Devo vs Oracle Security Monitoring and Analytics Cloud Service comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Devo and Oracle are both solutions in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category. Devo is ranked #17 with an average rating of 8.2, while Oracle is ranked #54. Devo holds a 1.2% mindshare in SIEM, compared to Oracle’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Devo users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

Devo

Read 27 Devo reviews

7,610 Views
4,109 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Oracle Security Monitoring ...

Read 1 Oracle Security Monitoring and Analytics Cloud Service review

2,506 Views
1,854 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Devo

Oracle Security Monitoring ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Devo and Oracle Security Monitoring and Analytics Cloud Service based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, IBM, Microsoft and others in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM).

To learn more, read our detailed Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 914,322 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Devo

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

17th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Log Management (17th), IT Operations Analytics (7th), AIOps (16th)

Oracle Security Monitoring ...

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

54th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (31st)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category, the mindshare of Devo is 1.2%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Security Monitoring and Analytics Cloud Service is 0.7%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Devo	1.2%
Oracle Security Monitoring and Analytics Cloud Service	0.7%
Other	98.1%

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

Featured Reviews

Usama Khan

Team Lead Soc at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Advanced threat hunting has improved SOC visibility and now supports faster incident response

Devo can improve in how its connectors enhance integration with third-party tools. Devo's architecture works by having you deploy a relay server in the data center of the client side and Devo SIEM is basically on the AWS cloud. There are specific ports which are enabled on the relay server, which are 514 and 13000, 13151, 152. However, when we talk about databases and custom integrations, there are not default ports in the relay server. No default ports are defined. For JDBC drivers, the port number is 1433, but it is not in the relay server. You have to add it manually. For Oracle RDBMS, the port is 1521, and it is also not there by default. I would appreciate more third-party integrations including Fortinet and others. Machine learning models can also be improved. Playbooks in the SOAR can also be improved. Regarding playbooks for automation, we utilize playbooks for automation in SOAR for automated IOC blocking on a firewall, on a web application firewall, on DNS security, etc. The only option for us to run the playbook is to schedule the job for it. However, if I want to manually run the playbook, there is no option for doing so. This needs improvement.

Read full review

it_user1640529

CEO, CTO at Genex Infosys Ltd.

Easy to install, highly secure standards, and reliable

We use Oracle Security Monitoring and Analytics Cloud Service for security information, event management, and analytics. This has helped eliminate any external network attacks The security level that they are maintaining with the pre-authentication keys is very good. They are following the global…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"With Devo, we can eliminate swivel chair analysis among tools for a streamlined workflow that gives us the most direct path to the root cause."

"The features I find most valuable in Devo are that it works on unstructured data."

"Those 400 days of hot data mean that people can look for trends and at what happened in the past. And they can not only do so from a security point of view, but even for operational use cases. In the past, our operational norm was to keep live data for only 30 days. Our users were constantly asking us for at least 90 days, and we really couldn't even do that. That's one reason that having 400 days of live data is pretty huge. As our users start to use it and adopt this system, we expect people to be able to do those long-term analytics."

"The real-time analytics of security-related data are super. There are a lot of data feeds going into it and it's very quick at pulling up and correlating the data and showing you what's going on in your infrastructure. It's fast. The way that their architecture and technology works, they've really focused on the speed of query results and making sure that we can do what we need to do quickly. Devo is pulling back information in a fast fashion, based on real-time events."

"When comparing Devo with Splunk and Carbon Black, I think Devo is the leader."

"The most powerful feature is the way the data is stored and extracted. The data is always stored in its original format and you can normalize the data after it has been stored."

"The most useful feature for us, because of some of the issues we had previously, was the simplicity of log integrations. It's much easier with this platform to integrate log sources that might not have standard logging and things like that."

"The querying and the log-retention capabilities are pretty powerful. Those provide some of the biggest value-add for us."

More Devo pros

"The security level that they are maintaining with the pre-authentication keys is very good."

"The solution is not expensive for the data security measure you receive, it is reasonable."

Cons

"The Activeboards feature is not as mature regarding the look and feel. Its functionality is mature, but the look and feel is not there. For example, if you have some data sets and are trying to get some graphics, you cannot change anything. There's just one format for the graphics. You cannot change the size of the font, the font itself, etc."

"Some basic reporting mechanisms have room for improvement."

"Both response time and support quality need attention."

"One improvement area for Devo could be simplifying some configuration and improving the onboarding for new analysts because it is quite complex for fresher or new analysts who are handling Devo."

"The price is one problem with Devo."

"Where Devo has room for improvement is the data ingestion and parsing. We tend to have to work with the Devo support team to bring on and ingest new sources of data."

"Technical support could be better."

"Some third-parties don't have specific API connectors built, so we had to work with Devo to get the logs and parse the data using custom parsers, rather than an out-of-the-box solution."

More Devo cons

"The solution could improve by providing better documentation for beginners to learn, such as videos or other tutorials."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Be cautious of metadata inclusion for log types in pricing, as there are some "gotchas" with that."

"I rate the pricing a four on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

"Pricing is based on the number of gigabytes of ingestion by volume, and it's on a 30-day average. If you go over one day, that's not a big deal as long as the average is what you expected it to be."

"Devo was very cost-competitive... Devo did come with that 400 days of hot data, and that was not the case with other products."

"The way Devo prices things is based on the amount of data, and I wish the tiers had more granularity. Maybe at this point they do, but when we first negotiated with them, there were only three or four tiers."

"Devo is a hosted or subscription-based solution, whereas before, we purchased QRadar, so we owned it and just had to pay a maintenance fee. We've encountered this with some other products, too, where we went over to subscription-based. Our thought process is that with subscription based, the provider hosts and maintains the tool, and it's offsite. That comes with some additional fees, but we were able to convince our upper management it was worth the price. We used to pay under 10k a year for maintenance, and now we're paying ten times that. It was a relatively tough sell to our management, but I wonder if we have a choice anymore; this is where the market is."

"It's very competitive. That was also a primary draw for us. Some of the licensing models with solutions like Splunk and Sentinel were attractive upfront, but there were so many micro-charges and services we would've had to add on to make them what we wanted. We had to include things like SOAR and extended capabilities, whereas all those capabilities are completely included with the Devo platform. I haven't seen any additional fee."

"It's a per gigabyte cost for ingestion of data. For every gigabyte that you ingest, it's whatever you negotiated your price for. Compared to other contracts that we've had for cloud providers, it's significantly less."

More Devo pricing and cost advice

"The solution is not expensive for the data security measure you receive, it is reasonable."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

914,322 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Outsourcing Company

11%

Construction Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

14%

Construction Company

14%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	12

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Devo?

The price is considered okay.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Devo?

Perhaps Devo could add some features in the future on the network part. Specifically, I think they could improve network traffic analysis capabilities.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Devo?

I have been using Devo as a partner and system integrator for three years. For log monitoring, the clients' use cases can utilize Devo perfectly. Compliance and security operation monitoring are th...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Devo

Compared 8% of the time

LogRhythm SIEM vs Devo

Compared 6% of the time

New Relic vs Devo

Compared 4% of the time

Datadog vs Devo

Compared 3% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs Devo

Compared 2% of the time

More Devo Competitors

IBM Security QRadar vs Oracle Security Monitoring and Analytics Cloud Service

Compared 13% of the time

LogRhythm SIEM vs Oracle Security Monitoring and Analytics Cloud Service

Compared 11% of the time

Exabeam vs Oracle Security Monitoring and Analytics Cloud Service

Compared 9% of the time

Google Security Operations vs Oracle Security Monitoring and Analytics Cloud Service

Compared 8% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Oracle Security Monitoring and Analytics Cloud Service

Compared 7% of the time

More Oracle Security Monitoring and Analytics Cloud Service Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Devo

September 2026

Download Devo product report

Buyer's Guide

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

September 2026

Oracle Security Monitoring and Analytics Cloud Service report

Download Oracle Security Monitoring and Analytics Cloud Service product report

Also Known As

No data available

SMA Cloud Service

Overview

Devo offers powerful visual analytics, real-time data querying, and log integration capabilities within a cloud-native, multi-tenant architecture, supporting extended data retention ideal for long-term analysis and compliance.

Devo is recognized for its Activeboards, which facilitate visual analytics. High-speed search capabilities and real-time analytics enable efficient data manipulation and querying. Its multi-tenant architecture supports effective data segregation and customization tailored to distinct business needs, enhancing its value for handling complex log integrations. With extended data retention of 400 days and a cloud-native architecture, Devo is a robust platform for long-term analysis and compliance requirements. Though opportunities exist to improve browser stability on large searches, SOAR integrations, and its parser capabilities, Devo remains essential for incident response and security monitoring, offering centralized data storage and analysis.

What are Devo's most important features?

Activeboards: Facilitate visual analytics and data exploration.
High-Speed Search: Enables fast data querying and manipulation.
Real-Time Analytics: Supports instant insights and decision-making.
Multi-Tenant Architecture: Allows effective data segregation and customization.
Extended Data Retention: Offers 400-day log retention for compliance and analysis.
Complex Log Integration: Handles intricate data sources effortlessly.

What benefits and ROI should organizations look for in reviews?

Visual Insights: Enhance understanding through interactive dashboards.
Performance Efficiency: Saves time with high-speed data search and real-time results.
Customization Flexibility: Fits specific business requirements with multi-tenant architecture.
Long-Term Compliance: Ensures alignment with extended data retention needs.
Centralized Monitoring: Enables comprehensive incident response and security monitoring.

Devo is extensively used in industries focused on incident response and digital forensics, centralizing data for security monitoring across hybrid environments. Organizations benefit from its ability to store and analyze aggregated logs, creating alerts and dashboards to enhance visibility for network and endpoint activities in multi-domain settings.

Devo

Oracle Security Monitoring and Analytics Cloud Service safeguards enterprise IT by providing advanced threat detection and actionable insights, ensuring enhanced security and compliance for businesses globally.

Oracle Security Monitoring and Analytics Cloud Service is designed to deliver comprehensive security intelligence, focusing on real-time monitoring and advanced threat detection. It enhances visibility across all layers of the IT infrastructure, integrating seamlessly with existing environments to adapt to evolving security challenges. With efficient data aggregation and analysis, this service identifies potential threats, enabling rapid response and prevention measures.

What are the key features of Oracle Security Monitoring and Analytics Cloud Service?

Real-Time Monitoring: Continuously monitors security events to detect potential threats swiftly.
Advanced Threat Detection: Utilizes machine learning to identify suspicious activities.
Comprehensive Reporting: Offers in-depth reports for security incident analysis.
Seamless Integration: Easily integrates with existing IT and security systems.
User Behavior Analytics: Detects anomalies in user activities suggesting potential security threats.

What benefits or ROI should users consider?

Improved Security Posture: Enhances protection against cyber threats.
Faster Threat Response: Reduces response time to security incidents.
Cost Efficiency: Minimizes costs associated with data breaches and security management.
Enhanced Compliance: Supports meeting regulatory requirements with comprehensive reporting.
Resource Optimization: Frees up resources by automating security monitoring tasks.

In sectors such as finance, healthcare, and retail, Oracle Security Monitoring and Analytics Cloud Service is particularly critical. In finance, it helps protect sensitive financial data by providing insights into unusual transaction patterns. In healthcare, it secures patient data against unauthorized access. Retail organizations benefit from detecting fraudulent activities, ensuring customer trust. Implementing Oracle tools leads to a fortified defense mechanism that meets industry-specific compliance needs while offering tailored threat detection and response strategies.

Oracle

Sample Customers

United States Air Force, Rubrik, SentinelOne, Critical Start, NHL, Panda Security, Telefonica, CaixaBank, OpenText, IGT, OneMain Financial, SurveyMonkey, FanDuel, H&R Block, Ulta Beauty, Manulife, Moneylion, Chime Bank, Magna International, American Express Global Business Travel

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

September 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, IBM, Microsoft and others in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM). Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

914,322 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) vendors.

We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.