

Zabbix and DX NetOps compete in the network monitoring and management category. Zabbix has the upper hand due to its cost-effectiveness and open-source flexibility.
Features: Zabbix offers comprehensive monitoring with auto-discovery, customizable dashboards, and flexibility as an open-source platform. It is designed for scalability, suitable for monitoring diverse systems and applications. DX NetOps specializes in performance management and network intelligence, offering robust network monitoring and insightful analysis.
Room for Improvement: Zabbix needs to enhance its user interface and simplify advanced configuration options. Better default reporting functionality and detailed templates are necessary. DX NetOps should streamline module integration and reduce manual process complexity, integrating automation more naturally into its ecosystem.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both Zabbix and DX NetOps are deployable in on-premises and hybrid cloud settings, with Zabbix also supporting public cloud deployment. Zabbix relies on community support due to its open-source nature, whereas DX NetOps provides a structured support system that may require varying resources.
Pricing and ROI: Zabbix is entirely free, offering substantial savings with optional paid support, benefiting organizations managing deployments internally. ROI is achieved through zero licensing fees and minimal downtime. DX NetOps has a complex pricing model, costly at first but mitigated by discounts and flexible pricing. Despite initial expenses, user feedback indicates value through support and services.
It can save you the cost of the product by reducing expenses and downtimes in 12 to 18 months.
Creating a support case based on priority allows for immediate responses.
Everything about DX NetOps is perfect, including the interface, technical support, and pricing.
They are fast, responsive, and have technical expertise.
It is so straightforward that I have never had to use the support.
The product is very scalable, to the maximum.
Zabbix has high scalability.
Zabbix is very scalable and lightweight.
I would rate its scalability ten out of ten.
I rate the stability of the product as ten on a scale of one to ten, indicating that it is very stable.
Zabbix is very scalable and lightweight.
I think the stability of Zabbix is around five to six on a scale of ten, where ten is the best and one is the worst.
Zabbix is quite stable, and we haven't had any problems with Zabbix itself.
Different communication methods such as agent-based connections, TCP/IP, or secured connections are necessary—features not currently available in DX NetOps and Spectrum.
DX NetOps is somewhat convoluted, and some of the programming constructs can be documented or driven through languages such as Python, Perl, and shell scripting, but they have their proprietary language, which may not be very user-friendly.
I would particularly like it to integrate with the Symantec portfolio and the Carbon Black portfolio.
The only issue I can note is that it's Linux-based, and Linux documentation is not the best.
The potential and customization is a little difficult because you have to learn scripts.
I think the pricing is expensive.
The licensing cost of DX NetOps is expensive, not very affordable, and on the top of the price range in the market.
Zabbix is providing everything free of cost.
It is literally free.
The product features include automation through AI, allowing out-of-the-box analysis of performance data, building baseline trends, and enabling configuration of dynamic thresholds relative to collected data.
The best features I've seen so far with DX NetOps are that it can work with large scale systems, and it has a lot of functionalities and matrices.
The most valuable feature in DX NetOps is the topological view, which is the network topological view.
If disk usage surpasses a threshold, say 70%, I receive alerts and can take proactive action.
The alerting systems are very good in Zabbix, and it has helped us to reduce time for reaction.
People want to save costs, which is why they install Zabbix, but the reporting functionality is not properly developed.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Zabbix | 6.9% |
| DX NetOps | 0.7% |
| Other | 92.4% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 4 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 5 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 56 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 23 |
| Large Enterprise | 34 |
DX NetOps by CA Technologies, a Broadcom company, improves your time to value through advanced AI capabilities and unified network visibility that delivers simplified NetOps intelligence into the user experience that traverses modern architectures. DX NetOps accomplishes this through high scale, unified network monitoring that enables full-stack analytics for assuring traditional and modern architectures. DX NetOps converts inventory, topology, device metrics, faults, flow and packet analysis into actionable intelligence for network operations teams. Complimented by our AIOps solution, DX NetOps enables IT teams to establish proactive, autonomous remediation capabilities across the applications, infrastructure, and networks that fuel superior user experiences.
Zabbix is an open-source monitoring software that provides real-time monitoring and alerting for servers, networks, applications, and services.
It offers a wide range of features including data collection, visualization, and reporting.
With its user-friendly interface and customizable dashboards, Zabbix helps organizations ensure the availability and performance of their IT infrastructure.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.