Entrust Identity Enterprise vs Microsoft Entra ID comparison

Entrust and Microsoft are both solutions in the Authentication Systems category. Entrust is ranked #19, while Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.6. Entrust holds a 1.8% mindshare in AS, compared to Microsoft’s 5.8% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Entrust users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Entrust Identity Enterprise

Read 7 Entrust Identity Enterprise reviews

2,822 Views
1,919 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Microsoft Entra ID

Read 277 Microsoft Entra ID reviews

41,007 Views
8,201 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Entrust Identity Enterprise

Microsoft Entra ID

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 11, 2024

Entrust Identity Enterprise and Microsoft Entra ID are two prominent identity management solutions. Entrust Identity Enterprise offers robust features suited for high-security needs, and user reviews highlight its effective encryption and extensive authentication methods. Microsoft Entra ID integrates seamlessly with Microsoft’s ecosystem, providing a user-friendly experience that leverages existing Microsoft 365 applications.

What features are offered by Entrust Identity Enterprise in comparison to Microsoft Entra ID?

Entrust Identity Enterprise is valued for its advanced encryption and multi-factor authentication, which users cite as crucial for protecting sensitive data. Microsoft Entra ID, on the other hand, is praised for its seamless integration with Microsoft 365, making it a convenient choice for existing Microsoft users. The primary difference is that Entrust Identity Enterprise focuses on security enhancements, while Microsoft Entra ID excels in integration capabilities.

What areas of improvement can be found in Entrust Identity Enterprise in comparison to Microsoft Entra ID?

Users suggest that Entrust Identity Enterprise could improve its reporting tools and user training resources. Microsoft Entra ID users often mention the need for more advanced security features and better scalability options. Entrust Identity Enterprise needs better usability enhancements, while Microsoft Entra ID requires security advancements.

How is the ease of deployment and customer service of Entrust Identity Enterprise in comparison to Microsoft Entra ID?

Entrust Identity Enterprise has a more complex deployment model, which users feel requires significant technical expertise. Microsoft Entra ID boasts a smoother deployment process due to its integration with the Microsoft suite. Users find customer service for Entrust satisfactory but slower than Microsoft’s prompt support. Entrust Identity Enterprise’s complexity is a barrier, while Microsoft Entra ID's integration eases deployment challenges.

What setup costs and ROI can be seen with Entrust Identity Enterprise in comparison to Microsoft Entra ID?

Entrust Identity Enterprise has higher setup costs but is seen to provide significant ROI through enhanced security features. Microsoft Entra ID is perceived as offering better value for existing Microsoft users due to lower initial costs and integration benefits, though some users feel the ROI is limited by its need for additional security measures. Entrust Identity Enterprise has higher initial costs with notable security ROI, while Microsoft Entra ID offers economical entry with integration advantages.

To learn more, read our detailed Entrust Identity Enterprise vs. Microsoft Entra ID Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Entrust Identity Enterprise vs. Microsoft Entra ID

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,834 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Entrust Identity Enterprise

Ranking in Authentication Systems

19th

Ranking in Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

28th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Microsoft Entra ID

Ranking in Authentication Systems

1st

Ranking in Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

1st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

277

Ranking in other categories

Single Sign-On (SSO) (2nd), Identity Management (IM) (2nd), Access Management (1st), Microsoft Security Suite (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Authentication Systems category, the mindshare of Entrust Identity Enterprise is 1.8%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Entra ID is 5.8%, down from 14.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Authentication Systems Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Microsoft Entra ID	5.8%
Entrust Identity Enterprise	1.8%
Other	92.4%

Authentication Systems

Featured Reviews

reviewer2312085

Cyber Security Analyst at a non-tech company with 11-50 employees

Provides strong authentication feature, which requires users to enter a one-time password (OTP)

The main issue I've noticed pertains to setting up the desktop client on virtual machines in Azure, GCP, or AWS, specifically for Entrust Identity Enterprise intended for on-premises use. It works for on-premises, but I'm not sure if it's fully supported in cloud environments. If support were added, it would function perfectly with on-premises configurations. So, it functions well on-premises, but integrating it with cloud services like AWS or Azure could be challenging. There are issues with cloud integrations, such as Azure, AWS, and GCP.

Read full review

Stafin Jacob

Microsoft 365 Security & Compliance Practice Lead at Invoke

Identity has become our central gatekeeper and has provided secure single sign-on for all users

Microsoft Entra ID can improve by focusing more on new passwordless methods and becoming a primary adopter. One feature we would like to see is the ability to have security questions for password resets. I know the current capability is phasing out, so we do not have an alternative method yet. Customers who already use security questions require a smoother transition for that capability to be available. My experience with the deployment has had some challenges, particularly around the Microsoft MFA campaigns. The hardest part is moving users from a different MFA provider to the Microsoft MFA provider, as it ultimately depends on user activity. In large enterprises with numerous users across various geographies, this transition takes time. If there are ways to exert more control around that process, it would improve the situation.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The integration matrix of the solution is huge compared to others."

"Entrust Identity Enterprise is a very mature product, it is very reliable and there are many use cases for which you can use the solution."

"I am impressed with Entrust because they are one of the most advanced identity access management companies. Their portfolio of products is well aligned with the CISA zero trust framework. If you compare the features of Entrust products with the CISA pillars of zero trust, you'll see that they're perfectly matched with CISA requirements."

"It is a scalable solution. You can add users and credentials without problems."

"This solution is flexible and easy to use for our clients, and we use it with different kinds of applications and integrate it with different processes."

"Entrust is an enterprise account, and they have a support system. Their training is also top-notch, and they are willing to share their knowledge with their partners."

"This product is very nice."

"The centralized management feature is very valuable."

"The most valuable feature for me is enterprise applications. This functionality allows the building of applications that are tied into APIs that we can grant specific permissions and limit the scope of access."

"Microsoft Entra ID, integrated with Microsoft Teams, has enhanced the security of access to applications and resources within our environment."

"It is pretty good in terms of stability."

"All of the features are amazing, such as identity governance and privileged identity management."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is that is easy to use."

"Improved user experience with SSO logins."

More Microsoft Entra ID pros

Cons

"It would be better if the on-prem Entrust Identity Enterprise solution could have the same features as the cloud version because the latter is easier to use."

"It functions well on-premises, but integrating it with cloud services like AWS or Azure could be challenging. There are issues with cloud integrations, such as Azure, AWS, and GCP."

"The product is very costly compared to other alternative solutions."

"We are introducing new processes and are migrating to a new version. Once we explore new functionalities, we'll be able to assess what could be improved."

"I would like to improve the tool's implementation and pricing."

"The workflow management for registering new applications and users could be improved."

"Licenses are very expensive."

"They can improve how people manage their accounts. They can simplify and provide more information about adding or updating a phone number or email id in the MSA account. A lot of time users do get confused about where to go. For example, if I've changed my mobile number, where do I go and change my mobile number in the MSA account? A lot of time, employees think if they change the phone number in the HR database, it'll automatically get changed on the MSA account, which is not the case. Microsoft can simplify that and add these questions in the FAQ documents as well."

"There should be a clearer separation between objects held in Entra and Azure, so we don't need to approach the Entra ID team to create rules, policies, and app registrations. It would help if we could make independent IDs on the Azure side to go through that team to create a role, change permissions, or create something for a specific task."

"Sometimes, level-one support lacks the immediate information needed, causing delays in receiving appropriate support."

"The variety of different group types has caused challenges in areas where we have Microsoft 365 groups, distribution groups, and security groups, and the different types do not always make programmatic management clear."

"Microsoft's biggest challenge is the documentation. The challenge lies in keeping documentation up-to-date due to rapid changes. Troubleshooting requires workarounds and research."

"The downside is that we now have all our eggs in one basket with Microsoft. We have this great authentication and single sign-on, but if Microsoft has an outage in North America or globally, on Outlook or Teams, we're dead in the water... We get some type of hiccup once a quarter."

More Microsoft Entra ID cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would rate the product's pricing a five out of ten."

"The subscription could be yearly or monthly, depending upon your choice."

"It's worth the money."

"The licensing is really not clear unless you are a premium client."

"The price is fine. It's a good value for the money compared with other solutions."

"Azure AD has four licensing options- Free, Office 365 apps, Premium P1, and Premium P2. The free option has a limited number of identities and features, and the Office 365 version comes included in several Office 365 subscriptions. With the P1 and P2 licenses, we get all the freeware features plus additional security features, but these come at a higher price. The base price for P1 and P2 is $6 and $9 per user per month, respectively."

"If you have a different IDP today, I would take a close look at what your licensing looks like, then reevaluate the licensing that you have with Microsoft 365, and see if you're covered for some of this other stuff. Folks sometimes don't realize that, "Oh, I'm licensed for that service in Azure." This becomes one of those situations where you have the "aha" moment, "Oh, I didn't know we can do that. Alright, let's go down this road." Then, they start to have conversations with Microsoft to see what they can gain. I would recommend that they work closely with their TAM, just to make sure that they are getting the right level of service. They may just not be aware of what is available to them."

"Most features of Entra ID are part of Microsoft's ecosystem and included in Microsoft 365 bundles, which means there are no additional costs associated with pricing and licensing."

"This product is sold as part of the enterprise package and our licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis."

"The price is fair. It's not very expensive given what they offer."

"Active Directory is bundled with a package of Microsoft services, so it doesn't cost much. I don't know about the individual license of Active Directory."

More Microsoft Entra ID pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Authentication Systems solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

12%

Performing Arts

10%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

11%

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	89
Midsize Enterprise	42
Large Enterprise	162

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

How does Duo Security compare with Microsoft Authenticator?

We switched to Duo Security for identity verification. We’d been using a competitor but got the chance to evaluate Duo for 30 days, and we could not be happier. Duo Security is easy to configure a...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Active Directory?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that going through and being able to use these things is always part of delivering an M365 bundle, so I don't think the experience is great ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Azure Active Directory?

Microsoft Entra ID can be improved by open-sourcing it. You already have Windows Subsystem for Linux, which is open-source Linux in Microsoft. One major shift for Microsoft would be using the commo...

See all answers

Comparisons

DigiCert PKI Platform vs Entrust Identity Enterprise

Compared 8% of the time

Okta Platform vs Entrust Identity Enterprise

Compared 8% of the time

RSA Authentication Manager vs Entrust Identity Enterprise

Compared 6% of the time

Certificate Lifecycle Manager vs Entrust Identity Enterprise

Compared 5% of the time

miniOrange IAM vs Entrust Identity Enterprise

Compared 5% of the time

More Entrust Identity Enterprise Competitors

Google Cloud Identity vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 29% of the time

Okta Platform vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 4% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 3% of the time

Microsoft Intune vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 2% of the time

Ping Identity Platform vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 2% of the time

More Microsoft Entra ID Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Entrust Identity Enterprise

August 2026

Download Entrust Identity Enterprise product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Entra ID

July 2026

Download Microsoft Entra ID product report

Also Known As

IdentityGuard

Azure AD, Azure Active Directory, Azure Active Directory, Microsoft Authenticator

Interactive Demo

Demo not available

Entrust

Microsoft

Overview

Entrust Identity Enterprise is recognized for its ease of use, reliability, and advanced authentication options, aligning with CISA zero trust guidelines and offering strong support for both mobile and desktop environments.

Entrust Identity Enterprise provides a comprehensive identity management system, facilitating seamless authentication across banking, government, and enterprise industries. The platform offers robust security with its risk engine and extensive API support, ensuring smooth version transitions. While its cloud version boasts intuitive usability and prompt updates, the on-premises version requires enhancements for feature parity and pricing adjustments. Integration challenges with platforms like Azure, AWS, and GCP are noted, particularly with virtual machine desktop setups.

What are the key features of Entrust Identity Enterprise?

Advanced Multifactor Authentication: Offers various methods like one-time passwords and tokens.
Intuitive Interface: Enhances accessibility and security with a user-friendly design.
Extensive Integration Matrix: Aligns with CISA zero trust and supports smooth API transitions.
Comprehensive Risk Engine: Provides sophisticated security threat assessments.
Mobile App Convenience: Ensures secure, convenient access for users on the go.

What benefits and ROI should be considered?

Enhanced Security: Protects against identity theft and security threats.
Improved Support and Training: Offers excellent customer service and training resources.
Increased Accessibility: Facilitates user access across devices and platforms.
Timely Updates: Receives consistent updates for cloud users.
Cost Management: High implementation and pricing costs may require consideration.

Entrust Identity Enterprise is widely implemented in the banking, government, and large enterprise sectors. Organizations leverage it for secure access to online banking, cloud portals, and VPNs using multifactor authentication methods. It monitors external user access and mitigates threats from compromised credentials, supporting both internal and external customer authentication.

Entrust

Microsoft Entra ID is an advanced identity and access management service offering seamless single sign-on, multifactor authentication, and centralized user access across applications, enhancing security and efficiency for organizations transitioning to cloud-based environments.

Recognized for its centralized management, Microsoft Entra ID significantly boosts organizational security by integrating features such as conditional access and identity protection. It supports a wide array of applications, facilitating a secure transition from on-premises to scalable cloud environments. By adopting robust security measures and flexible identity management, organizations can streamline operations and ensure consistent user experiences. However, challenges like confusing licensing costs, outdated documentation, and limited integration with non-Microsoft applications persist. Enhancements in technical support, interface design, and more granular permissions are needed to address these issues effectively.

What are the key features of Microsoft Entra ID?

Seamless Single Sign-On: Allows users to access multiple applications with one set of credentials.
Multifactor Authentication: Adds an extra layer of security by requiring multiple forms of verification.
Conditional Access: Provides adaptive policies to ensure the right access under the right conditions.
Identity Protection: Detects and responds to potential vulnerabilities and threats.
Privileged Identity Management: Controls and monitors access to critical resources.

What benefits should users expect when evaluating Microsoft Entra ID?

Enhanced Security: Protects against unauthorized access and data breaches.
Operational Efficiency: Centralizes identity management to reduce administrative tasks.
Scalability: Supports growth by accommodating evolving IT environments.
Cost Management: Facilitates cost control through centralized systems and automated processes.

In healthcare, Microsoft Entra ID facilitates secure patient record access and compliance with industry regulations. Financial institutions rely on it for robust security measures in safeguarding client data. In the education sector, it streamlines access to online resources for students and faculty. Global enterprises benefit from its ability to manage complex identity frameworks across multiple regions, ensuring reliable security amidst increasing cyber threats.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

Bank of New Zealand, CRISIL, Banco Mercantil, G_teborg University, Ministry of Economic Development of New Zealand, Ocean Systems, Skanska, Societe Generale, Susquehanna Bancshares

Microsoft Entre ID is trusted by companies of all sizes and industries including Walmart, Zscaler, Uniper, Amtrak, monday.com, and more.

Buyer's Guide

Entrust Identity Enterprise vs. Microsoft Entra ID

August 2026

Free Report: Entrust Identity Enterprise vs. Microsoft Entra ID

Find out what your peers are saying about Entrust Identity Enterprise vs. Microsoft Entra ID and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Entrust Identity Enterprise vs. Microsoft Entra ID report.

See our list of best Authentication Systems vendors and best Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) vendors.

We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.