No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Devo vs ManageEngine Log360 comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.4
Devo enhances efficiency by reducing MTTR, lowering costs, improving security and threat detection, and offering customizable auditing features.
Sentiment score
5.4
ManageEngine Log360 provides early returns, is user-valued for proactive monitoring benefits, yet requires skilled teams for evolving threats.
If unauthorized personnel attempt to add logs, the monitoring informs the administrator, enabling them to act promptly, leading to savings in both time and money for the company.
System Engineer at Corporate Projukti Limited
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.0
Devo's customer service is mixed, praised for responsiveness but criticized for ticket escalation, documentation, and onboarding delays.
Sentiment score
7.2
ManageEngine Log360 provides responsive customer service, though complex issues may cause delays; specialized regional support is exceptional.
I rate the customer support a nine out of ten because of their timely technical guidance and responsiveness during the deployment and troubleshooting periods.
Cyber Security Engineer II (Vulnerability & Threat Management) at FICO
I would rate their technical support as nine out of ten.
System Engineer at Corporate Projukti Limited
The support provided by ManageEngine Log360 is fantastic.
Lead IT Security and Remediation at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.6
Devo's scalable cloud infrastructure supports diverse needs, unlimited growth, and is praised for flexibility and a strong support community.
Sentiment score
6.8
ManageEngine Log360's scalability is mixed, with effective support but limited by licensing, technology, and variable deployment experiences.
Devo is a unified SIEM solution designed to handle growing log volumes and enterprise-scale monitoring requirements.
Cyber Security Engineer II (Vulnerability & Threat Management) at FICO
We backed up the database and completed the recovery with the application, proving it is reliable for disaster recovery.
System Engineer at Corporate Projukti Limited
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.3
Devo is valued for its high stability and reliability, with minor issues quickly resolved and strong user satisfaction.
Sentiment score
7.5
ManageEngine Log360 is generally stable, reliable, and trusted, with occasional startup delays and minor cloud switch issues.
It is stable and reliable for our security operations.
Cyber Security Engineer II (Vulnerability & Threat Management) at FICO
 

Room For Improvement

Devo requires improvements in stability, integration, documentation, customization, data handling, and user interface to enhance user experience.
ManageEngine Log360 needs improved backup, UI, Active Directory connectivity, AI capabilities, stability, encryption, and better support.
UI improvements, a simplified dashboard, or an easier reporting workflow could further improve analyst productivity.
Cyber Security Engineer II (Vulnerability & Threat Management) at FICO
Integrations with other sandboxes could be improved to better interpret data using AI and machine learning models.
Strategic Account Executive at a computer software company with 51-200 employees
Without needing to purchase an add-on module, ManageEngine Log360 should include more in-depth reporting capabilities in the current module.
Lead IT Security and Remediation at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
Log360 currently cannot gather information from Intune logs or cloud-integrated systems.
System Engineer at Corporate Projukti Limited
At minimum, PostgreSQL support should reach the MS SQL level of features and support that ManageEngine Log360 presents.
Consultant at TurkOnay Elektronik Para ve Ödeme Hizmetleri A.Ş.
 

Setup Cost

Devo's attractive pricing offers transparency, extended capabilities, and bundled features, but metadata charges may impact overall savings.
ManageEngine Log360 is affordable with fixed pricing, a free trial, and is suitable for flexible budgeting despite some high-cost views.
The price is suitable from a perspective of different pricing options.
System Engineer at Corporate Projukti Limited
 

Valuable Features

Devo offers powerful data visualization, real-time analytics, advanced querying, and ease of integration, enhancing security efficiency across industries.
Log360 offers user-friendly security management with analytics, compliance templates, real-time threat detection, and customizable reporting, enhancing efficiency.
When they see a spike in a line chart for a failed login, which could be a true or false attempt, they can click that spike, and a table widget on the same active board instantly populates with raw logs of data for those specific failed logins.
Strategic Account Executive at a computer software company with 51-200 employees
When the analyst uses queries to search, it pulls the data quickly, in a second, which aids us greatly with the investigation.
Cyber Security Engineer II (Vulnerability & Threat Management) at FICO
All mandatory regulatory compliance reports are available with the integrated system, and companies can easily customize reports without coding to meet their policy or reporting requirements.
System Engineer at Corporate Projukti Limited
ManageEngine Log360 could integrate with all systems, making it possible to integrate everything to the central location, which made it a useful and necessary tool.
Consultant at TurkOnay Elektronik Para ve Ödeme Hizmetleri A.Ş.
ManageEngine Log360 was selected because AlienVault was moving strictly away from on-premises to the cloud, and an on-premises solution was required.
Lead IT Security and Remediation at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
 

Categories and Ranking

Devo
Ranking in Log Management
26th
Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
28th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
24
Ranking in other categories
IT Operations Analytics (9th), AIOps (18th)
ManageEngine Log360
Ranking in Log Management
23rd
Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
22nd
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
19
Ranking in other categories
User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (13th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of Devo is 1.3%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ManageEngine Log360 is 1.3%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Log Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
ManageEngine Log3601.3%
Devo1.3%
Other97.4%
Log Management
 

Featured Reviews

FR
Strategic Account Executive at a computer software company with 51-200 employees
Has improved investigative workflows with interactive dashboards and simplified data correlation
The data analytics cloud component focuses on real-time analytics, which is very impressive. The SIEM collects and correlates logs data from different sources and can integrate with ServiceNow, hardware asset management, and software asset management. The security orchestration, automation, and response (SOAR) is another valuable feature. The security data platform serves as the foundation of Devo. Regarding advanced query capabilities, Devo offers several models including query logs, visual query builder, language integrated query, and SQL, with SQL being the most frequently used querying data capability. The single pane of glass that Devo offers is the SOC. The tools in Devo's active ports are for investigating, not just viewing data. They are more interactive than other market solutions. The drill-down reports capabilities allow analysts to click on any element in a widget. When they see a spike in a line chart for a failed login, which could be a true or false attempt, they can click that spike, and a table widget on the same active board instantly populates with raw logs of data for those specific failed logins. This is particularly important for enterprise companies with numerous endpoints and users. The dynamic filtering of inputs significantly reduces the time cybersecurity analysts spend trying to figure out failed logins and identifying false positives.
Burak Karakurt - PeerSpot reviewer
Consultant at TurkOnay Elektronik Para ve Ödeme Hizmetleri A.Ş.
Has fulfilled regulatory requirements through centralized log management
The alerting capabilities in ManageEngine Log360 needed work for creating alarms for the cases where alarms were needed and for prioritizing the alarms for criticality. ManageEngine Log360 uses PostgreSQL as its own database but does not automatically parse and allow creation of alarms the way it does in MS SQL. There is less support in PostgreSQL than in MS SQL. The ability to create alarms based on parsed data in the same way MS SQL does would have been beneficial and would have saved considerable time. On the PostgreSQL side, it was not parsing much, which required a lot of manual work. This support is needed, and I am sure many companies need this support on PostgreSQL. MS SQL features that were missing in ManageEngine Log360 that should be included in the future are those that automatically parse an MS SQL database and provide options for setting alarms. On the PostgreSQL side, this is not the same. At minimum, PostgreSQL support should reach the MS SQL level of features and support that ManageEngine Log360 presents.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.
900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
14%
Construction Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Computer Software Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Construction Company
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business9
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise12
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business14
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise2
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Devo?
Pricing generally depends on the scale, data ingestion requirements, and integrations for what the enterprise monitoring needs. I have not been part of the procurement process, so I am not aware of...
What needs improvement with Devo?
One improvement area for Devo could be simplifying some configuration and improving the onboarding for new analysts because it is quite complex for fresher or new analysts who are handling Devo.UI ...
What is your primary use case for Devo?
Devo serves as our centralized log monitoring, threat investigation, alert monitoring, and security analytics platform. We use it to collect logs from multiple systems so we can correlate the event...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ManageEngine Log360?
The price is suitable from a perspective of different pricing options. We already have an ongoing project where some features analytics can be escaped, and companies can manage their budgets carefu...
What needs improvement with ManageEngine Log360?
ManageEngine Log360 could provide more in-depth insights, particularly in reporting. Some other solutions provide deeper insights into issues, especially when generating reports. More detailed insi...
What is your primary use case for ManageEngine Log360?
ManageEngine Log360 is being used for database monitoring and as a SIEM solution.
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

United States Air Force, Rubrik, SentinelOne, Critical Start, NHL, Panda Security, Telefonica, CaixaBank, OpenText, IGT, OneMain Financial, SurveyMonkey, FanDuel, H&R Block, Ulta Beauty, Manulife, Moneylion, Chime Bank, Magna International, American Express Global Business Travel
First Mountain Bank, TRA, Citadel Group, OnPoint Financial Corp, Florida Dept. of Transportation
Find out what your peers are saying about Devo vs. ManageEngine Log360 and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.
900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.