Ping Identity Platform vs Symantec Siteminder comparison

Ping Identity and Broadcom are both solutions in the Single Sign-On (SSO) category. Ping Identity is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.3, while Broadcom is ranked #12 with an average rating of 6.6. Ping Identity holds a 7.7% mindshare in SSO, compared to Broadcom’s 2.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Ping Identity users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

Ping Identity Platform

Read 29 Ping Identity Platform reviews

3,282 Views
2,344 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Symantec Siteminder

Read 75 Symantec Siteminder reviews

1,148 Views
837 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Ping Identity Platform

Symantec Siteminder

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 16, 2025

Symantec Siteminder and Ping Identity Platform are competing products in the identity management space. Symantec Siteminder seems to have the upper hand in integration capabilities, whereas Ping Identity Platform excels in providing advanced security features.

Features: Symantec Siteminder offers robust integration capabilities with various applications, extensive policy management, and single sign-on (SSO). Ping Identity Platform supports advanced security protocols, extensive multi-factor authentication options, and highly configurable access management.

Room for Improvement: Symantec Siteminder could benefit from enhancements in customer support responsiveness, updating its user interface, and optimizing deployment processes. Ping Identity Platform could improve by reducing setup complexity, better integrating with legacy systems, and offering more competitive pricing.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Symantec Siteminder provides a straightforward deployment process but may lack in responsive customer service. Ping Identity Platform simplifies deployment with intuitive configuration tools and has a responsive customer support team.

Pricing and ROI: Symantec Siteminder generally has competitive initial costs but may show slower ROI. Ping Identity Platform typically incurs higher initial costs but justifies this with a strong ROI from enhanced security features and agile identity management.

To learn more, read our detailed Ping Identity Platform vs. Symantec Siteminder Report (Updated: May 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Ping Identity Platform vs. Symantec Siteminder

May 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 851,604 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Ping Identity Platform

Ranking in Single Sign-On (SSO)

4th

Ranking in Access Management

2nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Authentication Systems (5th), Data Governance (8th), Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (6th), Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) (2nd), Directory Servers (1st)

Symantec Siteminder

Ranking in Single Sign-On (SSO)

12th

Ranking in Access Management

11th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Web Access Management (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Single Sign-On (SSO) category, the mindshare of Ping Identity Platform is 7.7%, down from 10.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Symantec Siteminder is 2.6%, down from 3.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Single Sign-On (SSO)

Featured Reviews

MAHESHKUMAR7

Cyber Security Engineer at TECHMINDZ DIGITAL CONSULTING PRIVATE LIMITED

Offers multi-factor authentication and application support side of PingFederate but application only supports specific protocols

A lot of teams work with technical support, but I work with it for user issues only. You might need support with things like application swaps, application names, and application URLs. I didn't know where to find those in Ping Identity, so I contacted technical support for those issues. The support team is very clever and active. They provide end-to-end support once an issue is created. I have worked with most of the support team. I also work with the support team because I work with the operations team. I provide 24/7 support to production and non-production environments. I coordinate with application and network teams to troubleshoot critical tickets and issues related to Ping Identity solutions.

Read full review

Muzi Lubisi

Senior technical Consultant at CA Africa

Improved user experience with seamless integration and easy installation

The feature that I mostly valued is the ease of installation on different systems, especially on Windows. Additionally, it is very beneficial for deploying single sign-on sessions between different windows on a web browser, provided I am connected to the right identity provider. That seamless integration significantly improves user experience and efficiency.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"PingFederate is very flexible. We can do many customizations, and it also provides an SDK to tailor it to our specific requirements. There are also numerous plugins available. I've worked with tools like ForgeRock and Okta, but I find PingFederate to be the most customizable."

"We use the product to run different reports."

"I work on the application onboarding process because we have multiple customers and get data from different sources."

"I would recommend PingFederate as an IAM solution for its no-code environment, single sign-on, multi-factor authentication, bidirectional services, and advanced features."

"It is a scalable solution."

"Setting up the infrastructure with Ping Identity Platform is very easy compared to other IAM products."

"The product's most valuable features include its cloud-based capabilities for handling cloud applications and providing authentication and authorization through OIDC and SAML. It also supports integrations needed for both local and internal applications, including legacy applications requiring web server access."

"The mobile biometric authentication option improved user experience. It's always about security because, with two-factor authentication, it's always a separate device verifying the actual user logging in."

More Ping Identity Platform pros

"It is very scalable. We have a very large customer base: 75 million customers."

"Right now, federation that comes out-of-the-box with single sign-on is the most valuable feature that we have, and also scalability."

"It's quite scalable."

"All of our applications get a point, click, and you are in, while we increase security at the same time."

"The single sign-on is the solution's most valuable feature"

"Authentication & Authorization are important because all the sites need authentication for security purposes. That has been handled pretty well all these years with SSO."

"It has the ability to authenticate and authorize users. It is the main feature for our security."

"As our identity model continues to mature, probably the Federation is most valueable."

More Symantec Siteminder pros

Cons

"It has a long way to go until it is a cloud-based solution."

"We can choose a drop-down to search for which certificate we have to create, which is difficult."

"Ping Identity Platform must improve its UI since its management console is complicated."

"The timing of the token validity, if it could be extended, would be great. I'm not sure if there is even an option to configure these types of settings."

"PingID classifies the type of environment into internal and external, which is an area for improvement because you need to take additional steps to trust internal and external users."

"If the solution is going to compete with Microsoft, they need to offer more unique functionality to keep their current user base."

"Currently, the main integration is SAML-based, but other integration methodologies need to be supported."

"Some colleagues have mentioned API connectivity, data security, and privacy issues."

More Ping Identity Platform cons

"CA has reporting at the moment. With the reporting, every particular segmented product has a reporting engine. I would like to see centralized reporting for all of them together."

"Symantec SiteMinder is not easy to set up and maintain at an infrastructure level."

"While I have some integration with a few major providers, support for more would be advantageous."

"To add more value to this solution it needs to be more user-friendly."

"The support could be faster."

"The Federation part of CA Single Sign On, it's a bit complex to implement because it involves the SSL certificates, exchange of certificates, and lot of technical details. The documentation misses some important parts of this, so that's the reason it took some time for us to go live."

"All the problems that we reported actually have never been resolved. We could not capture enough information for CA to be able to debug the problem."

"The support team could work on their response time and overall competence."

More Symantec Siteminder cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Ping Identity Platform is not very expensive."

"The platform's value justifies the pricing, especially considering its security features and scalability."

"The tool is quite affordable."

"The pricing is neither too expensive nor too cheap."

"Compared to some SaaS-based solutions, the platform is relatively cost-effective."

"Ping offers flexible pricing that's not standardized."

"PingID's pricing is pretty competitive."

"The product is costly."

More Ping Identity Platform pricing and cost advice

"The price is quite comparable to the other enterprise-level solutions in that market."

"CA solutions are generally expensive but for the customer the ROI is big."

"The licensing is fair for this solution."

"The pricing is reasonable."

"I recommend conducting a PoC on every available product before choose one."

"The solution's pricing is competitive."

"Siteminder is a little costly. You pay for licensing, and they offer packages, so if you have less users, then you have to buy different products at different prices. If you have more of a user base, then the package is different. They also include other features—for example, if you have a database and you're using Siteminder, then it's good to use a Semantic-specific database, but if you are using less, then you have to purchase the database separately. Whereas if you are going for a bigger license, then it comes within the package. It depends on which plan you are using."

"Symantec Siteminder is expensive; they could definitely do better on the price."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Single Sign-On (SSO) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

25%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

35%

Insurance Company

13%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about PingID?

The mobile biometric authentication option improved user experience. It's always about security because, with two-factor authentication, it's always a separate device verifying the actual user logg...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PingID?

The pricing is neither too expensive nor too cheap.

See all answers

What needs improvement with PingID?

The management console needs to be improved. PingID should revise it.

See all answers

What do you like most about Symantec Siteminder?

It's agent-based. It's convenient to deploy and integrate.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Symantec Siteminder?

My experience with pricing is that it is all good.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Symantec Siteminder?

Symantec Siteminder needs to have adaptive authentication and multi-factor authentication as integrated features. Currently, multi-factor authentication is available as a separate solution, and it ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Entra ID vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 21% of the time

ForgeRock vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Active Directory vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 7% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Saviynt vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 6% of the time

More Ping Identity Platform Competitors

ForgeRock vs Symantec Siteminder

Compared 31% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Symantec Siteminder

Compared 15% of the time

Okta Workforce Identity vs Symantec Siteminder

Compared 9% of the time

More Symantec Siteminder Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Ping Identity Platform

May 2025

Download Ping Identity Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

Symantec Siteminder

April 2025

Download Symantec Siteminder product report

Also Known As

Ping Identity (ID), PingFederate, PingAccess, PingOne, PingDataGovernance, PingDirectory, OpenDJ

SiteMinder, CA SSO, Layer7 SiteMinder

Overview

IDENTITY DEFINED SECURITY PLATFORM delivers a unified, standards-based platform that can be deployed as SaaS, software or both and can scale to handle millions of identities. From multi-factor authentication and single sign-on to access security, directory and data governance, our capabilities work together to give employees, partners and customers secure access to cloud, mobile and enterprise applications, securing and streamlined everything from sign-on to sign-off and everywhere in between.

Ping Identity

Symantec® SiteMinder is designed to secure the modern enterprise through a unified access management platform that applies the appropriate authentication mechanism to positively identify users; provides single sign-on and identity federation for seamless access to any application; enforces granular security policies to stop unauthorized access to sensitive resources; and monitors and manages the entire user session to prevent session hijacking. Finally, Symantec SiteMinder is battle-tested and has been deployed in the largest IT environments in the world.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Equinix, Land O'Lakes, CDPHP, Box, International SOS, Opower, VSP, Chevron, Truist, Academy of Art University, Northern Air Cargo, Repsol

British Telecom, CoreBlox, DBS, HMS, Itera ASA and Simeo

Buyer's Guide

Ping Identity Platform vs. Symantec Siteminder

May 2025

Free Report: Ping Identity Platform vs. Symantec Siteminder

Find out what your peers are saying about Ping Identity Platform vs. Symantec Siteminder and other solutions. Updated: May 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Ping Identity Platform vs. Symantec Siteminder report.

See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors and best Access Management vendors.

We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.