F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) vs Symantec Siteminder comparison

F5 and Broadcom are both solutions in the Access Management category. F5 is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.4, while Broadcom is ranked #13 with an average rating of 6.8. F5 holds a 2.2% mindshare in AM, compared to Broadcom’s 2.8% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of F5 users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Man...

Read 18 F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) reviews

3,270 Views
752 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Symantec Siteminder

Read 75 Symantec Siteminder reviews

2,692 Views
1,804 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Man...

Symantec Siteminder

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 11, 2024

Symantec Siteminder and F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) are both robust access management solutions. F5 BIG-IP APM seems to have the upper hand due to its advanced functionalities and superior security capabilities despite its higher costs.

Features: Symantec Siteminder is praised for its comprehensive authentication capabilities, seamless integration with various applications, and reliability. F5 BIG-IP APM is valued for its advanced security features, strong endpoint inspection, and flexible policy creation. The primary difference is F5 BIG-IP APM's superior adaptability and security functionalities.

Room for Improvement: Users indicate that Symantec Siteminder could benefit from an easier configuration process, more intuitive management tools, and improved documentation. For F5 BIG-IP APM, users suggest better documentation, reduction of complexity in certain features, and streamlined user interface. Needed improvements for Symantec Siteminder are focused on usability, whereas for F5 BIG-IP APM, simplifying complex setups is key.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Symantec Siteminder is often highlighted for its straightforward deployment but requires significant time for proper setup and customization. Customer service receives mixed feedback, with room for constructive support enhancements. F5 BIG-IP APM, while more complex to deploy, is backed by strong customer service that aids in navigating its setup intricacies. F5 BIG-IP APM's customer support provides a more reliable framework that can ease the deployment process.

Pricing and ROI: Symantec Siteminder's costs are generally seen as acceptable relative to the features provided, with a decent return on investment reported by many users. F5 BIG-IP APM is noted to be more expensive, but users often find the pricing justified by its robust features and higher security capabilities. The return on investment for F5 BIG-IP APM is perceived to be strong despite the higher initial setup costs.

To learn more, read our detailed F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) vs. Symantec Siteminder Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) vs. Symantec Siteminder

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,933 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Man...

Ranking in Access Management

11th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Secure Web Gateways (SWG) (13th), Network Access Control (NAC) (8th), SSL VPN (5th), Remote Access (11th)

Symantec Siteminder

Ranking in Access Management

13th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Single Sign-On (SSO) (13th), Web Access Management (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Access Management category, the mindshare of F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) is 2.2%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Symantec Siteminder is 2.8%, down from 3.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Access Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)	2.2%
Symantec Siteminder	2.8%
Other	95.0%

Access Management

Featured Reviews

SÜ

SalihUcpinar

Senior Cyber Security Consultant at KoçSistem

Has provided reliable policy controls and secure web access for large enterprises

I consider Cloudflare when evaluating centralized access control features; Cloudflare utilizes multi-factor authentication and full API support, while F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) needs to enhance its API support. I recommend F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) for large companies such as Tüpraş and Ford. Tüpraş is one of the biggest companies in Turkey, along with other customers such as Tofaş, Euroko, Koç Holding, and more. For on-premises deployment, I would rate it a 10. For cloud deployment, I would rate it a seven. I primarily use it on-premises. I rate F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) eight out of ten.

Read full review

Muzi Lubisi

Senior technical Consultant at CA Africa

Improved user experience with seamless integration and easy installation

The feature that I mostly valued is the ease of installation on different systems, especially on Windows. Additionally, it is very beneficial for deploying single sign-on sessions between different windows on a web browser, provided I am connected to the right identity provider. That seamless integration significantly improves user experience and efficiency.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the virtual IP creation. It's our most frequently used feature."

"I recommend F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) to others due to its reliability, and it is perceived as critical to security infrastructure."

"In my opinion, the GUI is perfect with the configuration options provided. F5 BIG-IP has given customization options and policy configuration tools in the GUI. It's good and good enough to work."

"Our customers have never complained about the stability"

"The performance of the solution is valuable."

"This is a product that is easy to install and integrate, and it is simple to use."

"The F5 Access Policy Manager is something that I have experience with and I am happy with it."

"A lot of features are useful to me, including mostly the authentication, SAML, or SSO, with no sign-on."

More F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) pros

"Right now, federation that comes out-of-the-box with single sign-on is the most valuable feature that we have, and also scalability."

"SAML is the best thing we're using right now because there is no need for creating an external account."

"Once we have our authentication and authorization policies set, they are easy to duplicate across all our applications instead of trying to develop them into each application individually."

"It is a pretty complete product."

"The feature that I mostly valued is the ease of installation on different systems, especially on Windows."

"It's our single solution for managing user authentication."

"It will definitely help any company achieve their single sign on goal."

"Right now, federation that comes out-of-the-box with single sign-on is the most valuable feature that we have, and also scalability."

More Symantec Siteminder pros

Cons

"The main improvement needed for F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) is to integrate into the cloud-delivered services from F5."

"F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager has room for improvement in integration with other products."

"Cloud services are something that F5 Access Policy Manager could do better"

"We do not have knowledgeable support teams locally."

"The solution’s GUI looks very old."

"F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) does not have a direction for SaaS."

"Integrating identity providers and single sign-on solutions can simplify user authentication and access control."

"Cloud services are something that F5 Access Policy Manager could do better."

More F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) cons

"The GUIs are not very clear, especially when integrating with other products from CA."

"An area Siteminder could improve on is that there are a few limitations, in terms of new protocols for OpenID. If I want to have different scopes, the features are limited. They also do not have APIs exposed, which is a major drawback. API is a feature I would like to see included in the next release."

"The initial setup was complex, painful. But that is to be expected of any new setup. When you're a big bank like us, any kind of migration to a new product is hard. I expect it to be painful, and it was painful. But it's not something that you can avoid."

"It's not user friendly, but it's very customizable."

"I think they need to integrate some of the newer types of authentication into the product."

"We would like to the OAuth be more stable, more issues being fixed rather than not."

"As we are moving in to the mobility space, this is where we really see SiteMinder and their other product really come together to provide a solution base to a different area where the IoT is coming, the different business communications are happening. All of those things require authentication and we really want to see this product grow into that role."

"It seems that when there's a new version, patch, or service pack, we find bugs."

More Symantec Siteminder cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is very expensive."

"The tool is a little bit expensive."

"I rate the tool's pricing an eight out of ten."

"Recently, they have simplified the licensing"

"The licensing is fair for this solution."

"The pricing is reasonable."

"I recommend conducting a PoC on every available product before choose one."

"The solution's pricing is competitive."

"CA solutions are generally expensive but for the customer the ROI is big."

"The price is quite comparable to the other enterprise-level solutions in that market."

"Symantec Siteminder is expensive; they could definitely do better on the price."

"Siteminder is a little costly. You pay for licensing, and they offer packages, so if you have less users, then you have to buy different products at different prices. If you have more of a user base, then the package is different. They also include other features—for example, if you have a database and you're using Siteminder, then it's good to use a Semantic-specific database, but if you are using less, then you have to purchase the database separately. Whereas if you are going for a bigger license, then it comes within the package. It depends on which plan you are using."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Access Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Government

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

23%

Insurance Company

Marketing Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	9

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	69

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)?

In my opinion, the GUI is perfect with the configuration options provided. F5 BIG-IP has given customization options and policy configuration tools in the GUI. It's good and good enough to work.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)?

F5 products are more expensive than other solutions but are valued for their quality and reliability, akin to purchasing a Bentley as opposed to an Audi.

See all answers

What needs improvement with F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)?

F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) is not user-friendly and operates slowly. Additional features for architecture such as Anycast would be beneficial. The ability to run the Anycast feature woul...

See all answers

What do you like most about Symantec Siteminder?

It's agent-based. It's convenient to deploy and integrate.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Symantec Siteminder?

My experience with pricing is that it is all good.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Symantec Siteminder?

Symantec Siteminder needs to have adaptive authentication and multi-factor authentication as integrated features. Currently, multi-factor authentication is available as a separate solution, and it ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Fortinet FortiGate vs F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)

Compared 5% of the time

Ivanti Connect Secure vs F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)

Compared 5% of the time

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)

Compared 5% of the time

Citrix Gateway vs F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)

Compared 4% of the time

Symantec Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) vs F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)

Compared 4% of the time

More F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Competitors

Ping Identity Platform vs Symantec Siteminder

Compared 13% of the time

Okta Platform vs Symantec Siteminder

Compared 11% of the time

Keeper Enterprise Password Manager vs Symantec Siteminder

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Symantec Siteminder

Compared 7% of the time

Symantec VIP Access Manager vs Symantec Siteminder

Compared 3% of the time

More Symantec Siteminder Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)

March 2026

F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) report

Download F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) product report

Buyer's Guide

Symantec Siteminder

February 2026

Download Symantec Siteminder product report

Also Known As

F5 Access Policy Manager

SiteMinder, CA SSO, Layer7 SiteMinder

Overview

F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) is an access management proxy solution for managing global access to the enterprise networks, cloud providers, applications, and application programming interfaces (APIs). Through a single management interface, BIG-IP APM consolidates remote, mobile, network, virtual, and web access.

BIG-IP APM can also serve as a bridge between modern and classic authentication and authorization protocols and methods. For applications which are unable to support modern authentication and authorization protocols, like SAML and OAuth with OIDC, but which do support classic authentication methods, BIG-IP APM converts user credentials to the appropriate authentication standard supported by the application.

BIG-IP APM Benefits:

Ease of use
Flexibility
Ability to integrate with other systems
Security features
Granular access control
Responsive and helpful support team

BIG-IP APM Features:

Support for Identity Aware Proxy (IAP) enabling Zero Trust application access
Context-based authorization with dynamic L4/L7 ACLs
Integration with third-party MFA solutions
DTLS 2.0 mode for delivering and securing applications
SAML 2.0 identity federation support
Support for OAuth 2.0 authorization protocol
SSO support for classic authentication (Kerberos, header- based, etc.), credential caching, OAuth 2.0, SAML 2.0, and FIDO2 (U2F)
AAA server authentication and high-availability
Integration with leading IAM vendor products (Microsoft, Okta, Ping Identity)
BIG IP Edge Client and F5 Access integrate with VMware Horizon ONE (AirWatch), Microsoft Intune and IBM MaaS360
Risk-based access leveraging third-party UEBA and risk engines (HTTP Connector)

Reviews from Real Users

Below are some reviews and helpful feedback written by BIG-IP APM users.

Mahmmoud Rabie, Senior Site Reliability Engineer, writes that BIG-IP APM is "A highly stable solution for load balancing, but the initial setup is complex."

Clyde Livingston, Senior Process Specialist at Telstra, says that BIG-IP APM is "Easy to use, useful access remotely, but lacking stability."

Chris Lam, Senior Solution Consultant at Macroview Telecom Limited, states that BIG-IP APM is "Useful for remote access VPN and VPI integration with VMware.

Symantec® SiteMinder is designed to secure the modern enterprise through a unified access management platform that applies the appropriate authentication mechanism to positively identify users; provides single sign-on and identity federation for seamless access to any application; enforces granular security policies to stop unauthorized access to sensitive resources; and monitors and manages the entire user session to prevent session hijacking. Finally, Symantec SiteMinder is battle-tested and has been deployed in the largest IT environments in the world.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

City Bank, Ricacorp Properties, Miele, American Systems, Bangladesh Post Office

British Telecom, CoreBlox, DBS, HMS, Itera ASA and Simeo

Buyer's Guide

F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) vs. Symantec Siteminder

March 2026

Free Report: F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) vs. Symantec Siteminder

Find out what your peers are saying about F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) vs. Symantec Siteminder and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) vs. Symantec Siteminder report.

See our list of best Access Management vendors.

We monitor all Access Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.