Entrust Identity Enterprise vs Ping Identity Platform comparison

Entrust Datacard and Ping Identity are both solutions in the Authentication Systems category. Entrust Datacard is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.6, while Ping Identity is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.2. Entrust Datacard holds a 1.3% mindshare in AS, compared to Ping Identity’s 3.5% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Entrust Datacard users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Ping Identity users who would recommend it.

Entrust Identity Enterprise

Read 7 Entrust Identity Enterprise reviews

897 Views
649 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Ping Identity Platform

Read 28 Ping Identity Platform reviews

2,477 Views
1,771 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Entrust Identity Enterprise

Ping Identity Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 2, 2024

Entrust Identity Enterprise and Ping Identity Platform are competing solutions in the identity management space. Ping Identity Platform seems to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive feature set, which justifies its higher cost.

Features: Entrust Identity Enterprise offers competitive credentialing, encryption capabilities, and frictionless multifactor authentication, enhancing secure identity management. Ping Identity Platform has advanced single sign-on, adaptive authentication, and strong integration capabilities, essential for complex environments.

Room for Improvement: Entrust Identity Enterprise could enhance integration capabilities and scalability options and expand its feature set to cater to more complex environments. Ping Identity Platform would benefit from a more intuitive deployment process, reduced technical resource requirements for setup, and a more competitive pricing model.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Entrust Identity Enterprise is noted for its intuitive deployment process and prompt customer support, offering quick resolutions. Ping Identity Platform, though requiring more setup time and technical resources, compensates with comprehensive documentation and strong support infrastructure, providing excellent customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Entrust Identity Enterprise has an attractive pricing model, offering better immediate ROI with lower initial setup costs. Ping Identity Platform, although necessitating a larger upfront investment, delivers substantial long-term returns due to its enhanced features and scalability options.

To learn more, read our detailed Entrust Identity Enterprise vs. Ping Identity Platform Report (Updated: February 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Entrust Identity Enterprise vs. Ping Identity Platform

February 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 845,406 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Entrust Identity Enterprise

Ranking in Authentication Systems

10th

Ranking in Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

11th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Ping Identity Platform

Ranking in Authentication Systems

6th

Ranking in Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

6th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Single Sign-On (SSO) (4th), Data Governance (8th), Access Management (4th), Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) (2nd), Directory Servers (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Authentication Systems category, the mindshare of Entrust Identity Enterprise is 1.3%, down from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ping Identity Platform is 3.5%, down from 4.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Authentication Systems

Featured Reviews

Iwegbue Godspower Isioma

Cyber Security Analyst at Platview Technologies

Provides strong authentication feature, which requires users to enter a one-time password (OTP)

The main issue I've noticed pertains to setting up the desktop client on virtual machines in Azure, GCP, or AWS, specifically for Entrust Identity Enterprise intended for on-premises use. It works for on-premises, but I'm not sure if it's fully supported in cloud environments. If support were added, it would function perfectly with on-premises configurations. So, it functions well on-premises, but integrating it with cloud services like AWS or Azure could be challenging. There are issues with cloud integrations, such as Azure, AWS, and GCP.

Read full review

Dilip Reddy

Ping Engineer at Equitable

Easy to use but requires improvements in the area of stability

In my company, we have worked on authorization, and I know that there are different types of grants. We have worked on the authorization code, client credentials, and ROPC grant. There are two types of tokens, like the JWT token and internally managed reference tokens. JWT tokens are useful for finding information related to the claim requests. Internally managed reference tokens are useful for dealing with visual data and information. For the clients to fit the user information, they need to do additional work to fit all the user info into the site, which is to define and validate the token issue and provide the request for VPNs. I worked on the key differences between the authorization code and implicit grant. In the authorization code type, you will have the authorization code issued initially to the client, and the client has to exchange it with the authorization server, like using a DAC channel to get the access token. In implicit grants, tokens are issued right away if the application is a single-page application. We can either use the authorization code or an implicit grant.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The integration matrix of the solution is huge compared to others."

"This solution is flexible and easy to use for our clients. We use it with different kinds of applications and integrate it with different processes."

"Entrust is an enterprise account, and they have a support system. Their training is also top-notch, and they are willing to share their knowledge with their partners."

"It is a scalable solution. You can add users and credentials without problems."

"I am impressed with Entrust because they are one of the most advanced identity access management companies. Their portfolio of products is well aligned with the CISA zero trust framework. If you compare the features of Entrust products with the CISA pillars of zero trust, you'll see that they're perfectly matched with CISA requirements."

"The solution is stable. We haven't experienced any bugs or glitches."

"The most valuable feature is multifactor authentication."

"I find the auto-discovery feature the most valuable. It helps us automate a lot of things using a single password across applications."

"From a security perspective, I highly value the product's biometric authentication methods such as FIDO, FaceID, YubiKey, and the mobile app."

"Setting up the infrastructure with Ping Identity Platform is very easy compared to other IAM products."

"It provides ease of connecting all our devices."

"PingFederate gives you granular control over the settings. There are many options for fine-tuning policies."

"This is a user-friendly solution."

More Ping Identity Platform pros

Cons

"I would like to improve the tool's implementation and pricing."

"It functions well on-premises, but integrating it with cloud services like AWS or Azure could be challenging. There are issues with cloud integrations, such as Azure, AWS, and GCP."

"We are introducing new processes and are migrating to a new version. Once we explore new functionalities, we'll be able to assess what could be improved."

"The product is very costly compared to other alternative solutions."

"We can choose a drop-down to search for which certificate we have to create, which is difficult."

"Currently, the main integration is SAML-based, but other integration methodologies need to be supported."

"The solution should allow for better integration with other platforms and the UBT."

"The product's community has certain shortcomings that require improvement."

"They could use some bio-certification. It's just more user-friendly and more convenient than entering the one time passes. That would be an improvement."

"The product is not customizable."

"It has a long way to go until it is a cloud-based solution."

"The management console needs to be improved. PingID should revise it."

More Ping Identity Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would rate the product's pricing a five out of ten."

"The subscription could be yearly or monthly, depending upon your choice."

"It's worth the money."

"Ping offers flexible pricing that's not standardized."

"The pricing is neither too expensive nor too cheap."

"Compared to some SaaS-based solutions, the platform is relatively cost-effective."

"Ping Identity Platform is not very expensive."

"The tool is quite affordable."

"PingID pricing is a ten out of ten because it's a little bit cheaper than other tools, such as Okta and ForgeRock, and supports multiple tools."

"The platform's value justifies the pricing, especially considering its security features and scalability."

"PingID's pricing is pretty competitive."

More Ping Identity Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Authentication Systems solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

25%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Entrust IdentityGuard?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Entrust IdentityGuard?

I use it for an extra layer of security, that is two-factor authentication (2FA).

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Entrust IdentityGuard?

I would recommend it. I've used it for three years now, and I'm very happy with it. Overall, I would rate the solution a nine out of ten.

See all answers

What do you like most about PingID?

The mobile biometric authentication option improved user experience. It's always about security because, with two-factor authentication, it's always a separate device verifying the actual user logg...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PingID?

The pricing is neither too expensive nor too cheap.

See all answers

What needs improvement with PingID?

The management console needs to be improved. PingID should revise it.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Entra ID vs Entrust Identity Enterprise

Compared 25% of the time

Cisco Duo vs Entrust Identity Enterprise

Compared 18% of the time

Venafi vs Entrust Identity Enterprise

Compared 15% of the time

Entrust Identity Essentials vs Entrust Identity Enterprise

Compared 12% of the time

DigiCert PKI Platform vs Entrust Identity Enterprise

Compared 11% of the time

More Entrust Identity Enterprise Competitors

Microsoft Entra ID vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 22% of the time

Symantec Siteminder vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 11% of the time

ForgeRock vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 7% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Saviynt vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 6% of the time

More Ping Identity Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Entrust Identity Enterprise

March 2025

Download Entrust Identity Enterprise product report

Buyer's Guide

Ping Identity Platform

March 2025

Download Ping Identity Platform product report

Also Known As

IdentityGuard

Ping Identity (ID), PingFederate, PingAccess, PingOne, PingDataGovernance, PingDirectory, OpenDJ

Overview

Identity Enterprise is an integrated IAM platform that supports a full suite of workforce, consumer, and citizen use cases. Ideally suited for high-assurance applications that require a Zero Trust approach for thousands or millions of users, Identity Enterprise can be deployed on-premises.

Entrust Datacard

IDENTITY DEFINED SECURITY PLATFORM delivers a unified, standards-based platform that can be deployed as SaaS, software or both and can scale to handle millions of identities. From multi-factor authentication and single sign-on to access security, directory and data governance, our capabilities work together to give employees, partners and customers secure access to cloud, mobile and enterprise applications, securing and streamlined everything from sign-on to sign-off and everywhere in between.

Ping Identity

Sample Customers

Bank of New Zealand, CRISIL, Banco Mercantil, G_teborg University, Ministry of Economic Development of New Zealand, Ocean Systems, Skanska, Societe Generale, Susquehanna Bancshares

Equinix, Land O'Lakes, CDPHP, Box, International SOS, Opower, VSP, Chevron, Truist, Academy of Art University, Northern Air Cargo, Repsol

Buyer's Guide

Entrust Identity Enterprise vs. Ping Identity Platform

February 2025

Free Report: Entrust Identity Enterprise vs. Ping Identity Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about Entrust Identity Enterprise vs. Ping Identity Platform and other solutions. Updated: February 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Entrust Identity Enterprise vs. Ping Identity Platform report.

See our list of best Authentication Systems vendors and best Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) vendors.

We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.