No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo

Top 10 F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Alternatives

Vendor: F5
4.1 out of 5
Leave a review

Top F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Fortinet FortiGate, Microsoft Intune, and Microsoft Entra ID. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) surpasses its competitors by offering seamless identity and access management, secure application access, and comprehensive user authentication features ensuring robust security and improved performance for enterprises across various industries.

F5 Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with F5, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
Fortinet FortiGate
4.2 out of 5
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
Fortinet FortiGate
4.2 out of 5
Fortinet FortiGate appeals with cost-efficiency and user-friendly network security features like SD-WAN. In comparison, F5 BIG-IP APM offers extensive access management and detailed control, ideal for complex application security needs despite higher costs.
Download F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) vs. Fortinet FortiGate Report
Fortinet FortiGate offers a competitive setup cost that is generally lower than F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM), making FortiGate a cost-effective choice for initial implementation compared to APM's comprehensive but higher-priced setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiGate offers a competitive setup cost that is generally lower than F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM), making FortiGate a cost-effective choice for initial implementation compared to APM's comprehensive but higher-priced setup.
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
Microsoft Intune
4.1 out of 5
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
Microsoft Intune
4.1 out of 5
Microsoft Intune excels in device management within the Microsoft ecosystem, offering seamless integration and conditional access for cohesive security. In comparison, F5 APM targets secure remote access with extensive authentication protocols, fitting complex security environments.
Download F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) vs. Microsoft Intune Report
Microsoft Intune offers a straightforward setup with lower initial costs, while F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) requires a more complex setup and higher initial expenditure.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Intune offers a straightforward setup with lower initial costs, while F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) requires a more complex setup and higher initial expenditure.
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
Microsoft Entra ID
4.3 out of 5
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
Microsoft Entra ID
4.3 out of 5
Microsoft Entra ID excels in seamless integration with other Microsoft services and cloud-based features. In comparison, F5 BIG-IP APM offers granular access controls and extensive policy customization for complex IT environments. Microsoft Entra ID is cost-effective, while F5 BIG-IP APM provides significant ROI for advanced needs.
Download F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) vs. Microsoft Entra ID Report
Microsoft Entra ID offers a lower setup cost compared to F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM), which has a significantly higher initial expense.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Entra ID offers a lower setup cost compared to F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM), which has a significantly higher initial expense.
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
Cloudflare One
4.3 out of 5
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
Cloudflare One
4.3 out of 5
F5 BIG-IP APM offers advanced customization and diverse authentication protocols for enterprise environments. In comparison, Cloudflare One prides itself on ease of use and streamlined deployment. F5 BIG-IP APM caters to complex needs, while Cloudflare One fits smaller businesses seeking cost-effective solutions.
Download Cloudflare One vs. F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Report
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) has a higher setup cost compared to Cloudflare One, which offers a more budget-friendly option.
View comparison
Pricing
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) has a higher setup cost compared to Cloudflare One, which offers a more budget-friendly option.
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
Cisco Umbrella
4.4 out of 5
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
Cisco Umbrella
4.4 out of 5
Cisco Umbrella offers robust DNS protection and easy integration with Cisco products, enhancing threat response. In comparison, F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager provides secure remote access with strong policy management. Tech buyers choose based on DNS protection versus remote access needs.
Download Cisco Umbrella vs. F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Report
Cisco Umbrella offers a low setup cost with straightforward deployment, while F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) may require a higher investment and more complex configuration, highlighting a key difference in initial financial and technical commitment.
View comparison
Pricing
Cisco Umbrella offers a low setup cost with straightforward deployment, while F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) may require a higher investment and more complex configuration, highlighting a key difference in initial financial and technical commitment.
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks
4.1 out of 5
Prisma Access offers a unified cloud-native firewall and superior data inspection, making it ideal for seamless app access. In comparison, F5 BIG-IP APM specializes in secure remote access and portal customization, appealing to users needing strong integration with existing infrastructures.
Download F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) vs. Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks Report
Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks typically has a lower setup cost compared to F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM), making it more attractive for cost-conscious businesses.
View comparison
Pricing
Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks typically has a lower setup cost compared to F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM), making it more attractive for cost-conscious businesses.
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
Okta Platform
4.3 out of 5
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
Okta Platform
4.3 out of 5
Okta Platform excels in identity management with adaptive MFA, SSO, and flexible cloud deployment. In comparison, F5 BIG-IP APM offers robust security with extensive protocol support but is more expensive. Okta's competitive pricing contrasts with F5's premium cost for advanced security needs.
Download F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) vs. Okta Platform Report
The Okta Platform typically involves a lower initial setup cost than F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM), which is known for higher upfront investment.
View comparison
Pricing
The Okta Platform typically involves a lower initial setup cost than F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM), which is known for higher upfront investment.
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
Zscaler Internet Access
4.2 out of 5
Zscaler offers comprehensive cloud security with features like SSL inspection and cloud sandboxing. In comparison, F5 BIG-IP APM focuses on robust access management and customization, appealing to those who prioritize login and portal access capabilities. Both solutions provide strong security, with differing areas of emphasis.
Download F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) vs. Zscaler Internet Access Report
Zscaler Internet Access has a lower setup cost, making it more budget-friendly, whereas F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) requires a higher setup investment, often justified by its comprehensive control features.
View comparison
Pricing
Zscaler Internet Access has a lower setup cost, making it more budget-friendly, whereas F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) requires a higher setup investment, often justified by its comprehensive control features.
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE)
4.1 out of 5
Cisco Identity Services Engine offers robust integration within the Cisco ecosystem, ideal for Cisco-centric environments needing advanced security features. In comparison, F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager is valued for its flexibility in complex networks and solid SSL VPN capabilities, despite limited cloud integration.
Download Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) vs. F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Report
Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) generally has higher setup costs, while F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) tends to be more cost-effective in initial deployment. Pricing reflects differences in scalability and integration capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) generally has higher setup costs, while F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) tends to be more cost-effective in initial deployment. Pricing reflects differences in scalability and integration capabilities.
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
Workspace ONE UEM
4.0 out of 5
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
Workspace ONE UEM
4.0 out of 5
VMware Workspace ONE offers competitive pricing and streamlined deployment, favored for comprehensive device management and strong security. In comparison, F5 BIG-IP APM excels with advanced access control, scalability, and robust security features, despite higher costs, making it ideal for maximizing return on investment with superior support.
Download F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) vs. Workspace ONE UEM Report
VMware Workspace ONE has a lower initial setup cost compared to F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM), which has higher upfront expenses, making Workspace ONE more budget-friendly for initial deployments.
View comparison
Pricing
VMware Workspace ONE has a lower initial setup cost compared to F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM), which has higher upfront expenses, making Workspace ONE more budget-friendly for initial deployments.
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service)
4.2 out of 5
Citrix DaaS excels in flexibility and scalability, making it an attractive option for diverse business needs. In comparison, F5 BIG-IP APM is known for its robust security features, appealing to security-sensitive environments. Citrix DaaS offers superior usability, while F5 BIG-IP APM delivers comprehensive security measures.
Download Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) vs. F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Report
Citrix DaaS has a higher upfront setup cost compared to F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM), highlighting a significant difference in initial investment.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
Citrix DaaS has a higher upfront setup cost compared to F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM), highlighting a significant difference in initial investment.
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
Aruba ClearPass
4.3 out of 5
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
Aruba ClearPass
4.3 out of 5
Aruba ClearPass excels with comprehensive network security features and flexible modularity for policy management. In comparison, F5 APM efficiently handles complex authentication processes, making it valuable for large organizations. Tech buyers may prefer Aruba for integration and security, while F5 APM offers robust performance.
Download Aruba ClearPass vs. F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Report
Aruba ClearPass has a higher setup cost due to its comprehensive network access control features, while F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager offers a more budget-friendly option with its centralized user authentication capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
Aruba ClearPass has a higher setup cost due to its comprehensive network access control features, while F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager offers a more budget-friendly option with its centralized user authentication capabilities.
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81)
4.4 out of 5
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager is favored for its robust SSL VPN and customization, ideal for large enterprises needing extensive security features. In comparison, Check Point Harmony SASE offers seamless integration and ease of use, attracting businesses seeking comprehensive cloud-based security with simpler deployment.
Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Report
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) requires a substantial upfront investment for setup, whereas Check Point Harmony SASE offers a more budget-friendly setup cost option, creating a notable contrast between these two access solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) requires a substantial upfront investment for setup, whereas Check Point Harmony SASE offers a more budget-friendly setup cost option, creating a notable contrast between these two access solutions.
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
TeamViewer
4.3 out of 5
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
TeamViewer
4.3 out of 5
TeamViewer Business offers ease of use, making it ideal for small to medium businesses needing remote support and collaboration. In comparison, F5 BIG-IP APM emphasizes robust security for larger enterprises, appealing to organizations with complex authentication and stringent access requirements.
Download F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) vs. TeamViewer Report
TeamViewer Business offers straightforward setup costs, while F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) involves more complex initial setup expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
TeamViewer Business offers straightforward setup costs, while F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) involves more complex initial setup expenses.
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
Microsoft Remote Desktop Services
4.1 out of 5
Microsoft Remote Desktop Services is preferred for its pricing, support, reliability, and Microsoft product integration. In comparison, F5 BIG-IP APM is regarded for its superior feature set, comprehensive security, and scalability. A tech buyer might choose either for distinct reasons depending on their specific needs.
Download F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) vs. Microsoft Remote Desktop Services Report
Microsoft Remote Desktop Services offers a straightforward setup with competitive initial costs, while F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) tends to be more complex and expensive during deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Remote Desktop Services offers a straightforward setup with competitive initial costs, while F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) tends to be more complex and expensive during deployment.
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
Forescout Platform
4.2 out of 5
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
Forescout Platform
4.2 out of 5
Forescout Platform excels in flexible network access control, focusing on a diverse environment support without relying on 802.1x protocols. In comparison, F5 BIG-IP APM offers strong secure remote access and application delivery, preferred for environments requiring robust web application security.
Download F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) vs. Forescout Platform Report
Forescout Platform has a higher setup cost compared to the more budget-friendly F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM), highlighting a significant difference in initial financial investment for these security solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Forescout Platform has a higher setup cost compared to the more budget-friendly F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM), highlighting a significant difference in initial financial investment for these security solutions.
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
Fortinet FortiNAC
3.9 out of 5
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
Fortinet FortiNAC
3.9 out of 5
Fortinet FortiNAC is notable for its pricing and support efficiency, offering features for visibility, device profiling, and cloud integration. In comparison, F5 BIG-IP APM is preferred for large-scale environments, offering superior access management and handling complex issues effectively.
Download F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) vs. Fortinet FortiNAC Report
Fortinet FortiNAC has a lower setup cost compared to F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM), highlighting a budget-friendly advantage for FortiNAC users. In contrast, F5 BIG-IP APM tends to offer more comprehensive setup features.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiNAC has a lower setup cost compared to F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM), highlighting a budget-friendly advantage for FortiNAC users. In contrast, F5 BIG-IP APM tends to offer more comprehensive setup features.
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
Auth0 Platform
4.3 out of 5
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
Auth0 Platform
4.3 out of 5
Auth0 Platform excels with customizable authentication flows, ideal for multi-tenancy and efficient role management. In comparison, F5 BIG-IP APM specializes in load balancing and integration with authentication protocols, making it suitable for secure remote access and comprehensive VPN support.
Download Auth0 Platform vs. F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Report
Auth0 Platform typically has lower setup costs, offering a cost-efficient solution, while F5 BIG-IP APM involves a higher initial investment, reflecting its robust enterprise-level features.
View comparison
Pricing
Auth0 Platform typically has lower setup costs, offering a cost-efficient solution, while F5 BIG-IP APM involves a higher initial investment, reflecting its robust enterprise-level features.
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
Cisco Secure Client (including AnyConnect)
4.2 out of 5
F5 BIG-IP APM delivers robust security and customization for complex enterprise environments. In comparison, Cisco Secure Client, including AnyConnect, ensures straightforward and reliable connections, making it ideal for seamless integration and support in remote deployments.
Download Cisco Secure Client (including AnyConnect) vs. F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Report
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) has a higher initial setup cost compared to Cisco Secure Client with AnyConnect, which offers a more budget-friendly entry point.
View comparison
Pricing
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) has a higher initial setup cost compared to Cisco Secure Client with AnyConnect, which offers a more budget-friendly entry point.
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform
4.6 out of 5
F5 BIG-IP APM provides comprehensive secure access solutions with multi-factor authentication and load balancing. In comparison, ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform excels in application control and unauthorized software blocking, offering simplicity in deployment and a strong security posture with zero trust principles.
Download F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) vs. ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform Report
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) incurs a higher setup cost compared to the more budget-friendly setup of ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform, highlighting F5's robust initial investment needs against ThreatLocker's cost-effective entry.
View comparison
Pricing
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) incurs a higher setup cost compared to the more budget-friendly setup of ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform, highlighting F5's robust initial investment needs against ThreatLocker's cost-effective entry.
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
CyberArk Identity
4.1 out of 5
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
CyberArk Identity
4.1 out of 5
CyberArk Identity is appreciated for multi-factor authentication and single sign-on capabilities, while F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager offers advanced traffic management and security features. In comparison, CyberArk Identity benefits from simpler deployment, and F5 BIG-IP APM provides robust support, justifying its higher pricing.
Download CyberArk Identity vs. F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Report
CyberArk Identity's setup cost is considered lower compared to F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM), making CyberArk potentially more budget-friendly for organizations. In contrast, F5 BIG-IP APM offers a higher setup cost, which can indicate a more complex initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
CyberArk Identity's setup cost is considered lower compared to F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM), making CyberArk potentially more budget-friendly for organizations. In contrast, F5 BIG-IP APM offers a higher setup cost, which can indicate a more complex initial setup.
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
OneLogin
4.3 out of 5
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
OneLogin
4.3 out of 5
OneLogin prioritizes seamless integration and efficient user management through features like Single Sign-On and user provisioning. In comparison, F5 BIG-IP APM offers strong authentication protocols and secure access customization, appealing to tech buyers focused on robust security and policy management.
Download F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) vs. OneLogin Report
OneLogin's setup cost is straightforward and budget-friendly, while F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) presents a higher initial investment, reflecting its robust infrastructure.
View comparison
Pricing
OneLogin's setup cost is straightforward and budget-friendly, while F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) presents a higher initial investment, reflecting its robust infrastructure.
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
ForgeRock
4.0 out of 5
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
ForgeRock
4.0 out of 5
ForgeRock offers robust authentication and user management features with flexibility and scalability. In comparison, F5 BIG-IP APM excels in superior policy enforcement and application access controls. ForgeRock is easier to deploy, while F5 provides better ongoing support. ForgeRock is cost-effective; F5 justifies higher costs with advanced functionality.
Download F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) vs. ForgeRock Report
ForgeRock has a lower initial setup cost compared to F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM), which requires a higher investment.
View comparison
Pricing
ForgeRock has a lower initial setup cost compared to F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM), which requires a higher investment.
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
Check Point Remote Access VPN
4.4 out of 5
Check Point Remote Access VPN integrates seamlessly with its ecosystem, offering SSL VPN and multifactor authentication. In comparison, F5 BIG-IP APM excels in secure access with SAML and OAuth integration. Check Point is more budget-friendly, while F5 offers advanced protocol flexibility.
Download Check Point Remote Access VPN vs. F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Report
Check Point Remote Access VPN offers a simpler setup with lower initial costs compared to F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager, which requires significant investment for a more complex implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Remote Access VPN offers a simpler setup with lower initial costs compared to F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager, which requires significant investment for a more complex implementation.
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
Ivanti Connect Secure
3.8 out of 5
Ivanti Connect Secure provides strong VPN and SSL encryption with straightforward deployment and competitive pricing. In comparison, F5 BIG-IP APM offers extensive application support and granular access control, preferred for complex environments, despite higher costs and more challenging deployment.
Download F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) vs. Ivanti Connect Secure Report
Ivanti Connect Secure typically involves lower setup costs, providing a cost-effective option. In contrast, F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) often has higher upfront expenses, reflecting its premium positioning and extended feature set.
View comparison
Pricing
Ivanti Connect Secure typically involves lower setup costs, providing a cost-effective option. In contrast, F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) often has higher upfront expenses, reflecting its premium positioning and extended feature set.
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
ExtremeCloud IQ
4.4 out of 5
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
ExtremeCloud IQ
4.4 out of 5
ExtremeCloud IQ is ideal for seamless wireless network management with its controller-less infrastructure and cloud-based tools. In comparison, F5 BIG-IP APM offers robust policy management for secure applications. Each product addresses distinct networking needs.
Download ExtremeCloud IQ vs. F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Report
ExtremeCloud IQ offers a lower setup cost compared to F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager, which requires a more significant initial investment. While both solutions have unique strengths, the cost difference might influence budgeting decisions.
View comparison
Pricing
ExtremeCloud IQ offers a lower setup cost compared to F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager, which requires a more significant initial investment. While both solutions have unique strengths, the cost difference might influence budgeting decisions.
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
Portnox
4.0 out of 5
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
Portnox
4.0 out of 5
Portnox offers cost-effective licensing with agentless security and cloud-based control. In comparison, F5 BIG-IP APM delivers robust multi-factor authentication and secure remote access. Tech buyers might choose Portnox for scalability and affordability, while F5 BIG-IP APM suits needs for advanced security features and performance.
Download F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) vs. Portnox Report
Portnox offers a straightforward setup cost, while F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) typically involves higher initial expenses.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
Portnox offers a straightforward setup cost, while F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) typically involves higher initial expenses.
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway
3.9 out of 5
Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway is ideal for organizations seeking comprehensive web security with robust URL filtering and integration capabilities. In comparison, F5 BIG-IP APM suits those needing versatile access control and application management, thanks to its customizable access policies and reliable performance.
Download F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) vs. Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway Report
Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway boasts a competitive setup cost, while F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) requires a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway boasts a competitive setup cost, while F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) requires a higher initial investment.
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access
4.3 out of 5
BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access offers robust session management and access controls, ideal for managing multiple endpoints. In comparison, F5 BIG-IP APM excels in access policy enforcement and network integration. A tech buyer might choose BeyondTrust for its deployment ease or F5 BIG-IP APM for comprehensive performance.
Download BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access vs. F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Report
BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access has a lower initial setup cost. F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) features a higher initial setup cost.
View comparison
Pricing
BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access has a lower initial setup cost. F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) features a higher initial setup cost.
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
IBM Security Verify Access
3.9 out of 5
IBM Security Verify Access excels in identity governance and easy policy configuration. In comparison, F5 BIG-IP APM offers advanced traffic management and session monitoring. IBM Security Verify Access is easier to deploy, while F5 BIG-IP APM provides substantial long-term value despite higher complexity and costs.
Download F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) vs. IBM Security Verify Access Report
IBM Security Verify Access has a low initial setup cost while F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) incurs higher upfront expenses, making IBM Security Verify Access more affordable for initial deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
IBM Security Verify Access has a low initial setup cost while F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) incurs higher upfront expenses, making IBM Security Verify Access more affordable for initial deployment.
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
Symantec Siteminder
4.0 out of 5
Symantec Siteminder offers strong security and extensive integrations. In comparison, F5 BIG-IP APM excels in scalability and customization. Symantec Siteminder has a steep learning curve, while F5 BIG-IP APM's setup complexity is notable. Symantec Siteminder's pricing is contentious, whereas F5 BIG-IP APM is seen as justified.
Download F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) vs. Symantec Siteminder Report
Symantec Siteminder generally has higher setup costs compared to F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM), which tends to offer more budget-friendly setup options.
View comparison
Pricing
Symantec Siteminder generally has higher setup costs compared to F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM), which tends to offer more budget-friendly setup options.
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
BeyondTrust Remote Support
4.5 out of 5
BeyondTrust Remote Support offers simplicity in pricing and setup. In comparison, F5 BIG-IP APM justifies higher costs with advanced features. BeyondTrust excels in immediate remote support, while F5 BIG-IP APM shines in detailed access control and scalability.
Download BeyondTrust Remote Support vs. F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Report
BeyondTrust Remote Support requires a lower initial setup cost, whereas F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) incurs a higher setup cost.
View comparison
Pricing
BeyondTrust Remote Support requires a lower initial setup cost, whereas F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) incurs a higher setup cost.
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
Symantec VIP Access Manager
4.2 out of 5
While Symantec VIP Access Manager offers balanced pricing and solid support, F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager excels in advanced features, providing higher customization. In comparison, Symantec is simpler to deploy, making it ideal for small setups. In contrast, F5 provides long-term value through robust capabilities.
Download F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) vs. Symantec VIP Access Manager Report
Symantec VIP Access Manager has a lower setup cost compared to F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM), which generally incurs higher initial expenses for deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
Symantec VIP Access Manager has a lower setup cost compared to F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM), which generally incurs higher initial expenses for deployment.
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
Citrix Gateway
4.1 out of 5
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
Citrix Gateway
4.1 out of 5
Citrix Gateway offers secure remote access, load balancing, and VPN connectivity, acting as a reverse proxy and supporting virtual desktop infrastructure. It integrates with single sign-on systems and enhances endpoint security. Users value its scalability and flexibility but seek improvements in cost reduction, cloud capabilities, and user-friendliness.
Download Citrix Gateway vs. F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Report
Usually with Citrix the issue is the pricing, especially for the African region. We believe it's really expensive.
Pricing is very high if you do a comparison with what is available in the market.
View comparison
Pricing
Usually with Citrix the issue is the pricing, especially for the African region. We believe it's really expensive.
Pricing is very high if you do a comparison with what is available in the market.
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
Fortinet FortiProxy
4.0 out of 5
F5 BIG-IP APM is ideal for enterprises needing robust platform stability and SSL VPN capabilities. In comparison, Fortinet FortiProxy appeals to those valuing simplicity and cost-effectiveness, with a focus on strong web security and threat protection at a moderate price.
Download F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) vs. Fortinet FortiProxy Report
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) is known for its higher setup costs, reflecting its extensive features and scalability, while Fortinet FortiProxy offers a more budget-friendly installation, catering to those with cost-conscious deployment needs.
View comparison
Pricing
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) is known for its higher setup costs, reflecting its extensive features and scalability, while Fortinet FortiProxy offers a more budget-friendly installation, catering to those with cost-conscious deployment needs.
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
Forcepoint ONE
4.0 out of 5
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
Forcepoint ONE
4.0 out of 5
F5 BIG-IP APM excels in network access control and identity management with flexible deployment and competitive pricing. In comparison, Forcepoint ONE offers advanced data protection within a robust cloud-based architecture, facilitating straightforward deployment and responsive support, justifying its premium pricing and comprehensive ROI.
Download F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) vs. Forcepoint ONE Report
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) has a higher initial setup cost, while Forcepoint ONE offers a more budget-friendly option with lower upfront expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) has a higher initial setup cost, while Forcepoint ONE offers a more budget-friendly option with lower upfront expenses.
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
Rocket Exceed TurboX
4.2 out of 5
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager excels in security and integration capabilities, making it ideal for security-focused environments. In comparison, Rocket Exceed TurboX offers superior performance and scalability, appealing to those needing high-efficiency solutions. While APM could enhance configuration ease, TurboX needs a more intuitive workflow.
Download F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) vs. Rocket Exceed TurboX Report
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) has a higher setup cost compared to Rocket Exceed TurboX, though the performance efficiency of Rocket Exceed TurboX may make it a more cost-effective option depending on specific use cases.
View comparison
Pricing
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) has a higher setup cost compared to Rocket Exceed TurboX, though the performance efficiency of Rocket Exceed TurboX may make it a more cost-effective option depending on specific use cases.
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
Apache Guacamole
4.6 out of 5
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
Apache Guacamole
4.6 out of 5
Apache Guacamole enables secure remote server access without client installations. It supports multi-user operations in airlines and virtual machine provisioning for education. Cost-effective with no licensing fees, it enhances security with blockchain protocols. Users praise ease of use, customization, and clientless setup but note occasional UI and deployment issues.
Download Apache Guacamole vs. F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Report
View comparison
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
Axis Security
4.8 out of 5
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
Axis Security
4.8 out of 5
F5 BIG-IP APM excels with integrated access controls and scalable VPN solutions, making it ideal for traditional networks. In comparison, Axis Security offers cloud-native zero-trust access that enhances remote work security, appealing to those seeking modern solutions and simpler deployment.
Download Axis Security vs. F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Report
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) setup costs are higher, while Axis Security offers a more economical setup. The cost difference highlights F5's focus on extensive features compared to Axis Security's streamlined approach.
View comparison
Pricing
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) setup costs are higher, while Axis Security offers a more economical setup. The cost difference highlights F5's focus on extensive features compared to Axis Security's streamlined approach.
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
SecureAuth Identity Platform
2.8 out of 5
SecureAuth Identity Platform offers affordability and strong support, making it suitable for cost-conscious buyers. In comparison, F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager provides advanced features and extensive security, ideal for enterprises needing detailed configurations. SecureAuth excels in deployment ease, while F5 BIG-IP APM delivers comprehensive access control.
Download F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) vs. SecureAuth Identity Platform Report
SecureAuth Identity Platform offers lower initial setup costs compared to F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM), which requires a higher initial investment for configuration and deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
SecureAuth Identity Platform offers lower initial setup costs compared to F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM), which requires a higher initial investment for configuration and deployment.
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
Amazon Cognito
3.8 out of 5
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
Amazon Cognito
3.8 out of 5
F5 BIG-IP APM offers robust integration and access management features with simpler deployment and strong customer service. In comparison, Amazon Cognito stands out for its scalability and user authentication but presents configuration complexity and less responsive support. F5 BIG-IP APM provides better long-term ROI despite higher initial costs.
Download Amazon Cognito vs. F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Report
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) has a substantial setup cost, while Amazon Cognito is known for its lower initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) has a substantial setup cost, while Amazon Cognito is known for its lower initial expenses.
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
Thales SafeNet Trusted Access
4.2 out of 5
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) excels in initial pricing and customer service. In comparison, Thales SafeNet Trusted Access offers robust multi-factor authentication and integration capabilities. F5 is appreciated for network access controls, while Thales provides extensive features, justifying its higher cost.
Download F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) vs. Thales SafeNet Trusted Access Report
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) entails a high setup cost, while Thales SafeNet Trusted Access presents a more budget-friendly setup expense.
View comparison
Pricing
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) entails a high setup cost, while Thales SafeNet Trusted Access presents a more budget-friendly setup expense.
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway
4.4 out of 5
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager excels in handling complex challenges through features like SSL VPN and load balancing, ideal for banks. In comparison, Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway offers simplicity with strong cloud-based features such as CASB and advanced threat prevention, appealing for scalable SaaS integrations.
Download F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) vs. Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway Report
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) involves higher setup costs compared to Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway, which offers a more straightforward and cost-effective implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) involves higher setup costs compared to Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway, which offers a more straightforward and cost-effective implementation.
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
VNC Connect
3.7 out of 5
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
VNC Connect
3.7 out of 5
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) is praised for comprehensive security and customization options, while VNC Connect excels in simplicity and efficiency. In comparison, VNC Connect offers quicker deployment and better value for money, while APM provides in-depth features justifying its higher cost and complexity.
Download F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) vs. VNC Connect Report
F5 BIG-IP APM has a higher setup cost compared to VNC Connect, highlighting the investment required for its advanced features against the more cost-effective setup of VNC Connect.
View comparison
Pricing
F5 BIG-IP APM has a higher setup cost compared to VNC Connect, highlighting the investment required for its advanced features against the more cost-effective setup of VNC Connect.
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
Cisco IOS SSL VPN
4.3 out of 5
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
Cisco IOS SSL VPN
4.3 out of 5
Cisco IOS SSL VPN provides secure remote access to corporate networks, supporting remote work and VPN connections for sectors like HR and finance. It offers ease of use, stability, and security with multifactor authentication. Improvements are needed in pricing, compatibility, and configuration. Enhanced features and modern management tools could improve user experience.
Download Cisco IOS SSL VPN vs. F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Report
I would say it is a bit expensive, but I think it is worth the price.
The pricing of the solution is reasonable
View comparison
Pricing
I would say it is a bit expensive, but I think it is worth the price.
The pricing of the solution is reasonable
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
Symantec Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA)
1 out of 5
Symantec Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) enhances security by verifying each device and user before granting access. Notable features include seamless integration with existing systems and granular visibility. It could improve in ease of setup and providing more detailed analytics for effective monitoring.
View comparison
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
Safe-T Secure Application Access
3.9 out of 5
Safe-T Secure Application Access and F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) are prominent for their unique strengths. Safe-T is cost-effective with easy integration and strong support. In comparison, F5 BIG-IP APM offers extensive features and flexibility, justifying its higher cost and complexity.
Download F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) vs. Safe-T Secure Application Access Report
Safe-T Secure Application Access offers a lower setup cost compared to F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM), which tends to have higher initial expenses for implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
Safe-T Secure Application Access offers a lower setup cost compared to F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM), which tends to have higher initial expenses for implementation.
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
Sangfor SSL VPN
4.3 out of 5
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
Sangfor SSL VPN
4.3 out of 5
Sangfor SSL VPN offers easy deployment and affordability, appealing to those with budget constraints. In comparison, F5 BIG-IP APM attracts buyers needing advanced security and scalability, justifying its higher price with a feature-rich solution that meets complex network requirements.
Download F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) vs. Sangfor SSL VPN Report
Sangfor SSL VPN offers a straightforward setup with a competitive cost advantage, while F5 BIG-IP APM provides robust capabilities with potentially higher setup expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Sangfor SSL VPN offers a straightforward setup with a competitive cost advantage, while F5 BIG-IP APM provides robust capabilities with potentially higher setup expenses.
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
Oracle Access Manager
4.0 out of 5
Oracle Access Manager offers seamless integration capabilities and comprehensive access controls. In comparison, F5 BIG-IP APM provides robust security features and scalability. Oracle Access Manager has room for performance optimization, while F5 BIG-IP APM could improve documentation and navigation to enhance usability.
Download F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) vs. Oracle Access Manager Report
Oracle Access Manager has lower initial setup costs, while F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) tends to be more expensive to set up but offers more advanced features.
View comparison
Pricing
Oracle Access Manager has lower initial setup costs, while F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) tends to be more expensive to set up but offers more advanced features.
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Logo
Sophos Network Access Control
4.2 out of 5
Sophos Network Access Control offers robust threat detection with competitive pricing, ideal for stringent security needs. In comparison, F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager attracts tech buyers with advanced granular controls, despite higher costs, making it suitable for complex network environments requiring detailed access management.
Download F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) vs. Sophos Network Access Control Report
Sophos Network Access Control offers a more economical setup cost compared to F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM), which requires a higher initial investment, highlighting a key cost difference between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Sophos Network Access Control offers a more economical setup cost compared to F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM), which requires a higher initial investment, highlighting a key cost difference between the two solutions.

Related categories

Secure Web Gateways (SWG)
Network Access Control (NAC)
Remote Access