No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

ESET Endpoint Encryption vs McAfee Complete Data Protection comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 3, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

ESET Endpoint Encryption
Ranking in Endpoint Encryption
3rd
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
5.1
Number of Reviews
16
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
McAfee Complete Data Protec...
Ranking in Endpoint Encryption
5th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
36
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Endpoint Encryption category, the mindshare of ESET Endpoint Encryption is 4.7%, down from 17.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of McAfee Complete Data Protection is 6.0%, down from 6.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Endpoint Encryption Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
ESET Endpoint Encryption4.7%
McAfee Complete Data Protection6.0%
Other89.3%
Endpoint Encryption
 

Featured Reviews

AravindR - PeerSpot reviewer
Technical Team Lead at Exalogic Consulting
Centralized encryption has secured all endpoints and has maintained compliance for remote devices
The best features of ESET Endpoint Encryption include full disk encryption, which is the most used one, ensuring all the endpoints are protected. I rely on this daily. Its main key focus on centralized management lets me monitor, enforce policies, and remediate issues from one console, and it allows for user-friendly deployment. Using ESET Endpoint Encryption has had a clear positive impact on my organization, especially in terms of security operational efficiency. From a security standpoint, I achieved 100% encryption coverage across all the endpoints, which significantly reduces the risk of data breaches due to lost or stolen devices. I also saw a noticeable drop in security incidents.
reviewer2083461 - PeerSpot reviewer
Information Security Analyst at a real estate/law firm with 5,001-10,000 employees
Secures data loss for our law firm but has struggled with outdated, complex management
On a technical level, when I draw a comparison between McAfee Complete Data Protection and CrowdStrike, McAfee Complete Data Protection is a one out of ten, and then CrowdStrike is a ten out of ten. I say that technically McAfee Complete Data Protection is so low because the console and the portal haven't changed in almost ten years. It's had some slight visual improvements, but that's it. It's not really working in a modern portal the way that some of the enterprise apps like CrowdStrike actually work. McAfee Complete Data Protection is also very difficult to use. It takes a lot of time to get my head around how it actually operates. It's not very intuitive. However, in terms of pricing and the specific use cases that I have, it's good.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The initial setup is easy."
"The most valuable feature of ESET Endpoint Encryption is the high level of encryption protection."
"The most valuable feature is that everything is done on the server."
"The product is easy to implement and configure."
"From the last update, it's easier for me to use."
"It is a very stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"It is very secure and we have finally decided to use this after a thorough check. The interface is easy to navigate."
"The solution allows me to easily monitor the encryption and password management of multiple computers in my network and gives me visibility into user use."
"I don't need to have any interaction with this product, which means that it is very, very good, and it is doing its job."
"The best features of McAfee Complete Data Protection are DLP and encryption; compared to other products in the market, these features are quite intuitive."
"We can scale the solution."
"In addition, it is easy to use, and you can define rules that protect the database beyond the built-in rules of the product. I found another purpose for the product besides the basic things that it does, protecting the database: privileged use, weak authentication, SQL injection and and database platform vulnerability."
"The McAfee Threat Protection and McAfee Web Protection are valuable aspects of the solution, and they're better than other features that come with the endpoints."
"The interface is very good. You can create and manage your own dashboard."
"The most valuable feature is security."
"I am satisfied with the customer service/technical support."
 

Cons

"There could be an option for users to restart the system without a password."
"My problem is that there's a technical glitch and they don't have a fix for it. It's not working with the latest version of Windows, which is a problem."
"From an admin perspective, the solution's UI could be more user-friendly."
"For me, it is unstable."
"The overall compatibility of the device is an area where the solution lacks."
"I would like to see better compatibility with mobile devices. Most of the time, people are connecting to our server using their mobile device."
"The solution should have better synchronization with active directory users and passwords for use in the encryption."
"The initial setup could be made easier."
"The disk encryption can be improved."
"Maybe a better GUI platform; that would make it easier to present information to management, so I would not need to fix the data before I present it."
"On a technical level, when I draw a comparison between McAfee Complete Data Protection and CrowdStrike, McAfee Complete Data Protection is a one out of ten, and then CrowdStrike is a ten out of ten."
"As a new technology, it does need to grow."
"The refresh feature needs improvement. You need to refresh it manually yt going to the address bar, clicking on it and pressing enter, or pressing F5. There should be a button you can click on to refresh or have it so every five seconds it's refreshing."
"The price is a little high and could be better."
"The product consumes too much RAM and CPU for its processing and this can lead to resource issues on PCs."
"The solution's pricing could be better."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Licensing costs are on a yearly basis."
"ESET Endpoint Encryption is moderately priced."
"There are some inexpensive products compared to ESET Endpoint Encryption, but they lack the essential features."
"On a scale of one to ten, where one is the lowest and ten is the highest, I rate its pricing a two."
"We paid for an annual subscription, and it was reasonable."
"The pricing is mid-ranged and could be more cost-effective."
"The National University System dedicates 500 of their 5000 licenses to us, which is $14/yr per device. Most companies are paying $99 or $120 per device a year."
"It is neither very expensive, nor cheap. Overall it is affordable and there is a long term arrangement between our company and the solution providers for license."
"The pricing of the cloud offering seems confusing."
"The pricing is better than that of some competing products."
"When it comes to pricing, I've observed an increase recently."
"The price is good, it's a low-cost solution."
"The price of this solution needs to be improved."
"The licensing is yearly."
"This solution is reasonably priced."
"The pricing is quite reasonable compared to other vendors."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Encryption solutions are best for your needs.
913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Comms Service Provider
12%
University
10%
Computer Software Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Outsourcing Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Construction Company
9%
Comms Service Provider
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business12
Midsize Enterprise6
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business18
Midsize Enterprise5
Large Enterprise12
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with ESET Endpoint Encryption?
ESET Endpoint Encryption could be better as I have experience with Trend Micro encryption, but there are multiple getting challenges and policy defined challenges. However, ESET has a user-friendly...
What is your primary use case for ESET Endpoint Encryption?
My main use case for ESET Endpoint Encryption is full disk encryption, which I will achieve through this solution.
What advice do you have for others considering ESET Endpoint Encryption?
My advice to someone who is considering using ESET Endpoint Encryption is that it is easy to manage. I would tell them that the tool is straightforward to manage. I rated this product nine out of t...
Would you choose Microsoft BitLocker or McAfee Complete Data Protection?
Microsoft BitLocker is very intuitive and easy to maintain. It is basically the global standard solution for drive encryption and successfully fulfills regulatory needs in terms of data protection....
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for McAfee Complete Data Protection?
I am not very clear on whether McAfee Complete Data Protection is expensive or if it could be cheaper.
What needs improvement with McAfee Complete Data Protection?
The changes I would suggest for McAfee Complete Data Protection involve its global control capability. I am used to a comprehensive solution that extends beyond just branch or local office operations.
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

CCS Media Limited, Mercury Engineering, Unigarant, Pinewood Healthcare
Xcel Energy
Find out what your peers are saying about ESET Endpoint Encryption vs. McAfee Complete Data Protection and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.
913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.