Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Everlaw vs Microsoft Purview eDiscovery comparison

Everlaw and Microsoft are both solutions in the eDiscovery category. Everlaw is ranked #9 with an average rating of 7.0, while Microsoft is ranked #2 with an average rating of 7.5. Everlaw holds a 1.1% mindshare in eD, compared to Microsoft’s 27.3% mindshare. Additionally, 66% of Everlaw users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.
Everlaw
Read 3 Everlaw reviews
  • 55 Views
  • 33 Comparison Views
66% willing to recommend
Microsoft Purview eDiscovery
Read 8 Microsoft Purview eDiscovery reviews
  • 1,557 Views
  • 1,247 Comparison Views
87% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 6, 2024

Everlaw and Microsoft Purview eDiscovery compete in the eDiscovery market. Everlaw appears to have an advantage with its intuitive navigation and collaborative tools, while Microsoft Purview eDiscovery is preferred for its integration with Microsoft services.

Features: Everlaw includes intuitive navigation, efficient collaboration tools, and advanced analytics with visual data presentation. Microsoft Purview eDiscovery provides seamless access to Microsoft services, comprehensive data search capabilities, and compliance tracking features.

Room for Improvement: Everlaw could improve with enhanced customization, better data export features, and increased flexibility. Microsoft Purview eDiscovery faces challenges with occasional performance issues, the need for simplified workflows, and improvements in efficiency.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Everlaw is recognized for its simple deployment process and responsive support. Microsoft Purview eDiscovery offers straightforward deployment, with mixed feedback on customer service responsiveness, but provides extensive documentation for guidance.

Pricing and ROI: Everlaw is seen as cost-effective with a favorable ROI due to its feature set and reliability. Microsoft Purview eDiscovery is initially more expensive but is considered a good investment for users heavily integrated into Microsoft, offering long-term cost benefits.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Everlaw vs. Microsoft Purview eDiscovery Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Everlaw vs. Microsoft Purview eDiscovery
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 847,625 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Everlaw
Ranking in eDiscovery
9th
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Microsoft Purview eDiscovery
Ranking in eDiscovery
2nd
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
Microsoft Security Suite (24th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the eDiscovery category, the mindshare of Everlaw is 1.1%. The mindshare of Microsoft Purview eDiscovery is 27.3%, up from 15.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
eDiscovery
 

Featured Reviews

SimardeepSingh - PeerSpot reviewer
An user-friendly solution that provides fast and accurate processing capabilities
The product is very user-friendly. When new employees join, they find Everlaw the easiest to learn among our different eDiscovery tools, such as Relativity, Canopy, and Nuix. It's simple to use, even for third-party uploads. Their support team is very good and resolves issues quickly. Everlaw is fast and accurate in processing. Producing documents is easy - we create and use a protocol for future productions. Processing errors in Everlaw can't be fixed, which is efficient. We use the tool specifically for unitization in many projects. It's very easy for reviewers to use. Everlaw is improving daily, introducing new features like analytics and AI. Analytics in Everlaw runs by default when we process anything. We used AI to train the system for review in a project with five million records. I think Everlaw's predictive coding tools are good. It's an AI feature that provides responsive documents. We train the model with 50 responsive or 50 non-responsive documents, and it uses that to pull out responsive documents and exclude non-responsive ones for reviewers. This is a great feature of the tool.
Read full review
Frank Radeck - PeerSpot reviewer
Tasks that took an entire day before we implemented the solution now take just 30 minutes.
The most valuable feature of Microsoft Purview eDiscovery is its ability to search across various platforms, including Exchange, SharePoint, Teams, and OneDrive. It enables a streamlined, unified process for searching across these platforms. It is critical for Purview to be able to connect to iOS, Mac, and Android devices and data in other SaaS apps. From a support perspective, I can do things while I'm eating lunch or something else. It's more dynamic and responsive. I think everybody appreciates it. We're not tied to one device. Purview's multi-cloud capabilities are also essential for the same reasons. Keeping everything under one umbrella further increases the time savings. Purview accounts for critical regulations from around the world. This is crucial because we hold ourselves accountable to standards and need to align with them. Working at a law firm, we have clients who dictate to us what standards they expect. The visibility is excellent. As we move more things into the cloud, more opportunities exist to put everything under one umbrella.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"We use the tool specifically for unitization in many projects. It's very easy for reviewers to use. Everlaw is improving daily, introducing new features like analytics and AI. Analytics in Everlaw runs by default when we process anything. We used AI to train the system for review in a project with five million records."
"We rely heavily on the search term report, which shows how documents are distributed across selected keywords. This helps us determine if a keyword produces too many results, indicating it might be too broad."
"In Everlaw, you can add related items within a search to a search component, allowing you to build and expand your search incrementally. For example, you can start with an initial search, add related items, and then continue adding more related items to the entire search. Another thing about Everlaw is its speed. It loads quickly, whether it's images or documents."
"The machine learning wasn't half bad. I really like that part. I thought it was novel. It pretty much automated it, once you trained the model."
"The return on investment is saving the equivalent of one or two full-time IT department employees and a few hours per week for legal staff."
"The tool has been beneficial. Some of our previous users left the organization without sharing the information they had at a personal level. This information was related to the organization, and they didn't disclose it. Thanks to the product, it's easy for me to search and find out what communication a specific user has done, whether it's from SharePoint or any other platform. With Microsoft Purview eDiscovery, we can easily retrieve and restore this data."
"Purview eDiscovery has made it significantly easier to handle rare litigation requests."
"The ability to query everything that's in Microsoft and send links or add people, like managers, to review the documents is valuable. It's easy as I don't have to download and email anything. I just add them as a reviewer, and they can access it from there."
"The most valuable features are automatic content logging tagging. Performing these tasks manually would be impossible. Since most of our data is already in Microsoft, it's convenient to run it through this tool."
"The speed of it is valuable. I am able to search even 10,000 mailboxes for specific content. It helps search and accommodate the often limited information provided by users regarding what they need."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Purview eDiscovery is its ability to search across various platforms, including Exchange, SharePoint, Teams, and OneDrive. It enables a streamlined, unified process for searching across these platforms."
More Microsoft Purview eDiscovery pros
 

Cons

"The support team is open to suggestions. They regularly release updates, often monthly, which include new features and improvements."
"Everlaw could be less choosy about accepting control numbers for third-party loads. When uploading third-party loads, it currently needs two mandatory fields (like within date or end date or page count). I think the control number should be the only required field. Everlaw isn't used for Data Breach projects. For normal eDiscovery, we can use Everlaw, but most clients prefer Relativity."
"I see two significant challenges with many of my clients. One is that there are some functionality gaps compared to specialized tools in the legal industry, like a legal hold tool or a document review tool. They have features that Purview eDiscovery lacks. Those gaps create a situation where I almost have to do things twice. I need to collect all my data in eDiscovery and ship it to another platform to complete the review."
"Purview Data Loss Protection for remediating policy violations needs refinement, for example, in defining what constitutes a credit card because that is where I get the most false positives."
"The sorting and filtering of the result data need improvement, and the interface for writing queries is not user-friendly for business users. We still need all the backend stuff. We have to use Graph API to interface with everything and create custom interfaces on the front end to make it easier for the end users, which is costly. The reporting, sorting, and filtering capabilities that other products have aren't available natively in Purview."
"The sorting and filtering of the result data need improvement, and the interface for writing queries is not user-friendly for business users."
"Microsoft Purview eDiscovery should be cheaper."
"I would suggest adding more platforms. Currently, it's compatible with OneDrive, Teams, SharePoint, and Exchange. Adding more features, as Microsoft continues to expand their cloud offerings, would be beneficial. Exploring options like Azure Files might be an avenue for improvement."
"We find that many critical functions are available only to E5 license holders. It would be beneficial to have more options available for E3 customers. Enhanced Teams functionalities and better capture of text message data, both SMS and MMS, would also be improvements."
"Purview eDiscovery works, but it's not entirely perfect. There were times when search results would get hung up or error codes would be presented and we'd have to contact Microsoft to get that sorted out."
More Microsoft Purview eDiscovery cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool's pricing is higher than that of other tools. Other tools offer bundle rates, but Everlaw charges per GB, which is more expensive. It doesn't charge for users; it only charges for hosting."
"With the full bundle, pricing is not a significant concern. As an M3, I find the Purview pricing of 1250 per user worthwhile."
"The costs associated with E5 licensing are currently expensive for us, so we use the E3 license, which comes with fewer features and functionalities."
"Microsoft Purview eDiscovery comes as part of Microsoft 365 licenses."
"The pricing and licensing with Microsoft can be complex, and licensing is known to be a challenge because it changes frequently. While the licensing for Purview is not as tricky as other Microsoft products, navigating licenses since the shift to E3 and E5 plans has been a task, as individual licenses must now be purchased separately."
"In the positions that I've had through contracting over the years, I've heard talk of it being overpriced and underperforming compared to its competitors."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which eDiscovery solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
847,625 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
14%
Government
13%
Computer Software Company
11%
University
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Everlaw?
The tool's pricing is higher than that of other tools. Other tools offer bundle rates, but Everlaw charges per GB, which is more expensive. It doesn't charge for users; it only charges for hosting.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Everlaw?
Everlaw could be less choosy about accepting control numbers for third-party loads. When uploading third-party loads, it currently needs two mandatory fields (like within date or end date or page c...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Everlaw?
I have a higher certification in Everlaw for managerial organization. We use Everlaw for everything, like processing documents, creating STRs, promoting documents, and using analytics. I support ou...
See all answers
What do you like most about Microsoft Purview eDiscovery?
The tool has been beneficial. Some of our previous users left the organization without sharing the information they had at a personal level. This information was related to the organization, and th...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Purview eDiscovery?
The setup process was very straightforward. We acquired pricing through our reseller in NASDAQ, eliminating the need to search for prices ourselves.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Microsoft Purview eDiscovery?
The query language can be time-consuming to figure out if you don't know it initially. While there are options with dropdowns to select criteria, having a natural language feature would be benefici...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

No data available
Google Vault vs Microsoft Purview eDiscovery Logo
Google Vault vs Microsoft Purview eDiscovery
Compared 48% of the time
Veritas Enterprise Vault.cloud vs Microsoft Purview eDiscovery Logo
Veritas Enterprise Vault.cloud vs Microsoft Purview eDiscovery
Compared 7% of the time
Exterro vs Microsoft Purview eDiscovery Logo
Exterro vs Microsoft Purview eDiscovery
Compared 5% of the time
Relativity vs Microsoft Purview eDiscovery Logo
Relativity vs Microsoft Purview eDiscovery
Compared 5% of the time
Varonis Platform vs Microsoft Purview eDiscovery Logo
Varonis Platform vs Microsoft Purview eDiscovery
Compared 5% of the time
More Microsoft Purview eDiscovery Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
eDiscovery
March 2025
Everlaw reportDownload Everlaw product report
Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Purview eDiscovery
March 2025
Microsoft Purview eDiscovery reportDownload Microsoft Purview eDiscovery product report
 

Overview

Everlaw is thoughtfully architected to be the fastest, most powerful, and easiest ediscovery solution on the market. We bring the superior software experiences you’re used to in your consumer life — the blink-and-you’ll-miss-it speed of Google and the blissful usability of Apple products — to your litigation toolkit.
Everlaw

Efficiently respond to legal matters or internal investigations with intelligent capabilities that reduce data to only what’s relevant. Discover data where it lives. Discover and collect data in place, within your Microsoft Purview boundary. Manage workflows efficiently. Streamline your eDiscovery process with an end-to-end workflow from one platform. Accelerate your process. Get insights quickly with built-in capabilities, reducing review time and costs.

To learn more about our solution, ask questions, and share feedback, join our Microsoft Security, Compliance and Identity Community.

Microsoft
 

Sample Customers

Trusted by 8 of the top 10 class action law firms and over 65% of state attorneys general
Information Not Available
Buyer's Guide
Everlaw vs. Microsoft Purview eDiscovery
April 2025
Free Report: Everlaw vs. Microsoft Purview eDiscovery
Find out what your peers are saying about Everlaw vs. Microsoft Purview eDiscovery and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
847,625 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Everlaw vs. Microsoft Purview eDiscovery report.
See our list of best eDiscovery vendors.

We monitor all eDiscovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.