OrbusInfinity vs erwin Data Modeler comparison

Quest Software and Orbus Software are both solutions in the Enterprise Architecture Management category. Quest Software is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.2, while Orbus Software is ranked #13. Quest Software holds a 7.3% mindshare in AM, compared to Orbus Software’s 3.5% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Quest Software users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Orbus Software users who would recommend it.

erwin Data Modeler

Read 50 erwin Data Modeler reviews

7,814 Views
5,235 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

OrbusInfinity

Read 2 OrbusInfinity reviews

2,412 Views
1,688 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

erwin Data Modeler

OrbusInfinity

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 1, 2026

Erwin Data Modeler and OrbusInfinity compete in the data management and enterprise architecture space. OrbusInfinity seems to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive features, offering superior value despite the higher cost.

Features: Erwin Data Modeler excels in data modeling capabilities with robust metadata management and integration with cloud services. It also provides an efficient interface for designing and managing complex data models. OrbusInfinity offers strategic planning, comprehensive business process modeling, and a wide range of enterprise architecture features that enhance its versatility in enterprise solutions.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OrbusInfinity provides a flexible deployment model with cloud-based and on-premises options, backed by strong customer service. Erwin Data Modeler's on-premises deployment is straightforward with highly rated support. The wider deployment options of OrbusInfinity contribute to its adaptability and enhance customer satisfaction.

Pricing and ROI: Erwin Data Modeler is attractive for businesses with budget constraints due to its lower initial setup cost. OrbusInfinity, despite its higher price tag, offers a higher ROI through its expansive feature set and strategic benefits, delivering longer-term value.

To learn more, read our detailed OrbusInfinity vs. erwin Data Modeler Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

OrbusInfinity vs. erwin Data Modeler

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,644 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

erwin Data Modeler

Ranking in Enterprise Architecture Management

1st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

5.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Design (5th), Data Governance (10th)

OrbusInfinity

Ranking in Enterprise Architecture Management

13th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Service Management (ITSM) (37th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Enterprise Architecture Management category, the mindshare of erwin Data Modeler is 7.3%, down from 10.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OrbusInfinity is 3.5%, up from 3.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Enterprise Architecture Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
erwin Data Modeler	7.3%
OrbusInfinity	3.5%
Other	89.2%

Enterprise Architecture Management

Featured Reviews

Sushree Panigrahi

Snowflake Data Engineer| Senior PLSQL Developer |Data Modeler|Assitant Vice Pre at Jp Morgan Chase & Co.

Data modeling has transformed regulatory reporting and collaboration across cloud environments

In erwin Data Modeler, areas that have room for improvement include performance improvements. I see that large models sometimes cause it to be slow when opening. Impact analysis can lag as well. Version control is another aspect. If we have developed a current version, it is not integrated with Git where we can easily compare different versions. UI modernization is also something we cannot utilize as it is primarily for development. Additionally, cloud-specific optimizations are needed when it comes to Snowflake or Databricks. When it comes to AI aspects, auto-suggestions for normalization or identifying primary, foreign, or surrogate keys are areas that can be improved.

Read full review

Kenneth Igiri

Enterprise Architect at Ecobank Transnational Incorporated

Cost-effective, integrates with the Office tools, and allows us to articulate all entities across the enterprise on one platform

The refresh cycles for our dashboards could be better. I keep complaining about that. The refresh is supposed to be once a day, but I would love it if it was real-time so that if I make a change to the data in iServer, I should see those changes immediately reflected in the dashboards. They use Power BI, and it seems they've scheduled their refresh to be once a day, which is not that good for us. We've had some issues with the integration between Visio and iServer because sometimes the add-in that allows you to do that integration takes a lot of memory and then your Visio crashes. However, I've not experienced this issue for some time, so it was probably fixed in the recent version. Also, if I copy a large amount of data and I want to copy from one Visio file to another, I have had a case where it suddenly just closes Visio without saving. So, that integration could be more smooth. There should be ease of integration with other systems in our environment such as SysAid. I understand that there is an integration to ServiceNow, but we use SysAid. We need to be able to say that when there's an incident that impacts or requires a change in a particular component, ServiceNow or SysAid should be able to communicate to Orbus that this component is about to change. Similarly, when it comes to discovery or when a new architecture change has happened in the enterprise, we should be able to detect the change in the baseline Enterprise Architecture. There should be such advanced automation. The visibility of our models is limited to those to whom we have assigned licenses. I would've loved it if everyone in the organization could at least see the diagrams. The licensing should be there for those who need to make updates or changes.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"There is absolutely no problem with the stability."

"It has made a lot of difference in terms of naming standards, processes around our metadata, and the schema in which we create a database."

"The solution’s ability to generate database code from a model for a wide array of data sources cuts development time from two weeks to one day or even hours."

"It provides flexibility with the code. You can change the code as you want. Basically, you can change SQL based on what's best for your project."

"The most valuable feature is the physical or visual representation of the database, showing the tables, the columns, the foreign keys, and the ability to generate DDL, so you can physically implement databases."

"We find that its ability to generate database code from a model for a wide array of data sources cuts development time. The ability to create one model in your design phase and then have it generate DDL code for Oracle or Teradata, or whichever environment you need is really nice. It's not only nice but it also saves man-hours of time. You would have to take your design and just type in manually. It has to take days off out of the work."

"The process of creating visual representations of data structures using erwin Data Modeler allows you to see everything you are doing, and you have visuals to see what you are going to do and what has been done so far."

"When you're getting down to the database level, where you're building a design and you're creating DDL out of it, or you're going in the other direction where you're reaching into system catalogs and bringing things back, that starts to really require specialization. Visio isn't going to reverse-engineer that for you. Those features in erwin are valuable."

More erwin Data Modeler pros

"The most valuable features are mainly the reporting side of things and the dashboard."

"I like the integration with the Office tools such as Visio and Excel. The integration with Excel helped us to be able to upload data very easily. Integration with Visio helps us to be able to make changes once and have a centralized diagram. We don't have versions of the diagram. This integration with the Office tools is very useful."

Cons

"When I was working at Honda, it became very difficult to work with the Japanese teams using just one model."

"I would like to see the ability to support more NoSQL platforms more quickly. In addition, enhancing the graphics to render more quickly would be beneficial for any user."

"The erwin Data Modeler is quite complex to use."

"I still use Visio for conceptual modeling, and that's mainly because it is easier to change things, and you can relax some of the rules. DM's eventual target is a database, which means you actually have to dot all the Is and cross all the Ts, but in a conceptual model, you don't often know what you're working with. So, that's probably a constraint with erwin. They have made it a lot easier, and they've done a lot, but there is probably still room for improvement in terms of the ease of presentation back to the business. I'm comparing it with something like Visio where you can change colors on a box, change the text color and that sort of stuff, and change the lines. Such things are a whole lot easier in Visio, but once you get a theme organized in erwin, you can apply that theme to all of the objects. So, it becomes easier, but you do have to set up that theme."

"erwin generally fails to successfully reverse engineer our Oracle Databases into erwin data models. The way that they are engineered on our side, the syntax is correct from an Oracle perspective, but it seems to be very difficult for erwin to interpret. What I end up doing is using Oracle Data Modeler to reverse engineer into the Oracle data model, then forward engineer the DDL into an Oracle syntax, and importing that DDL into erwin in order to successfully bring in most of the information from our physical data models. That is a bit of a challenge."

"The solution's reporting side needs to be improved."

"I love the product. I love the ability to get into the code, make it automated, and make it do what I want. I would like to see them put some kind of governance over the ability to make changes to the mart tables with the API, so that instead of just using the modeler's rights to a table -- it has a separate set of rights for API access. That would give us the ability to put governance around API applications. Right now a person with erwin and Excel/VBA has the ability to make changes to models with the API if they also have rights to make changes to the model from erwin. It's a risk."

"There is a lack of local support in the China region."

More erwin Data Modeler cons

"We found a few issues with importing data and all the manipulation of data, especially when it came to the BI side of things because it utilized a particular template to be able to get certain reports. The user administrators could not manipulate it to get the right reports."

"The refresh cycles for our dashboards could be better. I keep complaining about that. The refresh is supposed to be once a day, but I would love it if it was real-time so that if I make a change to the data in iServer, I should see those changes immediately reflected in the dashboards. They use Power BI, and it seems they've scheduled their refresh to be once a day, which is not that good for us."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We've continued to use the product for many years and compared it with others on the market. The pricing is reasonable considering what the solution offers and what we pay. There are cheaper tools, but they may not be as robust and easy to use, so it's worth the money."

"The tool is expensive."

"Price-wise, erwin Data Modeler is okay. You can purchase a single license and it is not very expensive."

"I wish it wasn't so expensive. I would love to personally buy a copy of my own and have it at home, because the next job that I'm looking at is probably project management and I might not have access to the tool. I would like to keep my ability to use the tool. Therefore, they should probably have a pricing for people like me who want to just use the solution as an independent consultant, trying to get started. $3,000 is a big hit."

"Though the solution is not cheap, it's worth the money."

"This company had bought the license for three years, and it's not an individual license. While you can buy a license for each individual, that would be very expensive. There is something called concurrent licenses where you can purchase licenses in bulk and 15 to 20 people can access the license and model. Concurrent licenses are scalable to the number of users and are proportional to the cost."

"Pricing is very high compared to any other product."

"I don't specifically know what we're paying now. About three years ago, in another organization, I have this memory of 6,000 AUD a seat or something like that, but I am not sure. In the mid-2000s, it was something like 1,200 AUD a seat. I get the impression that there was a price jump when it was spun off from CA as a separate company, which is understandable, but it could sometimes be a barrier in some organizations picking it up. I haven't talked to erwin people yet, but I'm going to suggest to them that they could perhaps think of having an entry-level product that is priced a bit lower, and then, you can buy the extra suite."

More erwin Data Modeler pricing and cost advice

"It was very cost-effective as compared to the other ones we evaluated. We spent about $20,000 per annum for support and license together. There was also an implementation fee at the beginning. I would rate it a nine out of ten in terms of pricing."

"The licensing is on a yearly basis. We currently work with a standard fee."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Architecture Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

Marketing Services Firm

Government

16%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	16
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	38

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for erwin Data Modeler by Quest?

I have no idea about the setup cost because I did not buy the license.

See all answers

What needs improvement with erwin Data Modeler by Quest?

The UI in erwin Data Modeler can be improved significantly because when any new person opens the tool, all the toolbars are kept open with many tools in view, making it appear chunky. If possible, ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for erwin Data Modeler by Quest?

I primarly use erwin Data Modeler for modeling purposes. Once we have the business requirement, we create the models in erwin Data Modeler, and then we perform forward engineering to get the query ...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

SAP PowerDesigner vs erwin Data Modeler

Compared 39% of the time

IDERA ER/Studio vs erwin Data Modeler

Compared 6% of the time

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect vs erwin Data Modeler

Compared 4% of the time

Visio vs erwin Data Modeler

Compared 4% of the time

Lucidchart vs erwin Data Modeler

Compared 4% of the time

More erwin Data Modeler Competitors

MEGA HOPEX vs OrbusInfinity

Compared 13% of the time

ServiceNow vs OrbusInfinity

Compared 11% of the time

BiZZdesign HoriZZon vs OrbusInfinity

Compared 11% of the time

iServer vs OrbusInfinity

Compared 10% of the time

Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management vs OrbusInfinity

Compared 3% of the time

More OrbusInfinity Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

erwin Data Modeler

June 2026

Download erwin Data Modeler product report

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise Architecture Management

May 2026

Download OrbusInfinity product report

Also Known As

erwin DM

No data available

Overview

Erwin Data Modeler provides an effective approach to visualizing and managing data models. It assists in creating, reversing, and synchronizing data models with ease, supporting logical and physical transitions while enhancing understanding across teams.

Erwin Data Modeler is a comprehensive tool designed for professional database management. It offers capabilities to organize and enforce standards, automating script generation with robust reverse engineering and DDL output. Users can manage complex data environments, capitalize on integration with data intelligence, and maintain large-scale databases smoothly. Despite its strengths, improvements in multi-language support, database integration, and reporting features are needed. Users benefit from extensive support for conceptual, logical, and physical database modeling, enhancing architectural design and data governance for platforms like SQL Server, Oracle, and Teradata.

What are the key features of Erwin Data Modeler?

Visual Representation: Facilitates clear visualization of data models, aiding comprehension.
Versioning and Editing: Enhance usability with versioning and bulk editing capabilities.
Reverse Engineering: Offers powerful tools for reverse engineering and DDL generation.
Integration: Aligns with data intelligence to streamline database management.
Naming Standards: Enforces consistency with automated script creation.

What benefits should users consider in Erwin Data Modeler reviews?

Collaboration: Promotes team understanding and collaboration through visual tools.
Automation: Reduces manual effort through automated processes and integration.
Scalability: Handles large database management efficiently, crucial for enterprise settings.
Data Governance: Facilitates effective data governance with structured modeling.

Erwin Data Modeler finds application in industries focused on robust data management, implementing it for enterprise data warehouses, business domain models, and operational systems. It supports architectural design and governance, aligning with business applications demanding precise data representation and visualization.

Quest Software

OrbusInfinity offers robust capabilities for organizations looking to optimize their business processes through effective enterprise architecture management. It aids in transforming complex enterprise structures into coherent and strategic frameworks.

Designed for strategists and IT professionals, OrbusInfinity provides a comprehensive platform that integrates seamlessly with industry standards, enhancing decision-making and fostering innovation. It not only supports detailed architecture modeling but also offers powerful analytics tools that assist in identifying and addressing inefficiencies, aligning IT investments with long-term goals.

What are the key features of OrbusInfinity?

Architecture Modeling: Provides a dynamic environment for creating and managing architectural models.
Analytics Dashboard: Delivers insights through customizable dashboards that enhance strategic decision-making.
Integration Capability: Seamlessly integrates with other systems, aiding in cohesive data flow across platforms.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Enhanced Strategic Clarity: Improves alignment between IT activities and business objectives.
Cost Efficiency: Identifies areas for cost reduction by optimizing resource allocation.
Scalable Flexibility: Adapts to evolving organizational demands, supporting continuous growth.

OrbusInfinity is implemented in sectors like finance and healthcare where precise data governance and streamlined workflow processes are essential. By aligning business and IT strategies, it enables industries to manage regulatory compliance and operational risk effectively.

Orbus Software

Sample Customers

Premera, America Honda Motors, Aetna, Kaiser Permanente, Dental Dental Cali, Cigna, Staples

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

OrbusInfinity vs. erwin Data Modeler

June 2026

Free Report: OrbusInfinity vs. erwin Data Modeler

Find out what your peers are saying about OrbusInfinity vs. erwin Data Modeler and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OrbusInfinity vs. erwin Data Modeler report.

See our list of best Enterprise Architecture Management vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Architecture Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.