Ekran System vs One Identity Safeguard comparison

Ekran System and One Identity are both solutions in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category. Ekran System is ranked #25 with an average rating of 8.0, while One Identity is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.3. Ekran System holds a 0.8% mindshare in PAM, compared to One Identity’s 4.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Ekran System users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of One Identity users who would recommend it.

Ekran System

Read 1 Ekran System review

774 Views
488 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

One Identity Safeguard

Read 73 One Identity Safeguard reviews

7,550 Views
4,908 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Ekran System

One Identity Safeguard

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Ekran System and One Identity Safeguard based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, One Identity, Okta and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM).

To learn more, read our detailed Privileged Access Management (PAM) Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 893,244 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Ekran System

Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)

25th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

User Activity Monitoring (5th)

One Identity Safeguard

Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)

2nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (3rd), Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM) (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category, the mindshare of Ekran System is 0.8%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of One Identity Safeguard is 4.4%, up from 4.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Privileged Access Management (PAM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
One Identity Safeguard	4.4%
Ekran System	0.8%
Other	94.8%

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

Featured Reviews

Andreas Lalos

Director of Professional Services at Besecure

Early threat detection and diverse OS support with enhanced security

Ekran System offers a lightweight solution that does not impact the systems where it is implemented. It provides rich metadata for monitored activities and includes threat analysis capabilities for early alerting and investigation of unauthorized actions. Additionally, it supports diverse operating systems and allows for monitoring and enforcement policies, like blocking actions for policy violations, and provides a retention of historical data in a lightweight format.

Read full review

Mahesh Malve

Senior Business Development Executive at DigitalTrack Solutions Ind Pvt Ltd

Centralized control has strengthened privileged security and simplified audit investigations

While One Identity Safeguard is a strong and reliable PAM solution, there are a few areas where it can be further improved to enhance user experience and scalability. Regarding the user interface and experience, the UI, while functional, can be a bit complex for new users. A more intuitive and modern dashboard with simplified navigation would improve adoption, especially for non-technical stakeholders. Regarding integration flexibility, although it supports major integrations, expanding out-of-the-box connectors for more cloud-native apps, DevOps tools, and SaaS platforms would be beneficial. Faster and simpler API-based integrations could reduce deployment efforts. Regarding scalability and performance in large enterprise environments, performance tuning and scaling can require additional efforts. Enhancing seamless scalability and high availability configuration would improve enterprise readiness.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It supports diverse operating systems and allows for monitoring and enforcement policies, like blocking actions for policy violations, and provides a retention of historical data in a lightweight format."

"We were able to take an environment where we had several hosts managed by different people and consolidate that into a single, centrally managed solution."

"It is the life of our customers because it brings a lot of security."

"We use the solution’s “transparent mode” feature for privileged sessions. It is very easy because it is only a simple configuration for our users. We don't have to modify our network. We install it, configure it, and it works. So, it is super easy. The rollout for our users is seamless."

"It was super easy to deploy, not complicated, and did not have the hidden Capex that competitors do!"

"It offers high availability and enables end users to deploy the solution with 99.999 percent uptime, which is crucial in an enterprise environment with a large number of endpoints."

"We are able to log and get reporting on all privileged activity that is being performed. We like the fact that we can leverage the session recording feature, which is especially valuable when we're dealing with third-party vendors that have to remote into our our boxes and servers to do any work on behalf of the bank. Now, we can record everything they are doing to ensure that they're only doing the changes that were needed. In addition, we use it to leverage knowledge transfer with our internal staff."

"Using this solution has been a great decision in helping with our tasks."

"I have successfully connected Identity Manager (IGA) to Safeguard to achieve Privilege Access Governance, making it possible by using an OOTB connector in Identity Manager to talk to the Safeguard system so I can govern the data from Safeguard and provision PAM accounts from Identity Manager to achieve a complete lifecycle."

More One Identity Safeguard pros

Cons

"Ekran System could improve in terms of communication to the market, particularly after their rebranding as Shiteka."

"The interface is better now, but it still could be improved a lot. It needs more organization, menus, automatic refresh of information, and Web 2.0."

"Transparent mode was too cumbersome, so I don't foresee us being able to use it. On paper when we were initially talking about it, it was definitely going to be the preferred method until we realized the burden it would be on our network guys. Then, we had to step back and reevaluate what we wanted to do. That's when we changed our approach to use the RD Gateway feature."

"One Identity Safeguard can improve by having more integration with multiple devices."

"One Identity Safeguard can be improved by fixing the documentation, which is very convoluted as of now, and addressing versioning, as some major bugs and issues are not documented well enough in the documentation, along with some patches and fixes."

"I would like to see an adjustment with more enterprise architecture. You can buy multiple appliances but you can not fully separate different functions, so scaling might be a bit more complicated."

"The only part of the Safeguard solution that I think could be a problem over time is the amount of storage it takes in the sessions."

"One Identity Safeguard can improve by having more integration with multiple devices."

"Some of the out-of-the-box reporting isn't that rich."

More One Identity Safeguard cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The full license is expensive but if you plan to use it in a big organization then it is the best option because it is more flexible."

"We bought their other products, so it was not that expensive. It is one of those where the more you buy, the cheaper it is."

"Its subscription cost is too much, and sometimes, it is very difficult to pitch the solution to the management for cost approval. If the cost is reduced a little bit, it would be easier. If its cost was less, many other organizations that currently cannot afford it would be able to use this technology. I'm sure many organizations around the globe are having issues with identity management, and it is a very difficult task for IT to manage privileged accounts."

"Our licensing costs are on a yearly basis."

"Safeguard is cheaper than CyberArk."

"Setup cost, pricing and licensing are all very expensive."

"One Identity Safeguard is expensive and the cost goes up as we scale."

"They offer a fair price for a robust solution."

More One Identity Safeguard pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

University

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	63
Midsize Enterprise	25
Large Enterprise	30

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Ekran System?

The business model has become more complex with changes in feature licensing, yet they provide affordable options, particularly with the standard edition, which doesn't charge for the management co...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Ekran System?

Ekran System could improve in terms of communication to the market, particularly after their rebranding as Shiteka. The solution does not support other protocols beyond traditional monitoring chann...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Ekran System?

The primary use case for Ekran System is third-party vendor monitoring and privileged access management monitoring. It is also used for privilege access management solutions.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for One Identity Safeguard?

One Identity Safeguard is priced at a premium level, typical for enterprise-grade privilege access management solutions. The licensing is generally based on the number of privileged accounts, users...

See all answers

What needs improvement with One Identity Safeguard?

While One Identity Safeguard is a strong privilege access management solution, there are some areas where improvements can be made. The initial deployment and configuration can be complex, especial...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for One Identity Safeguard?

In my daily operations, I rely on One Identity Safeguard for administrator requests for access through One Identity Safeguard, which are approved via workflows. Once approved, sessions are launched...

See all answers

Comparisons

TSFactory RecordTS vs Ekran System

Compared 18% of the time

Endpoint Privilege Manager vs Ekran System

Compared 16% of the time

AWS CloudTrail vs Ekran System

Compared 16% of the time

WALLIX Bastion vs Ekran System

Compared 14% of the time

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs Ekran System

Compared 13% of the time

More Ekran System Competitors

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 16% of the time

Delinea Secret Server vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 7% of the time

Delinea Privileged Access Service vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 6% of the time

BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 6% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 5% of the time

More One Identity Safeguard Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

User Activity Monitoring

April 2026

Download Ekran System product report

Buyer's Guide

One Identity Safeguard

April 2026

Download One Identity Safeguard product report

Overview

Ekran System is a comprehensive insider threat detection and employee monitoring tool designed for businesses seeking efficient security solutions. It offers powerful features ideal for protecting sensitive data and ensuring compliance with industry regulations.

Ekran System caters to companies needing to monitor internal activities effectively. It provides robust insider threat management by capturing user sessions and analyzing behavioral patterns. This tool supports various industries, aiming to reduce data breaches and increase accountability. Ekran System offers multiple deployment options, making it easily adaptable to different organizational environments.

What are the key features of Ekran System?

Session Recording: Monitors and records user activity for in-depth security analysis.
User Behavior Analytics: Identifies unusual behavior patterns by analyzing data.
Access Management: Offers granular control over devices and applications.
Real-Time Alerts: Immediately notifies administrators of suspicious activities.
Audit and Compliance: Provides detailed reports to meet compliance standards.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Risk Mitigation: Helps prevent insider threats and data breaches through vigilant monitoring.
Increased Security: Strengthens data protection and accountability measures.
Regulatory Compliance: Ensures adherence to legal and industry-specific mandates.
Operational Efficiency: Streamlines monitoring processes, reducing manual tasks.

Ekran System is used in industries like finance, healthcare, and manufacturing. It helps financial institutions monitor transactions, supports healthcare compliance with regulations like HIPAA, and assists manufacturers in safeguarding intellectual property through detailed monitoring of employee activities.

Ekran System

One Identity Safeguard manages and monitors privileged access, enhancing security with features like automatic session recording, real-time monitoring, and credential rotation. It integrates seamlessly, supports compliance with audit trails, and improves operational efficiency across organizations. This robust platform significantly bolsters security protocols while controlling sensitive operations.

One Identity

Sample Customers

Deloitte, UPS, Seoul National University, KDN, Finat, Constitutional Court of Korea, Ukrsibbank

Cavium

Buyer's Guide

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

April 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, One Identity, Okta and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM). Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

893,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.

We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.