No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.
ESET Inspect Logo

Top 10 ESET Inspect Alternatives

Vendor: ESET
3.8 out of 5
Leave a reviewWhy PeerSpot?

Top ESET Inspect Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to ESET Inspect based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include CrowdStrike Falcon, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks, and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

ESET Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with ESET, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
ESET Inspect Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon
4.4 out of 5
ESET Inspect Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon
4.4 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon Insight XDR excels with real-time threat intelligence and seamless integration, offering competitive pricing and efficient ROI. In comparison, ESET Inspect provides extensive threat hunting and deep analysis, appealing to organizations prioritizing comprehensive security despite higher costs and more complex deployment.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. ESET Inspect Report
CrowdStrike Falcon Insight XDR has a slightly higher setup cost than ESET Inspect, providing an advanced scope of features, while ESET Inspect offers a more cost-effective initial setup with robust capabilities for cybersecurity.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon Insight XDR has a slightly higher setup cost than ESET Inspect, providing an advanced scope of features, while ESET Inspect offers a more cost-effective initial setup with robust capabilities for cybersecurity.
ESET Inspect Logo
ESET Inspect Logo
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks
4.2 out of 5

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides endpoint protection by detecting and blocking malware. It integrates with firewalls, enhances security with AI-driven threat detection, and offers behavior-based analysis. Praised for its user-friendly interface, it ensures endpoint safety but faces challenges like integration issues, high memory usage, and compatibility differences.

Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs. ESET Inspect Report
I feel it is fairly priced.
The pricing seems fair, and I do like the licensing model. You use wherever they are, and it is elastic.
View comparison
Pricing
I feel it is fairly priced.
The pricing seems fair, and I do like the licensing model. You use wherever they are, and it is elastic.
ESET Inspect Logo
ESET Inspect Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
4.1 out of 5
ESET Inspect excels with detailed reports and tracing capabilities, appealing for its reasonable setup costs. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, though pricier, offers seamless integration and advanced analytics, justifying its higher costs with superior features and significant ROI.
Download ESET Inspect vs. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Report
ESET Inspect has a lower setup cost compared to Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, which has a higher initial cost.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Inspect has a lower setup cost compared to Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, which has a higher initial cost.
ESET Inspect Logo
ESET Inspect Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint
4.4 out of 5
SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint excels with automation and real-time threat response, appealing to those seeking efficient mitigation. In comparison, ESET Inspect offers forensic capabilities and granular control, attracting users prioritizing detailed security management and those requiring extensive analytics.
Download ESET Inspect vs. SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint Report
SentinelOne Singularity Complete involves higher setup costs with comprehensive features, whereas ESET Inspect offers a more budget-friendly implementation, emphasizing value in simpler settings.
View comparison
Pricing
SentinelOne Singularity Complete involves higher setup costs with comprehensive features, whereas ESET Inspect offers a more budget-friendly implementation, emphasizing value in simpler settings.
ESET Inspect Logo
ESET Inspect Logo
IBM Security QRadar
4.0 out of 5
IBM Security QRadar excels in comprehensive threat detection for large enterprises. In comparison, ESET Inspect offers user-focused features appealing for usability and advanced protection. Both solutions suit distinct needs, with QRadar ideal for large networks and ESET Inspect favored for cost-effective endpoint security.
Download ESET Inspect vs. IBM Security QRadar Report
IBM Security QRadar frequently incurs higher setup costs, whereas ESET Inspect typically offers a more budget-friendly installation.
View comparison
Pricing
IBM Security QRadar frequently incurs higher setup costs, whereas ESET Inspect typically offers a more budget-friendly installation.
ESET Inspect Logo
Elastic Security
3.9 out of 5
ESET Inspect Logo
Elastic Security
3.9 out of 5
Elastic Security is valued for its comprehensive monitoring, real-time alerts, and reasonable setup costs. In comparison, ESET Inspect provides advanced threat detection and detailed forensic capabilities, justifying its higher investment. Elastic Security offers smooth deployment, while ESET Inspect delivers effective customer service despite a more complex setup.
Download ESET Inspect vs. Elastic Security Report
Elastic Security has a moderate setup cost, providing accessible deployment, whereas ESET Inspect has a lower setup cost, offering a more budget-friendly option.
View comparison
Pricing
Elastic Security has a moderate setup cost, providing accessible deployment, whereas ESET Inspect has a lower setup cost, offering a more budget-friendly option.
ESET Inspect Logo
Tanium
3.9 out of 5
ESET Inspect Logo
Tanium
3.9 out of 5
Tanium provides cost-effective, real-time threat detection and responsive support for seamless integration. In comparison, ESET Inspect emphasizes advanced threat prevention and comprehensive analysis, appealing to those prioritizing robust security features despite higher initial costs. Tech buyers may choose based on financial priorities and security needs.
Download ESET Inspect vs. Tanium Report
Tanium requires an initial setup cost that is higher and tailored towards larger enterprises, while ESET Inspect offers a more affordable setup, appealing to smaller businesses with budget constraints.
View comparison
Pricing
Tanium requires an initial setup cost that is higher and tailored towards larger enterprises, while ESET Inspect offers a more affordable setup, appealing to smaller businesses with budget constraints.
ESET Inspect Logo
ESET Inspect Logo
Huntress Managed EDR
4.6 out of 5
ESET Inspect offers cost-effective monitoring and customizability, appealing to budget-sensitive buyers. In comparison, Huntress Managed EDR provides efficient automation and superior customer service, attracting those seeking rapid deployment and high ROI. Both products cater distinctively to different tech buyer priorities.
Download ESET Inspect vs. Huntress Managed EDR Report
ESET Inspect requires a higher setup cost, focusing on customizable options, while Huntress Managed EDR offers a lower upfront payment, prioritizing ease of setup and rapid deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Inspect requires a higher setup cost, focusing on customizable options, while Huntress Managed EDR offers a lower upfront payment, prioritizing ease of setup and rapid deployment.
ESET Inspect Logo
TrendAI Vision One
4.3 out of 5
ESET Inspect Logo
TrendAI Vision One
4.3 out of 5
ESET Inspect is favored for its ease of use and competitive pricing, appealing to budget-conscious organizations. In comparison, TrendAI Vision One attracts buyers with advanced detection capabilities and seamless integration, ideal for businesses seeking sophisticated analytics and AI-driven insights for comprehensive threat management.
Download ESET Inspect vs. TrendAI Vision One Report
ESET Inspect involves straightforward setup costs, while TrendAI Vision One presents a more complex pricing structure.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Inspect involves straightforward setup costs, while TrendAI Vision One presents a more complex pricing structure.
ESET Inspect Logo
ESET Inspect Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform
4.0 out of 5
Trellix offers extensive threat intelligence and automated response, suitable for broad enterprise protection. In comparison, ESET Inspect provides deep threat visibility and flexible integration, catering to niche security needs. Trellix’s streamlined deployment contrasts with ESET's complex setup, offering potential long-term advantages.
Download ESET Inspect vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform's setup cost is higher than ESET Inspect's, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform's setup cost is higher than ESET Inspect's, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.
ESET Inspect Logo
WatchGuard Firebox
4.2 out of 5
ESET Inspect Logo
WatchGuard Firebox
4.2 out of 5
WatchGuard Firebox appeals with its cost-effective simplicity and robust integration. In comparison, ESET Inspect offers comprehensive threat analysis and rich forensic capabilities for organizations needing deep security insights and long-term effectiveness despite higher initial expenses.
Download ESET Inspect vs. WatchGuard Firebox Report
WatchGuard Firebox has higher setup costs compared to ESET Inspect, where setup is notably more cost-efficient.
View comparison
Pricing
WatchGuard Firebox has higher setup costs compared to ESET Inspect, where setup is notably more cost-efficient.
ESET Inspect Logo
HP Wolf Security
3.9 out of 5
ESET Inspect Logo
HP Wolf Security
3.9 out of 5
HP Wolf Security excels in advanced threat protection and ease of deployment, making it a cost-effective choice with strong customer service. In comparison, ESET Inspect offers comprehensive threat detection and integration features, justifying its higher cost with a superior ROI.
Download ESET Inspect vs. HP Wolf Security Report
HP Wolf Security's setup cost is characterized by its competitive pricing, while ESET Inspect's setup cost is noted for being higher but potentially offering more comprehensive features.
View comparison
Pricing
HP Wolf Security's setup cost is characterized by its competitive pricing, while ESET Inspect's setup cost is noted for being higher but potentially offering more comprehensive features.
ESET Inspect Logo
ESET Inspect Logo
Microsoft Defender XDR
4.2 out of 5
ESET Inspect is favored for its cost, seamless deployment, and excellent customer service. In comparison, Microsoft Defender XDR stands out due to its comprehensive features, Microsoft ecosystem integration, and automation capabilities. Both have specific strengths and room for improvement in aspects such as integration and resource management.
Download ESET Inspect vs. Microsoft Defender XDR Report
ESET Inspect has a high setup cost, while Microsoft Defender XDR offers a more budget-friendly option.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Inspect has a high setup cost, while Microsoft Defender XDR offers a more budget-friendly option.
ESET Inspect Logo
ESET Inspect Logo
Check Point Harmony Endpoint
4.4 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers cost-effective, robust threat prevention with straightforward deployment and excellent customer support. In comparison, ESET Inspect's advanced threat detection and data-driven analytics justify its higher costs, appealing to those seeking superior long-term returns despite limited deployment support.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. ESET Inspect Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint has a higher setup cost compared to ESET Inspect, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment. This cost difference highlights a key consideration for businesses evaluating their cybersecurity expenditure.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint has a higher setup cost compared to ESET Inspect, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment. This cost difference highlights a key consideration for businesses evaluating their cybersecurity expenditure.
ESET Inspect Logo
Rapid7 InsightIDR
4.2 out of 5
ESET Inspect Logo
Rapid7 InsightIDR
4.2 out of 5
Rapid7 InsightIDR provides comprehensive threat detection and streamlined incident response, favored for its ease of use and customer support. In comparison, ESET Inspect offers in-depth analytics and robust integration options, excelling in detailed security insights despite a steeper learning curve and higher cost.
Download ESET Inspect vs. Rapid7 InsightIDR Report
Rapid7 InsightIDR's setup cost is often described as higher, while ESET Inspect's setup cost is generally considered more reasonable. Rapid7 users find value despite its setup cost, contrasting with ESET users who appreciate its affordability.
View comparison
Pricing
Rapid7 InsightIDR's setup cost is often described as higher, while ESET Inspect's setup cost is generally considered more reasonable. Rapid7 users find value despite its setup cost, contrasting with ESET users who appreciate its affordability.
ESET Inspect Logo
ESET Inspect Logo
Intercept X Endpoint
4.2 out of 5
ESET Inspect features robust threat detection, while Intercept X Endpoint excels with comprehensive protection capabilities. In comparison, ESET Inspect's advanced threat hunting contrasts with Intercept X Endpoint's deep learning malware detection. ESET Inspect offers cost-effectiveness; Intercept X Endpoint provides extensive features for higher investment.
Download ESET Inspect vs. Intercept X Endpoint Report
ESET Inspect is hailed for its low setup cost, while Intercept X Endpoint is often critiqued for higher upfront expenses. Intercept X's intricate configuration demands more time compared to the straightforward setup of ESET Inspect.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Inspect is hailed for its low setup cost, while Intercept X Endpoint is often critiqued for higher upfront expenses. Intercept X's intricate configuration demands more time compared to the straightforward setup of ESET Inspect.
ESET Inspect Logo
Cynet
4.4 out of 5
ESET Inspect Logo
Cynet
4.4 out of 5
Cynet is appreciated for its automated threat detection and response, while ESET Inspect offers advanced forensic analysis essential for enterprise protection. In comparison, Cynet is noted for cost efficiency. ESET Inspect, although more expensive, is ideal for in-depth analysis tool needs.
Download Cynet vs. ESET Inspect Report
Cynet offers a lower setup cost compared to ESET Inspect, but ESET Inspect provides more comprehensive initial setup assistance.
View comparison
Pricing
Cynet offers a lower setup cost compared to ESET Inspect, but ESET Inspect provides more comprehensive initial setup assistance.
ESET Inspect Logo
Fortinet FortiEDR
4.0 out of 5
ESET Inspect Logo
Fortinet FortiEDR
4.0 out of 5
Fortinet FortiEDR excels in threat detection, real-time response, and automation, offering straightforward deployment. In comparison, ESET Inspect provides comprehensive endpoint visibility, proactive threat hunting, and advanced investigative tools, thus delivering better ROI and detailed investigative features. Scalability is a challenge for ESET Inspect, while FortiEDR faces integration issues.
Download ESET Inspect vs. Fortinet FortiEDR Report
Fortinet FortiEDR has higher initial setup costs compared to ESET Inspect, which is more budget-friendly. ESET Inspect users find setup straightforward, while Fortinet FortiEDR requires advanced IT skills for initial configuration.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiEDR has higher initial setup costs compared to ESET Inspect, which is more budget-friendly. ESET Inspect users find setup straightforward, while Fortinet FortiEDR requires advanced IT skills for initial configuration.
ESET Inspect Logo
ESET Inspect Logo
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint
3.9 out of 5
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint excels in real-time threat intelligence and incident response for large enterprises. In comparison, ESET Inspect offers advanced threat detection, low-system impact, and detailed analytics. VMware is ideal for enterprise-level needs, while ESET's lightweight efficiency appeals to cost-conscious buyers.
Download ESET Inspect vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Report
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint has a straightforward setup cost, while ESET Inspect's setup cost includes additional customization fees. VMware's pricing is competitive with no hidden charges, whereas ESET may involve extra expenditures for comprehensive deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint has a straightforward setup cost, while ESET Inspect's setup cost includes additional customization fees. VMware's pricing is competitive with no hidden charges, whereas ESET may involve extra expenditures for comprehensive deployment.
ESET Inspect Logo
ESET Inspect Logo
TrendAI Vision One – Endpoint Security
4.1 out of 5
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security excels in integration and ease of deployment with lower initial costs. In comparison, ESET Inspect provides superior threat detection and system visibility, attracting businesses willing to invest in advanced features and long-term security through comprehensive threat analysis.
Download ESET Inspect vs. TrendAI Vision One – Endpoint Security Report
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security has a straightforward setup at a reasonable cost, while ESET Inspect might require a higher upfront investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security has a straightforward setup at a reasonable cost, while ESET Inspect might require a higher upfront investment.
ESET Inspect Logo
USM Anywhere
4.2 out of 5
ESET Inspect Logo
USM Anywhere
4.2 out of 5
USM Anywhere offers an integrated solution with centralized visibility and automated response, making it ideal for organizations with limited resources. In comparison, ESET Inspect provides advanced threat hunting and forensic analysis, which appeals to buyers needing deep cybersecurity insights and detailed analytics.
Download ESET Inspect vs. USM Anywhere Report
USM Anywhere's setup cost is higher compared to ESET Inspect, which offers a more budget-friendly initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
USM Anywhere's setup cost is higher compared to ESET Inspect, which offers a more budget-friendly initial setup.
ESET Inspect Logo
ESET Inspect Logo
Stellar Cyber Open XDR
1 out of 5

Stellar Cyber Open XDR enhances threat detection and response with advanced analytics and integrations. Its valuable features include AI-driven insights and real-time monitoring. Some users point to room for improvement in deployment processes and customizability to better align with diverse industry needs.

Download ESET Inspect vs. Stellar Cyber Open XDR Report
It’s a single license platform.
View comparison
Pricing
It’s a single license platform.
ESET Inspect Logo
NetWitness NDR
4.0 out of 5
ESET Inspect Logo
NetWitness NDR
4.0 out of 5
NetWitness NDR excels in threat detection with detailed analytics, while ESET Inspect offers comprehensive endpoint monitoring. In comparison, NetWitness NDR is noted for its high-end features but challenging deployment. ESET Inspect, easier to deploy, appeals to budget-conscious buyers with efficient performance.
Download ESET Inspect vs. NetWitness NDR Report
NetWitness NDR has a higher setup cost, whereas ESET Inspect offers a more budget-friendly setup. NetWitness provides robust features for a higher initial investment, while ESET Inspect balances cost with essential functionalities.
View comparison
Pricing
NetWitness NDR has a higher setup cost, whereas ESET Inspect offers a more budget-friendly setup. NetWitness provides robust features for a higher initial investment, while ESET Inspect balances cost with essential functionalities.
ESET Inspect Logo
WatchGuard EPDR
4.2 out of 5
ESET Inspect Logo
WatchGuard EPDR
4.2 out of 5
ESET Inspect excels in threat detection and reporting, appealing to those prioritizing analytics, while WatchGuard EPDR, with its intuitive management and integration capabilities, offers robust threat hunting. In comparison, WatchGuard EPDR garners preference for its support services and comprehensive feature set, justifying higher costs with better long-term value.
Download ESET Inspect vs. WatchGuard EPDR Report
ESET Inspect has a moderate setup cost, while WatchGuard EPDR is more expensive, reflecting its comprehensive feature set.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Inspect has a moderate setup cost, while WatchGuard EPDR is more expensive, reflecting its comprehensive feature set.
ESET Inspect Logo
ESET Inspect Logo
Bitdefender GravityZone EDR
4.2 out of 5
Bitdefender GravityZone EDR excels in threat detection and automation with smooth deployment and strong customer service. In comparison, ESET Inspect offers rich forensic data and network visibility but has a challenging setup. Bitdefender provides lower costs, while ESET delivers valuable features despite higher expenses.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone EDR vs. ESET Inspect Report
Bitdefender GravityZone EDR has higher setup costs, while ESET Inspect offers a more cost-effective setup experience. ESET Inspect stands out for its affordability, contrasting sharply with the premium setup investment required for Bitdefender GravityZone EDR.
View comparison
Pricing
Bitdefender GravityZone EDR has higher setup costs, while ESET Inspect offers a more cost-effective setup experience. ESET Inspect stands out for its affordability, contrasting sharply with the premium setup investment required for Bitdefender GravityZone EDR.
ESET Inspect Logo
Lookout
3.8 out of 5
ESET Inspect Logo
Lookout
3.8 out of 5
Lookout offers cost-effectiveness and ease of use with real-time threat intelligence and mobile security. In comparison, ESET Inspect provides advanced threat detection and forensic analysis. Lookout’s swift deployment contrasts with ESET Inspect’s detailed features, potentially offering greater value despite higher setup costs.
Download ESET Inspect vs. Lookout Report
Lookout has a higher setup cost compared to ESET Inspect. ESET Inspect offers a lower initial financial barrier, making it more accessible for budget-conscious businesses.
View comparison
Pricing
Lookout has a higher setup cost compared to ESET Inspect. ESET Inspect offers a lower initial financial barrier, making it more accessible for budget-conscious businesses.
ESET Inspect Logo
Logpoint
3.8 out of 5
ESET Inspect Logo
Logpoint
3.8 out of 5
Logpoint offers flexibility and support with extensive SIEM functionalities, while ESET Inspect provides advanced endpoint investigation and real-time threat detection. In comparison, Logpoint is cost-efficient and easier to deploy. ESET Inspect justifies its higher cost with precise threat analysis and detailed documentation.
Download ESET Inspect vs. Logpoint Report
Logpoint has a lower setup cost compared to ESET Inspect. ESET Inspect's setup cost is higher, reflecting its advanced security features.
View comparison
Pricing
Logpoint has a lower setup cost compared to ESET Inspect. ESET Inspect's setup cost is higher, reflecting its advanced security features.
ESET Inspect Logo
Red Canary
4.5 out of 5
ESET Inspect Logo
Red Canary
4.5 out of 5
ESET Inspect impresses with strong threat detection and easy integration, ideal for cost-conscious buyers. In comparison, Red Canary's advanced automation and extensive threat intelligence offer more robust features. ESET Inspect's straightforward deployment contrasts with Red Canary's superior customer support, justifying its higher price.
Download ESET Inspect vs. Red Canary Report
ESET Inspect has a higher setup cost, while Red Canary offers a more competitive pricing for initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Inspect has a higher setup cost, while Red Canary offers a more competitive pricing for initial setup.
ESET Inspect Logo
ConnectWise SIEM
4.3 out of 5
ESET Inspect Logo
ConnectWise SIEM
4.3 out of 5
ESET Inspect excels in threat detection and response, making it ideal for users prioritizing security features. In comparison, ConnectWise SIEM's strength lies in its integrations and scalability. ESET Inspect is cost-effective, while ConnectWise SIEM justifies its higher cost with extensive features.
Download ConnectWise SIEM vs. ESET Inspect Report
ESET Inspect has a one-time setup cost that is competitively priced, while ConnectWise SIEM requires a higher initial investment making it more suitable for larger enterprises seeking comprehensive security features.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Inspect has a one-time setup cost that is competitively priced, while ConnectWise SIEM requires a higher initial investment making it more suitable for larger enterprises seeking comprehensive security features.
ESET Inspect Logo
Fidelis Elevate
4.2 out of 5
ESET Inspect Logo
Fidelis Elevate
4.2 out of 5
Fidelis Elevate excels in threat detection, automation, and security integration, making it ideal for robust threat response. In comparison, ESET Inspect offers detailed forensic analysis and customizable dashboards. Tech buyers might choose Fidelis Elevate for reasonable costs or ESET Inspect for its superior features.
Download ESET Inspect vs. Fidelis Elevate Report
Fidelis Elevate has a higher initial setup cost, while ESET Inspect offers a more budget-friendly setup. Fidelis Elevate's comprehensive security features may justify the higher cost compared to ESET Inspect.
View comparison
Pricing
Fidelis Elevate has a higher initial setup cost, while ESET Inspect offers a more budget-friendly setup. Fidelis Elevate's comprehensive security features may justify the higher cost compared to ESET Inspect.
ESET Inspect Logo
ESET Inspect Logo
Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response
3.9 out of 5
Cybereason offers comprehensive threat detection and rapid response with machine learning and advanced threat intelligence. In comparison, ESET Inspect excels in behavioral analysis, integration, and resource efficiency, making it ideal for those prioritizing seamless interaction and cost-effective security solutions.
Download Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. ESET Inspect Report
Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response users report lower setup costs compared to ESET Inspect, highlighting a significant cost advantage for organizations prioritizing initial implementation expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response users report lower setup costs compared to ESET Inspect, highlighting a significant cost advantage for organizations prioritizing initial implementation expenses.
ESET Inspect Logo
ESET Inspect Logo
Kaspersky Next EDR Expert
4.1 out of 5
ESET Inspect enhances integration into existing IT ecosystems, emphasizing versatile threat detection and management. In comparison, Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert offers advanced AI-driven analytics for superior detection and response, catering to companies seeking comprehensive security.
Download ESET Inspect vs. Kaspersky Next EDR Expert Report
ESET Inspect offers a more streamlined setup with lower initial costs, while Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert entails higher setup expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Inspect offers a more streamlined setup with lower initial costs, while Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert entails higher setup expenses.
ESET Inspect Logo
ESET Inspect Logo
Heimdal Endpoint Security
4.5 out of 5
Heimdal Endpoint Security enhances threat detection, integrating smoothly with existing systems. Users value its real-time monitoring and ransomware protection capabilities. There is room for improvement in customization options and reporting features, ensuring it meets diverse user requirements efficiently.
View comparison
ESET Inspect Logo
Kaseya 365
1 out of 5
ESET Inspect Logo
Kaseya 365
1 out of 5

Kaseya 365 offers efficient IT management with features like automated patching and remote monitoring. Users appreciate its integration capabilities but seek improvements in performance and reporting tools. Its scalability and security functions make it suitable for diverse IT environments, though some desire a more intuitive design.

View comparison
ESET Inspect Logo
ESET Inspect Logo
Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
3.8 out of 5
ESET Inspect excels in threat detection and detailed forensics, offering comprehensive threat hunting capabilities. In comparison, Datto EDR provides advanced threat intelligence and real-time monitoring with seamless integration. ESET Inspect is budget-friendly, while Datto EDR's higher cost is justified by its advanced features and proactive protection.
Download Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs. ESET Inspect Report
ESET Inspect has a minimal setup cost, while Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) involves a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Inspect has a minimal setup cost, while Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) involves a higher initial investment.
ESET Inspect Logo
Kandji
4.4 out of 5
ESET Inspect Logo
Kandji
4.4 out of 5
Kandji is utilized by companies for macOS and iOS management, offering MDM solutions, software deployment, and security compliance. Its intuitive interface facilitates device control and automatic updates. Known for efficient support, it requires enhancements in app library, Windows support, and remote features to meet niche needs and improve user experience.
Download ESET Inspect vs. Kandji Report
Users have to pay a yearly licensing fee for Kandji, which is expensive.
View comparison
Pricing
Users have to pay a yearly licensing fee for Kandji, which is expensive.
ESET Inspect Logo
ESET Inspect Logo
Kaspersky Next XDR Expert
3.9 out of 5
ESET Inspect attracts budget-conscious buyers with its competitive pricing and strong support. In comparison, Kaspersky appeals to those valuing advanced threat detection, behavior analysis, and machine learning. ESET offers straightforward deployment, while Kaspersky provides extensive resources and robust customer service.
Download ESET Inspect vs. Kaspersky Next XDR Expert Report
ESET Inspect has a lower setup cost compared to Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response, highlighting a significant pricing advantage. Kaspersky offers robust features but at a higher initial investment than ESET.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Inspect has a lower setup cost compared to Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response, highlighting a significant pricing advantage. Kaspersky offers robust features but at a higher initial investment than ESET.
ESET Inspect Logo
ESET Inspect Logo
SonicWall Capture Client
4.2 out of 5
ESET Inspect stands out for its pricing and customer support, making it an attractive cost-effective choice with strong threat detection and low resource consumption. In comparison, SonicWall Capture Client excels with its comprehensive feature set and easy integration, justifying its higher price with extensive security features.
Download ESET Inspect vs. SonicWall Capture Client Report
ESET Inspect has lower initial setup costs compared to SonicWall Capture Client, which tends to be more expensive due to its advanced features and robust security measures.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Inspect has lower initial setup costs compared to SonicWall Capture Client, which tends to be more expensive due to its advanced features and robust security measures.
ESET Inspect Logo
ESET Inspect Logo
VMware Carbon Black Cloud
4.1 out of 5
VMware Carbon Black Cloud is valued for advanced features and support, while ESET Inspect offers cost-effective, robust performance. In comparison, ESET Inspect excels in simplicity. VMware Carbon Black Cloud provides superior integration capabilities and real-time detection. ESET Inspect’s pricing appeals to budget-conscious buyers.
Download ESET Inspect vs. VMware Carbon Black Cloud Report
VMware Carbon Black Cloud has a higher setup cost compared to ESET Inspect, which offers a more affordable option for smaller organizations.
View comparison
Pricing
VMware Carbon Black Cloud has a higher setup cost compared to ESET Inspect, which offers a more affordable option for smaller organizations.
ESET Inspect Logo
ESET Inspect Logo
Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
3.9 out of 5
ESET Inspect offers robust security capabilities and cost-effectiveness. In comparison, Trellix EDR features comprehensive threat intelligence and automated response. ESET Inspect is easier to deploy, while Trellix EDR provides extensive features that justify its higher cost. ESET Inspect suits budget-conscious buyers; Trellix EDR appeals to those needing advanced functionality.
Download ESET Inspect vs. Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Report
ESET Inspect has high setup costs, whereas Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) is known for more cost-effective setup pricing.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Inspect has high setup costs, whereas Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) is known for more cost-effective setup pricing.
ESET Inspect Logo
ESET Inspect Logo
Kaspersky Next EDR Foundations
3.9 out of 5
ESET Inspect excels in security analytics and threat hunting capabilities, appealing to those prioritizing proactive security. In comparison, Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud offers a comprehensive feature set, ideal for those seeking a holistic solution with easier deployment and accessible customer support.
Download ESET Inspect vs. Kaspersky Next EDR Foundations Report
ESET Inspect has a higher setup cost than Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud, highlighting a key pricing difference between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Inspect has a higher setup cost than Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud, highlighting a key pricing difference between the two solutions.
ESET Inspect Logo
ESET Inspect Logo
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response
4.0 out of 5
ESET Inspect is known for its affordability, comprehensive threat detection, and behavioral analysis capabilities, with straightforward deployment and reliable customer service. In comparison, WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response offers advanced threat hunting and automated responses, providing substantial ROI despite a slightly complex deployment.
Download ESET Inspect vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response Report
ESET Inspect requires a moderate setup cost, while WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response is known for its relatively lower initial setup expenses.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Inspect requires a moderate setup cost, while WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response is known for its relatively lower initial setup expenses.
ESET Inspect Logo
Guardz
4.0 out of 5
ESET Inspect Logo
Guardz
4.0 out of 5
Guardz enhances online security with its threat detection and automated response features. Users find it effective for businesses handling sensitive data. Its intuitive setup is praised, but some desire advanced customization options. Guardz continuously works on improving its capabilities for diverse cybersecurity needs.
I like Guardz's pricing model because it's very cost-effective and has no long-term commitments.
View comparison
Pricing
I like Guardz's pricing model because it's very cost-effective and has no long-term commitments.
ESET Inspect Logo
SECDO Platform
4.5 out of 5
ESET Inspect Logo
SECDO Platform
4.5 out of 5
SECDO Platform stands out with its advanced threat detection and automated response capabilities, offering powerful investigative tools. In comparison, ESET Inspect excels with robust endpoint detection and seamless integration capabilities. SECDO suits users seeking comprehensive threat analysis, whereas ESET effectively addresses integration and endpoint security needs.
Download ESET Inspect vs. SECDO Platform Report
SECDO Platform has a higher setup cost, while ESET Inspect offers a more budget-friendly setup. SECDO Platform's pricing may be prohibitive for smaller budgets, whereas ESET Inspect provides a cost-effective alternative for users.
View comparison
Pricing
SECDO Platform has a higher setup cost, while ESET Inspect offers a more budget-friendly setup. SECDO Platform's pricing may be prohibitive for smaller budgets, whereas ESET Inspect provides a cost-effective alternative for users.
ESET Inspect Logo
ESET Inspect Logo
Sangfor Endpoint Secure
4.1 out of 5
ESET Inspect is appreciated for its ease of use and reliable threat detection. In comparison, Sangfor Endpoint Secure offers advanced features and integrated network security, catering to those needing comprehensive protection. Sangfor's additional capabilities come at increased complexity but provide higher value for tech buyers.
Download ESET Inspect vs. Sangfor Endpoint Secure Report
ESET Inspect's setup cost is generally lower compared to Sangfor Endpoint Secure, highlighting a significant difference in initial investment requirements.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Inspect's setup cost is generally lower compared to Sangfor Endpoint Secure, highlighting a significant difference in initial investment requirements.
ESET Inspect Logo
Open EDR
4.0 out of 5
ESET Inspect Logo
Open EDR
4.0 out of 5
Open EDR provides robust threat detection and response capabilities, offering valuable features for data security, including real-time analysis and customizable alerts. Users appreciate its extensive integration options. However, improvements in documentation and better customer support would enhance its user experience.
View comparison
ESET Inspect Logo
ESET Inspect Logo
Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response
3.8 out of 5
ESET Inspect excels with advanced threat detection and deep forensic capabilities. In comparison, Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response offers comprehensive threat analysis and automated response. ESET Inspect needs better third-party tool integration, while Symantec requires streamlined updates. ESET Inspect is cost-effective; Symantec has a superior feature set.
Download ESET Inspect vs. Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response Report
ESET Inspect has a lower setup cost, making it a budget-friendly option, while Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response requires a higher initial investment, indicating a potentially more robust feature set.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Inspect has a lower setup cost, making it a budget-friendly option, while Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response requires a higher initial investment, indicating a potentially more robust feature set.
ESET Inspect Logo
N-able EDR
3.8 out of 5
ESET Inspect Logo
N-able EDR
3.8 out of 5
ESET Inspect excels in detailed reporting and advanced threat detection, making it ideal for users needing comprehensive visibility. In comparison, N-able EDR streamlines integration and real-time monitoring for those prioritizing ease of deployment and efficient customer service over extensive threat analysis.
Download ESET Inspect vs. N-able EDR Report
ESET Inspect has a lower setup cost compared to N-able EDR, which offers extensive features.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Inspect has a lower setup cost compared to N-able EDR, which offers extensive features.
ESET Inspect Logo
ESET Inspect Logo
VIPRE Endpoint Security Cloud
1 out of 5
VIPRE Endpoint Security Cloud effectively addresses security use cases with features like real-time threat detection and ease of deployment. Its administrative controls are valuable, though reporting capabilities could see improvement. VIPRE supports various operating systems, ensuring tailored protection across different environments.
View comparison

Related categories

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
Extended Detection and Response (XDR)