Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Exabeam vs Hunters comparison

Exabeam and Hunters are both solutions in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category. Exabeam is ranked #20 with an average rating of 7.4, while Hunters is ranked #33 with an average rating of 8.0. Exabeam holds a 1.6% mindshare in SIEM, compared to Hunters’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 75% of Exabeam users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Hunters users who would recommend it.
Exabeam
Read 20 Exabeam reviews
  • 4,379 Views
  • 2,321 Comparison Views
75% willing to recommend
Hunters
Read 1 Hunters review
  • 1,133 Views
  • 782 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between Exabeam and Hunters based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, Wazuh, IBM and others in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM).

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) Report (Updated: January 2026).
Buyer's Guide
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
January 2026
Download the complete report
Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Exabeam
Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
20th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
20
Ranking in other categories
User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (2nd), Security Incident Response (5th), Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) (12th), Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (12th), AI-Powered Cybersecurity Platforms (10th)
Hunters
Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
33rd
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
SOC as a Service (5th), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (31st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category, the mindshare of Exabeam is 1.6%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Hunters is 0.6%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Exabeam1.6%
Hunters0.6%
Other97.8%
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
 

Featured Reviews

DH
Deepanshu Hans
Solution Architect at CTC
Improved threat detection has provided clear user risk insights and streamlined incident response
Exabeam's UEBA is the most valuable feature that I have found so far. Exabeam's UEBA displays the type of description that it could show in a console regarding one particular user, the rating that it shows, and how vulnerable the user is, which is very good. Exabeam's automation for incident response is very good. The machine learning capabilities of Exabeam are also good.
Read full review
VikramSingh8 - PeerSpot reviewer
VikramSingh8
Security Delivery Manager at Accenture
Advanced detectors streamline threat monitoring with many use cases
Hunter support is functional yet not exceptional. Their support engineers could be more advanced and faster in providing solutions. Their turnaround time could improve to match other tools. When feedback is provided, they consider it and indicate if it is in the development stage. They commit to fixing bugs and developing the module or feature, however, take quite a lot of time. I would rate their customer support as needing improvement. Another area needing improvement is integration capabilities, as they are not yet fully compatible. Users still have to rely on third-party software or integration tools. Furthermore, they should incorporate more GenAI capabilities, a current buzzword, and enable predictive use cases. Their tools should be capable of reading the environment, making adaptations, and automatically tweaking settings as per client or environmental needs, similar to capabilities provided by other SIEM tools.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The way it can connect with AWS is very useful, and the integrations are pretty good."
"The user interface and the timelines they use are the most valuable features. The price model is very simple so that one can understand it easily and there are no surprises within it."
"Exabeam has improved our organization by speeding up the investigation process."
"The solution's initial setup process is easy."
"The most valuable feature of Exabeam Fusion SIEM is the easy-to-use user interface."
"It is user-friendly and quite simple to use."
"Exabeam Fusion SIEM has a good performance and more advantages than traditional solutions."
"Exabeam's UEBA displays the type of description that it could show in a console regarding one particular user, the rating that it shows, and how vulnerable the user is, which is very good."
More Exabeam pros
"Hunter proactively provides a set of five to six hundred use cases, categorized based on cloud use cases, endpoint use cases, parameter use cases, and malicious use cases."
"Other SIEM tools base their license cost on the volume of data processed, often charging by how much TB or GB data is processed. Hunter, however, charges based on the number of data sources and the number of data entities integrated, which saves money."
 

Cons

"Adding to the number of certifications that they have, for example, ISO 27001, would be helpful."
"The organzation is rigid and not flexible in the way they operate"
"Exabeam's integration capabilities are not good, as Exabeam has a very limited number of integrations and no out-of-box integration, which is an area where Exabeam should improve."
"They should provide detailed information about detecting phishing emails."
"Exabeam needs to improve its adaptive nature towards rules and its capability to understand the entire client environment faster."
"We still have questions surrounding hardware deployment."
"They need to focus on more of the MITRE ATT&CK Framework and coverage. They claim they cover about 70 to 80%. I'm not sure if it's really quite that much, however."
"I believe if it were more flexible it would be a better product."
More Exabeam cons
"Hunter support is functional yet not exceptional. Their support engineers could be more advanced and faster in providing solutions."
"Hunter support is functional yet not exceptional."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Exabeam Fusion SIEM's pricing is reasonable."
"Exabeam is not a cheap solution."
"They have a great model for pricing that can be based either on user count or gigabits per day."
"There is an annual license required to use Exabeam Fusion SIEM. The price of the solution should be reduced."
"The solution is expensive."
"The platform is not extremely expensive compared to its direct competitors; I would rate its pricing around six out of ten."
Information not available
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
12%
Computer Software Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Healthcare Company
6%
Computer Software Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Energy/Utilities Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business12
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise7
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What are the biggest differences between Securonix UEBA, Exabeam, and IBM QRadar?
It mostly depends on your use-cases and environment. Exabeam and Securonix have a stronger UEBA feature set, friendlier GUI and are not licensed based on capacity (amount of logs and information in...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Exabeam Fusion SIEM?
I do not have much information about the pricing. However, I am aware that Exabeam is cheaper than Palo Alto based on discussions in meetings.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Exabeam Fusion SIEM?
We use the on-prem Exabeam product and face limitations using the web UI and administration of custom models and rules. I have explored the SaaS version; it offers many new features. We are conside...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Hunters?
Hunter support is functional yet not exceptional. Their support engineers could be more advanced and faster in providing solutions. Their turnaround time could improve to match other tools. When fe...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Hunters?
Hunter is a very new SIEM in the market. It is definitely a broad market for us as they are trying to establish a new place against competitors like Splunk and QRadar. This makes it challenging to ...
See all answers
What advice do you have for others considering Hunters?
Their knowledge base is good. When starting with Hunter, ensure you have one or two sessions to understand navigation, features, and modules, along with obtaining proper documentation. This will he...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Exabeam Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security vs Exabeam
Compared 8% of the time
Splunk User Behavior Analytics vs Exabeam Logo
Splunk User Behavior Analytics vs Exabeam
Compared 5% of the time
IBM Security QRadar vs Exabeam Logo
IBM Security QRadar vs Exabeam
Compared 5% of the time
Dtex Systems vs Exabeam Logo
Dtex Systems vs Exabeam
Compared 4% of the time
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM vs Exabeam Logo
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM vs Exabeam
Compared 4% of the time
More Exabeam Competitors
Huntress Managed SIEM vs Hunters Logo
Huntress Managed SIEM vs Hunters
Compared 19% of the time
Anomali vs Hunters Logo
Anomali vs Hunters
Compared 11% of the time
Panther vs Hunters Logo
Panther vs Hunters
Compared 11% of the time
Anvilogic vs Hunters Logo
Anvilogic vs Hunters
Compared 9% of the time
Cisco XDR vs Hunters Logo
Cisco XDR vs Hunters
Compared 5% of the time
More Hunters Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Exabeam
January 2026
Exabeam reportDownload Exabeam product report
Buyer's Guide
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
January 2026
Hunters reportDownload Hunters product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
Hunters.AI
 

Interactive Demo

Demo not available
Exabeam
Hunters
 

Overview

Exabeam Fusion is a cloud-delivered solution that that enables you to:

-Leverage turnkey threat detection, investigation, and response
-Collect, search and enhance data from anywhere
-Detect threats missed by other tools, using market-leading behavior analytics
-Achieve successful SecOps outcomes with prescriptive, threat-centric use case packages
-Enhance productivity and reduce response times with automation
-Meet regulatory compliance and audit requirements with ease

Exabeam

Hunters Security Operations Platform is a Human-Driven, AI-Powered SIEM alternative that revolutionize the way SOCs operate. Hunters automates the entire TDIR process, replacing repetitive human work with machine-powered detection, enrichment, correlation, prioritization and investigation, freeing analysts to proactively protect their organizations. Hunters utilizes an open security data lake architecture, ensuring complete and cost effective coverage of the entire security stack.

Hunters
 

Sample Customers

Hulu, ADP, Safeway, BBCN Bank
We're happy to support organizations like Booking.com, ChargePoint, Yext, Red Ventures and Cimpress who leverage Hunters SOC Platform to transform their security teams' operations.
Buyer's Guide
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
January 2026
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, Wazuh, IBM and others in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM). Updated: January 2026.
DOWNLOAD NOW
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.