OrbusInfinity vs erwin Data Modeler comparison

Quest Software and Orbus Software are both solutions in the Enterprise Architecture Management category. Quest Software is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.2, while Orbus Software is ranked #13. Quest Software holds a 7.3% mindshare in AM, compared to Orbus Software’s 3.5% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Quest Software users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Orbus Software users who would recommend it.

erwin Data Modeler

Read 50 erwin Data Modeler reviews

7,814 Views
5,235 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

OrbusInfinity

Read 2 OrbusInfinity reviews

2,412 Views
1,688 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

erwin Data Modeler

OrbusInfinity

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 1, 2026

Erwin Data Modeler and OrbusInfinity compete in the data management and enterprise architecture space. OrbusInfinity seems to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive features, offering superior value despite the higher cost.

Features: Erwin Data Modeler excels in data modeling capabilities with robust metadata management and integration with cloud services. It also provides an efficient interface for designing and managing complex data models. OrbusInfinity offers strategic planning, comprehensive business process modeling, and a wide range of enterprise architecture features that enhance its versatility in enterprise solutions.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OrbusInfinity provides a flexible deployment model with cloud-based and on-premises options, backed by strong customer service. Erwin Data Modeler's on-premises deployment is straightforward with highly rated support. The wider deployment options of OrbusInfinity contribute to its adaptability and enhance customer satisfaction.

Pricing and ROI: Erwin Data Modeler is attractive for businesses with budget constraints due to its lower initial setup cost. OrbusInfinity, despite its higher price tag, offers a higher ROI through its expansive feature set and strategic benefits, delivering longer-term value.

To learn more, read our detailed OrbusInfinity vs. erwin Data Modeler Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

OrbusInfinity vs. erwin Data Modeler

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,644 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

erwin Data Modeler

Ranking in Enterprise Architecture Management

1st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

5.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Design (5th), Data Governance (10th)

OrbusInfinity

Ranking in Enterprise Architecture Management

13th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Service Management (ITSM) (37th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Enterprise Architecture Management category, the mindshare of erwin Data Modeler is 7.3%, down from 10.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OrbusInfinity is 3.5%, up from 3.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Enterprise Architecture Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
erwin Data Modeler	7.3%
OrbusInfinity	3.5%
Other	89.2%

Enterprise Architecture Management

Featured Reviews

Sushree Panigrahi

Snowflake Data Engineer| Senior PLSQL Developer |Data Modeler|Assitant Vice Pre at Jp Morgan Chase & Co.

Data modeling has transformed regulatory reporting and collaboration across cloud environments

In erwin Data Modeler, areas that have room for improvement include performance improvements. I see that large models sometimes cause it to be slow when opening. Impact analysis can lag as well. Version control is another aspect. If we have developed a current version, it is not integrated with Git where we can easily compare different versions. UI modernization is also something we cannot utilize as it is primarily for development. Additionally, cloud-specific optimizations are needed when it comes to Snowflake or Databricks. When it comes to AI aspects, auto-suggestions for normalization or identifying primary, foreign, or surrogate keys are areas that can be improved.

Read full review

Kenneth Igiri

Enterprise Architect at Ecobank Transnational Incorporated

Cost-effective, integrates with the Office tools, and allows us to articulate all entities across the enterprise on one platform

The refresh cycles for our dashboards could be better. I keep complaining about that. The refresh is supposed to be once a day, but I would love it if it was real-time so that if I make a change to the data in iServer, I should see those changes immediately reflected in the dashboards. They use Power BI, and it seems they've scheduled their refresh to be once a day, which is not that good for us. We've had some issues with the integration between Visio and iServer because sometimes the add-in that allows you to do that integration takes a lot of memory and then your Visio crashes. However, I've not experienced this issue for some time, so it was probably fixed in the recent version. Also, if I copy a large amount of data and I want to copy from one Visio file to another, I have had a case where it suddenly just closes Visio without saving. So, that integration could be more smooth. There should be ease of integration with other systems in our environment such as SysAid. I understand that there is an integration to ServiceNow, but we use SysAid. We need to be able to say that when there's an incident that impacts or requires a change in a particular component, ServiceNow or SysAid should be able to communicate to Orbus that this component is about to change. Similarly, when it comes to discovery or when a new architecture change has happened in the enterprise, we should be able to detect the change in the baseline Enterprise Architecture. There should be such advanced automation. The visibility of our models is limited to those to whom we have assigned licenses. I would've loved it if everyone in the organization could at least see the diagrams. The licensing should be there for those who need to make updates or changes.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"What has been useful, I have been able to reverse engineer our existing data models to document explicitly referential integrity relationships, primary/foreign keys in the model, and create ERDs that are subject area-based which our clients can use when working with our databases. The reality is that our databases are not explicitly documented in the DDL with primary/foreign key relationships. You can't look at the DDL and explicitly understand the primary/foreign key relationships that exist between our tables, so the referential integrity is not easily understood. erwin has allowed me to explicitly document that and create ERDs. This has made it easier for our clients to consume our databases for their own purposes."

"The product itself is fantastic and it's about the only way to get an enterprise view of the data that you're designing."

"The value of understanding your data in a graphical way has been very rich in communicating to developers and testers when they recognize the relationships and the business rules."

"It is a scalable solution...The technical support team is fine."

"It has centralized storage so that a data model can be shared by different teams."

"The most valuable feature is the physical or visual representation of the database, showing the tables, the columns, the foreign keys, and the ability to generate DDL, so you can physically implement databases."

"Drag-and-drop data modeling and reverse engineering out of databases are the most valuable features of erwin Data Modeler by Quest."

"The principal feature that I liked is that the solution has a very graphic interface."

More erwin Data Modeler pros

"I like the integration with the Office tools such as Visio and Excel. The integration with Excel helped us to be able to upload data very easily. Integration with Visio helps us to be able to make changes once and have a centralized diagram. We don't have versions of the diagram. This integration with the Office tools is very useful."

"The most valuable features are mainly the reporting side of things and the dashboard."

Cons

"There is a lack of local support in the China region."

"The report generation has room for improvement. I think it was version 8 where you had to use Crystal Reports, and it was so painful that the company I was with just stayed on version 7 until version 9 came out and they restored the data browser. That's better than it was, but it's still a little cumbersome. For example, you run it in erwin, then export it out to Excel, and then you have to do a lot of cosmetic modification. If you discover that you missed a column, then you would have to rerun the whole thing. Sometimes what you would do is just go ahead and fix it in the report, then you have to remember to go back and fix it in the model. Therefore, I think the report generation still could use some work."

"Complete Compare is set up only to compare properties that are of interest to us, but some of the differences cannot be brought over from one version of the model to another."

"We can only get licenses through partners."

"We are planning to move, in 2021, into their server version, where multiple data modelers can work at the same time and share their models. It has become a pain point to merge the models from individual desktops and get them into a single data model, when multiple data modelers are working on a particular project. It becomes a nightmare for the senior data modeler to bring them together, especially when it comes to recreating them when you want to merge them."

"Complete Compare is set up only to compare properties that are of interest to us, but some of the differences cannot be brought over from one version of the model to another. This is despite the fact that we are clicking to bring objects from one place to another. Therefore, it's hard to tell at times if Complete Compare is working as intended without having to manually go into the details and check everything. If it could be redesigned to a degree where it is easier to use when we bring things over from one site to another and be sure that it's been done correctly, that would be nice to have. We would probably use the tool more often if the Complete Compare were easier to use."

"I would like to see more support for working with the big-data world. There are so many new databases evolving and it's very hard for them to keep up with all of the new technologies. It would be good if they were able to dynamically support big-data platforms, other than Hive and Teradata."

"The solution's model mark could be better because it crashes sometimes."

More erwin Data Modeler cons

"We found a few issues with importing data and all the manipulation of data, especially when it came to the BI side of things because it utilized a particular template to be able to get certain reports. The user administrators could not manipulate it to get the right reports."

"The refresh cycles for our dashboards could be better. I keep complaining about that. The refresh is supposed to be once a day, but I would love it if it was real-time so that if I make a change to the data in iServer, I should see those changes immediately reflected in the dashboards. They use Power BI, and it seems they've scheduled their refresh to be once a day, which is not that good for us."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This company had bought the license for three years, and it's not an individual license. While you can buy a license for each individual, that would be very expensive. There is something called concurrent licenses where you can purchase licenses in bulk and 15 to 20 people can access the license and model. Concurrent licenses are scalable to the number of users and are proportional to the cost."

"The tool is expensive."

"There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."

"erwin Data Modeler by Quest is an expensive solution."

"The solution is expensive."

"I don't specifically know what we're paying now. About three years ago, in another organization, I have this memory of 6,000 AUD a seat or something like that, but I am not sure. In the mid-2000s, it was something like 1,200 AUD a seat. I get the impression that there was a price jump when it was spun off from CA as a separate company, which is understandable, but it could sometimes be a barrier in some organizations picking it up. I haven't talked to erwin people yet, but I'm going to suggest to them that they could perhaps think of having an entry-level product that is priced a bit lower, and then, you can buy the extra suite."

"erwin is expensive compared to other solutions. We are paying almost $6,000 per seat a month."

"We've continued to use the product for many years and compared it with others on the market. The pricing is reasonable considering what the solution offers and what we pay. There are cheaper tools, but they may not be as robust and easy to use, so it's worth the money."

More erwin Data Modeler pricing and cost advice

"It was very cost-effective as compared to the other ones we evaluated. We spent about $20,000 per annum for support and license together. There was also an implementation fee at the beginning. I would rate it a nine out of ten in terms of pricing."

"The licensing is on a yearly basis. We currently work with a standard fee."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Architecture Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

Marketing Services Firm

Government

16%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	16
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	38

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for erwin Data Modeler by Quest?

I have no idea about the setup cost because I did not buy the license.

See all answers

What needs improvement with erwin Data Modeler by Quest?

The UI in erwin Data Modeler can be improved significantly because when any new person opens the tool, all the toolbars are kept open with many tools in view, making it appear chunky. If possible, ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for erwin Data Modeler by Quest?

I primarly use erwin Data Modeler for modeling purposes. Once we have the business requirement, we create the models in erwin Data Modeler, and then we perform forward engineering to get the query ...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

SAP PowerDesigner vs erwin Data Modeler

Compared 39% of the time

IDERA ER/Studio vs erwin Data Modeler

Compared 6% of the time

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect vs erwin Data Modeler

Compared 4% of the time

Visio vs erwin Data Modeler

Compared 4% of the time

Lucidchart vs erwin Data Modeler

Compared 4% of the time

More erwin Data Modeler Competitors

MEGA HOPEX vs OrbusInfinity

Compared 13% of the time

ServiceNow vs OrbusInfinity

Compared 11% of the time

BiZZdesign HoriZZon vs OrbusInfinity

Compared 11% of the time

iServer vs OrbusInfinity

Compared 10% of the time

Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management vs OrbusInfinity

Compared 3% of the time

More OrbusInfinity Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

erwin Data Modeler

June 2026

Download erwin Data Modeler product report

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise Architecture Management

May 2026

Download OrbusInfinity product report

Also Known As

erwin DM

No data available

Overview

Erwin Data Modeler provides an effective approach to visualizing and managing data models. It assists in creating, reversing, and synchronizing data models with ease, supporting logical and physical transitions while enhancing understanding across teams.

Erwin Data Modeler is a comprehensive tool designed for professional database management. It offers capabilities to organize and enforce standards, automating script generation with robust reverse engineering and DDL output. Users can manage complex data environments, capitalize on integration with data intelligence, and maintain large-scale databases smoothly. Despite its strengths, improvements in multi-language support, database integration, and reporting features are needed. Users benefit from extensive support for conceptual, logical, and physical database modeling, enhancing architectural design and data governance for platforms like SQL Server, Oracle, and Teradata.

What are the key features of Erwin Data Modeler?

Visual Representation: Facilitates clear visualization of data models, aiding comprehension.
Versioning and Editing: Enhance usability with versioning and bulk editing capabilities.
Reverse Engineering: Offers powerful tools for reverse engineering and DDL generation.
Integration: Aligns with data intelligence to streamline database management.
Naming Standards: Enforces consistency with automated script creation.

What benefits should users consider in Erwin Data Modeler reviews?

Collaboration: Promotes team understanding and collaboration through visual tools.
Automation: Reduces manual effort through automated processes and integration.
Scalability: Handles large database management efficiently, crucial for enterprise settings.
Data Governance: Facilitates effective data governance with structured modeling.

Erwin Data Modeler finds application in industries focused on robust data management, implementing it for enterprise data warehouses, business domain models, and operational systems. It supports architectural design and governance, aligning with business applications demanding precise data representation and visualization.

Quest Software

OrbusInfinity offers robust capabilities for organizations looking to optimize their business processes through effective enterprise architecture management. It aids in transforming complex enterprise structures into coherent and strategic frameworks.

Designed for strategists and IT professionals, OrbusInfinity provides a comprehensive platform that integrates seamlessly with industry standards, enhancing decision-making and fostering innovation. It not only supports detailed architecture modeling but also offers powerful analytics tools that assist in identifying and addressing inefficiencies, aligning IT investments with long-term goals.

What are the key features of OrbusInfinity?

Architecture Modeling: Provides a dynamic environment for creating and managing architectural models.
Analytics Dashboard: Delivers insights through customizable dashboards that enhance strategic decision-making.
Integration Capability: Seamlessly integrates with other systems, aiding in cohesive data flow across platforms.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Enhanced Strategic Clarity: Improves alignment between IT activities and business objectives.
Cost Efficiency: Identifies areas for cost reduction by optimizing resource allocation.
Scalable Flexibility: Adapts to evolving organizational demands, supporting continuous growth.

OrbusInfinity is implemented in sectors like finance and healthcare where precise data governance and streamlined workflow processes are essential. By aligning business and IT strategies, it enables industries to manage regulatory compliance and operational risk effectively.

Orbus Software

Sample Customers

Premera, America Honda Motors, Aetna, Kaiser Permanente, Dental Dental Cali, Cigna, Staples

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

OrbusInfinity vs. erwin Data Modeler

June 2026

Free Report: OrbusInfinity vs. erwin Data Modeler

Find out what your peers are saying about OrbusInfinity vs. erwin Data Modeler and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OrbusInfinity vs. erwin Data Modeler report.

See our list of best Enterprise Architecture Management vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Architecture Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.