Fidelis Elevate vs Symantec SSL Visibility Appliance comparison

Fidelis Security and Broadcom are both solutions in the SSL/TLS Decryption category. Fidelis Security is ranked #4, while Broadcom is ranked #1. Additionally, 100% of Fidelis Security users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Fidelis Elevate and Symantec SSL Visibility Appliance based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two SSL/TLS Decryption solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Fidelis Elevate vs. Symantec SSL Visibility Appliance Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Fidelis Elevate vs. Symantec SSL Visibility Appliance

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,976 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Net...

Featured Reviews

ABHISHEK_SINGH

Senior Process Expert at A.P. Moller - Maersk

Gained full visibility and streamlined threat detection through behavior-based insights and AI integration

Initially, we got to have a lot of false positives when we onboarded, but nowadays it's quite smooth. We have fine-tuned our security policies and allowed different levels of policies to get rid of those false positives. Currently, we are getting a fairly good amount of incidents that are not false positives or benign, but actionable items. The process is streamlined. In the initial days, the operations used to get involved in a lot of benign and other activities, but now the process is streamlined. We are leveraging the auto-detection and remediation plans. The operations teams are now more involved in other business roles as well, not just looking into the logs and fetching out what's happening there. They have fixed a lot of things. Initially, they didn't have IAC code drift detection, cloud posture management, or security posture management, but they have those now. They purchased different vendors and did a merger with that. They have now Prisma Cloud that gets integrated and now they are working with Cortex Cloud. Everything that was negative has now been addressed, and the product altogether looks to be in a very better and mature shape now. Currently, it's more or less detecting the workloads with AI-based best practices. Since most organizations are consuming AI agents and other things, we are looking forward to seeing what other feature enhancements Palo Alto can support in that.

Read full review

Mostafa Ameen

Information Security Engineer at ICT Misr

Advanced threat detection capabilities with comprehensive incident response features providing robust cybersecurity for organizations

The initial aspect concerns two engines. The first one mentioned is available for searching behaviors directly. The second engine involves the Google Ade tool, which operates on the machine. The challenge arises when attempting to rectify protection rules, causing confusion. It would be beneficial to enhance Rigixs Query. I encounter difficulty removing certain entries in behavior or alerts; likewise, I am unable to add specific calls.

Read full review

cto543714

CTO at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Feature-rich, works as advertised, and sends decrypted traffic at close-to-line speed to products that can't decrypt

The ability to do SSL chaining is most valuable. It provides the ability to send decrypted traffic at close-to-line speed to products that can't decrypt. So, it can take the decrypted traffic and send it to your IPS or your other tools to be able to see what's inside of that traffic for DLP or malicious content detection. That's the whole beauty of it. It was probably the elephant in the room for the longest in terms of SSL decryption. It can get the high band, especially for places that had a lot of decryption to do, such as big finance companies, big telcos, etc. It is a really good product. It has different features and things built into it. Feature-wise, they're the elephant in the room.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I like the centralized console and the predictive analysis it does of malware. It is very stable and also scalable."

"The product has an intuitive dashboard."

"Stability is a primary factor, and then there's the ease of distribution and policy management; Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is very easy to work with, and we're quite happy with them."

"The solution helps find bugs, and it is safe to use to prevent attacks by hackers."

"If any application performs suspicious activities, such as changing registries or modifying other applications, Cortex XDR detects and blocks the entire application."

"My advice for others looking into using Cortex is that it is very easy to use and very useful for the customer environment, whether it's a public or private one."

"Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks has helped lighten the load of our security analysts because it was the major tool that we were using and the one we utilized most."

"The positive impacts I see from Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks include a complete 360-degree view of our security posture altogether, being a uniform platform where we are ingesting logs from multiple resources."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pros

"There are many valuable features. The NDR gives very good network visibility, and the endpoint module has a great feature called "Live Connect" for remote connections. They also have "Tasks" that can be run on endpoints to gather specific information or retrieve logs."

"It is used as our primary in-line IDS/IPS system, replacing FireEye NX, and it catches more, looks at more ports than FireEye NX, and is a scalable appliance, unlike our NX which was saturated and shut itself down."

"What I like the most about this solution is the complexity. It covers a lot of areas, unlike other solutions."

"After rack and stack, devices were up and running base configurations within two hours. As with any IPS, tuning is required to stop false positives. This is no different, but the ease of use of the interface allowed my team to start making adjustments within a few hours."

"The technical support is very helpful."

"The solution is pretty scalable; you buy a lot of features, a known product, and you want it to run in any environment, and it does, so it's scalable enough."

"It ensures the stability of network behavior across various aspects of our network and offers responsive capabilities to address incidents promptly"

"Compared to similar solutions, it's quite scalable. You just need to add more storage to scale-up."

More Fidelis Elevate pros

"The ability to do SSL chaining is most valuable. It provides the ability to send decrypted traffic at close-to-line speed to products that can't decrypt. So, it can take the decrypted traffic and send it to your IPS or your other tools to be able to see what's inside of that traffic for DLP or malicious content detection. That's the whole beauty of it. It was probably the elephant in the room for the longest in terms of SSL decryption. It can get the high band, especially for places that had a lot of decryption to do, such as big finance companies, big telcos, etc."

"This is the easiest solution and I did a little bit of research before and I could not find another solution that does this."

"It is a really good product, and I don't have any problems with it."

"The most valuable feature is the Fail-to-Network (FTN) option, which means that if for any reason the appliance goes down then there is no interruption in traffic."

"One of the most valuable aspects of this solution is that it's easy to deploy without a lot of complications."

"Since implementing this solution, we have enhanced our detection rates and our proxy."

Cons

"Cortex XDR could improve its sales support team, including better commission structures and referral programs."

"Being able to filter the events to see those that are related to the actual alert would save time spent by the engineer."

"There are some third-party solutions that are difficult to integrate with, which is something that can be improved."

"However, if you do not have Palo Alto in your environment, you are paying these additional services just for Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks, so it is not a cost-effective solution."

"The solution lacks real-time, on-demand antivirus."

"A little bit more automation would be nice."

"I would like to see them include NDR (Network Detection Response). Then it would work well with SIEM Response."

"This is a very costly product."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks cons

"We position the solution as an antivirus, but this part of the solution needs improvement."

"Fidelis Endpoint is an expensive product making it one of its shortcomings that needs improvement."

"The reports in the endpoint area of Elevate can be improved."

"I encounter difficulty removing certain entries in behavior or alerts; likewise, I am unable to add specific calls."

"There is room for improvement in email security. It's a security issue. If you're aiming for XDR, covering the entire threat landscape is crucial."

"We position the solution as an antivirus, but this part of the solution needs improvement. They need to generally enhance the features that they have, rather than adding anything new."

"Configuration, in terms of building the collector and communicating with endpoints, is complex."

"The reports in the endpoint area of Elevate can be improved."

More Fidelis Elevate cons

"When it comes to tech support, they have challenges everywhere."

"They're working on being able to handle more traffic. They're working on bigger boxes full of throughput because now networks are going to 40 gigs and 100 gigs. So, trying to keep up with the bandwidth demands is where things are being pushed."

"From the operations perspective, they have to come up with easier ways so that the operational guys can easily manage it."

"Technical support needs to be improved."

"We haven't been satisfied with their support for around two months now."

"These days, I have not been happy with technical support."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Cortex XDR is a costly solution."

"The solution is expensive. It's pricing is on a yearly-basis."

"I did PoCs on products called Cylance and CrowdStrike. Although, I consider these products and they were also good, when it come to cost and budgetary factors, Traps has been proven to be better than the other two products. It is quite cost-effective and delivers all the entire solution which we require."

"I don't recall what the cost was, but it wasn't really that expensive."

"Our customers have expressed that the price is high."

"It is "expensive" and flexible."

"I don't have any issues with the pricing. We are satisfied with the price."

"When we first bought it, it was a bit expensive, but it was worth it. The licensing was straightforward."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pricing and cost advice

"You license by the number of days of logs you need to maintain visibility for. Forty-five days is a good solid number for a company with around a 10k user base."

"It's quite expensive but we can customize it to reduce the price."

"It's somehow expensive. From one to ten, I would rate it a five. They need to improve the prices. It's very high."

"Fidelis Endpoint is an expensive product. My company makes yearly payments toward the licensing cost of the solution."

"Licensing fees are billed annually and we purchased a three-year license."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which SSL/TLS Decryption solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Comms Service Provider

Government

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	44
Midsize Enterprise	20
Large Enterprise	47

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Large Enterprise	2

No data available

Questions from the Community

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. Sentinel One

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. SentinelOne SentinelOne offers very detailed specifics with regard to risks or attacks. ...

See all answers

Comparing CrowdStrike Falcon to Cortex XDR (Palo Alto)

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Both Cortex XDR and Crowd Strike Falcon offer cloud-based solutions th...

See all answers

How is Cortex XDR compared with Microsoft Defender?

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security solution. The tool reduces the attack surface,...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 9% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 6% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

Cortex XSIAM vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks Competitors

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Fidelis Elevate

Compared 8% of the time

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs Fidelis Elevate

Compared 6% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs Fidelis Elevate

Compared 4% of the time

VMware Carbon Black Cloud vs Fidelis Elevate

Compared 3% of the time

TrendAI Vision One – Endpoint Security vs Fidelis Elevate

Compared 2% of the time

More Fidelis Elevate Competitors

A10 Networks Thunder SSL Insight (SSLi) vs Symantec SSL Visibility Appliance

Compared 39% of the time

GigaSMART vs Symantec SSL Visibility Appliance

Compared 39% of the time

More Symantec SSL Visibility Appliance Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

March 2026

Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks product report

Buyer's Guide

Fidelis Elevate

March 2026

Download Fidelis Elevate product report

Buyer's Guide

SSL/TLS Decryption

March 2026

Symantec SSL Visibility Appliance report

Download Symantec SSL Visibility Appliance product report

Also Known As

Cyvera, Cortex XDR, Palo Alto Networks Traps

Fidelis Elevate Platform, Fidelis Enterprise, Fidelis Cloud, Fidelis Managed Detection and Response, Fidelis Deception, Fidelis Decryption, Fidelis Endpoint, Fidelis Network

No data available

Overview

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.

Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.

What are the key features of Cortex XDR?

Advanced Threat Detection: Uses AI and machine learning for proactive threat identification.
Multi-layered Security: Combines various security measures for comprehensive protection.
Endpoint Protection: Safeguards against malware and exploits.
Behavioral Analysis: Monitors suspicious activity for early detection.
Automatic Threat Response: Automates responses to neutralize threats.

What benefits should users expect?

Ease of Use: Simplifies security management with intuitive design.
Resource Efficiency: Minimizes impact on system resources.
Integration Capabilities: Works well with existing security setups.
Reduced Analyst Workload: Automates processes to decrease manual intervention.

Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.

Palo Alto Networks

Fidelis Elevate integrates network visibility, data loss prevention, deception, and endpoint detection and response into one unified solution. Now your security team can focus on the most urgent threats and protect sensitive data rather than spending time validating and triaging thousands of alerts.

Fidelis Security

The Symantec SSL Visibility Appliance is a high-performance transparent proxy for Secure Socket Layer (SSL) network communications. You install the SSL Visibility Appliance in the network and attach one or more security devices to it. The SSL Visibility Appliance is able to decrypt the SSL traffic, enabling the attached security appliances to see the plaintext (that is, the original unencrypted data) in SSL encrypted connections. It eliminates the blind spot created by encrypted traffic, enables your organization to combat the threats hidden within SSL, while preserving user privacy and regulatory compliance. Powerful policies allow you to bypass specific types of traffic (such as financial or healthcare data) to maintain employee data privacy.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

CBI Health Group, University Honda, VakifBank

First Midwest Bank

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Fidelis Elevate vs. Symantec SSL Visibility Appliance

March 2026

Free Report: Fidelis Elevate vs. Symantec SSL Visibility Appliance

Find out what your peers are saying about Fidelis Elevate vs. Symantec SSL Visibility Appliance and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Fidelis Elevate vs. Symantec SSL Visibility Appliance report.

See our list of best SSL/TLS Decryption vendors and best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.

We monitor all SSL/TLS Decryption reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.