F5 Advanced WAF vs Wallarm NG WAF comparison

Why PeerSpot?

F5 and Wallarm are both solutions in the Web Application Firewall (WAF) category. F5 is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.3, while Wallarm is ranked #39. F5 holds a 3.3% mindshare in WAF, compared to Wallarm’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 98% of F5 users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Wallarm users who would recommend it.

F5 Advanced WAF

Read 72 F5 Advanced WAF reviews

9,990 Views
9,590 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

Wallarm NG WAF

Read 5 Wallarm NG WAF reviews

2,492 Views
1,744 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

F5 Advanced WAF

Wallarm NG WAF

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 1, 2025

Wallarm NG WAF and F5 Advanced WAF are competing in the web application firewall market. While Wallarm excels in affordability and support, F5 stands out for its complex features and advanced security capabilities.

Features: Wallarm NG WAF focuses on robust threat detection, adaptive security capabilities, and ease of integration. F5 Advanced WAF offers extensive features like bot protection, advanced application security, and behavioral analytics for enhanced security for organizations requiring intricate controls.

Room for Improvement: Wallarm can improve by expanding its feature set and offering more advanced customization. Additionally, it could benefit from better threat intelligence integration. F5 Advanced WAF could improve its user-friendliness and streamline its deployment process. The cost can also be a barrier for some potential users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Wallarm NG WAF provides easy deployment and seamless integration, making it appealing for companies looking for simplicity, coupled with reliable customer support. F5 Advanced WAF offers extensive support options but might have a steeper learning curve due to its complex features, although this is mitigated by their comprehensive customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Wallarm NG WAF is notable for its cost-effective pricing and solid return on investment, ideal for businesses managing tight budgets. F5 Advanced WAF demands a higher setup cost but justifies the expense with advanced features that offer substantial ROI for businesses needing higher security levels.

To learn more, read our detailed F5 Advanced WAF vs. Wallarm NG WAF Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

F5 Advanced WAF vs. Wallarm NG WAF

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,929 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

F5 Advanced WAF

Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)

3rd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Wallarm NG WAF

Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)

39th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

API Security (15th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Web Application Firewall (WAF) category, the mindshare of F5 Advanced WAF is 3.3%, down from 7.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Wallarm NG WAF is 1.2%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Web Application Firewall (WAF) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
F5 Advanced WAF	3.3%
Wallarm NG WAF	1.2%
Other	95.5%

Web Application Firewall (WAF)

Featured Reviews

reviewer2797602

Senior Security Systems Engineer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Granular security policies have protected critical applications and ensure safe user and admin access

Improvements could be made regarding the log information from the backend CLI. There are enhancements needed; if a request gets blocked on the TCP layer, there should be traces or data to verify which source generated these requests, including the source and port information for initiation. These data are missing from F5 Advanced WAF. Besides that, another improvement could be refining the bot detection to minimize false positives; it should be able to verify more granularly between legitimate and non-legitimate clients. Overall, I find everything else good. A wish list feature I have is for the Technical Assistance Center (TAC) to respond more promptly. Their response time needs improvement; while they do not take excessive time, it can be enhanced, especially given it is a security product.

Read full review

it_user796242

Information Security Engineer at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees

Helps us to monitor attacks to our sites and prevents a lot of them

Set up Wallarm as a reverse proxy. Do not replace your web server. Use Wallarm first in monitoring mode, then learn from Wallarm which type of request is false positive and which type of request is not. This process takes a couple of weeks for very highly-loaded web applications (few millions of unique visitors in one month). Then you can turn Wallarm into blocking mode and everything will be fine. Do not forget to build a monitoring system, the wave, and API for it. Before we started using Wallarm, I already knew Ivan (CEO) and Stepan (COO) from a couple of years before. Ivan had his own security company and Stepan was working on a Russian security magazine called Xakep. They told us that they wanted to create a new WAF and already had a working version of it. They asked me to test it. We did tests, and it was really good. After few month after testing, we signed an agreement. Our choice was made not because we knew these guys for a long time, but because the product was really cool and we were glad to start using it as one of the first on the market!

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This is a good solution, it's very useful and offers easy application management, which is good to have at the perimeter level."

"It provides web application security and reduces bot attacks."

"Overall, the technical support is excellent."

"It's a fairly easy-to-use and user-friendly tool. My administrators and team also like its ability to customize the rules per the requirements."

"iRules are quite appealing when it comes to F5."

"I definitely recommend this solution because of the time you save on analysis."

"It protects and mitigates damage in the network."

"There is no need to worry about updating signatures because WAF will automatically update the signatures for you."

More F5 Advanced WAF pros

"Helps us to monitor situation in regards to attacks to our sites and prevents a lot of them."

"Vulnerability scanner and WAF are valuable features."

"Perimeter control and active vulnerability scanner are the most valuable features."

"With active threat detection, we are no longer over-swamped with tons of useless events."

"They are the only solution that fits our success criteria and business objectives: WAF must have a low (<5%) false negative rate and be ready to protect from all well-known web attacks."

"The most powerful feature is the ability to first learn what type of query to make to your web application when it is attacked and what type of query creates a false positive to your app."

Cons

"Users would like to have an additional IP intelligence license to handle this within WAF itself without needing to engage with the SOC team."

"My experience with the technical support from F5 is that on the technical side, we sometimes face issues with reachability and availability."

"The solution's dashboard could be improved."

"I would say their graphical interface, the GUI. I don't like the GUI as much as before."

"For me, an area for improvement in F5 Advanced WAF is the reporting as it isn't so clear. The vendor needs to work on the reporting capability of the solution. What I'd like to see in the next release of F5 Advanced WAF is threat intelligence to protect your web application, particularly having that capability out-of-the-box, and not needing to pay extra for it, similar to what's offered in FortiWeb, for example, any request that originates from a malicious IP will be blocked automatically by FortiWeb. F5 Advanced WAF should have the intelligence for blocking malicious IPs, or automatically blocking threats included in the license, instead of making it an add-on feature that users have to pay for apart from the standard licensing fees."

"While F5 Advanced WAF does limit the number of partners in certain regions to ensure successful business transactions, they could also benefit from expanding their partnerships and making it easier for more people to learn about and become experts in F5 Advanced WAF. By doing so, they could increase the reach and exposure of their solution, similar to how Cisco has become widely recognized in the security industry."

"For F5 Advanced WAF, it's only 70% different over time with upgrades. F5 can still build AWS support after many long years of absence."

"There should be more ability to rate limit certain scenarios. The majority of the time, it is either on or off. For certain types of use cases, there should be the ability to rate limit, not just enable or disable."

More F5 Advanced WAF cons

"Wallarm uses a learning mechanism to detect attacks and to avoid false positives. If Wallarm blocks some illegitimate request, then you can go to the management console and mark this request as false positive, but sometimes this does not work properly."

"It needs more customization in PDF reports."

"Technical support is 6 or 7 out of 10. Sometimes we have had trouble with communication and understanding."

"There were several stability issues during the first pilot."

"The biggest problem for us was the stability and speed using the first version of Wallarm. Now, it is fine."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing of F5 Advanced WAF is more expensive than other solutions like Radware and CD18, it is quite high."

"A yearly license for F5 Advanced WAF is expensive."

"F5 Advanced WAF pricing structure should be adjusted to meet the need of small to medium-sized companies."

"There are various plans available for Fortinet FortiWeb Cloud WAF as a Service, including a trial version."

"There is an annual subscription for this solution."

"The pricing for F5 Advanced WAF is comparable to a Rolls-Royce. Its price is a bit high when you compare it with other vendors. F5 Advanced WAF is a bit expensive. The customer was on a three-year plan and it was around $560,000."

"The cost is slightly above average."

"The way we deployed it, I would rate it a four out of five in terms of pricing."

More F5 Advanced WAF pricing and cost advice

"Pricing must be cheaper than the competition and the licensing must be good."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,929 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

21%

Government

11%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	27
Midsize Enterprise	16
Large Enterprise	31

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for F5 Advanced WAF?

F5 Advanced WAF is somewhat costly compared to other vendors, but it is worth the investment due to the stability it provides to the environment and infrastructure.

See all answers

What needs improvement with F5 Advanced WAF?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for F5 Advanced WAF?

My main use case for F5 Advanced WAF is to protect external and internal applications from cyber attacks and to prevent malicious payloads and malicious data from reaching servers. Even if maliciou...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Fortinet FortiWeb vs F5 Advanced WAF

Compared 13% of the time

Imperva Application Security Platform vs F5 Advanced WAF

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs F5 Advanced WAF

Compared 5% of the time

Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) vs F5 Advanced WAF

Compared 4% of the time

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs F5 Advanced WAF

Compared 4% of the time

More F5 Advanced WAF Competitors

Imperva Application Security Platform vs Wallarm NG WAF

Compared 13% of the time

Salt Security vs Wallarm NG WAF

Compared 11% of the time

Venusense Web Application Firewall vs Wallarm NG WAF

Compared 9% of the time

Cloudflare vs Wallarm NG WAF

Compared 6% of the time

Link11 vs Wallarm NG WAF

Compared 2% of the time

More Wallarm NG WAF Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

F5 Advanced WAF

October 2026

Download F5 Advanced WAF product report

Buyer's Guide

Web Application Firewall (WAF)

October 2026

Download Wallarm NG WAF product report

Also Known As

No data available

Wallarm NG-WAF

Overview

F5 Advanced WAF delivers robust web security with features like signature-based threat protection and behavior analysis, ensuring app stability and security.

F5 Advanced WAF integrates advanced security with functionalities such as SQL injection defense and real-time threat intelligence. It enhances security for applications with load balancing, bot detection, and DDoS protection alongside comprehensive attack monitoring capabilities. Popular among diverse sectors, its usability and easy integration make it a practical choice by providing a stable security infrastructure across both on-premises and cloud environments.

What are the key features?

Signature-Based Protection: Defends against SQL injections and other cyber threats with up-to-date signature detections.
Behavior Analysis: Reduces false positives by monitoring patterns and behaviors.
Load Balancing: Ensures application stability and optimal performance.
Bot Detection: Identifies and mitigates bot traffic to secure applications.
DDoS Protection: Guards against distributed denial of service attacks, maintaining service availability.
Real-time Threat Intelligence: Offers live updates and insights into potential security threats.

What benefits and ROI can organizations expect?

Enhanced Security: Comprehensive protection against an array of web-based threats.
Improved Performance: Raises application availability and user experience.
Deployment Flexibility: Supports diverse environments, from on-premises to cloud settings.
Ease of Integration: Simple incorporation into existing security frameworks.

Particularly relevant in banking and financial services, F5 Advanced WAF safeguards applications from threats like SQL injections and DDoS attacks, ensuring compliance and API security. Its capabilities are leveraged for both load balancing and application defense, offering a versatile deployment model suited for protecting critical infrastructure in competitive and demanding industries.

Wallarm NG WAF provides advanced security by integrating machine learning, making it essential for modern web applications. It offers protection against sophisticated threats and automates many processes.

Wallarm NG WAF leverages AI-driven technology to deliver robust security measures. It helps in defending web applications from cybersecurity threats with enhanced threat detection and response capabilities. Beyond vulnerability insights, Wallarm enhances security protocols, scales with growing online demands, and ensures comprehensive threat coverage, fostering a safer web environment.

What are the key features of Wallarm NG WAF?

AI-Powered Threat Detection: Identifies and mitigates sophisticated attacks efficiently.
Automated Security Updates: Continuously updates defense strategies without manual intervention.
Flexible Deployment: Easily integrates across cloud, on-premise, and hybrid setups.
Scalability: Adapts to growing traffic volumes with consistent protection.
Detailed Reporting: Provides comprehensive analytics on web security posture.

What benefits can users expect from Wallarm NG WAF?

Increased Security: Enhances threat detection and reduces vulnerabilities.
Operational Efficiency: Reduces manual intervention with automated tasks.
Cost-Effectiveness: Optimizes security expenditure by preventing potential breaches.
Time Savings: Automates repetitive actions, saving valuable time for IT teams.

In industries like finance, e-commerce, and healthcare, Wallarm NG WAF is implemented to ensure data protection and compliance with stringent security standards. Its adaptability allows it to meet industry-specific requirements, offering specialized configurations tailored to each sector's unique demands.

Wallarm

Sample Customers

MAXIMUS, Vivo, American Systems, Bangladesh Post Office, City Bank

Panasonic. Miro. Rappi. Wargaming. Gannett. Omio. Acronis. Workforce Software. Tipalti. SEMRush.

Buyer's Guide

F5 Advanced WAF vs. Wallarm NG WAF

September 2026

Free Report: F5 Advanced WAF vs. Wallarm NG WAF

Find out what your peers are saying about F5 Advanced WAF vs. Wallarm NG WAF and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,929 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our F5 Advanced WAF vs. Wallarm NG WAF report.

See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.

We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.