Elastic Security vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform comparison

Elastic and Seceon are both solutions in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category. Elastic is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.5, while Seceon is ranked #44 with an average rating of 7.0. Elastic holds a 3.7% mindshare in SIEM, compared to Seceon’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 86% of Elastic users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Seceon users who would recommend it.

Elastic Security

Read 66 Elastic Security reviews

11,636 Views
7,098 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

Seceon Open Threat Manageme...

Read 13 Seceon Open Threat Management Platform reviews

1,528 Views
1,497 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Elastic Security

Seceon Open Threat Manageme...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Elastic Security and Seceon Open Threat Management Platform are robust security solutions in the security sector. Seceon seems to have the upper hand due to advanced features and higher user satisfaction.

Features: Elastic Security users value comprehensive threat detection, cost-effectiveness, and customer support. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform offers AI-driven analytics, automatic threat mitigation, and advanced features, giving it a competitive edge.

Room for Improvement: Elastic Security needs better documentation, more intuitive configurations, and improved integrations. Seceon could enhance integration with third-party applications, reporting capabilities, and usability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Elastic Security is praised for straightforward deployment and prompt customer service. Seceon has a simple deployment process and receives high marks for the quality and responsiveness of its support team.

Pricing and ROI: Elastic Security is viewed as a lower-cost solution with solid ROI, catering to budget-conscious buyers. Seceon, being more expensive, is considered worth the investment due to superior features and higher user satisfaction in ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Elastic Security vs. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Elastic Security vs. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,933 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Elastic Security

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

5th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Log Management (9th), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (15th), Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (7th), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (8th)

Seceon Open Threat Manageme...

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

44th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category, the mindshare of Elastic Security is 3.7%, down from 6.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Seceon Open Threat Management Platform is 0.8%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Elastic Security	3.7%
Seceon Open Threat Management Platform	0.8%
Other	95.5%

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

Featured Reviews

Laurentiu Popescu

Chief Product Officer at ClusterPower

Has improved threat detection with deep log analysis and streamlined investigation workflows

The most useful features I find in Elastic Security are the forensic ones that allow us to carry deeper analysis into the logs for in-depth investigations, and the dashboards, with the reporting dashboard being quite user-friendly. Elastic Security is quite good at identifying threats, as it is part of the deep investigation tool that I mentioned before. Unless we need to look further into a certain log, we can carry out a deeper analysis and forensics on those particular logs. I can assess the impact of Elastic Security's real-time data analysis on our threat response efficiency as working pretty good. We are looking for real-time analysis because we have a continuous inflow of logs from different sources: from our cloud, from Active Directory, from our network. So it works pretty well.

Read full review

TamimKhan

Solution Architect at Tiger IT Bangladesh Limited

Customization options need improvement but valuable threat management features and reasonable pricing benefit service providers

We are a Managed Security Service Provider (MSSP), and we provide services to our customers Seceon Open Threat Management Platform offers valuable features such as XDR and EDR. I also find the SOC and SOAR features valuable. Log management is another key functionality of the product. There are…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The performance is good and it is faster than IBM QRadar."

"The visualization is very good."

"Elastic Security is very easy to adapt."

"The intelligence of the system has been very impressive; it's pretty accurate and gives you good details to create an intelligence report and present that to your C-level management."

"Elastic Security actually has a very good cost-benefit ratio compared to other vendors in the market."

"It is an extremely stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"I like that it's a SIEM platform. I like that I can sell Elastic Security quickly. Elastic Security has a large community that can support users."

"Elastic Security is applied within my cyber defense strategy by utilizing many modules such as EDR, GenAI, SOAR module and combines with the SIEM module."

More Elastic Security pros

"I like that it's an AI-based platform. The most valuable feature is that it's a comprehensive solution. Most tools in the marketplace are comprised of miscellaneous items. They fail to provide real-time remediation features. However, with Seceon Open Threat Management Platform, anything you can think of in cybersecurity, like auto-remediation, real-time response, and even on-premise components, is available in a single platform. So, it's perfect for finance and healthcare who don't want to share their data with a third party like the cloud. You can have this on-premise as well. So, the expenditure will be lower as less human intervention is required."

"The main thing is the value proposition. It is one of the most sophisticated yet affordable solutions that I've come across. It is also one of the easiest-to-manage yet comprehensive solutions for a SOC analyst. Its customizations are really good, and it has a lot of integrations. It is multi-tenant and very fast to onboard. Its stability is 100%. We've never had an outage with it. It doesn't require extensive hardware resources. Its level of support is also very good. They have a very responsive technical team."

"The most valuable features are behaviour analytics, threat intelligence, endpoint detection, and response features."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is its artificial intelligence."

"We only recently started using Seceon, so we aren't taking advantage of all its features yet. We have enabled some proactive alerts about utilization and bottlenecks from high traffic."

"The pricing of Seceon Open Threat Management Platform is very reasonable."

"Seceon Open Threat Management Platform notifies only genuine alerts. It offers plenty of options that are suitable for MSPs."

"It is effective because it has threat intelligence from across the world and constantly checks and updates for new threats."

More Seceon Open Threat Management Platform pros

Cons

"There isn't really a very good user experience. You need a lot of training."

"In terms of what could be improved with Elastic, in some use cases, especially on the advanced level, they are not ready-made, so you'll have to write some scripts."

"This solution is very hard to implement."

"We're using the open-source edition, for now, I think maybe they can allow their OLED plugin to be open source, as at the moment it is commercialised."

"An area for improvement in Elastic Security is the pricing. It could be better. Right now, when you increase the volume of logs to be collected, the price also increases a lot."

"In terms of improvement, there could be more automation in responding to and evaluating detections."

"The solution does not have a UI and this is one of the reasons we are looking for another solution."

"The biggest challenge has been related to the implementation."

More Elastic Security cons

"We are at the client’s end, offering services. They don’t know about security rules and benchmarks. We are working on the discovery and remediation but we don’t really have the intelligence that was available while working with other tools. Human working is also very essential for the solution. The automatic session is impossible to play since it needs to touch Redfin for further analysis. No one has breached our clients."

"It would be ideal with the processing was more manageable. Not many customers are willing to have a dedicated server with two CPUs and one TB of memory. The cost of this is huge for a smaller organization."

"The product should improve the triggering rate."

"The dashboard has always been an issue."

"Seceon Open Threat Management Platform sells some add-ons as part of the whole suite but not individually. If they sold them individually, they could potentially attract more business."

"The SOP they provided wasn't great. They offered training over Sherp Virtualization, and the Seceon leadership visited our location to explain everything in detail, but the documentation and training could be better. It isn't as effective as it could be. There's some room for improvement there."

"For small to medium-sized customers, Seceon Open Threat Management Platform is good. However, for large enterprises, it is not as effective."

"For future releases, integrating incident response tools and improving communication on incident reporting could be beneficial."

More Seceon Open Threat Management Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Its price is fine. Its licensing works on a yearly basis. We have to renew the license every year. I also have a good experience with Darktrace. When we buy Darktrace, we get training free of cost, which is not there in Elastic. We have to pay extra for training. There is certainly room for improvement."

"The tool's pricing is flexible and comes at unit cost. You don't have to pay for everything."

"The solution is free."

"The price is reasonable. It probably costs the same as ArcSight and LogRhythm SIEM. FortiSIEM might cost less than Elastic Security. There are no hidden or additional costs."

"The pricing is in the middle. I think it is not an expensive experience if we compare it with big names, for example, QRadar, and also Oxide. I think Elastic Security is quite cheap. I would rate the pricing of this solution a five out of ten."

"We are using the free, open-source version of this solution."

"I find it better than Splunk in terms of cost-effectiveness. For cost-effectiveness, I would rate it a nine out of 10."

"It's a monthly cost with Elastic SIEM, but I am not sure of the exact cost."

More Elastic Security pricing and cost advice

"We used the solution's trial version for two months and later purchased it."

"I find Seceon OTM's pricing to be reasonable, not too high or low, just okay for the market standards. I can't disclose specific figures, we pay on a quarterly basis under a service model. I would rate it eight out of ten. As a customer, I always hope for better pricing options."

"The price is quite reasonable."

"The pricing is very competitive. It's not expensive."

"The solution is cheap and very competitive. It offers good tuning in terms of the pricing. Other solutions like Palo Alto and IBM are more expensive."

"It has a per-asset model instead of an ingestion-based model, which gives predictable pricing. In terms of price, it is in the middle to lower range of SIEMs that it competes against. It is the most affordable solution that we have implemented so far. It was much more affordable than anything else I've implemented."

"Seceon Open Threat Management Platform is cost-effective because it's a comprehensive platform that offers high availability."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

10%

Government

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	40
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	15

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	1

Questions from the Community

Datadog vs ELK: which one is good in terms of performance, cost and efficiency?

With Datadog, we have near-live visibility across our entire platform. We have seen APM metrics impacted several times lately using the dashboards we have created with Datadog; they are very good c...

See all answers

What do you like most about Elastic Security?

Elastic provides the capability to index quickly due to the reverse indexes it offers. This data is crucial as it contains critical information. The reverse index allows fast data indexing because ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Elastic Security?

I am satisfied with the pricing, setup cost, and licensing cost. It is a pure 10.

See all answers

What do you like most about Seceon Open Threat Management Platform?

The algorithm used in Seceon OTM is clear and logical, categorizing events as needed. This helps us identify and respond to threats effectively.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Seceon Open Threat Management Platform?

The pricing of Seceon Open Threat Management Platform is very reasonable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Seceon Open Threat Management Platform?

There are areas for improvement in the customization options. Every ( /products/every-reviews ) quarter, they are developing the platform with new updates based on feedback provided.

See all answers

Comparisons

Wazuh vs Elastic Security

Compared 8% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Elastic Security

Compared 5% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs Elastic Security

Compared 5% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Elastic Security

Compared 4% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Elastic Security

Compared 3% of the time

More Elastic Security Competitors

IBM Security QRadar vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

Compared 12% of the time

Microsoft Sentinel vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

Compared 11% of the time

LogRhythm SIEM vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

Compared 9% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

Compared 7% of the time

Wazuh vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

Compared 6% of the time

More Seceon Open Threat Management Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Elastic Security

March 2026

Download Elastic Security product report

Buyer's Guide

Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

February 2026

Seceon Open Threat Management Platform report

Download Seceon Open Threat Management Platform product report

Also Known As

Elastic SIEM, ELK Logstash

Seceon OTM, Seceon aiSIEM, aiSIEM, Seceon Open Threat Management

Overview

Elastic Security is a robust, open-source security solution designed to offer integrated threat prevention, detection, and response capabilities across an organization's entire digital estate. Part of the Elastic Stack (which includes Elasticsearch, Logstash, and Kibana), Elastic Security leverages the power of search, analytics, and data aggregation to provide real-time insight into threats and vulnerabilities. It is a comprehensive platform that supports a wide range of security needs, from endpoint protection to cloud and network security, making it a versatile choice for organizations looking to enhance their cybersecurity posture.

Elastic Security combines the features of a security information and event management (SIEM) system with endpoint protection, allowing organizations to detect, investigate, and respond to threats in real time. This unified approach helps reduce complexity and improve the efficiency of security operations.

Additional offerings and benefits:

The platform utilizes advanced analytics, machine learning algorithms, and anomaly detection to identify threats and suspicious activities.
It offers extensive integration options with other tools and platforms, facilitating a more cohesive and comprehensive security ecosystem.
With Kibana, users gain access to powerful visualization tools and dashboards that provide real-time insight into security data.

Finally, Elastic Security benefits from a global community of users who contribute to its threat intelligence, helping to enhance its detection capabilities. This collaborative approach ensures that the solution remains on the cutting edge of cybersecurity, with up-to-date information on the latest threats and vulnerabilities.

Elastic

Seceon Open Threat Management Platform is a comprehensive cybersecurity solution that offers real-time threat detection, analysis, and response capabilities. It leverages advanced AI and machine learning algorithms to provide proactive threat hunting and automated incident response.

With its intuitive dashboard, users can gain complete visibility into their network, applications, and endpoints, enabling them to identify and mitigate potential risks effectively. The platform integrates seamlessly with existing security infrastructure, consolidating data from various sources for centralized monitoring and analysis.

Its threat intelligence feeds and behavioral analytics enable the identification of both known and unknown threats, ensuring comprehensive protection against advanced cyber attacks. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform empowers security teams with actionable insights, enabling them to prioritize and respond to threats swiftly. With its automated remediation capabilities, it minimizes the impact of attacks and reduces response time. The platform also offers customizable reporting and compliance management features, facilitating regulatory compliance and providing stakeholders with comprehensive security status updates.

Seceon Open Threat Management Platform is a robust and scalable solution that caters to the evolving cybersecurity needs of organizations across industries.

Seceon

Sample Customers

Texas A&M, U.S. Air Force, NuScale Power, Martin's Point Health Care

Caduceus, SUNY

Buyer's Guide

Elastic Security vs. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

March 2026

Free Report: Elastic Security vs. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about Elastic Security vs. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Elastic Security vs. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform report.

See our list of best Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) vendors.

We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.