

LogicMonitor and Devo are both powerful monitoring platforms that cater to different aspects of IT infrastructure management. LogicMonitor has the upper hand in ease of use and customer service, while Devo's advanced features justify its higher cost.
Features: LogicMonitor has comprehensive monitoring capabilities, real-time alerts, and ease of integration. Devo offers advanced data analytics, custom visualizations, and scalability. LogicMonitor provides straightforward functionality, whereas Devo has more robust and sophisticated features.
Room for Improvement: LogicMonitor could enhance its reporting features and expand its device coverage. Devo could simplify its setup process and reduce the learning curve associated with its advanced features. Both products need minor enhancements, with LogicMonitor needing to broaden its core capabilities and Devo focusing on user accessibility.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: LogicMonitor is praised for its quick deployment and responsive support team. Devo's deployment can be more complex, but its customer service is commendable. LogicMonitor is favored for faster setup, whereas Devo, once deployed, provides powerful assistance.
Pricing and ROI: LogicMonitor is more budget-friendly with quicker ROI due to its straightforward implementation. Devo demands a higher initial investment, but users requiring its advanced analytics and capabilities find the long-term ROI justified. LogicMonitor suits simpler needs, whereas Devo is preferred for sophisticated monitoring requirements.
The return is more of value and savings in preventing costly downtime, making the savings of about $60,000 which we would have lost without LogicMonitor, and in IT staff efficiency, we save approximately 15 hours a week.
Because of LogicMonitor, we have reduced our EC2 infrastructure significantly, which has helped us reduce costs by 20%.
Downtime on each network asset has been reduced, and there is now better visibility for the operations team to manage 24/7 support.
Within one day, I received a script, and LogicMonitor was able to provide the firewall configuration in LogicMonitor on the same day I submitted the request.
Customer support is on point and very well trained.
We need to be able to reach them in real-time, and without those kinds of options available, we have to set up ad hoc calls, which could be improved.
They are not licensed, so you could deploy one collector or 1,000 collectors for the same cost.
LogicMonitor's scalability absolutely meets our organization's growth needs.
LogicMonitor is pretty good at scaling things when it comes to monitoring AWS infrastructure because I can see that it scales very well for us.
The platform is reliable, alerts are consistent, and once collectors and integrations are in place, monitoring runs smoothly with minimal disruption.
It is very stable. I have never seen LogicMonitor itself go down.
Since we implemented LogicMonitor and got it working in production, there has been no downtime, no reliability issues, and nothing major regarding flare-ups from LogicMonitor's perspective.
This is particularly evident when dealing with failed login attempts and determining true versus false positives.
I would also appreciate a stronger out-of-the-box AWS correlation, such as automatically grouping related issues across EC2, EBS, and ALBs in a way that reads as a single incident story.
We are not just looking for a solution that is monitoring-based; we are looking for a solution that fixes the outage and documents it all.
I wish the user interface would be customizable to allow users to create personal context-specific workspaces to hide irrelevant data, rather than trying to have a one-size-fits-all interface.
For small businesses that want to utilize LogicMonitor and are just starting out with limited customers, a pricing model targeted to this segment would be beneficial, perhaps at three or two dollars per device per month.
I experienced no issues with pricing, setup cost, and licensing; it was very transparent, and the licensing model is very clear and easy to understand.
The pricing and overall deployment was quite easy.
When they see a spike in a line chart for a failed login, which could be a true or false attempt, they can click that spike, and a table widget on the same active board instantly populates with raw logs of data for those specific failed logins.
The dynamic alerting and root cause analysis have helped us fix issues before they cause a full-blown outage or degrade performance for end users.
Our SLAs and SLOs were averaging about 10 to 15 failed SLAs and SLOs that were over the time allotted to get those resolved, and those are now down to about two to three per week.
When talking about the statistics, it has helped us reduce downtime to about 40 to 50% because without LogicMonitor, we used to know about the downtime only when the application was actually down.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| LogicMonitor | 5.5% |
| Devo | 1.6% |
| Other | 92.9% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 8 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 11 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 14 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 11 |
| Large Enterprise | 17 |
Devo offers powerful visual analytics, real-time data querying, and log integration capabilities within a cloud-native, multi-tenant architecture, supporting extended data retention ideal for long-term analysis and compliance.
Devo is recognized for its Activeboards, which facilitate visual analytics. High-speed search capabilities and real-time analytics enable efficient data manipulation and querying. Its multi-tenant architecture supports effective data segregation and customization tailored to distinct business needs, enhancing its value for handling complex log integrations. With extended data retention of 400 days and a cloud-native architecture, Devo is a robust platform for long-term analysis and compliance requirements. Though opportunities exist to improve browser stability on large searches, SOAR integrations, and its parser capabilities, Devo remains essential for incident response and security monitoring, offering centralized data storage and analysis.
What are Devo's most important features?Devo is extensively used in industries focused on incident response and digital forensics, centralizing data for security monitoring across hybrid environments. Organizations benefit from its ability to store and analyze aggregated logs, creating alerts and dashboards to enhance visibility for network and endpoint activities in multi-domain settings.
LogicMonitor offers flexible IT monitoring with customizable dashboards and robust alerting capabilities. It integrates seamlessly with third-party apps like ServiceNow and provides a single-pane view for diverse IT environments, aiding in proactive issue resolution and enhancing operational efficiency.
LogicMonitor stands out with its capability to monitor diverse infrastructures including Cisco Voice systems, data centers, and virtual environments. Supporting servers, storage, networking devices, and applications, it provides seamless integration with cloud services like AWS and Azure. Users leverage its scalability and flexibility, benefiting from dynamic thresholds, anomaly detection, and detailed visualization. All these features contribute to improved management of IT assets and streamlined operations. Users suggest improvements in mapping, reporting, and automation for remediation, desiring more customizations and an expansive application performance monitoring toolset.
What are LogicMonitor's key features?LogicMonitor is widely implemented across industries, providing monitoring for infrastructure in sectors like telecommunications, cloud computing, and managed services. Managed service providers particularly value its ability to track client environments, deliver proactive alerts, and generate comprehensive reports, while its integration with cloud platforms like AWS and Azure offers users centralized management and visibility into IT assets worldwide.
We monitor all AIOps reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.