Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM Trusteer vs Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM Trusteer
Ranking in Fraud Detection and Prevention
13th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
3.6
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Nice Actimize Fraud & Authe...
Ranking in Fraud Detection and Prevention
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
18
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Fraud Detection and Prevention category, the mindshare of IBM Trusteer is 2.2%, down from 3.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management is 3.6%, down from 6.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Fraud Detection and Prevention Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management3.6%
IBM Trusteer2.2%
Other94.2%
Fraud Detection and Prevention
 

Featured Reviews

Olawale Ayuba - PeerSpot reviewer
Head Management GRC and Privacy Solution at activedge
AI and machine learning capabilities improve fraud management
For IBM Trusteer, one of the advantages is its AI and machine learning capabilities, which are very strong. The solution provides the ability to manage fraud in every session of a user, from login to logout of the user experience. It operates quickly and can intelligently cover a wide range of threats in the field. The Adaptive Authentication feature allows for frictionless operation for the user. Based on its AI intelligence and intelligence sets, it enables frictionless flow and only creates the need for further authentication based on what it has intelligently gathered about that session. Two different users will have different login experiences based on their history and behavioral analysis that tells the system whether to proceed with the transaction or pause it, protecting users from account takeovers or new account frauds. Integration is straightforward using JSON integration. It is easy to integrate with banking solutions or middleware solutions that financial institutions already have, both from the front end and back end. Whether it is a single-paged application or a multi-page application, there are different snippets and code bases for various types of integrations with back-end applications. IBM Trusteer captures customer ID and user ID at every session, enabling it to follow users through their journey through the banking application. It has its own real-time dashboard that allows fraud analysts to quickly make decisions about ongoing activities and determine whether to deny or allow transactions. It protects sensitive information of users through session and transaction-based monitoring, capturing CSID, customer ID, and user ID, enabling analysts to take swift, real-time action.
RK
AML Compliance Analyst at HCLTech
Easy transaction monitoring but requires improvement in handling high user volumes
We can definitely improve the Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management tool because I sometimes encounter issues while searching for particular customer transactions; it results in errors and I cannot easily find specific transactions. If there is improvement in those points, we can easily identify customer details and detect spikes in transactions to cover money laundering. Regarding specific features, I think AI should be implemented in the Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management tool. AI should be integrated for better analysis and suggestions because nowadays, AI is very important for all organizations. If implemented, it can easily identify transaction details, reducing the need for extra manpower.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The solution provides the ability to manage fraud in every session of a user, from login to logout of the user experience, operates quickly, and can intelligently cover a wide range of threats in the field."
"The features were pretty straightforward. I just used them as I went along with very little interference all the years that I have used it."
"The process and technology in the solution are very fast, and it is bug-free."
"Nice's most valuable feature would be its rule engine."
"The solution is easier to set up, configure, and use than other products."
"It's a very good case management system."
"I like the score generated on the Actimize platform for each customer transaction. Those are transactions per second, accommodating millions of transactions per second. That's the best feature of Actimize."
"The core engine seems to be better than the rest for pattern recognition. It is able to process large amounts of data."
"I like the tracking methodology. Though it was implemented on-premises, the compliance is compatible with it. It will have certain modifications with RPM and APR. It has good exposure from a compliance point of view."
"It's a very good product for compliance and transaction monitoring for anti-money laundering."
 

Cons

"After a Windows update, it started acting up. It blocked several programs. It became inactive after the Windows update and I had to remove Trusteer, allowing my computer to go back to its norm."
"I would like them to make it as user-friendly as possible. Simplicity is what we need. Load and go."
"This solution is unnecessarily complex."
"From the front end side, the UI is definitely user-friendly. It is highly compatible as long as the reading is at the coding point of view. But it can't provide certain high coding. When a person clicks on any kind of scenario or alert, I would like to have a metadata help menu."
"I would say — Actimize is not being moved forward by Nice."
"Its user interface could be better."
"Sometimes when we move from one version to another, a few things don't work as expected."
"The patch section has room for improvement."
"It is complex in terms of daily maintenance. Other detection platforms run on a 15-day or one-month window, whereas this particular platform runs daily. Therefore, it requires daily maintenance. If there is a delay due to this daily maintenance, it creates a snowball effect impacting the subsequent days. It takes a lot of effort to catch up and get into BAU mode. It would be great if they could include certain features to make the daily processing less complex, but I don't see that happening. It is a complex product, and with each version release, it is just becoming more and more complex."
"Processes don't function when front end is down."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"It is reasonable for enterprise customers."
"I don't like the length of our vendor contracts because it kills our flexibility."
"We need a separate license for each of the packages, such as the core package, self-development package, and customization package."
"Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management is an expensive product."
"I don't know how licensing is handled in the current organization. I know that Actimize provides an option for yearly licensing because that's what we had in my previous job."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Fraud Detection and Prevention solutions are best for your needs.
881,757 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
37%
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Outsourcing Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
35%
Comms Service Provider
10%
Sports Company
6%
Retailer
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Large Enterprise14
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Trusteer?
The solution is somewhat expensive. IBM could improve their pricing structure. It comes with both licensing and professional services as separate entities that must be purchased before proceeding. ...
What needs improvement with IBM Trusteer?
During integration, it is difficult to fully integrate within a specified time, primarily because code snippets must be installed on every page. This makes the process more challenging based on use...
What is your primary use case for IBM Trusteer?
IBM Trusteer is an anti-fraud solution that is used for account takeover fraud, new account fraud, account fraud, and online frauds on platforms such as mobile platforms and web applications.
What is your primary use case for Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management?
I am working on Transaction Monitoring and Fraud Risk, and I have experience using the Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management tool alongside World-Check and Salesforce for this purpose...
What needs improvement with Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management?
We can definitely improve the Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management tool because I sometimes encounter issues while searching for particular customer transactions; it results in error...
What advice do you have for others considering Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management?
I have rated Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management a seven out of ten. AI should be integrated into the Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management tool for better analysis an...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Actimize, NICE Actimize
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Banco Satander
Associated Banc-Corp
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Trusteer vs. Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.
881,757 professionals have used our research since 2012.