Top 10 McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator Alternatives

4.0 out of 5

41 reviews
81% willing to recommend

574 followers

Top McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Microsoft Sentinel, IBM Security QRadar, and Elastic Security. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator surpasses its competitors by providing centralized security management, real-time visibility, and streamlined workflows that enhance threat protection and compliance for businesses.

McAfee Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with McAfee, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Microsoft Sentinel

4.1 out of 5

Microsoft Sentinel

4.1 out of 5

McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator appeals with centralized management and customizable policies. In comparison, Microsoft Sentinel excels with cloud-native deployment and powerful analytics. McAfee suits on-premises needs, while Microsoft offers scalable cloud solutions, appealing to organizations focused on innovative security technologies.

Download McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator vs. Microsoft Sentinel Report

Pricing

McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator involves a higher setup cost compared to Microsoft Sentinel, which is known for its more cost-effective setup process, offering an affordable solution for businesses with limited budgets.

View comparison

Pricing

IBM Security QRadar

4.0 out of 5

IBM Security QRadar

4.0 out of 5

IBM Security QRadar excels in scalability, user behavior analytics, and third-party integration, ideal for large enterprises. In comparison, McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator offers centralized management for endpoint security, appealing to organizations prioritizing antivirus and device control with cost-effective, modular pricing.

Download IBM Security QRadar vs. McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator Report

Pricing

IBM Security QRadar setup costs are often higher due to its comprehensive features, while McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator offers a more cost-effective setup option, making it a more budget-friendly choice.

View comparison

Pricing

Elastic Security

3.9 out of 5

Elastic Security

3.9 out of 5

McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator focuses on centralized management, enhancing control across devices. In comparison, Elastic Security emphasizes advanced threat detection with strong data analysis capabilities. McAfee's setup is user-friendly, while Elastic requires more configuration but offers greater flexibility.

Download Elastic Security vs. McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator Report

Pricing

McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator incurs higher setup costs compared to Elastic Security, which offers more economical initial setup pricing.

View comparison

Pricing

McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator incurs higher setup costs compared to Elastic Security, which offers more economical initial setup pricing.

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR

4.2 out of 5

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR

4.2 out of 5

McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator appeals with its cost-effective endpoint management and seamless integration with McAfee solutions. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR attracts tech buyers seeking advanced automation and incident response capabilities, offering substantial ROI despite higher initial costs.

Download McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator vs. Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR Report

Pricing

McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator typically incurs higher setup costs compared to Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR, which offers a more budget-friendly setup, highlighting a key difference in initial investment requirements for these cybersecurity solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

Splunk SOAR

4.0 out of 5

Splunk SOAR

4.0 out of 5

McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator attracts buyers with its cost-effective centralized security management and strong support. In comparison, Splunk SOAR appeals with automated incident response and integration capabilities, making it a valuable investment for those seeking advanced analytics despite requiring specialized deployment expertise.

Download McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator vs. Splunk SOAR Report

Pricing

McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is noted for its more affordable setup cost, providing a cost-effective solution for businesses. In contrast, Splunk SOAR's setup cost is significantly higher, reflecting its comprehensive suite of advanced security automation features.

View comparison

Pricing

ServiceNow Security Operations

4.0 out of 5

ServiceNow Security Operations

4.0 out of 5

McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator offers competitive pricing and robust customer support. In comparison, ServiceNow Security Operations delivers advanced features like automated incident response and IT service management integration, appealing to those seeking enhanced operational efficiency despite a higher cost.

Download McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator vs. ServiceNow Security Operations Report

Pricing

McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator has an affordable setup cost, while ServiceNow Security Operations requires a higher initial investment. This difference highlights the distinct budget considerations between the two solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

Related categories

Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

Microsoft Security Suite