No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Ekran System vs One Identity Safeguard comparison

Ekran System and One Identity are both solutions in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category. Ekran System is ranked #23 with an average rating of 8.0, while One Identity is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.6. Ekran System holds a 0.8% mindshare in PAM, compared to One Identity’s 4.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Ekran System users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of One Identity users who would recommend it.
Ekran System
Read 1 Ekran System review
  • 889 Views
  • 551 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
One Identity Safeguard
Read 85 One Identity Safeguard reviews
  • 8,528 Views
  • 5,458 Comparison Views
97% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between Ekran System and One Identity Safeguard based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, One Identity, Okta and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM).

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Privileged Access Management (PAM) Report (Updated: June 2026).
Buyer's Guide
Privileged Access Management (PAM)
June 2026
Download the complete report
Helped 900,747 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Ekran System
Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)
23rd
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
User Activity Monitoring (5th)
One Identity Safeguard
Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)
2nd
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
85
Ranking in other categories
User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (2nd), Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM) (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category, the mindshare of Ekran System is 0.8%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of One Identity Safeguard is 4.3%, up from 3.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Privileged Access Management (PAM) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
One Identity Safeguard4.3%
Ekran System0.8%
Other94.9%
Privileged Access Management (PAM)
 

Featured Reviews

Andreas Lalos - PeerSpot reviewer
Andreas Lalos
Director of Professional Services at Besecure
Early threat detection and diverse OS support with enhanced security
Ekran System offers a lightweight solution that does not impact the systems where it is implemented. It provides rich metadata for monitored activities and includes threat analysis capabilities for early alerting and investigation of unauthorized actions. Additionally, it supports diverse operating systems and allows for monitoring and enforcement policies, like blocking actions for policy violations, and provides a retention of historical data in a lightweight format.
Read full review
Mahesh Malve - PeerSpot reviewer
Mahesh Malve
Senior Business Development Associate at DigitalTrack Solutions ind pvt ltd
Centralized control has strengthened privileged security and simplified audit investigations
While One Identity Safeguard is a strong and reliable PAM solution, there are a few areas where it can be further improved to enhance user experience and scalability. Regarding the user interface and experience, the UI, while functional, can be a bit complex for new users. A more intuitive and modern dashboard with simplified navigation would improve adoption, especially for non-technical stakeholders. Regarding integration flexibility, although it supports major integrations, expanding out-of-the-box connectors for more cloud-native apps, DevOps tools, and SaaS platforms would be beneficial. Faster and simpler API-based integrations could reduce deployment efforts. Regarding scalability and performance in large enterprise environments, performance tuning and scaling can require additional efforts. Enhancing seamless scalability and high availability configuration would improve enterprise readiness.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It supports diverse operating systems and allows for monitoring and enforcement policies, like blocking actions for policy violations, and provides a retention of historical data in a lightweight format."
"Over four years of use, we have not encountered a single system crash or failure, and the product is stable."
"It is easy to manage. There is a very logical, clear user interface. Also, the integration of scripts is thoughtfully implemented. Overall, it's a nice product to manage."
"The implementation time was quick. It was basically up and running within a week."
"It is the life of our customers because it brings a lot of security."
"Since using One Identity Safeguard, we have more control over who accesses what, especially regarding vendors, and we have seen billing actually go down because we now know how long vendors have been on the server and how long they have worked on it."
"The incidents of password theft have reduced by around forty percent, which has been a very good result from using One Identity Safeguard for our organization and is a great benefit for us."
"There is ease of implementation."
"I like that One Identity Safeguard lets you configure the maximum number of connections to the target, a configuration I didn't find in its competitor."
More One Identity Safeguard pros
 

Cons

"Ekran System could improve in terms of communication to the market, particularly after their rebranding as Shiteka."
"One Identity Safeguard could be improved, and some user tools can be enhanced."
"We sometimes face issues with configuration and things like that, but we manage to solve them."
"One Identity Safeguard can be improved with a more modern and intuitive interface, better troubleshooting and diagnostic tools, enhanced real-time monitoring and reporting, and stronger integration with cloud and hybrid identity platforms to simplify administration and improve operational visibility."
"There is room for improvement in One Identity Safeguard in several areas."
"The customer support for One Identity Safeguard was not very good and definitely needs to be improved."
"I just received a question from a customer in regards to a connection with Oracle OID. I tried to integrate Safeguard with the Oracle YAML as well as something else to manage the groups and users from a different system, like AD or LDAP. This one feature could be better. At this moment, the platform system can only use the integration with LDAP or AD. The software for research and development to create a connector to a YAML platform can be very complicated."
"There is room for improvement in the launch module. They built in a launch button but they don't have effective instructions for configuring it to allow it to launch an RDP session. They're working on that, but the button is in the live product. If they were going to install something that wasn't useful, they should have just disabled it and not rolled it out with the product."
"I find it challenging mostly when managing complex work, especially when trying to implement it on a larger scale; sometimes it becomes slow, and the automation process also slows down."
More One Identity Safeguard cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The full license is expensive but if you plan to use it in a big organization then it is the best option because it is more flexible."
"Setup cost, pricing and licensing are all very expensive."
"The license is around $3,000 per month."
"We have a yearly license. The cost depends on how much a company wants to invest in technology. In our organization, we believe in modern digitization and automation processes so we found it affordable. One Identity was not that much less than other solutions and it is not a cheap solution. There were number of cheaper solutions. However, it's the most effective, according to our evaluation."
"Our licensing costs are on a yearly basis."
"The pricing is about $80,000 per 100 servers. There are few elective costs."
"As compared to other products, it is reasonable, but the training sessions are too expensive."
"It was definitely cheaper than the other two products that we evaluated."
More One Identity Safeguard pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Retailer
10%
Outsourcing Company
10%
Computer Software Company
9%
University
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business86
Midsize Enterprise25
Large Enterprise35
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Ekran System?
The business model has become more complex with changes in feature licensing, yet they provide affordable options, particularly with the standard edition, which doesn't charge for the management co...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Ekran System?
Ekran System could improve in terms of communication to the market, particularly after their rebranding as Shiteka. The solution does not support other protocols beyond traditional monitoring chann...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Ekran System?
The primary use case for Ekran System is third-party vendor monitoring and privileged access management monitoring. It is also used for privilege access management solutions.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for One Identity Safeguard?
Pricing, setup cost, and licensing are managed by the management team.
See all answers
What needs improvement with One Identity Safeguard?
One Identity Safeguard is a very strong privileged access management solution, and the only thing that needs to be enhanced is its dashboard customization; apart from this, everything is perfect.
See all answers
What is your primary use case for One Identity Safeguard?
One Identity Safeguard is used primarily to secure privileged credentials, enforce control over administrative access, and provide visibility into privileged activities. Whenever a network or serve...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

AWS CloudTrail vs Ekran System Logo
AWS CloudTrail vs Ekran System
Compared 22% of the time
TSFactory RecordTS vs Ekran System Logo
TSFactory RecordTS vs Ekran System
Compared 16% of the time
Idira Privileged Access Manager vs Ekran System Logo
Idira Privileged Access Manager vs Ekran System
Compared 13% of the time
Endpoint Privilege Manager vs Ekran System Logo
Endpoint Privilege Manager vs Ekran System
Compared 13% of the time
WALLIX Bastion vs Ekran System Logo
WALLIX Bastion vs Ekran System
Compared 10% of the time
More Ekran System Competitors
Idira Privileged Access Manager vs One Identity Safeguard Logo
Idira Privileged Access Manager vs One Identity Safeguard
Compared 15% of the time
Delinea Secret Server vs One Identity Safeguard Logo
Delinea Secret Server vs One Identity Safeguard
Compared 7% of the time
BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access vs One Identity Safeguard Logo
BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access vs One Identity Safeguard
Compared 5% of the time
Delinea Privileged Access Service vs One Identity Safeguard Logo
Delinea Privileged Access Service vs One Identity Safeguard
Compared 5% of the time
SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs One Identity Safeguard Logo
SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs One Identity Safeguard
Compared 4% of the time
More One Identity Safeguard Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
User Activity Monitoring
May 2026
Ekran System reportDownload Ekran System product report
Buyer's Guide
One Identity Safeguard
June 2026
One Identity Safeguard reportDownload One Identity Safeguard product report
 

Overview

Ekran System is a comprehensive insider threat detection and employee monitoring tool designed for businesses seeking efficient security solutions. It offers powerful features ideal for protecting sensitive data and ensuring compliance with industry regulations.

Ekran System caters to companies needing to monitor internal activities effectively. It provides robust insider threat management by capturing user sessions and analyzing behavioral patterns. This tool supports various industries, aiming to reduce data breaches and increase accountability. Ekran System offers multiple deployment options, making it easily adaptable to different organizational environments.

What are the key features of Ekran System?
  • Session Recording: Monitors and records user activity for in-depth security analysis.
  • User Behavior Analytics: Identifies unusual behavior patterns by analyzing data.
  • Access Management: Offers granular control over devices and applications.
  • Real-Time Alerts: Immediately notifies administrators of suspicious activities.
  • Audit and Compliance: Provides detailed reports to meet compliance standards.
What benefits and ROI should users consider?
  • Risk Mitigation: Helps prevent insider threats and data breaches through vigilant monitoring.
  • Increased Security: Strengthens data protection and accountability measures.
  • Regulatory Compliance: Ensures adherence to legal and industry-specific mandates.
  • Operational Efficiency: Streamlines monitoring processes, reducing manual tasks.

Ekran System is used in industries like finance, healthcare, and manufacturing. It helps financial institutions monitor transactions, supports healthcare compliance with regulations like HIPAA, and assists manufacturers in safeguarding intellectual property through detailed monitoring of employee activities.

Ekran System

One Identity Safeguard manages and monitors privileged access, enhancing security with features like automatic session recording, real-time monitoring, and credential rotation. It integrates seamlessly, supports compliance with audit trails, and improves operational efficiency across organizations. This robust platform significantly bolsters security protocols while controlling sensitive operations.

One Identity
 

Sample Customers

Deloitte, UPS, Seoul National University, KDN, Finat, Constitutional Court of Korea, Ukrsibbank
Cavium
Buyer's Guide
Privileged Access Management (PAM)
June 2026
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, One Identity, Okta and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM). Updated: June 2026.
DOWNLOAD NOW
900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.

We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.