Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Entrust TransactionGuard vs IBM Trusteer comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Entrust TransactionGuard
Ranking in Fraud Detection and Prevention
16th
Average Rating
6.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
IBM Trusteer
Ranking in Fraud Detection and Prevention
11th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
3.6
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Fraud Detection and Prevention category, the mindshare of Entrust TransactionGuard is 0.2%, down from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Trusteer is 2.8%, down from 4.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Fraud Detection and Prevention
 

Featured Reviews

IH
Monitors transactions effectively but needs better support and more advanced AI
Entrust Transaction Guard monitors transactions between core banking applications. It offers integrations to many platforms, compatibility, and easy API integrations, providing effective fraud detection. The product reduces fraud for customers, especially within the financial services industry, by protecting transactions such as online payments and card usage. Without such solutions, online banking would face significant challenges.
Olawale Ayuba - PeerSpot reviewer
AI and machine learning capabilities improve fraud management
For IBM Trusteer, one of the advantages is its AI and machine learning capabilities, which are very strong. The solution provides the ability to manage fraud in every session of a user, from login to logout of the user experience. It operates quickly and can intelligently cover a wide range of threats in the field. The Adaptive Authentication feature allows for frictionless operation for the user. Based on its AI intelligence and intelligence sets, it enables frictionless flow and only creates the need for further authentication based on what it has intelligently gathered about that session. Two different users will have different login experiences based on their history and behavioral analysis that tells the system whether to proceed with the transaction or pause it, protecting users from account takeovers or new account frauds. Integration is straightforward using JSON integration. It is easy to integrate with banking solutions or middleware solutions that financial institutions already have, both from the front end and back end. Whether it is a single-paged application or a multi-page application, there are different snippets and code bases for various types of integrations with back-end applications. IBM Trusteer captures customer ID and user ID at every session, enabling it to follow users through their journey through the banking application. It has its own real-time dashboard that allows fraud analysts to quickly make decisions about ongoing activities and determine whether to deny or allow transactions. It protects sensitive information of users through session and transaction-based monitoring, capturing CSID, customer ID, and user ID, enabling analysts to take swift, real-time action.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Entrust Transaction Guard monitors transactions between core banking applications."
"Entrust Transaction Guard monitors transactions between core banking applications."
"The features were pretty straightforward. I just used them as I went along with very little interference all the years that I have used it."
 

Cons

"Entrust has an issue with support."
"Entrust has an issue with support. The technical support hardly ever involves getting an Entrust person to help on calls, and they often refer only to the documentation."
"After a Windows update, it started acting up. It blocked several programs. It became inactive after the Windows update and I had to remove Trusteer, allowing my computer to go back to its norm."
"I would like them to make it as user-friendly as possible. Simplicity is what we need. Load and go."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Fraud Detection and Prevention solutions are best for your needs.
865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
43%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Insurance Company
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Entrust TransactionGuard?
The pricing is quite affordable compared to other solutions, with a rating of six out of ten. There are additional costs for premium support.
What needs improvement with Entrust TransactionGuard?
Entrust has an issue with support. The technical support hardly ever involves getting an Entrust person to help on calls, and they often refer only to the documentation. Another area for improvemen...
What is your primary use case for Entrust TransactionGuard?
I am a system integrator providing professional services and implementing Entrust solutions for customers across Africa.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Also Known As

TransactionGuard
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Banco Security, IndianMusicInfo.com, Oakland County Michigan, SILA Communications
Banco Satander
Find out what your peers are saying about ThreatMetrix, NICE, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention. Updated: July 2025.
865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.