ESET Inspect vs Kaspersky Anti Targeted Attack comparison

The compared ESET and Kaspersky solutions aren't in the same category. ESET is ranked #33 in EDR , with an average rating of 8.0, and holds a 1.2% mindshare in the category. Additionally, 80% of ESET users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of Kaspersky users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 9, 2026

ESET Inspect and Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform compete in cybersecurity threat detection and response. ESET Inspect is preferred for its intuitive deployment and supportive customer service, while Kaspersky stands out in features.

Features: ESET Inspect offers real-time threat monitoring, seamless integration, and advanced behavioral analysis. Kaspersky provides robust threat intelligence, high-level analytics, and comprehensive data protection.

Room for Improvement: ESET Inspect could enhance its scalability options, integration with third-party tools, and expand reporting capabilities. Kaspersky might simplify its user interface, reduce setup complexity, and improve system resource efficiency.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ESET Inspect is recognized for straightforward deployment and responsive customer service. Kaspersky, although providing thorough support, may present complexities due to its extensive configuration options.

Pricing and ROI: ESET Inspect is cost-effective with quicker setup times, appealing to budget-conscious organizations. Kaspersky’s higher costs align with its features, potentially offering long-term ROI for extensive security needs.

To learn more, read our detailed ESET Inspect vs. Kaspersky Anti Targeted Attack Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

ESET Inspect vs. Kaspersky Anti Targeted Attack

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 886,174 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Net...

Featured Reviews

ABHISHEK_SINGH

Senior Process Expert at A.P. Moller - Maersk

Gained full visibility and streamlined threat detection through behavior-based insights and AI integration

Initially, we got to have a lot of false positives when we onboarded, but nowadays it's quite smooth. We have fine-tuned our security policies and allowed different levels of policies to get rid of those false positives. Currently, we are getting a fairly good amount of incidents that are not false positives or benign, but actionable items. The process is streamlined. In the initial days, the operations used to get involved in a lot of benign and other activities, but now the process is streamlined. We are leveraging the auto-detection and remediation plans. The operations teams are now more involved in other business roles as well, not just looking into the logs and fetching out what's happening there. They have fixed a lot of things. Initially, they didn't have IAC code drift detection, cloud posture management, or security posture management, but they have those now. They purchased different vendors and did a merger with that. They have now Prisma Cloud that gets integrated and now they are working with Cortex Cloud. Everything that was negative has now been addressed, and the product altogether looks to be in a very better and mature shape now. Currently, it's more or less detecting the workloads with AI-based best practices. Since most organizations are consuming AI agents and other things, we are looking forward to seeing what other feature enhancements Palo Alto can support in that.

Read full review

Moshiur-Rahman Khan

CEO at IOPoint.com

Provides reliable and comprehensive internet security solutions without significant system slowdowns

My organization uses ESET Inspect for antivirus and internet security on laptops and desktops. On the enterprise side, we utilize it on our Windows Server. The platform has improved our organization's security by providing comprehensive antivirus and internet security solutions. It is fast and…

Read full review

FarkhundAbbas

Security Engineer at adcb

The tool provides excellent sandboxing and email security features, but the backup and recovery features are not good

If my primary solution is down, no backup solution is available to restore it. It is one of the biggest weaknesses of the platform. If I need to update the solution, there is no option to pick the events and the logs from it and deploy it in another solution. The backup and recovery features of the product are not good. I need backup. If the tool is down for some time, I cannot get the logs at that particular time.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The best feature of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is that it collects logs from different sections such as the endpoint, the network, and the cloud, making it easy to investigate alerts, collect some of the investigation packages related to the infected machines, and provide live response."

"Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is easy to use and does not consume a lot of hardware resources."

"There has been a significant reduction of approximately 70% to 80% in our internal MTTR and MTTD metrics, now around five to eight minutes whereas previously it was hours, which has helped tremendously."

"The information the dashboard provides is very clear."

"Cortex XDR is stable, offering high quality and reliable performance."

"If you are looking to deploy a security solution as a whole, this is a good option."

"We have found in our test Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks to be a very good tool."

"The solution's stability is generally good."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pros

"This solution is easy to install, setup and monitor."

"Scalability-wise, it is a very good solution."

"I find the multilayered endpoint security the most valuable feature."

"ESET Enterprise Inspector's greatest asset lies in its user-friendly interface, which allows for easy navigation and thorough analysis of incidents."

"ESET Enterprise Inspector's most valuable feature is EDR."

"The rules are the best and most useful features."

"Rules are the most valuable feature of ESET Inspect. They are created through XML language, and they track and filter events from endpoints. If the event matches the rule, the rule is triggered. Exceptions are the second most valuable feature because it gives you the power to filter false positives in large numbers. The third most valuable feature is the Learning mode that facilitates making exceptions for known processes with a good reputation."

"The product's most valuable features are its performance and stability."

"The most valuable use is detailing metadata collection from the endpoint and network."

"The product's deployment phase is easy."

"The email security feature is really good."

"The Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform provides visibility into telemetry data, enabling comprehensive monitoring of environmental activities."

"Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform is stable and runs all the time."

"I feel the anti-ransomware update is one of the tool's valuable features."

"The solution is very easy to use. Its interface is very simple, and you can build IOC's indicators. You can use your rules to detect these attacks because you can leverage threat intelligence. Y"

Cons

"The solution needs better reports. I think they should let the customer go in and customize the reports."

"The downsides of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks are that in many incidents, when I enter the causality chain, there are numerous logs."

"The installation should be easier and the Palo Alto pre-sales and sales teams should have more information on the product because they don't know what they are selling."

"To jump from the partner to Palo Alto directly was challenging."

"The dashboard could use some significant improvement, just making it more useful with more information. It has a limited amount of information right now. It is customizable, but I'd love to see a better out-of-box dashboard."

"The tool needs to be improved in terms of integration and interface."

"Cortex XDR could be improved with more GUI features."

"I would like to see some additional features related to email protection included."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks cons

"It may be difficult for a first-time customer to understand all of the functions that are available to him."

"One area that needs improvement for the product is ransomware protection, which does not offer complete security."

"Every vendor is working on making the job of SOC analysts easier, with fewer false positives and more precise detections. ESET uses LiveGrid technology that provides feedback on the reputation of files and operations. It's hard to eliminate all of the false positives, but hopefully, we'll see some improvement with the advances in AI."

"The product is complex to configure, and there are too many errors that are not errors, making it an area that can be considered for improvement."

"It is not a stable product. We were disappointed in the stability of this product in comparison to McAffee."

"The solution could improve the consumption of resources. The RAM and CPU usage increases during usage which can cause issues. We have three separate services and it would be beneficial if all were executed from one agent limiting the over usage of system resources."

"The platform's price could be better."

"The solution lacks cloud integrations."

"The blind spot or gap in the platform is network analysis functionality."

"I think the tool is still not really good enough for integration compared to other products."

"The backup and recovery features of the product are not good."

"The solution lacks cloud integrations."

"In some of the places I have come across, even though they use Kaspersky, the ransomware enters their system."

"Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform is not a good product. We had problems with endpoints and the solution did not detect it. We didn't get any alerts about the attack."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is expensive. It's pricing is on a yearly-basis."

"This is an expensive solution."

"Cortex XDR is a costly solution."

"I don't recall what the cost was, but it wasn't really that expensive."

"Cortex XDR's pricing is ok."

"Every customer has to pay for a license because it doesn't work with what you get from a managed services provider."

"The cost of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is $55 to $90 USD per endpoint per month."

"We pay about $50,000 USD per year for a bundle that includes Cortex XDR."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pricing and cost advice

"This is true in the case of licensing, we do not have the most expensive products, and we don't have the cheapest product, it's somewhere in the middle. Perhaps a little higher from the middle, but we are known for what we provide to our customers, and they are pleased."

"The pricing and licensing are the big issue now, in my opinion. If the price was less than other companies, or a one-time charge for service was available, I think there would be more users of this solution."

"I feel it is a very expensive product."

"The platform's licensing is affordable and straightforward."

"The platform is expensive; it could be cheaper."

"The solution has competitive pricing."

"Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform is cheap."

"Kaspersky is one of the cheaper solutions."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

886,174 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

13%

Educational Organization

Government

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	44
Midsize Enterprise	20
Large Enterprise	48

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Large Enterprise	2

No data available

Questions from the Community

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. Sentinel One

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. SentinelOne SentinelOne offers very detailed specifics with regard to risks or attacks. ...

See all answers

Comparing CrowdStrike Falcon to Cortex XDR (Palo Alto)

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Both Cortex XDR and Crowd Strike Falcon offer cloud-based solutions th...

See all answers

How is Cortex XDR compared with Microsoft Defender?

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security solution. The tool reduces the attack surface,...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ESET Inspect?

The platform's licensing is affordable and straightforward. We purchase soft keys, install them, and manage the licen...

See all answers

What needs improvement with ESET Inspect?

One area that needs improvement for the product is ransomware protection, which does not offer complete security.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for ESET Inspect?

My organization uses ESET Inspect for antivirus and internet security on laptops and desktops. On the enterprise side...

See all answers

What do you like most about Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform?

The solution is very easy to use. Its interface is very simple, and you can build IOC's indicators. You can use your ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform?

Its price is reasonable; it's neither very high nor very low, considering its capabilities.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform?

I think the tool is still not really good enough for integration compared to other products. If you need to integrate...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 8% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 6% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

Cortex XSIAM vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks Competitors

CrowdStrike Falcon vs ESET Inspect

Compared 12% of the time

HP Wolf Security vs ESET Inspect

Compared 9% of the time

Fortinet FortiEDR vs ESET Inspect

Compared 6% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs ESET Inspect

Compared 6% of the time

Sangfor Endpoint Secure vs ESET Inspect

Compared 4% of the time

More ESET Inspect Competitors

HP Wolf Security vs Kaspersky Anti Targeted Attack

Compared 9% of the time

TrendAI Vision One vs Kaspersky Anti Targeted Attack

Compared 7% of the time

SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform vs Kaspersky Anti Targeted Attack

Compared 6% of the time

Morphisec vs Kaspersky Anti Targeted Attack

Compared 5% of the time

MaxPatrol EDR vs Kaspersky Anti Targeted Attack

Compared 5% of the time

More Kaspersky Anti Targeted Attack Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

April 2026

Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks product report

Buyer's Guide

ESET Inspect

April 2026

Download ESET Inspect product report

Buyer's Guide

Kaspersky Anti Targeted Attack

March 2026

Download Kaspersky Anti Targeted Attack product report

Also Known As

Cyvera, Cortex XDR, Palo Alto Networks Traps

ESET Enterprise Inspector

Kaspersky Anti Targeted Attack

Overview

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.

Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.

What are the key features of Cortex XDR?

Advanced Threat Detection: Uses AI and machine learning for proactive threat identification.
Multi-layered Security: Combines various security measures for comprehensive protection.
Endpoint Protection: Safeguards against malware and exploits.
Behavioral Analysis: Monitors suspicious activity for early detection.
Automatic Threat Response: Automates responses to neutralize threats.

What benefits should users expect?

Ease of Use: Simplifies security management with intuitive design.
Resource Efficiency: Minimizes impact on system resources.
Integration Capabilities: Works well with existing security setups.
Reduced Analyst Workload: Automates processes to decrease manual intervention.

Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.

Palo Alto Networks

ESET Inspect is an essential component to help ensure the highest level of enterprise security. While standard ESET Endpoint Security provides strong protection, ESET Inspect takes your environment's security to a new dimension. A security tool is needed to help security professionals protect their sensitive data and detect and investigate security incidents, advanced threats, and targeted attacks or breaches on endpoint devices. ESET Inspect is a tool that offers the peace of mind of continuous protection and security monitoring in a powerful and easy-to-use solution.

ESET

Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform offers comprehensive capabilities for EDR and targeted attack prevention, focusing on detecting advanced threats and protecting endpoints, email, and networks with features like sandbox analysis.

This platform integrates user-friendly interfaces for creating detection rules and performing IOC sweeps to identify potential compromises. It includes metadata collection from endpoints and networks, anti-ransomware updates, and email security via sandbox analysis. Organizations employ it for monitoring system and network activities, enhancing threat detection across IT infrastructures without relying on signatures. Despite its strengths, improvements are needed in network analysis and integration within its ecosystem and with third-party solutions. Pricing adjustments could benefit smaller companies, and enhancements in endpoint detection and package deal options could optimize its effectiveness.

What are the most important features of Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform?

Metadata Collection: Gathers valuable details from endpoints and networks
Anti-Ransomware Update: Regular updates enhance protection against ransomware attacks
Email Security: Sandbox analysis detects malicious code effectively
User-Friendly Interface: Simplifies rule creation and IOC sweeps
Threat Intelligence: Assists in developing detection rules based on IOCs

What benefits or ROI should users look for?

Advanced Threat Detection: Identifies threats without relying on signatures
Comprehensive Email Protection: Detects and mitigates malicious content
Ease of Deployment: Offers easy setup in on-premise models
Enhanced Monitoring: Provides rigorous monitoring of system and network activities

In industries like finance and healthcare, Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform is implemented to protect sensitive data and maintain compliance with regulatory standards. Its combination of email, web, and endpoint protection supports organizations by preventing data breaches and ensuring robust security across IT systems.

Kaspersky

Sample Customers

CBI Health Group, University Honda, VakifBank

Mitsubishi Motors, Allianz Suisse, Cannon, T-Mobile

Republic of Serbia, Goods.ru, Tael, Insolar

Buyer's Guide

ESET Inspect vs. Kaspersky Anti Targeted Attack

March 2026

Free Report: ESET Inspect vs. Kaspersky Anti Targeted Attack

Find out what your peers are saying about ESET Inspect vs. Kaspersky Anti Targeted Attack and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

886,174 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ESET Inspect vs. Kaspersky Anti Targeted Attack report.

We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.