IT Operations Analytics category, the mindshare of Devo is 4.6%, down from 5.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ExtremeAnalytics is 2.4%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Operations Analytics Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Devo	4.6%
ExtremeAnalytics	2.4%
Other	93.0%

IT Operations Analytics

Featured Reviews

Usama Khan

Team Lead SOC at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Advanced threat hunting has improved SOC visibility and now supports faster incident response

Devo can improve in how its connectors enhance integration with third-party tools. Devo's architecture works by having you deploy a relay server in the data center of the client side and Devo SIEM is basically on the AWS cloud. There are specific ports which are enabled on the relay server, which are 514 and 13000, 13151, 152. However, when we talk about databases and custom integrations, there are not default ports in the relay server. No default ports are defined. For JDBC drivers, the port number is 1433, but it is not in the relay server. You have to add it manually. For Oracle RDBMS, the port is 1521, and it is also not there by default. I would appreciate more third-party integrations including Fortinet and others. Machine learning models can also be improved. Playbooks in the SOAR can also be improved. Regarding playbooks for automation, we utilize playbooks for automation in SOAR for automated IOC blocking on a firewall, on a web application firewall, on DNS security, etc. The only option for us to run the playbook is to schedule the job for it. However, if I want to manually run the playbook, there is no option for doing so. This needs improvement.

Read full review

Dushan Niranga

Product Manager at Connex Information Technologies

User-friendly initial setup, reliable, and effective wireless intrusion prevention

ExtremeAnalytics is used for reporting and monitoring The most valuable feature of ExtremeAnalytics is wireless intrusion prevention. ExtremeAnalytics could improve application control. The URL filtering is not working properly. We have had issues with the reports and heat maps not working as…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The ROI has been great as we could launch it in a few months instead of a couple of years, and when you put all the costs together, it is less to have done it than with the open source approach."

"One of the immediate improvements that come to mind is the amount of hot, searchable data, as in the SIEM we had before we were only able to search back 90 days of hot, searchable data, whereas here we have 400 days worth, which has definitely improved our threat hunting capabilities."

"Devo saves us hours in every investigation."

"Overall, I have no issues with it and my guys love it."

"Devo's speed and performance allows us to query in real-time and keep up with what is actually happening on the network, then respond effectively to events."

"The most valuable feature is definitely the ability that Devo has to ingest data. From the previous SIEM that I came from and helped my company administer, it really was the type of system where data was parsed on ingest. This meant that if you didn't build the parser efficiently or correctly, sometimes that would bring the system to its knees. You'd have a backlog of processing the logs as it was ingesting them."

"The most valuable feature is that it has native MSSP capabilities and maintains perfect data separation. It does all of that in a very easy-to-manage cloud-based solution."

"The ability to have high performance, high-speed search capability is incredibly important for us. When it comes to doing security analysis, you don't want to be doing is sitting around waiting to get data back while an attacker is sitting on a network, actively attacking it. You need to be able to answer questions quickly. If I see an indicator of attack, I need to be able to rapidly pivot and find data, then analyze it and find more data to answer more questions. You need to be able to do that quickly. If I'm sitting around just waiting to get my first response, then it ends up moving too slow to keep up with the attacker. Devo's speed and performance allows us to query in real-time and keep up with what is actually happening on the network, then respond effectively to events."

More Devo pros

"The initial setup of ExtremeAnalytics is straightforward and user-friendly."

"The application response latency is valuable and suitable for troubleshooting."

"The most valuable feature of ExtremeAnalytics is wireless intrusion prevention."

"The solution's scalability is a ten out of ten."

Cons

"There is room for improvement in the ability to parse different log types. I would go as far as to say the product is deficient in its ability to parse multiple, different log types, including logs from major vendors that are supported by competitors. Additionally, the time that it takes to turn around a supported parser for customers and common log source types, which are generally accepted standards in the industry, is not acceptable. This has impacted customer onboarding and customer relationships for us on multiple fronts."

"One major area for improvement for Devo... is to provide more capabilities around pre-built monitoring."

"Where Devo has room for improvement is the data ingestion and parsing. We tend to have to work with the Devo support team to bring on and ingest new sources of data."

"The biggest area with room for improvement in Devo is the Security Operations module that just isn't there yet. That goes back to building out how they're going to do content and larger correlation and aggregation of data across multiple things, as well as natively ingesting CTI to create rule sets."

"The tools in Devo's active ports need enhancement in their investigative capabilities."

"Some of the documentation could be improved a little bit. A lot of times it doesn't go as deep into some of the critical issues you might run into. They've been really good to shore us up with support, but some of the documentation could be a little bit better."

"There's always room to reduce the learning curve over how to deal with events and machine data. They could make the machine data simpler."

"The Activeboards feature is not as mature regarding the look and feel. Its functionality is mature, but the look and feel is not there. For example, if you have some data sets and are trying to get some graphics, you cannot change anything. There's just one format for the graphics. You cannot change the size of the font, the font itself, etc."

More Devo cons

"The solution's stability needs to be improved."

"There are issues with cloud distribution of the servers, and it could be faster."

"ExtremeAnalytics could improve application control. The URL filtering is not working properly. We have had issues with the reports and heat maps not working as expected. We have been receiving download errors when attempting to retrieve the heat maps and reports."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Our licensing fees are billed annually and per terabyte."

"We have an OEM agreement with Devo. It is very similar to the standard licensing agreement because we are charged in the same way as any other customer, e.g., we use the backroom."

"Devo is definitely cheaper than Splunk. There's no doubt about that. The value from Devo is good. It's definitely more valuable to me than QRadar or LogRhythm or any of the old, traditional SIEMs."

"The way Devo prices things is based on the amount of data, and I wish the tiers had more granularity. Maybe at this point they do, but when we first negotiated with them, there were only three or four tiers."

"Devo is a hosted or subscription-based solution, whereas before, we purchased QRadar, so we owned it and just had to pay a maintenance fee. We've encountered this with some other products, too, where we went over to subscription-based. Our thought process is that with subscription based, the provider hosts and maintains the tool, and it's offsite. That comes with some additional fees, but we were able to convince our upper management it was worth the price. We used to pay under 10k a year for maintenance, and now we're paying ten times that. It was a relatively tough sell to our management, but I wonder if we have a choice anymore; this is where the market is."

"Pricing is based on the number of gigabytes of ingestion by volume, and it's on a 30-day average. If you go over one day, that's not a big deal as long as the average is what you expected it to be."

"It's a per gigabyte cost for ingestion of data. For every gigabyte that you ingest, it's whatever you negotiated your price for. Compared to other contracts that we've had for cloud providers, it's significantly less."

"I rate the pricing a four on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

More Devo pricing and cost advice

"The price of the solution is approximately $100 to $120 and is paid annually."

"The pricing is an eight out of ten."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Operations Analytics solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Construction Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	12

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Devo?

The pricing of the product is reasonable if we compare it with other Gartner leading products like Splunk, LogRhythm, Microsoft Sentinel, Google SecOps. Its licensing model is basically on per-day ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Devo?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Devo?

I am using Devo myself. Basically, I work at an MSSP, and we provide services to the organization for Security Operation Centers. In our Security Operation Center, we provide the service of SIEM vi...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Devo

Compared 8% of the time

LogRhythm SIEM vs Devo

Compared 7% of the time

New Relic vs Devo

Compared 4% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs Devo

Compared 3% of the time

Datadog vs Devo

Compared 3% of the time

More Devo Competitors

ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs ExtremeAnalytics

Compared 16% of the time

Huawei eSight vs ExtremeAnalytics

Compared 11% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs ExtremeAnalytics

Compared 11% of the time

Cisco DNA Center vs ExtremeAnalytics

Compared 9% of the time

Aruba Airwave vs ExtremeAnalytics

Compared 3% of the time

More ExtremeAnalytics Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Devo

August 2026

Download Devo product report

Buyer's Guide

Network Management Applications

July 2026

Download ExtremeAnalytics product report

Also Known As

No data available

Extreme Application Analytics, Purview

Overview

Devo offers powerful visual analytics, real-time data querying, and log integration capabilities within a cloud-native, multi-tenant architecture, supporting extended data retention ideal for long-term analysis and compliance.

Devo is recognized for its Activeboards, which facilitate visual analytics. High-speed search capabilities and real-time analytics enable efficient data manipulation and querying. Its multi-tenant architecture supports effective data segregation and customization tailored to distinct business needs, enhancing its value for handling complex log integrations. With extended data retention of 400 days and a cloud-native architecture, Devo is a robust platform for long-term analysis and compliance requirements. Though opportunities exist to improve browser stability on large searches, SOAR integrations, and its parser capabilities, Devo remains essential for incident response and security monitoring, offering centralized data storage and analysis.

What are Devo's most important features?

Activeboards: Facilitate visual analytics and data exploration.
High-Speed Search: Enables fast data querying and manipulation.
Real-Time Analytics: Supports instant insights and decision-making.
Multi-Tenant Architecture: Allows effective data segregation and customization.
Extended Data Retention: Offers 400-day log retention for compliance and analysis.
Complex Log Integration: Handles intricate data sources effortlessly.

What benefits and ROI should organizations look for in reviews?

Visual Insights: Enhance understanding through interactive dashboards.
Performance Efficiency: Saves time with high-speed data search and real-time results.
Customization Flexibility: Fits specific business requirements with multi-tenant architecture.
Long-Term Compliance: Ensures alignment with extended data retention needs.
Centralized Monitoring: Enables comprehensive incident response and security monitoring.

Devo is extensively used in industries focused on incident response and digital forensics, centralizing data for security monitoring across hybrid environments. Organizations benefit from its ability to store and analyze aggregated logs, creating alerts and dashboards to enhance visibility for network and endpoint activities in multi-domain settings.

Devo

ExtremeAnalytics provides a comprehensive and insightful analytics experience designed for network professionals seeking data-driven solutions to optimize and secure their networks effectively.

ExtremeAnalytics empowers users with real-time insights into network applications and performance, offering detailed visibility across the network. It supports decision-making processes by providing data that helps streamline operations and improve overall efficiency. Users can analyze and act on information swiftly, ensuring optimal network performance by tackling potential issues proactively.

What features does ExtremeAnalytics offer?

Real-Time Data Collection: Provides immediate access to network data for current visibility.
Application Performance Monitoring: Tracks and analyzes application behaviors to ensure consistent performance levels.
Predictive Analytics: Employs advanced analytics to predict potential network issues before they arise.
Granular Traffic Analysis: Offers deep insights into network traffic to optimize resource allocation.

What benefits and ROI can be expected?

Increased Network Efficiency: Drives higher performance by identifying and resolving network bottlenecks.
Enhanced Security: Offers insights into abnormal traffic patterns for improved security measures.
Cost Reduction: Helps reduce operational costs through efficient resource management and decreased downtime.
Improved User Experience: Enhances service delivery with stable and reliable network performance.

ExtremeAnalytics is widely implemented across industries such as healthcare, finance, and education, where robust network performance is critical. For example, in healthcare, real-time data analysis ensures the stability of patient monitoring systems, while in finance, it supports secure transaction processing by monitoring application performance effectively.

Extreme Networks

Sample Customers

United States Air Force, Rubrik, SentinelOne, Critical Start, NHL, Panda Security, Telefonica, CaixaBank, OpenText, IGT, OneMain Financial, SurveyMonkey, FanDuel, H&R Block, Ulta Beauty, Manulife, Moneylion, Chime Bank, Magna International, American Express Global Business Travel

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Devo vs. ExtremeAnalytics

June 2026

Free Report: Devo vs. ExtremeAnalytics

Find out what your peers are saying about Devo vs. ExtremeAnalytics and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Devo vs. ExtremeAnalytics report.

See our list of best IT Operations Analytics vendors.

We monitor all IT Operations Analytics reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.