F5 Advanced WAF vs Wallarm NG WAF comparison

F5 and Wallarm are both solutions in the Web Application Firewall (WAF) category. F5 is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.4, while Wallarm is ranked #40. F5 holds a 7.8% mindshare in WAF, compared to Wallarm’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 98% of F5 users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Wallarm users who would recommend it.

F5 Advanced WAF

Read 72 F5 Advanced WAF reviews

7,021 Views
6,600 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

Wallarm NG WAF

Read 5 Wallarm NG WAF reviews

741 Views
393 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

F5 Advanced WAF

Wallarm NG WAF

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 1, 2025

Wallarm NG WAF and F5 Advanced WAF are competing in the web application firewall market. While Wallarm excels in affordability and support, F5 stands out for its complex features and advanced security capabilities.

Features: Wallarm NG WAF focuses on robust threat detection, adaptive security capabilities, and ease of integration. F5 Advanced WAF offers extensive features like bot protection, advanced application security, and behavioral analytics for enhanced security for organizations requiring intricate controls.

Room for Improvement: Wallarm can improve by expanding its feature set and offering more advanced customization. Additionally, it could benefit from better threat intelligence integration. F5 Advanced WAF could improve its user-friendliness and streamline its deployment process. The cost can also be a barrier for some potential users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Wallarm NG WAF provides easy deployment and seamless integration, making it appealing for companies looking for simplicity, coupled with reliable customer support. F5 Advanced WAF offers extensive support options but might have a steeper learning curve due to its complex features, although this is mitigated by their comprehensive customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Wallarm NG WAF is notable for its cost-effective pricing and solid return on investment, ideal for businesses managing tight budgets. F5 Advanced WAF demands a higher setup cost but justifies the expense with advanced features that offer substantial ROI for businesses needing higher security levels.

To learn more, read our detailed F5 Advanced WAF vs. Wallarm NG WAF Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

F5 Advanced WAF vs. Wallarm NG WAF

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

F5 Advanced WAF

Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)

2nd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Wallarm NG WAF

Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)

40th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

API Security (13th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Web Application Firewall (WAF) category, the mindshare of F5 Advanced WAF is 7.8%, down from 10.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Wallarm NG WAF is 0.7%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Web Application Firewall (WAF) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
F5 Advanced WAF	7.8%
Wallarm NG WAF	0.7%
Other	91.5%

Web Application Firewall (WAF)

Featured Reviews

Kallamuddin Ansari

Cyber Security Consultant at ProTechmanize

Application security has protected critical banking services while policy learning minimizes false blocks

F5 Advanced WAF performs well overall, but I have noticed some points that could enhance the solution. Initially, policy tuning could be simpler, as while the learning engine is powerful, initial tuning still requires experienced engineers, which can be challenging for new teams due to the complexity of options and parameters. A more guided and simple tuning workflow would help reduce the learning curve. Additionally, tighter native integration with SIEM or SOAR tools would simplify correlation and investigations for security teams, although log exports are available. Overall, these are not blockers, merely enhancement opportunities, and once tuned, F5 Advanced WAF is very stable and reliable; improving usability, reporting, and onboarding would make it even more effective for larger environments.

Read full review

it_user796242

Information Security Engineer at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees

Helps us to monitor attacks to our sites and prevents a lot of them

Set up Wallarm as a reverse proxy. Do not replace your web server. Use Wallarm first in monitoring mode, then learn from Wallarm which type of request is false positive and which type of request is not. This process takes a couple of weeks for very highly-loaded web applications (few millions of unique visitors in one month). Then you can turn Wallarm into blocking mode and everything will be fine. Do not forget to build a monitoring system, the wave, and API for it. Before we started using Wallarm, I already knew Ivan (CEO) and Stepan (COO) from a couple of years before. Ivan had his own security company and Stepan was working on a Russian security magazine called Xakep. They told us that they wanted to create a new WAF and already had a working version of it. They asked me to test it. We did tests, and it was really good. After few month after testing, we signed an agreement. Our choice was made not because we knew these guys for a long time, but because the product was really cool and we were glad to start using it as one of the first on the market!

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's flexible and powerful, and the users can input their own rules to the system."

"The most valuable features of F5 Advanced WAF are SSL uploading, signature, and anomaly detection. It is overall a high-quality solution."

"It's scalable and very easy to manage."

"The support experience is better than average."

"F5 Advanced WAF secures our connectivity and combines both the main functions of WAF (balancing and web application security)."

"F5 Advanced WAF offers features not available in other products."

"The best solution for WAF."

"It can scale."

More F5 Advanced WAF pros

"Helps us to monitor situation in regards to attacks to our sites and prevents a lot of them."

Cons

"The solution should include protection against web page attacks like what is available in FortiWeb."

"The solution could improve by having an independent capture module. It has a built feature that you can deploy the capture on your published website. However, it's not very user-friendly. When you compare this feature to Google Capture or other enterprise captures, they are very simple. It needs a good connection to the F5 Advanced WAF sandbox. When you implement this feature in the data center, you may suffer some complications with connecting to the F5 Advanced WAF sandbox. This should be improved in the future."

"The delay times on firmware patches and software updates could be better and improved."

"The Sandbox integration feature could be improved."

"Nevertheless, F5 products are generally considered to be hard to deploy."

"The BNS module needs improvement."

"The accuracy of the automatic learning feature needs improvement."

"The tool needs to improve its pricing."

More F5 Advanced WAF cons

"The biggest problem for us was the stability and speed using the first version of Wallarm. Now, it is fine."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate F5 Advanced WAF's pricing a three out of ten."

"It is expensive. Its price should be better. Its licensing is on a yearly basis. Its licensing is also based on the model. There are no additional costs."

"F5 Advanced WAF's pricing is high."

"There is an annual subscription for this solution."

"The way we deployed it, I would rate it a four out of five in terms of pricing."

"F5 Advanced WAF pricing structure should be adjusted to meet the need of small to medium-sized companies."

"A yearly license for F5 Advanced WAF is expensive."

"The pricing is too high."

More F5 Advanced WAF pricing and cost advice

"Pricing must be cheaper than the competition and the licensing must be good."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

12%

Government

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

13%

Government

13%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	25
Midsize Enterprise	15
Large Enterprise	31

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about F5 Advanced WAF?

It's a fairly easy-to-use and user-friendly tool. My administrators and team also like its ability to customize the rules per the requirements.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for F5 Advanced WAF?

Regarding the price, I think the cost is a bit higher compared to others. Earlier we were using Radware, and compared to Radware, it is very high. However, it is providing more features than Radwar...

See all answers

What needs improvement with F5 Advanced WAF?

In terms of additional features I would like to see from them in the future, I think the GTM is a bit complicated to configure, which I observed. Otherwise, LTM and WAF are straightforward. I faced...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Fortinet FortiWeb vs F5 Advanced WAF

Compared 28% of the time

Imperva Application Security Platform vs F5 Advanced WAF

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs F5 Advanced WAF

Compared 7% of the time

AWS WAF vs F5 Advanced WAF

Compared 6% of the time

Radware Alteon vs F5 Advanced WAF

Compared 5% of the time

More F5 Advanced WAF Competitors

Akamai API Security vs Wallarm NG WAF

Compared 19% of the time

Cequence Security vs Wallarm NG WAF

Compared 13% of the time

Imperva Application Security Platform vs Wallarm NG WAF

Compared 12% of the time

Salt Security vs Wallarm NG WAF

Compared 10% of the time

Fastly vs Wallarm NG WAF

Compared 10% of the time

More Wallarm NG WAF Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

F5 Advanced WAF

January 2026

Download F5 Advanced WAF product report

Buyer's Guide

Web Application Firewall (WAF)

January 2026

Download Wallarm NG WAF product report

Also Known As

No data available

Wallarm NG-WAF

Overview

F5 Advanced WAF is a web application security solution for financial and government sectors, e-commerce, and public-facing websites. It offers protection against various attacks, including botnets, web scraping, and foreign entities. The solution can be deployed on-premises or in the cloud and is often used with other security tools. Its most valuable features include DDoS and DNS attack protection, SSL uploading, anomaly detection, and the ability to input custom rules.

F5 Advanced WAF has helped organizations to expose more services to the public while providing an extra layer of protection, preventing revenue loss, and securing connectivity.

Wallarm NG WAF provides advanced security by integrating machine learning, making it essential for modern web applications. It offers protection against sophisticated threats and automates many processes.

Wallarm NG WAF leverages AI-driven technology to deliver robust security measures. It helps in defending web applications from cybersecurity threats with enhanced threat detection and response capabilities. Beyond vulnerability insights, Wallarm enhances security protocols, scales with growing online demands, and ensures comprehensive threat coverage, fostering a safer web environment.

What are the key features of Wallarm NG WAF?

AI-Powered Threat Detection: Identifies and mitigates sophisticated attacks efficiently.
Automated Security Updates: Continuously updates defense strategies without manual intervention.
Flexible Deployment: Easily integrates across cloud, on-premise, and hybrid setups.
Scalability: Adapts to growing traffic volumes with consistent protection.
Detailed Reporting: Provides comprehensive analytics on web security posture.

What benefits can users expect from Wallarm NG WAF?

Increased Security: Enhances threat detection and reduces vulnerabilities.
Operational Efficiency: Reduces manual intervention with automated tasks.
Cost-Effectiveness: Optimizes security expenditure by preventing potential breaches.
Time Savings: Automates repetitive actions, saving valuable time for IT teams.

In industries like finance, e-commerce, and healthcare, Wallarm NG WAF is implemented to ensure data protection and compliance with stringent security standards. Its adaptability allows it to meet industry-specific requirements, offering specialized configurations tailored to each sector's unique demands.

Wallarm

Sample Customers

MAXIMUS, Vivo, American Systems, Bangladesh Post Office, City Bank

Panasonic. Miro. Rappi. Wargaming. Gannett. Omio. Acronis. Workforce Software. Tipalti. SEMRush.

Buyer's Guide

F5 Advanced WAF vs. Wallarm NG WAF

December 2025

Free Report: F5 Advanced WAF vs. Wallarm NG WAF

Find out what your peers are saying about F5 Advanced WAF vs. Wallarm NG WAF and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our F5 Advanced WAF vs. Wallarm NG WAF report.

See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.

We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.