Evanios vs IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus comparison

Evanios and IBM are both solutions in the Event Monitoring category. Evanios is ranked #17, while IBM is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.0. Evanios holds a 2.2% mindshare in EM, compared to IBM’s 7.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Evanios users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Evanios

Read 6 Evanios reviews

669 Views
134 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus

Read 15 IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus reviews

1,414 Views
1,032 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Evanios

IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 23, 2025

IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus and Evanios compete in the IT operations management space. IBM emphasizes comprehensive monitoring capabilities, while Evanios appeals with advanced features for integration.

Features: IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus provides robust network monitoring with incident management, real-time alerts, and data aggregation capabilities. Its event management offers seamless handling of alerts with detailed information. The platform supports various protocols and provides a user-friendly interface for efficient system management. Evanios excels in integrating with ITSM tools, enhancing data insights across platforms. It offers advanced rule-based management capabilities and reliable agent architecture, allowing flexibility and scalability in complex environments. The seamless integration with alert-generating systems holds significant value for organizations.

Room for Improvement: IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus could benefit from enhanced compatibility beyond IBM DB2 and improved ease in customization for non-technical users. Expansion in native integration options and streamlined deployment processes would be advantageous. Additionally, making visual interfaces more intuitive could bolster its overall appeal. Evanios might look to refine its integration assistance offerings and expand support for even broader sets of ITSM tools. A focus on simplifying complex configurations could make its deployment more user-friendly. Increasing flexibility in rule customization would cater to varying enterprise needs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus presents a traditional deployment model, which accommodates extensive customization, although the process may require significant time and expertise. Its customer service is comprehensive, leveraging IBM's established infrastructure capabilities. Evanios offers an intuitive deployment process, reducing time and effort needed, with a responsive support team oriented towards facilitating integrations.

Pricing and ROI: IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus has a higher initial setup cost but offers strong ROI through its versatile and comprehensive monitoring capabilities. The support structure justifies the investment for enterprises requiring stable and extensive monitoring solutions. Evanios presents a cost-effective setup, making it appealing for businesses prioritizing lower initial costs with an emphasis on integration and unification of processes. Its potential ROI is boosted by its contribution to reducing operational expenses over time.

To learn more, read our detailed Evanios vs. IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Evanios vs. IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Evanios

Ranking in Event Monitoring

17th

Average Rating

9.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Infrastructure Monitoring (66th), IT Operations Analytics (19th)

IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus

Ranking in Event Monitoring

4th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

5.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Event Monitoring category, the mindshare of Evanios is 2.2%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus is 7.8%, down from 8.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Event Monitoring Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus	7.8%
Evanios	2.2%
Other	90.0%

Event Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Deepak-Malik

Director at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees

Customizable solution that provides the ability to ingest alerts from different systems

The price could be cheaper. That was one reason why we switched to PagerDuty. We wanted to switch to something that provided the same features but at a lower cost. We also switched because PagerDuty provided other features like integration with ServiceNow and the scheduling of engineers. Evanios was only for event integration. Evanios created too much noise. For every alert, it would create an incident. We received too many alerts and incidents from monitoring. It wasn't able to intelligently ingest alerts. It created 4,000 incident tickets in a month, which didn't reflect what was happening. If we received an alert, the synthetic monitoring and volume drop would give us the same alert. Evanios should include alert ingestion and de-duplication of alerts and noise reduction. We couldn't have people resolving each and every incident. PagerDuty gives us reports on how many alerts are being ingested, how many are noise, how many have bigger incidents, and which of the alerts are creating noise. It would be helpful if Evanios had metrics on the amount of alerts and types of the alerts to show which ones were serious incidents and which ones were just noise.

Read full review

SadanandSadashivaiah

Senior Consultant AWS at Cognizant

Good GUI and accuracy in processing but needs automated incident management

There is a complex setup and configuration process. It requires experience. We've had integration capabilities. We have to assess the specific needs or objectives of the organization, including scaling of deployment, and integration points, before implementation. Then, we need to design the architecture, including server specification networks, configuration, and storage requirements. We also need to consider the environment setup, hardware, projecting, and virtual machines. We need to ensure that network settings, firewalls, and security protocols are configured to allow communication between the components. Once you have all of the requirements laid out, it will only take five to six hours to set up. It does depend on the level of connectivity. If you are connecting remotely, it may take a bit longer. I set it up for three environments: development, testing, and production. One person can set up the solution themselves. If you are doing a NetCool suite of products, it may take two to three resources. You may need to do some maintenance in terms of additional patching or upgrading.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Provided up to a 90% noise reduction in some our noisy monitoring tools."

"The most valuable feature is the integration with various alert-generating systems because you might have synthetic alerts or monitoring alerts for volume drops."

"The ability to manipulate events via JavaScript getting the exact data that we want."

"IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus supports legacy protocols like CORBA, Huawei, and other telecom protocols, which I find beneficial."

"It's good for managed systems. The end query on the user interface is good. You can view lots of charts and graphs."

"Probes are the best feature because they are well written which rarely requires you to write additional rules. These probes monitor activity within your environment."

"It is customer-centric. Customers can access the event list from their location or desktop and view the event. There is no need to go and connect to any other server and run events to have a view of all the events happening in the environment. We get a good response from customers about this feature and the main architecture of NetCool. Its processing is very good. Deduplication and correlation functionalities are good in this solution as compared to other solutions. A big advantage of NetCool is that it also supports multi-layered protocols. We can receive multiple events from different protocols like UDP, HTTP, and those events can be captured in NetCool."

"The biggest plus points for me are the configurability and scalability of the solution, as well as the multi-tenancy of the platform."

"OMNIbus is valuable for its compatibility and performance, as I haven't encountered any performance issues."

"It is an easy-to-use solution."

"The most valuable feature is the event management capability."

More IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus pros

Cons

"We would like the ability to have an "exit" option for events when they are being processed."

"The price could be cheaper."

"More complex correlation rules would be nice. The ability to clearly define a parent event in a correlation and nested correlations, specifically."

"They could enhance the visibility to give us a unified view of our entire IT infrastructure."

"The solution has limitations in database integration as it cannot integrate with databases other than IBM DB2."

"Areas that could be better include the fact that the solution is only on-premises, lacks AI capabilities, and support response times could be quicker."

"The solution needs to invest in the development of a knowledge base and use of AI services for providing event resolution and intervention directions."

"The cost of the product is quite high. They should work to adjust their pricing models."

"Its technical support team takes longer to reply."

"Its integration could be better. They should provide an easier integration for all the monitoring stuff, and it will make things easier for us. Currently, there is a complexity in integrating it with a vendor application, and we have to use another tool to integrate it with a vendor application. To integrate some applications with NetCool, I need to install an IBM tool on top of it. It would be good if they can provide an API or any kind of interface that we can leverage while developing a new protocol interface or application. We should be able to use an API or interface with NetCool. Its GUI can also be better. As compared to other tools, it is not user friendly, and it is not easy to do stuff through GUI. Whenever we do anything on the GUI, it takes time. They need to focus on the GUI part, especially the dashboard. They should focus on how users can effectively drill down from one box to another. The visual appeal of the dashboard is as important as the data and functionality."

"There should be an easier-to-understand model, more of a flat-structured model rather than different tiers of licenses which complicates licensing."

More IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"It is a costly solution."

"You have to have the right level of budget to afford this solution."

"Its license cost is a little bit more than other solutions. Our customers expect a standard market price that is comparative to other products. For each and every NetCool OMNIbus component, we have to purchase a separate license. These components are not free with the product."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Event Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

27%

Computer Software Company

16%

Energy/Utilities Company

Non Profit

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus?

I would rate the pricing for IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus as three, where one is a high price and ten is a low price.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus?

Based on my experience and my colleagues' feedback, IBM can improve IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus in automation with respect to using AI, as it lacks considerably compared to other tools. The integrat...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus?

My current use case for IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus is for monitoring the networks.

See all answers

Comparisons

OpenText AI Operations Management vs Evanios

Compared 17% of the time

Moogsoft vs Evanios

Compared 17% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs Evanios

Compared 16% of the time

HPE OneView vs Evanios

Compared 15% of the time

ServiceNow IT Operations Management vs Evanios

Compared 13% of the time

More Evanios Competitors

ServiceNow IT Operations Management vs IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus

Compared 23% of the time

SCOM vs IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus

Compared 11% of the time

IBM Tivoli NetCool Impact vs IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus

Compared 11% of the time

PagerDuty Operations Cloud vs IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus

Compared 10% of the time

ScienceLogic vs IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus

Compared 9% of the time

More IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Evanios

January 2026

Download Evanios product report

Buyer's Guide

IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus

January 2026

Download IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus product report

Also Known As

No data available

Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus

Overview

A key component of the Event Management process is consolidation of events from across the enterprise. By consolidating disparate events into a single solution, they can be de-duplicated and correlated. For example, network failure events can be correlated with system failures, and then prioritized based on service impact.

Reduce the noise

Evanios Integrations allows filtering and processing close to the event source, keeping the weight off of the ServiceNow system for increased performance. Filters are easily configured. EVA, the Evanios consolidation point also has built in event flood control features, to protect against unexpected event storms which can quickly overload traditional integrations.

Evanios

Tivoli Netcool OMNIbus provides near real-time service assurance for business infrastructure, applications, servers, network devices and protocols, Internet protocols, storage and security devices.

IBM

Sample Customers

Greenville Health System, Land O’Lakes, AstraZeneca

Consolidated Communications, €sterreichische Bundesbahnen (€BB), Capgemini

Buyer's Guide

Evanios vs. IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus

December 2025

Free Report: Evanios vs. IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus

Find out what your peers are saying about Evanios vs. IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Evanios vs. IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus report.

See our list of best Event Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Event Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.