Elastic Security vs McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator comparison

Elastic and McAfee are both solutions in the Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) category. Elastic is ranked #6 with an average rating of 7.7, while McAfee is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.3. Elastic holds a 4.8% mindshare in SOAR, compared to McAfee’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 86% of Elastic users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 81% of McAfee users who would recommend it.

Elastic Security

Read 64 Elastic Security reviews

2,062 Views
1,689 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator

Read 40 McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator reviews

988 Views
222 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

Elastic Security

McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 5, 2024

McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator and Elastic Security are competitors in the cybersecurity space. McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator leads in attractive pricing and support, while Elastic Security is preferred for its comprehensive feature set.

Features: McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator offers centralized management capabilities, integration with numerous third-party products, and straightforward deployment. Elastic Security provides advanced threat detection, a supportive open-source community, and high scalability.

Room for Improvement: McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator could enhance its flexibility and depth in threat detection. Elastic Security could benefit from simplifying deployment processes, optimizing cost-effectiveness, and improving initial user support.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is known for its easy deployment and strong customer support, ideal for quick implementation needs. Elastic Security offers a complex deployment process but has extensive online resources and community support.

Pricing and ROI: McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is cost-effective with low setup costs, offering a good ROI for budget-sensitive businesses. Elastic Security, although more expensive, provides a strong long-term ROI for organizations requiring flexible and comprehensive security solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed Elastic Security vs. McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Elastic Security vs. McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 845,406 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Elastic Security

Ranking in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)

6th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Log Management (7th), Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (5th), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (16th), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (8th)

McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator

Ranking in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)

12th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) category, the mindshare of Elastic Security is 4.8%, down from 5.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is 0.5%, down from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)

Featured Reviews

Gajewski Marek

Chief Technology Officer & Co-founder at CS2

Provides good anomaly detection and connectivity reporting

We previously used Splunk but switched to Elastic Security because Splunk was more expensive. Feature-wise, both tools are pretty much the same. They have almost the same functions. Elastic Security has a much better AI assistant that allows you to ask questions like a normal person. With Elastic Security, I can also predict the price and how much it will cost. Splunks's pricing depends on how much data we use and the different add-ons I have to add. The pricing is much better with Elastic Security.

Read full review

DavidJones7

Head of Content at Pharmaflow

Offers automation alert features with easy integrations and impressive scalability

I would rate the initial setup an eight out of ten. There are a few technical challenges with the deployment, but it can easily solved by an experienced professional but not by a beginner user of the tool. The complete implementation and migration to McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator will take around three months. If someone is using a software platform already with implemented use cases in their environment, it might be difficult to implement the same use cases when the customer is migrating to McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator. The conditions and prior alert settings needs to be accurate when migrating to McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator, otherwise false positive alerts might get generated.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's very customizable, which is quite helpful."

"It is very quick to react. I can set it to check anomalies or suspicious behavior every 30 seconds. It is very fast."

"Elastic Security is cost-effective compared to Defender and CrowdStrike."

"The feature that we have found the most valuable is scalability."

"The product has huge integration varieties available."

"The most valuable thing is that this solution is widely used for work management and research. It's easy to jump into the security use case with the same technology."

"The most valuable feature is the speed, as it responds in a very short time."

"The most valuable feature of Elastic Security is that you can install agents, and they are not separately licensed."

More Elastic Security pros

"If you set it up right, it can really manage a very complex environment which require fine tuning where there are a lot of exceptions. That's what it caters to. It can just do those specifics in those exceptional situations, which is good."

"The general endpoint protection is valuable, and it is easy to manage."

"You have to have some experience, however, it's pretty simple to understand."

"The DLP feature in McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is good."

"What I like the most is the ability to manage centrally, to manage the various devices, the platform, and the endpoint, all from one console."

"The initial setup is very easy."

"The best part is management in McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator."

"McAfee is helping us to clean all of the viruses from the machines, protecting our desktops from the latest threats."

More McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator pros

Cons

"This solution cannot do predictive maintenance, so we have to build our own modules for doing it."

"Sometimes, the solution isn't the easiest to use."

"In terms of improvement, there could be more automation in responding to and evaluating detections."

"If you compare this with CrowdStrike or Carbon Black, they can improve."

"One limitation of Elastic Security is that it does not have built-in workflows for all tasks. For example, if you need a workflow for compliance, you will need to create a custom workflow."

"An area for improvement in Elastic Security is the pricing. It could be better. Right now, when you increase the volume of logs to be collected, the price also increases a lot."

"Elastic has one problem. In the past, Elastic Security was free. Now, they currently only offer the basic license or a certain period of time."

"The setup process is complex. You need a solid working knowledge of networking, operating systems, and a little programming."

More Elastic Security cons

"The detection aspect should be improved so that signatures are updated more quickly."

"I would like to see McAfee reduce the amount of manual work required."

"The areas of concern where improvements are needed are related to the product's assignment policy and tag assignment, where users can assign the policies with the help of tags and sort out the systems."

"McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator needs to upgrade the technology; it's like their area function is not quite as good as compared to other market vendors."

"McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator should improve its integration with other tools."

"There are some issues we are having with updating our Windows server. So we need to contact support or access our support portal."

"The solution is difficult to tune to avoid false positives."

"Lacks a single plug-in for multiple uses."

More McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"When compared to other products, the price is average or on the low side."

"There is no charge for using the open-source version."

"The solution is not expensive and costs around ten dollars a month."

"The price is reasonable. It probably costs the same as ArcSight and LogRhythm SIEM. FortiSIEM might cost less than Elastic Security. There are no hidden or additional costs."

"The pricing is in the middle. I think it is not an expensive experience if we compare it with big names, for example, QRadar, and also Oxide. I think Elastic Security is quite cheap. I would rate the pricing of this solution a five out of ten."

"Elastic Security is free to use."

"The product offers an amazing pricing structure. Price-wise, the product is very competitive."

"The base product is open-source but if you need advanced security features then you need to pay for the subscription. Elastic Security's price is reasonable in some cases and in other cases it's not."

More Elastic Security pricing and cost advice

"It's an expensive solution"

"For large enterprise companies, the price should be alright, but for small businesses, the uptake might be slow because, for these clients, the price doesn't look very attractive."

"Compared to other Antivirus products, the cost of this solution is a bit high."

"$The price of McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is expensive, it is approximately $6,000 to $9,000 per license annually."

"McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is not an expensive solution."

"This solution is priced in the mid-range."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a three out of ten."

"It is attractively priced. It is a fraction of what we're going to pay for CrowdStrike or SentinelOne, but it only has a fraction of the capabilities as well."

More McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Government

10%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Government

13%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Datadog vs ELK: which one is good in terms of performance, cost and efficiency?

With Datadog, we have near-live visibility across our entire platform. We have seen APM metrics impacted several times lately using the dashboards we have created with Datadog; they are very good c...

See all answers

What do you like most about Elastic Security?

Elastic provides the capability to index quickly due to the reverse indexes it offers. This data is crucial as it contains critical information. The reverse index allows fast data indexing because ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Elastic Security?

Elastic Security is considered cost-effective, especially at lower EPS levels. However, a direct comparison was not made due to different pricing structures.

See all answers

Which is better - Mcafee's MVision ePO or ePolicy Orchestrator?

Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether Mcafee's MVision ePO or ePolicy Orchestrator network security software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Mcafee's ePolicy O...

See all answers

What do you like most about McAfee MVISION ePO?

McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator's performance is good.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for McAfee MVISION ePO?

It's an expensive solution.

See all answers

Comparisons

Wazuh vs Elastic Security

Compared 23% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Elastic Security

Compared 9% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs Elastic Security

Compared 7% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Elastic Security

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Sentinel vs Elastic Security

Compared 5% of the time

More Elastic Security Competitors

Symantec Data Loss Prevention vs McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator

Compared 52% of the time

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator

Compared 48% of the time

More McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Elastic Security

March 2025

Download Elastic Security product report

Buyer's Guide

McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator

March 2025

Download McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator product report

Also Known As

Elastic SIEM, ELK Logstash

McAfee ePO, ePolicy Orchestrator, Intel Security ePolicy Orchestrator, McAfee MVISION ePO

Overview

Elastic Security is a robust, open-source security solution designed to offer integrated threat prevention, detection, and response capabilities across an organization's entire digital estate. Part of the Elastic Stack (which includes Elasticsearch, Logstash, and Kibana), Elastic Security leverages the power of search, analytics, and data aggregation to provide real-time insight into threats and vulnerabilities. It is a comprehensive platform that supports a wide range of security needs, from endpoint protection to cloud and network security, making it a versatile choice for organizations looking to enhance their cybersecurity posture.

Elastic Security combines the features of a security information and event management (SIEM) system with endpoint protection, allowing organizations to detect, investigate, and respond to threats in real time. This unified approach helps reduce complexity and improve the efficiency of security operations.

Additional offerings and benefits:

The platform utilizes advanced analytics, machine learning algorithms, and anomaly detection to identify threats and suspicious activities.
It offers extensive integration options with other tools and platforms, facilitating a more cohesive and comprehensive security ecosystem.
With Kibana, users gain access to powerful visualization tools and dashboards that provide real-time insight into security data.

Finally, Elastic Security benefits from a global community of users who contribute to its threat intelligence, helping to enhance its detection capabilities. This collaborative approach ensures that the solution remains on the cutting edge of cybersecurity, with up-to-date information on the latest threats and vulnerabilities.

Elastic

McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator (McAfee ePO) is the most advanced, extensible, and scalable centralized security management software in the industry. Unifying security management through an open platform, McAfee ePO makes risk and compliance management simpler and more successful for organizations of all sizes.

McAfee

Sample Customers

Texas A&M, U.S. Air Force, NuScale Power, Martin's Point Health Care

Brelje & Race, Cognizant, Sutherland Global Services, Eagle Rock Energy, Arab National Bank, Bank Central Asia, Kleberg Bank, Leading Mexican Bank, SF Police Credit Union, Macquarie Telecom, Seagate Technology, Blackburn & Darwen Council, California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, IRCEP, Major U.S. State Government, State of Alaska, State of Colorado, Cemex, Deutsche Edelstahlwerke

Buyer's Guide

Elastic Security vs. McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator

March 2025

Free Report: Elastic Security vs. McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator

Find out what your peers are saying about Elastic Security vs. McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Elastic Security vs. McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator report.

See our list of best Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) vendors.

We monitor all Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.