Exabeam and Google Chronicle Suite each offer robust cybersecurity solutions, but their strengths vary across different aspects. Exabeam's pricing and support generally receive more positive feedback, but Google Chronicle Suite stands out with its extensive features and higher overall user satisfaction.
Features: Exabeam is appreciated for real-time threat detection, user behavior analytics, and an intuitive design. Google Chronicle Suite is valued for its scalability, speed in threat detection, and integration with the broader Google ecosystem. Users highlight Google Chronicle Suite’s advanced analytics as a key advantage.
Room for Improvement: Exabeam users mention the need for enhanced reporting features and better data correlation capabilities. Google Chronicle Suite users see improvement in incident response times and better support for diverse data formats.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Exabeam is noted for its straightforward deployment and responsive customer service. Google Chronicle Suite users report a more complex setup process but appreciate Google’s comprehensive support resources.
Pricing and ROI: Exabeam is often mentioned as cost-effective with a clear ROI. Google Chronicle Suite, despite being more expensive, is viewed as justified due to its superior feature set and performance. Users find Exabeam more accessible in terms of initial setup costs, while Google Chronicle Suite’s higher investment yields substantial long-term benefits.
Exabeam offers more machine learning models that detect anomalies.
Even with TAM support from Exabeam, many issues go unresolved.
I also had the chance to look at the documentation, and the documentation is good.
We are a critical project for them at this moment, and they provide excellent service.
They are slow, and the initial responses often require more information rather than providing helpful solutions.
I have faced challenges with technical support from Sentinel, though Sentinel support is better than Google's, while Splunk support is also not that great.
Regarding Exabeam's scalability and how well it adapts to its customers' needs, I would rate it an eight.
Google Chronicle Suite is very scalable, being a cloud-based solution.
In the cloud-native space, the problem is that if you require additional devices, you might have to work on custom applications.
I rate the scalability of Google Chronicle Suite as ten out of ten.
These problems were not frequent, and the last six to eight months have been stable.
Overall, I think Exabeam's stability level is good.
I rate the stability of Google Chronicle Suite as a nine, as I have not encountered any stability issues.
Exabeam's integration capabilities are not good, as Exabeam has a very limited number of integrations and no out-of-box integration.
I have explored the SaaS version; it offers many new features.
Exabeam needs to improve its documentation and provide more customization for dashboards and case management.
The UI is the primary challenge in need of improvement.
Google Chronicle Suite lacks near time detection.
Customization is vital where users can customize the alerts, dashboard, or content as per their needs. This is more required in Google Chronicle Suite, allowing analysts or engineers to create according to the organization.
Compared to a SIEM like Microsoft Sentinel, it is much more affordable.
It's neither expensive nor cheap, and I believe it is a justified price for the features offered.
I experience Chronicle as less expensive and less complicated than Azure.
Exabeam's AI capabilities, like the natural language mode, convert natural language into Exabeam queries, enhancing ease of use.
The product offers useful features like the dashboard, timeline, and session views, which enhance our security tools.
Exabeam's UEBA is the most valuable feature that I have found so far.
They also combine their source solution into one product, allowing for out-of-the-box playbook creation and incident response.
The AI infused into the platform helps in investigations and rule creation.
The most effective features for threat detection in Google Chronicle Suite include Google Threat Intelligence, VirusTotal, and Mandiant threat feeds.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Google Chronicle Suite | 1.8% |
| Exabeam | 1.6% |
| Other | 96.6% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 12 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 7 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 9 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 6 |
Exabeam Fusion is a cloud-delivered solution that that enables you to:
-Leverage turnkey threat detection, investigation, and response
-Collect, search and enhance data from anywhere
-Detect threats missed by other tools, using market-leading behavior analytics
-Achieve successful SecOps outcomes with prescriptive, threat-centric use case packages
-Enhance productivity and reduce response times with automation
-Meet regulatory compliance and audit requirements with ease
Organizations primarily leverage Google Chronicle Suite for centralized log management, threat intelligence, and endpoint security, addressing MDR requirements with continuous monitoring.
Google Chronicle Suite supports storage, security, and alert checking. Utilizing log information to generate alerts and integration with search engines, it monitors network and login issues. It is a choice for consultants on client projects, and partners handle its global resale and implementation.
What are the key features of Google Chronicle Suite?Industries employ Google Chronicle Suite for its robust security measures and log management. It is especially vital for IT, finance, healthcare, and any sector needing stringent security and compliance. Consultants find it essential for tailoring security protocols in client projects, while partners ensure seamless implementation across regions.
We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
