ESET Inspect vs Kaspersky Next EDR Foundations comparison

ESET and Kaspersky are both solutions in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category. ESET is ranked #33 with an average rating of 8.0, while Kaspersky is ranked #25 with an average rating of 7.4. ESET holds a 1.2% mindshare in EDR, compared to Kaspersky’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of ESET users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Kaspersky users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 9, 2026

ESET Inspect and Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud are competitors in the cybersecurity market. While ESET Inspect is reported to have a slight edge in pricing efficiency and customer support satisfaction, Kaspersky's superior feature set gives it a compelling advantage.

Features: ESET Inspect offers user-friendly advanced threat detection, effective detection of pre-execution tasks, and multilayered endpoint security. Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud provides robust malware detection, a cloud-based console, and seamless integration with Microsoft Office 365.

Room for Improvement: ESET Inspect could enhance its feature set for more comprehensive endpoint protection, expand AI-driven threat intelligence capabilities, and streamline cloud integration. Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud can improve export data management, decrease its reliance on central management for simplicity, and enhance real-time monitoring efficiencies.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud is favored for its streamlined cloud-based deployment and responsive customer service. ESET Inspect is noted for its straightforward on-premise installation and reliable technical assistance.

Pricing and ROI: ESET Inspect is recognized for its cost-effectiveness and favorable ROI, appealing to cost-conscious buyers. In contrast, Kaspersky's higher price point is justified by its advanced functionalities, although its ROI slightly lags due to premium pricing.

To learn more, read our detailed ESET Inspect vs. Kaspersky Next EDR Foundations Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

ESET Inspect vs. Kaspersky Next EDR Foundations

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 886,174 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Net...

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category, the mindshare of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is 3.4%, down from 3.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ESET Inspect is 1.2%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kaspersky Next EDR Foundations is 0.7%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks	3.4%
Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud	0.7%
ESET Inspect	1.2%
Other	94.7%

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Featured Reviews

ABHISHEK_SINGH

Senior Process Expert at A.P. Moller - Maersk

Gained full visibility and streamlined threat detection through behavior-based insights and AI integration

Initially, we got to have a lot of false positives when we onboarded, but nowadays it's quite smooth. We have fine-tuned our security policies and allowed different levels of policies to get rid of those false positives. Currently, we are getting a fairly good amount of incidents that are not false positives or benign, but actionable items. The process is streamlined. In the initial days, the operations used to get involved in a lot of benign and other activities, but now the process is streamlined. We are leveraging the auto-detection and remediation plans. The operations teams are now more involved in other business roles as well, not just looking into the logs and fetching out what's happening there. They have fixed a lot of things. Initially, they didn't have IAC code drift detection, cloud posture management, or security posture management, but they have those now. They purchased different vendors and did a merger with that. They have now Prisma Cloud that gets integrated and now they are working with Cortex Cloud. Everything that was negative has now been addressed, and the product altogether looks to be in a very better and mature shape now. Currently, it's more or less detecting the workloads with AI-based best practices. Since most organizations are consuming AI agents and other things, we are looking forward to seeing what other feature enhancements Palo Alto can support in that.

Read full review

Moshiur-Rahman Khan

CEO at IOPoint.com

Provides reliable and comprehensive internet security solutions without significant system slowdowns

My organization uses ESET Inspect for antivirus and internet security on laptops and desktops. On the enterprise side, we utilize it on our Windows Server. The platform has improved our organization's security by providing comprehensive antivirus and internet security solutions. It is fast and…

Read full review

Zunair Aftab

Supports Engineer at Rawad IT Solutions

Security features excel while management tools face challenges

Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud has proven to be a robust and comprehensive solution for endpoint protection. So far, no major negative features have been observed. However, email security integration with Microsoft 365 has room for improvement. In a recent real-world incident, a company received 10 phishing emails, of which only three were blocked by the system. Enhancing detection accuracy to block 7 or more would significantly improve trust and effectiveness. With the on-premises version, there's a known issue where assigning a device to a new group results in it being auto-assigned back to the previous group. Fixing this bug would greatly streamline device management. Additionally, in the cloud version, once a device is assigned to a user, it cannot be reassigned without deleting the user or the device entirely. It would be far more user-friendly if the platform allowed simple reassignment or de-assignment, returning the device to an "unassigned" state. As for automated behavioral analysis, while current functionality is based on machine learning, upgrading to true AI-powered detection could bring substantial improvements. Ideally, the system should proactively flag potential threats, and offer administrators the option to either allow or block applications based on intelligent risk analysis

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The dashboard is customizable."

"Traps is quite a stable product. Once it was properly deployed and configured, you have nothing to be worried about."

"The main benefit of using Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks while employing Palo Alto Firewall at the internet edge is that it improves security on our endpoint devices, integrating seamlessly with Palo Alto Firewalls to deliver comprehensive network, analyst, and security details all in a single dashboard, which allows us to manage everything from our network devices."

"Implementing Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks has had a significant impact on my security analyst workload because it becomes much easier."

"After deploying Traps, we saw the performance of the network improve by 65 to 70 percent."

"They did what they said, and this solution could apply to any scenario."

"It detected stuff that other things wouldn't detect."

"It collects and caches and the knowledge of machine learning from different customers to take to the cloud, it makes it better to use for everybody, it allows for quick learning and updates and can, therefore, offer zero-day malware security, and this sharing of metadata helps make the solution very safe."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pros

"ESET Enterprise Inspector's most valuable feature is EDR."

"ESET Enterprise Inspector's greatest asset lies in its user-friendly interface, which allows for easy navigation and thorough analysis of incidents."

"Scalability-wise, it is a very good solution."

"I find the multilayered endpoint security the most valuable feature."

"The product's most valuable features are its performance and stability."

"This solution is easy to install, setup and monitor."

"The rules are the best and most useful features."

"Rules are the most valuable feature of ESET Inspect. They are created through XML language, and they track and filter events from endpoints. If the event matches the rule, the rule is triggered. Exceptions are the second most valuable feature because it gives you the power to filter false positives in large numbers. The third most valuable feature is the Learning mode that facilitates making exceptions for known processes with a good reputation."

"In Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud, anti-phishing and anti-malware are two very powerful aspects."

"All features in Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud are perfect, and I am interested in working with Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud."

"I would say that Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud is one of the best, very effective software because of its vulnerability assessment and threat assessments."

"I find the EDR service valuable as it adds extra protection and provides a centralized view."

"The platform's ability to update the database from my device and manage user profiles is quite effective."

"We had the cloud suite of KasperskyEndpoint Security Cloud, and its monitoring was fine."

"Kaspersky has a Cloud Discovery feature. There is no template in Kaspersky. They provide a temporary risk assessment of the cloud services. For example, if we want to block public storage services like OneDrive or Google Drive, we need to specify each individually. The main difference is that Kaspersky's process takes more time because it requires individual input."

"The product works perfectly to prevent malware in our organization."

More Kaspersky Next EDR Foundations pros

Cons

"The installation should be easier and the Palo Alto pre-sales and sales teams should have more information on the product because they don't know what they are selling."

"The GUI could be improved."

"It is not very strong in terms of endpoint management. It should have additional features like DLP, encryption, or advanced device control. Currently, Cortex is good in terms of the security of the endpoints, but it is not as good as other vendors in terms of the management of the endpoint."

"Cortex XDR should have a lightweight agent, and the agent size should not be heavy."

"As an improvement, I would like to see enhanced connection speeds."

"They've been having some issues with updating their endpoint agents, and it has been quite frustrating."

"Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR does not detect malicious activity like in other anti-virus solutions like Trend Micro and Windows with Cisco."

"In terms of areas of improvement, we have not completed our review of the product. We're also looking at other products. So, it's a little bit hard to tell what could be different because we have not completed the review of this product, but based on our experience so far, its implementation is quite complex."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks cons

"It is not a stable product. We were disappointed in the stability of this product in comparison to McAffee."

"The product is complex to configure, and there are too many errors that are not errors, making it an area that can be considered for improvement."

"It is not a stable product. We were disappointed in the stability of this product in comparison to McAffee."

"One area that needs improvement for the product is ransomware protection, which does not offer complete security."

"The solution could improve the consumption of resources. The RAM and CPU usage increases during usage which can cause issues. We have three separate services and it would be beneficial if all were executed from one agent limiting the over usage of system resources."

"It may be difficult for a first-time customer to understand all of the functions that are available to him."

"The platform's price could be better."

"Every vendor is working on making the job of SOC analysts easier, with fewer false positives and more precise detections. ESET uses LiveGrid technology that provides feedback on the reputation of files and operations. It's hard to eliminate all of the false positives, but hopefully, we'll see some improvement with the advances in AI."

"Kaspersky's global ranking has been on the decline."

"The solution’s stability could be improved because we earlier faced an issue where the solution was not detecting file-less malware."

"While the product provides a good level of protection, we need better support, especially in terms of being kept informed about new threats and specific configurations needed."

"Certain shortcomings in the anti-ransomware part of the solution need improvement. XDR and MDR, along with threat hunting, a big step in cybersecurity today, need improvement."

"Sometimes, the tool consumes a lot of resources from the endpoints, making it an area of concern where improvements are required since it currently consumes a little bit of RAM."

"Its high CPU usage also slows down devices, particularly those with lower specifications like Core i3."

"Recently, there was a company which was attacked by phishing emails, and out of 10, it was only blocking three emails."

"Kaspersky doesn't provide local support."

More Kaspersky Next EDR Foundations cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I don't like that they have different types of licenses."

"We didn't have to pay any additional fee for the cloud instance. It just came with the renewal, which was nice."

"It has reasonable pricing for the use cases it provides to the company."

"The price of the solution is high for the license and in general."

"This is an expensive solution."

"Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is an expensive solution."

"I don't have any issues with the pricing. We are satisfied with the price."

"It is "expensive" and flexible."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pricing and cost advice

"The platform's licensing is affordable and straightforward."

"This is true in the case of licensing, we do not have the most expensive products, and we don't have the cheapest product, it's somewhere in the middle. Perhaps a little higher from the middle, but we are known for what we provide to our customers, and they are pleased."

"I feel it is a very expensive product."

"The platform is expensive; it could be cheaper."

"The pricing and licensing are the big issue now, in my opinion. If the price was less than other companies, or a one-time charge for service was available, I think there would be more users of this solution."

"Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud is a cost-effective solution."

"I find Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud more accessible in terms of pricing."

"The platform is expensive."

"The solution is reasonably priced."

"The pricing is favorable, and there are no additional expenses associated with using the product."

"The product’s price is flexible."

"The solution is moderately priced and cannot be considered an expensive or cheap tool."

"The product is averagely priced."

More Kaspersky Next EDR Foundations pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

886,174 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

13%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	44
Midsize Enterprise	20
Large Enterprise	48

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. Sentinel One

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. SentinelOne SentinelOne offers very detailed specifics with regard to risks or attacks. ...

See all answers

Comparing CrowdStrike Falcon to Cortex XDR (Palo Alto)

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Both Cortex XDR and Crowd Strike Falcon offer cloud-based solutions th...

See all answers

How is Cortex XDR compared with Microsoft Defender?

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security solution. The tool reduces the attack surface,...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ESET Inspect?

The platform's licensing is affordable and straightforward. We purchase soft keys, install them, and manage the licen...

See all answers

What needs improvement with ESET Inspect?

One area that needs improvement for the product is ransomware protection, which does not offer complete security.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for ESET Inspect?

My organization uses ESET Inspect for antivirus and internet security on laptops and desktops. On the enterprise side...

See all answers

What do you like most about KasperskyEndpoint Security Cloud?

The product works perfectly to prevent malware in our organization.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for KasperskyEndpoint Security Cloud?

No advise, its pretty simple

See all answers

What needs improvement with KasperskyEndpoint Security Cloud?

I cannot find another problem.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 8% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 6% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

Cortex XSIAM vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks Competitors

CrowdStrike Falcon vs ESET Inspect

Compared 12% of the time

HP Wolf Security vs ESET Inspect

Compared 9% of the time

Fortinet FortiEDR vs ESET Inspect

Compared 6% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs ESET Inspect

Compared 6% of the time

TrendAI Vision One vs ESET Inspect

Compared 4% of the time

More ESET Inspect Competitors

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Kaspersky Next EDR Foundations

Compared 10% of the time

Kaspersky Next XDR Optimum vs Kaspersky Next EDR Foundations

Compared 8% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Kaspersky Next EDR Foundations

Compared 6% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response vs Kaspersky Next EDR Foundations

Compared 5% of the time

Huntress Managed EDR vs Kaspersky Next EDR Foundations

Compared 4% of the time

More Kaspersky Next EDR Foundations Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

April 2026

Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks product report

Buyer's Guide

ESET Inspect

April 2026

Download ESET Inspect product report

Buyer's Guide

Kaspersky Next EDR Foundations

March 2026

Download Kaspersky Next EDR Foundations product report

Also Known As

Cyvera, Cortex XDR, Palo Alto Networks Traps

ESET Enterprise Inspector

No data available

Overview

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.

Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.

What are the key features of Cortex XDR?

Advanced Threat Detection: Uses AI and machine learning for proactive threat identification.
Multi-layered Security: Combines various security measures for comprehensive protection.
Endpoint Protection: Safeguards against malware and exploits.
Behavioral Analysis: Monitors suspicious activity for early detection.
Automatic Threat Response: Automates responses to neutralize threats.

What benefits should users expect?

Ease of Use: Simplifies security management with intuitive design.
Resource Efficiency: Minimizes impact on system resources.
Integration Capabilities: Works well with existing security setups.
Reduced Analyst Workload: Automates processes to decrease manual intervention.

Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.

Palo Alto Networks

ESET Inspect is an essential component to help ensure the highest level of enterprise security. While standard ESET Endpoint Security provides strong protection, ESET Inspect takes your environment's security to a new dimension. A security tool is needed to help security professionals protect their sensitive data and detect and investigate security incidents, advanced threats, and targeted attacks or breaches on endpoint devices. ESET Inspect is a tool that offers the peace of mind of continuous protection and security monitoring in a powerful and easy-to-use solution.

ESET

Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud offers robust cybersecurity with features like malware detection and cloud-based endpoint management, suitable for businesses requiring advanced protection.

This solution provides comprehensive endpoint security, including a self-protection mechanism, EDR service, and integration with Microsoft Office 365. It supports multiple operating systems with components like Web Control, Device Control, and BitLocker encryption. Anti-phishing and anti-malware features, alongside detailed vulnerability assessments, enhance its security capabilities. Despite its strengths, users note areas for improvement in deployment, update management, and resource usage. Challenges include high CPU usage, installation delays, and stability issues. Companies benefit from features like ransomware protection and cloud platform integration, ensuring protection against threats.

What are the most important features of Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud?

Self-Protection Mechanism: Defends against unauthorized changes and ensure operation stability.
Malware Detection: Identifies and mitigates threats with high accuracy.
Cloud-Based Endpoint Management: Simplifies management across devices with a centralized console.
Microsoft Office 365 Integration: Enhances security and productivity in collaborative environments.
Vulnerability Assessments: Provides insights into potential security weaknesses.
Anti-Phishing & Anti-Malware: Protects against harmful emails and web content.

What benefits or ROI should users look for in reviews?

Reliable Performance: Consistent security measures against complex threats.
Detailed Reporting: Offers in-depth analysis of vulnerabilities and threats.
Comprehensive Protection: Covers a wide range of threats including malware and phishing.
Integration Capability: Easily integrates with other security solutions and platforms.

Companies in sectors such as automation and insurance implement Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud for its advanced cybersecurity features. They rely on its capabilities for application blocking, web and email threat defense, and compliance with data protection standards. By leveraging endpoint management and behavior analysis, organizations integrate this tool with cloud platforms to secure servers, workstations, and mobile devices.

Kaspersky

Sample Customers

CBI Health Group, University Honda, VakifBank

Mitsubishi Motors, Allianz Suisse, Cannon, T-Mobile

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

ESET Inspect vs. Kaspersky Next EDR Foundations

March 2026

Free Report: ESET Inspect vs. Kaspersky Next EDR Foundations

Find out what your peers are saying about ESET Inspect vs. Kaspersky Next EDR Foundations and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

886,174 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ESET Inspect vs. Kaspersky Next EDR Foundations report.

See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.