F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) vs Symantec Siteminder comparison

F5 and Broadcom are both solutions in the Access Management category. F5 is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.3, while Broadcom is ranked #11 with an average rating of 6.8. F5 holds a 2.0% mindshare in AM, compared to Broadcom’s 3.0% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of F5 users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Man...

Read 18 F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) reviews

2,814 Views
619 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Symantec Siteminder

Read 75 Symantec Siteminder reviews

2,039 Views
1,387 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Man...

Symantec Siteminder

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 11, 2024

Symantec Siteminder and F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) are both robust access management solutions. F5 BIG-IP APM seems to have the upper hand due to its advanced functionalities and superior security capabilities despite its higher costs.

Features: Symantec Siteminder is praised for its comprehensive authentication capabilities, seamless integration with various applications, and reliability. F5 BIG-IP APM is valued for its advanced security features, strong endpoint inspection, and flexible policy creation. The primary difference is F5 BIG-IP APM's superior adaptability and security functionalities.

Room for Improvement: Users indicate that Symantec Siteminder could benefit from an easier configuration process, more intuitive management tools, and improved documentation. For F5 BIG-IP APM, users suggest better documentation, reduction of complexity in certain features, and streamlined user interface. Needed improvements for Symantec Siteminder are focused on usability, whereas for F5 BIG-IP APM, simplifying complex setups is key.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Symantec Siteminder is often highlighted for its straightforward deployment but requires significant time for proper setup and customization. Customer service receives mixed feedback, with room for constructive support enhancements. F5 BIG-IP APM, while more complex to deploy, is backed by strong customer service that aids in navigating its setup intricacies. F5 BIG-IP APM's customer support provides a more reliable framework that can ease the deployment process.

Pricing and ROI: Symantec Siteminder's costs are generally seen as acceptable relative to the features provided, with a decent return on investment reported by many users. F5 BIG-IP APM is noted to be more expensive, but users often find the pricing justified by its robust features and higher security capabilities. The return on investment for F5 BIG-IP APM is perceived to be strong despite the higher initial setup costs.

To learn more, read our detailed F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) vs. Symantec Siteminder Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) vs. Symantec Siteminder

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Man...

Ranking in Access Management

9th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Secure Web Gateways (SWG) (15th), Network Access Control (NAC) (7th), SSL VPN (5th), Remote Access (10th)

Symantec Siteminder

Ranking in Access Management

11th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Single Sign-On (SSO) (13th), Web Access Management (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Access Management category, the mindshare of F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) is 2.0%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Symantec Siteminder is 3.0%, down from 3.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Access Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)	2.0%
Symantec Siteminder	3.0%
Other	95.0%

Access Management

Featured Reviews

SÜ

SalihUcpinar

Senior Cyber Security Consultant at KoçSistem

Has provided reliable policy controls and secure web access for large enterprises

I consider Cloudflare when evaluating centralized access control features; Cloudflare utilizes multi-factor authentication and full API support, while F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) needs to enhance its API support. I recommend F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) for large companies such as Tüpraş and Ford. Tüpraş is one of the biggest companies in Turkey, along with other customers such as Tofaş, Euroko, Koç Holding, and more. For on-premises deployment, I would rate it a 10. For cloud deployment, I would rate it a seven. I primarily use it on-premises. I rate F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) eight out of ten.

Read full review

Muzi Lubisi

Senior technical Consultant at CA Africa

Improved user experience with seamless integration and easy installation

The feature that I mostly valued is the ease of installation on different systems, especially on Windows. Additionally, it is very beneficial for deploying single sign-on sessions between different windows on a web browser, provided I am connected to the right identity provider. That seamless integration significantly improves user experience and efficiency.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This is a product that is easy to install and integrate, and it is simple to use."

"In my opinion, the GUI is perfect with the configuration options provided. F5 BIG-IP has given customization options and policy configuration tools in the GUI. It's good and good enough to work."

"The performance of the solution is valuable."

"The load balancing features are valuable."

"On a scale from one to ten for stability, I would rate F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) a ten."

"Stickiness is the most valuable feature of the product."

"We have seen a return on investment from F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager. It provided access at a time when we didn't have it."

"Our organization is small - a college with about 3,500 students. We use F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager to protect our site, especially from the Iranian attacks we faced last year. We restrict access to only inside the country."

More F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) pros

"The Directory is secure. It's our user store, and it's important to keep our members safe. The product does well with that."

"It has the ability to authenticate and authorize users. It is the main feature for our security."

"As our identity model continues to mature, probably the Federation is most valueable."

"The most valuable feature is that it meets the requirements of the customer. You have a lot of features in the product. Every product has them, but the question is, are these products going to meet the requirement of the customer?"

"Federation is valuable, for sure, because we have a lot of third-party vendors that we need to integrate with, and this is a turnkey solution in some ways."

"The most valuable feature is the integration with the Active Directory."

"It is reliable."

"We almost never have outages nor see slowdowns."

More Symantec Siteminder pros

Cons

"The technical support’s response time must be improved."

"F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) does not have a direction for SaaS."

"The solution is quite costly."

"Cloud services are something that F5 Access Policy Manager could do better"

"Integrating identity providers and single sign-on solutions can simplify user authentication and access control."

"The solution’s GUI looks very old."

"The price of this product can be improved."

"If I could copy and paste objects instead of picking and configuring them from scratch each time, it would be great."

More F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) cons

"The initial setup was complex, painful. But that is to be expected of any new setup. When you're a big bank like us, any kind of migration to a new product is hard. I expect it to be painful, and it was painful. But it's not something that you can avoid."

"They need to make configurations easier, and not have the engineer having to guess what will happen when he changes a particular setting."

"I'd like to see a rework of the user directory configuration."

"The main thing is we do not have the traceability and good monitoring that CA can provide us to capture problems when they occur."

"I would like to see a move towards the newer technologies, which is what we are doing right now. I think that's in the roadmap that's coming, in the 12.8 and 14 releases, but we would like to have it sooner than later."

"CA has reporting at the moment. With the reporting, every particular segmented product has a reporting engine. I would like to see centralized reporting for all of them together."

"To add more value to this solution it needs to be more user-friendly."

"The technical support could be better."

More Symantec Siteminder cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is very expensive."

"I rate the tool's pricing an eight out of ten."

"Recently, they have simplified the licensing"

"The tool is a little bit expensive."

"Siteminder is a little costly. You pay for licensing, and they offer packages, so if you have less users, then you have to buy different products at different prices. If you have more of a user base, then the package is different. They also include other features—for example, if you have a database and you're using Siteminder, then it's good to use a Semantic-specific database, but if you are using less, then you have to purchase the database separately. Whereas if you are going for a bigger license, then it comes within the package. It depends on which plan you are using."

"Symantec Siteminder is expensive; they could definitely do better on the price."

"The price is quite comparable to the other enterprise-level solutions in that market."

"The licensing is fair for this solution."

"CA solutions are generally expensive but for the customer the ROI is big."

"The solution's pricing is competitive."

"I recommend conducting a PoC on every available product before choose one."

"The pricing is reasonable."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Access Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Government

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

26%

Insurance Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	9

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	69

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)?

In my opinion, the GUI is perfect with the configuration options provided. F5 BIG-IP has given customization options and policy configuration tools in the GUI. It's good and good enough to work.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)?

F5 products are more expensive than other solutions but are valued for their quality and reliability, akin to purchasing a Bentley as opposed to an Audi.

See all answers

What needs improvement with F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)?

F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) is not user-friendly and operates slowly. Additional features for architecture such as Anycast would be beneficial. The ability to run the Anycast feature woul...

See all answers

What do you like most about Symantec Siteminder?

It's agent-based. It's convenient to deploy and integrate.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Symantec Siteminder?

My experience with pricing is that it is all good.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Symantec Siteminder?

Symantec Siteminder needs to have adaptive authentication and multi-factor authentication as integrated features. Currently, multi-factor authentication is available as a separate solution, and it ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Ivanti Connect Secure vs F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)

Compared 6% of the time

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)

Compared 5% of the time

Fortinet FortiGate vs F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)

Compared 5% of the time

Citrix Gateway vs F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)

Compared 5% of the time

Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) vs F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)

Compared 4% of the time

More F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Competitors

Ping Identity Platform vs Symantec Siteminder

Compared 21% of the time

Okta Platform vs Symantec Siteminder

Compared 13% of the time

ForgeRock vs Symantec Siteminder

Compared 10% of the time

Keeper Enterprise Password Manager vs Symantec Siteminder

Compared 10% of the time

Akamai Identity Cloud vs Symantec Siteminder

Compared 3% of the time

More Symantec Siteminder Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)

January 2026

F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) report

Download F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) product report

Buyer's Guide

Symantec Siteminder

January 2026

Download Symantec Siteminder product report

Also Known As

F5 Access Policy Manager

SiteMinder, CA SSO, Layer7 SiteMinder

Overview

F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) is an access management proxy solution for managing global access to the enterprise networks, cloud providers, applications, and application programming interfaces (APIs). Through a single management interface, BIG-IP APM consolidates remote, mobile, network, virtual, and web access.

BIG-IP APM can also serve as a bridge between modern and classic authentication and authorization protocols and methods. For applications which are unable to support modern authentication and authorization protocols, like SAML and OAuth with OIDC, but which do support classic authentication methods, BIG-IP APM converts user credentials to the appropriate authentication standard supported by the application.

BIG-IP APM Benefits:

Ease of use
Flexibility
Ability to integrate with other systems
Security features
Granular access control
Responsive and helpful support team

BIG-IP APM Features:

Support for Identity Aware Proxy (IAP) enabling Zero Trust application access
Context-based authorization with dynamic L4/L7 ACLs
Integration with third-party MFA solutions
DTLS 2.0 mode for delivering and securing applications
SAML 2.0 identity federation support
Support for OAuth 2.0 authorization protocol
SSO support for classic authentication (Kerberos, header- based, etc.), credential caching, OAuth 2.0, SAML 2.0, and FIDO2 (U2F)
AAA server authentication and high-availability
Integration with leading IAM vendor products (Microsoft, Okta, Ping Identity)
BIG IP Edge Client and F5 Access integrate with VMware Horizon ONE (AirWatch), Microsoft Intune and IBM MaaS360
Risk-based access leveraging third-party UEBA and risk engines (HTTP Connector)

Reviews from Real Users

Below are some reviews and helpful feedback written by BIG-IP APM users.

Mahmmoud Rabie, Senior Site Reliability Engineer, writes that BIG-IP APM is "A highly stable solution for load balancing, but the initial setup is complex."

Clyde Livingston, Senior Process Specialist at Telstra, says that BIG-IP APM is "Easy to use, useful access remotely, but lacking stability."

Chris Lam, Senior Solution Consultant at Macroview Telecom Limited, states that BIG-IP APM is "Useful for remote access VPN and VPI integration with VMware.

Symantec® SiteMinder is designed to secure the modern enterprise through a unified access management platform that applies the appropriate authentication mechanism to positively identify users; provides single sign-on and identity federation for seamless access to any application; enforces granular security policies to stop unauthorized access to sensitive resources; and monitors and manages the entire user session to prevent session hijacking. Finally, Symantec SiteMinder is battle-tested and has been deployed in the largest IT environments in the world.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

City Bank, Ricacorp Properties, Miele, American Systems, Bangladesh Post Office

British Telecom, CoreBlox, DBS, HMS, Itera ASA and Simeo

Buyer's Guide

F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) vs. Symantec Siteminder

December 2025

Free Report: F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) vs. Symantec Siteminder

Find out what your peers are saying about F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) vs. Symantec Siteminder and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) vs. Symantec Siteminder report.

See our list of best Access Management vendors.

We monitor all Access Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.