Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Symantec Siteminder Logo

Top 10 Symantec Siteminder Alternatives

Vendor: Broadcom
4.0 out of 5
Badge Ranked 1
1,181 followers
Start review

Top Symantec Siteminder Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Symantec Siteminder based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identity, and Auth0. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Symantec Siteminder surpasses its competitors by offering robust access management, seamless single sign-on capabilities, and comprehensive security features that ensure scalable enterprise solutions, enhancing user experience and protecting sensitive data efficiently.

Broadcom Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Broadcom, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Symantec Siteminder Logo
Microsoft Entra ID
4.3 out of 5
Symantec Siteminder Logo
Microsoft Entra ID
4.3 out of 5
Symantec Siteminder is known for its robust security policies and integration options. In comparison, Microsoft Entra ID offers advanced identity protection and seamless Microsoft service integration. Symantec Siteminder requires a steep learning curve, while Microsoft Entra ID needs better customization. Symantec Siteminder’s support is strong, whereas Microsoft Entra ID provides smoother deployment.
Download Microsoft Entra ID vs. Symantec Siteminder Report
Symantec Siteminder has higher setup costs compared to Microsoft Entra ID, making it less economical initially.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
Symantec Siteminder has higher setup costs compared to Microsoft Entra ID, making it less economical initially.
Symantec Siteminder Logo
Symantec Siteminder Logo
Okta Workforce Identity
4.3 out of 5
Symantec Siteminder offers reliable access management and robust security, praised for cost-effectiveness but needing improved configuration and documentation. In comparison, Okta Workforce Identity stands out for its integration options and ease of deployment, despite higher costs, delivering superior ROI and customer support.
Download Okta Workforce Identity vs. Symantec Siteminder Report
Symantec Siteminder has a higher setup cost compared to Okta Workforce Identity, which offers a more affordable initial setup. Siteminder's implementation process is complex, while Okta provides a more streamlined and user-friendly setup experience.
View comparison
Pricing
Symantec Siteminder has a higher setup cost compared to Okta Workforce Identity, which offers a more affordable initial setup. Siteminder's implementation process is complex, while Okta provides a more streamlined and user-friendly setup experience.
Symantec Siteminder Logo
Auth0
4.2 out of 5
Symantec Siteminder Logo
Auth0
4.2 out of 5
Symantec Siteminder is chosen for its policy-driven security features and extensive integration capabilities. In comparison, Auth0 provides multi-factor authentication and excellent developer support. Symantec Siteminder offers thorough customer service, while Auth0 delivers a smoother deployment and flexible pricing, making it attractive for tech buyers.
Download Auth0 vs. Symantec Siteminder Report
Symantec Siteminder requires a higher setup cost compared to Auth0, which has a more budget-friendly initial expense for users.
View comparison
Pricing
Symantec Siteminder requires a higher setup cost compared to Auth0, which has a more budget-friendly initial expense for users.
Symantec Siteminder Logo
Symantec Siteminder Logo
Ping Identity Platform
4.1 out of 5
Symantec Siteminder attracts budget-conscious buyers with competitive pricing and comprehensive support. In comparison, Ping Identity Platform offers advanced features and modern deployment options, appealing to organizations seeking flexibility and wide integration capabilities for detailed identity management solutions.
Download Ping Identity Platform vs. Symantec Siteminder Report
Symantec Siteminder involves a higher setup cost, while Ping Identity Platform offers a more economical initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Symantec Siteminder involves a higher setup cost, while Ping Identity Platform offers a more economical initial investment.
Symantec Siteminder Logo
ForgeRock
4.0 out of 5
Symantec Siteminder Logo
ForgeRock
4.0 out of 5
Symantec Siteminder stands out for strong security protocols and scalability. In comparison, ForgeRock excels in extensive integration capabilities and detailed configuration options. Symantec Siteminder offers lower initial setup costs. ForgeRock justifies higher costs through advanced features and extended capabilities.
Download ForgeRock vs. Symantec Siteminder Report
Symantec Siteminder setup costs are higher due to extensive customization options, while ForgeRock offers a more affordable setup with fewer configuration needs.
View comparison
Pricing
Symantec Siteminder setup costs are higher due to extensive customization options, while ForgeRock offers a more affordable setup with fewer configuration needs.
Symantec Siteminder Logo
Symantec Siteminder Logo
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)
4.1 out of 5
Symantec Siteminder offers strong security and extensive integrations. In comparison, F5 BIG-IP APM excels in scalability and customization. Symantec Siteminder has a steep learning curve, while F5 BIG-IP APM's setup complexity is notable. Symantec Siteminder's pricing is contentious, whereas F5 BIG-IP APM is seen as justified.
Download F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) vs. Symantec Siteminder Report
Symantec Siteminder generally has higher setup costs compared to F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM), which tends to offer more budget-friendly setup options.
View comparison
Pricing
Symantec Siteminder generally has higher setup costs compared to F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM), which tends to offer more budget-friendly setup options.
Symantec Siteminder Logo
CyberArk Identity
4.1 out of 5
Symantec Siteminder Logo
CyberArk Identity
4.1 out of 5
Symantec Siteminder offers robust access control and secure authentication, appealing to organizations needing strong security measures. In comparison, CyberArk Identity excels with advanced identity management and seamless cloud integration. While Symantec has a lower initial cost, CyberArk delivers superior long-term ROI due to enhanced functionality.
Download CyberArk Identity vs. Symantec Siteminder Report
Symantec Siteminder has a higher setup cost compared to CyberArk Identity, which offers a more cost-effective initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Symantec Siteminder has a higher setup cost compared to CyberArk Identity, which offers a more cost-effective initial setup.
Symantec Siteminder Logo
Symantec Siteminder Logo
IBM Security Verify Access
3.9 out of 5
Symantec Siteminder is favored for its pricing and support, offering robust security features and easy integration. In comparison, IBM Security Verify Access offers advanced access controls and a variety of authentication methods. Symantec requires simplified setup, while IBM needs better documentation and configuration flexibility.
Download IBM Security Verify Access vs. Symantec Siteminder Report
Symantec Siteminder typically has higher setup costs compared to IBM Security Verify Access, making the latter a more budget-friendly choice.
View comparison
Pricing
Symantec Siteminder typically has higher setup costs compared to IBM Security Verify Access, making the latter a more budget-friendly choice.
Symantec Siteminder Logo
Symantec Siteminder Logo
Red Hat Single Sign On
4.3 out of 5
Symantec Siteminder is noted for its robust security features and seamless integrations. In comparison, Red Hat Single Sign On excels in flexibility due to its open-source nature. Symantec Siteminder enjoys simpler deployment, while Red Hat Single Sign On offers better long-term ROI and customization.
Download Red Hat Single Sign On vs. Symantec Siteminder Report
Symantec Siteminder setup cost is higher due to extensive features and customization, while Red Hat Single Sign On offers a lower initial setup cost with a more streamlined deployment. Differences in setup costs highlight varying approaches and capabilities in each solution.
View comparison
Pricing
Symantec Siteminder setup cost is higher due to extensive features and customization, while Red Hat Single Sign On offers a lower initial setup cost with a more streamlined deployment. Differences in setup costs highlight varying approaches and capabilities in each solution.
Symantec Siteminder Logo
Symantec Siteminder Logo
Oracle Access Manager
3.9 out of 5
Symantec Siteminder excels in robust authentication and seamless integration, making it ideal for secure environments. In comparison, Oracle Access Manager provides better support for cloud environments and flexible authentication options. Oracle Access Manager, with superior customer support, justifies higher upfront costs for better long-term ROI.
Download Oracle Access Manager vs. Symantec Siteminder Report
Symantec Siteminder has a moderate setup cost, while Oracle Access Manager incurs a higher initial setup expense.
View comparison
Pricing
Symantec Siteminder has a moderate setup cost, while Oracle Access Manager incurs a higher initial setup expense.
Symantec Siteminder Logo
Symantec Siteminder Logo
NetIQ Access Manager
4.0 out of 5
Symantec Siteminder offers comprehensive security features, while NetIQ Access Manager excels in integration capabilities. In comparison, NetIQ Access Manager provides competitive pricing and ease of deployment. Symantec Siteminder's robust security protocols come with high setup costs, offering solid ROI.
Download NetIQ Access Manager vs. Symantec Siteminder Report
Symantec Siteminder has a higher setup cost compared to NetIQ Access Manager, which offers a more affordable initial implementation. Symantec Siteminder's pricing is aimed at larger enterprises, while NetIQ Access Manager caters to smaller budgets.
View comparison
Pricing
Symantec Siteminder has a higher setup cost compared to NetIQ Access Manager, which offers a more affordable initial implementation. Symantec Siteminder's pricing is aimed at larger enterprises, while NetIQ Access Manager caters to smaller budgets.
Symantec Siteminder Logo
Symantec Siteminder Logo
i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management
4.0 out of 5
Symantec Siteminder offers robust security and seamless enterprise application integration. In comparison, i-Sprint AccessMatrix provides comprehensive access control and easy customization. Symantec Siteminder requires extensive technical expertise for deployment, while i-Sprint AccessMatrix is straightforward to deploy. Symantec Siteminder has high initial costs; however, i-Sprint AccessMatrix offers better value and quicker ROI.
Download Symantec Siteminder vs. i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management Report
Symantec Siteminder has a higher setup cost compared to i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management, making the latter a cost-effective choice for initial implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
Symantec Siteminder has a higher setup cost compared to i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management, making the latter a cost-effective choice for initial implementation.
Symantec Siteminder Logo
Symantec Siteminder Logo
IBM Tivoli Federated Identity Manager
4.0 out of 5
IBM Tivoli Federated Identity Manager provides web and federated single sign-on (SSO) to users across multiple applications. It uses federated SSO for security-rich information sharing for private, public and hybrid cloud deployments. With it you can enable security-rich business collaboration in the cloud.
Our customers pay for the license every year or every three years. It's not available on a monthly basis.
View comparison
Pricing
Our customers pay for the license every year or every three years. It's not available on a monthly basis.

Related categories

Single Sign-On (SSO)
Access Management
Web Access Management