ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs ScienceLogic comparison

ExtraHop Networks and ScienceLogic are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. ExtraHop Networks is ranked #71, while ScienceLogic is ranked #26 with an average rating of 9.0. ExtraHop Networks holds a 0.7% mindshare in NMS, compared to ScienceLogic’s 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of ExtraHop Networks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of ScienceLogic users who would recommend it.

ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT O...

Read 8 ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations reviews

3,829 Views
2,604 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

ScienceLogic

Read 46 ScienceLogic reviews

10,364 Views
5,493 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT O...

ScienceLogic

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

ScienceLogic and ExtraHop Reveal(x) compete in IT operations management. ScienceLogic has an advantage in pricing and customer support, whereas ExtraHop Reveal(x) stands out with its comprehensive features that justify higher costs.

Features: ScienceLogic enhances monitoring and automation, integrating seamlessly with diverse IT environments. It offers straightforward automation tools, effective IT environment integration, and reliable performance tracking. ExtraHop Reveal(x) excels in network traffic analysis, real-time anomaly detection, and security insights, ensuring a secure IT infrastructure with its real-time monitoring capabilities.

Room for Improvement: ScienceLogic could benefit from enhancing network analysis capabilities, improving real-time anomaly detection, and providing more advanced security features. ExtraHop Reveal(x) might improve by simplifying its automation processes, offering a more streamlined integration experience, and presenting a more straightforward pricing model.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ScienceLogic provides an easier deployment with comprehensive support resources, facilitating a hassle-free implementation process. ExtraHop Reveal(x) may require more initial effort due to its complex deployment model, yet it offers efficient and responsive customer service, which aids users during the setup and operation.

Pricing and ROI: ScienceLogic offers a cost-effective initial setup with a clear ROI path attributed to low initial costs and a straightforward pricing model. ExtraHop Reveal(x) incurs higher upfront costs, but delivers ROI through advanced features that make the investment worthwhile over time, positioning itself as a premium solution with strong long-term returns.

To learn more, read our detailed ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs. ScienceLogic Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs. ScienceLogic

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,800 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT O...

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

71st

Ranking in IT Operations Analytics

13th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Diagnostics (10th), Network Packet Capture (6th)

ScienceLogic

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

26th

Ranking in IT Operations Analytics

9th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Event Monitoring (6th), Unified Communications Monitoring (1st), Server Monitoring (11th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (18th), Cloud Monitoring Software (14th), AIOps (11th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations is 0.7%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ScienceLogic is 1.4%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
ScienceLogic	1.4%
ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations	0.7%
Other	97.9%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Out West

Project Manager and IT Management Consultant at a integrator with 1,001-5,000 employees

Great for identifying application interdependencies with helpful support but needs better visualizations

We're just trying to identify the application interdependencies, which normally reside on different servers, including web servers, database servers, enterprise service bus, et cetera, up to your presentation layer before we start moving stuff around. Normally, the reason why we use these tools is to understand what assets we have, where they're deployed, and how they enter and operate before we decide to go move something from point A to point B. The solution is going to allow me to establish a wave or migration plan where you have different waves of migration and then you actually have move groups to try and get your application moved from A to B seamlessly. A to B could be on-premise to on-premise. It could be on-premise to cloud. Et cetera. The solution can tell me what components can I deploy, for example, into a cloud space, without having to refactor my applications since that can be quite time-consuming and costly.

Read full review

Michael Wenn

CEO / Co-Founder at Aiops ltd

Offers comprehensive monitoring and tool consolidation but integration complexity needs improvement

There is room for improvement in the speed of setting up the service and integrating PowerPacks. Although these prebuilt features are great, there is considerable complexity in bringing them together to create a unified dashboard. Even with many good integrations and deep visibility, the implementation takes time, especially when it doesn't involve these integrations. While some other companies have easier APIs, using this solution demands significant expertise. It's challenging for new customers to implement independently. The implementation speed of non-PowerPack or non-out-of-the-box integrations should be improved. Additionally, the AI automation feature is not yet very rich due to resource constraints supporting a wide platform.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the way it handles data, from Layer 2 up to Layer 7. We can see everything that happens in the network."

"The most valuable features are security detections, perimeter detection, dashboards, and alerts."

"Not only can you look at the protocol import level. It also has a live PCAP analysis."

"We have been able to improve the mean time to resolution by several hours in some cases."

"ExtraHop came out with the best price, and I think that it gives us a broader view of our network."

"This is a must-try product."

"Wire data analytics."

"It's a must-have solution for large IT Operations, providing the ability to analyze infrastructure and application-related performance and data from the wire perspective."

More ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations pros

"We have received an ROI from the use of ScienceLogic, and we are getting better visibility and help on the platform."

"The flexibility to support most technologies. The way ScienceLogic gathers data from multiple sources is vital to our customers. As we work with new customers (often with different technology requirements), ScienceLogic is flexible enough to support our clients’ varying network needs."

"We were able to increase the monitoring coverage of both our legacy and public cloud based infrastructures, while also cutting costs by over $2 million across a five year period."

"The stability of ScienceLogic is great."

"It has a lot of integration capabilities as well; we can integrate with a lot of things, monitor emails and APIs, handle customization and automation, and there is a great dashboard with many features to take advantage of."

"The support's been fantastic."

"A major benefit is eliminating visibility gaps, which motivates me to consolidate tools."

"Their customer service is unparalleled."

More ScienceLogic pros

Cons

"I would improve the Rule-Based Access Control (RBAC) by providing granular access control to the data."

"Additional out-of-the-box solutions and use cases would be nice."

"They either have to go broad or decide what their bread and butter is and get really good at that."

"The improvement that would make the most impact would be expanding on the new EXA big data back end."

"This solution would be improved if it had the ability to retain data longer."

"There is room for improvement in the security part. They have a new solution, ExtraHop Reveal(x), and I think it needs improvement."

"We've had some struggles getting it to see everything that we want to see. Network visibility is something that needs to be improved."

"The solution could get more aggressive in the discounting of the overall cost."

More ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations cons

"There are often bugs in new releases."

"We often face bugs when there's a new release."

"The UI takes a bit to learn but once you get past that it gets the job done."

"From a performance perspective, it needs to improve a lot."

"Error information doesn’t have a good information if something goes wrong while doing a device discovery (I tried this a while back- couldn’t be more specific)."

"It doesn't have the complete application-level topology. It could have service topology and business service monitoring."

"If I were a small to medium business, I probably wouldn't choose this provider. It is a heavily configurable, heavyweight, and scalable IT solution for IT infrastructure monitoring."

"It doesn't have the complete application-level topology. It could have service topology and business service monitoring. I would like to see how business service monitoring will function with agent-based installation, and how flexible and business-oriented it is for service modeling and service infrastructure. I have a lot of experience in using business service monitoring, service topology, and service hierarchy functionalities in similar products from BMC and Micro Focus (OpenView), and I want to see how these functionalities will look like in ScienceLogic."

More ScienceLogic cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of this solution for our environment is about £650,000 ($855,000 USD) for three years."

"The pricing is fair considering the value provided."

"The pricing is higher than other solutions, but with such good features, I think it's worth it."

"Plan for adding more to it. Once you see EM7 in action, you will want to keep adding systems to monitor."

"It comes with the OS built in, so no need to purchase an OS license or DB license."

"I'm not the best person to discuss pricing, but what I do know is that it's a use-and-go structure. You use this much storage and pay this much for it. That's how it is. Every time, we continue to add a large amount of data to the environment."

"Its price could be lower, but for what you pay, you got a lot of value from its features and functionalities. Customers always want a discount or a cheaper solution."

"The license of ScienceLogic is based on how many endpoints are used. The number of monitoring points you want to have."

"Decide what you want to monitor and only monitor those items. Absorb other elements as you grow."

"The pricing model for ScienceLogic could improve."

"The solution is license-based. It's between $8 and $15, depending on what you need from the product."

More ScienceLogic pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Construction Company

12%

Healthcare Company

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Construction Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	3

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	13
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	27

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ScienceLogic?

ScienceLogic is not that expensive and is cost-effective overall.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ScienceLogic?

I am interested in improving the flexibility of ScienceLogic's user interface, configuration, and customization. I am particularly keen on learning about issues raised by the ScienceLogic support t...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for ScienceLogic?

Our usual use case of ScienceLogic is as a strategic monitoring tool for all the customers in our company, and because of that reason, all the accounts and projects are migrated from other monitori...

See all answers

Comparisons

ExtremeAnalytics vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations

Compared 5% of the time

gen-E vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations

Compared 5% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations

Compared 5% of the time

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations

Compared 5% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations

Compared 5% of the time

More ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations Competitors

LogicMonitor vs ScienceLogic

Compared 5% of the time

Datadog vs ScienceLogic

Compared 5% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs ScienceLogic

Compared 4% of the time

Nagios XI vs ScienceLogic

Compared 3% of the time

Dynatrace vs ScienceLogic

Compared 3% of the time

More ScienceLogic Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations

August 2026

ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations report

Download ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations product report

Buyer's Guide

ScienceLogic

July 2026

Download ScienceLogic product report

Overview

ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations leverages wire data analytics to provide valuable insights across all network layers. Offering auto-discovery, live PCAP analysis, and customizable dashboards, it empowers IT teams with enhanced application analysis and security detections.

Focusing on wire data analytics from Layer 2 to Layer 7, ExtraHop Reveal(x) delivers application analysis, security anomaly monitoring, and real-time traffic analysis. With plug-and-play deployment and minimal administration, it facilitates seamless integration. Users benefit from its comprehensive network performance evaluation, insightful network topology mapping, and capabilities like auto-discovery. Despite room for enhancement in industry-specific solutions, visualizations, and security features, its extensive programmability supports diverse IT operations needs. It is perfect for monitoring enterprise applications and ensuring efficient network security and operations.

What are the key features of ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations?

Wire Data Analytics: Analyzes data from Layer 2 to 7 for comprehensive insights into network performance.
Application Analysis: Offers deep analysis of applications to optimize performance and resolve issues quickly.
Security Detections: Provides robust anomaly detection for enhanced network security.
Customizable Dashboards: Users can tailor dashboards for specific monitoring needs.
Plug-and-Play Deployment: Ensures easy setup and integration with existing infrastructure.

What benefits and ROI should users look for in reviews?

Network Performance Insights: Provides detailed insights to improve network efficiency and performance.
Real-Time Traffic Analysis: Enables quick response to network anomalies with real-time data.
Enhanced Security Monitoring: Strengthens security through comprehensive anomaly detection.
Efficient Problem Resolution: Facilitates identification of root causes for rapid issue resolution.
Reduced Administrative Overhead: Requires minimal administration with an easy-to-deploy configuration.

ExtraHop Reveal(x) is implemented in industries requiring detailed IT infrastructure monitoring, enterprise application tracking, and network security evaluation. It aids in identifying device misconfigurations, vulnerabilities, and analyzing IT component interactions to ensure secure and efficient operations.

ExtraHop Networks

ScienceLogic excels in customizable dashboards, seamless integrations, and real-time data analysis, supporting diverse IT environments with multi-tenant capabilities.

ScienceLogic provides robust infrastructure and network monitoring, catering to cloud, applications, and server environments. It supports hybrid setups, integrating with CMDB and ticketing systems while automating incident management. ScienceLogic's PowerPacks eliminate visibility gaps and its adaptable nature supports modern and legacy systems. Offering agentless monitoring, it ensures efficient operations with scalable infrastructure support and detailed reporting. However, the interface complexity and need for professional support can present usability challenges. Enhancements in reporting, application coverage, API support, and customization are desirable for improved user experience.

What are ScienceLogic's most important features?

Customizable Dashboards: Tailor views for precise monitoring across different environments.
PowerPacks: Extensive device integrations reduce visibility gaps.
Real-time Data Analysis: Enables quick decision-making with up-to-date insights.
Seamless Integration: Compatible with multiple platforms to unify IT systems.
Adaptive Infrastructure: Supports both modern and legacy systems with ease.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Operational Efficiency: Automates event management and simplifies monitoring tasks.
Scalable Support: Grows with the organizational needs, accommodating larger infrastructures.
Comprehensive Reports: Provides complete oversight for informed strategic planning.
Enhanced Adaptability: Unifies diverse technological environments efficiently.

ScienceLogic is often implemented across industries requiring detailed attention to infrastructure and network monitoring. It finds utility in managing hybrid environments, integrating seamlessly with essential systems like CMDB and ticketing platforms. Its scalability and adaptability are valued in unifying complex, diverse environments under one monitoring platform.

ScienceLogic

Sample Customers

Alaska Airlines, bet365, Concur, McKesson, Microsoft, Morgan Stanley, Practice Fusion, Seattle Children's Hospital, Steward Health Care System

Kellogg Company, Booz Allen, Cisco, Red Bull, Fidelus, Telstra, Comcast, CSC, Peak 10, HughesNet, Hosting, Datapipe, US Army, Equinix, Rite Aid, Carbonite, Sybase, Carpathia, AT&T, ePlus, Dimension Data, Virtustream, Boeing, Honeywell

Buyer's Guide

ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs. ScienceLogic

August 2026

Free Report: ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs. ScienceLogic

Find out what your peers are saying about ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs. ScienceLogic and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs. ScienceLogic report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors and best IT Operations Analytics vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.