Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Field Effect MDR vs SentinelOne Vigilance comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 3, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.1
Field Effect MDR enhanced financial returns, facilitated contract renewals, and increased new business by 35% with appreciated pricing flexibility.
Sentiment score
7.8
SentinelOne Vigilance enhances security against ransomware, offering adaptability and notable ROI, with users praising its effectiveness and reliability.
For the overall return on investment, both time and money, I would say it is a full 20.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
8.4
Field Effect MDR's customer service is praised for responsiveness, expertise, and availability, earning commendations despite calls for extended hours.
Sentiment score
7.1
SentinelOne Vigilance support is responsive and effective, with high customer satisfaction and 24/7 assistance, despite complex issue improvements.
Field Effect MDR provides real human support, which offers precise instruction and guidance.
I would rate the actual technical support from SentinelOne Vigilance a nine.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.5
Field Effect MDR offers seamless scalability, efficiently accommodating growth and diverse environments with minimal maintenance and effortless upgrades.
Sentiment score
8.4
SentinelOne Vigilance is highly scalable, adaptable for all business sizes, supporting global enterprises with effective resource distribution and licensing.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.5
Field Effect MDR offers stable, reliable performance without crashes, integrating smoothly across environments for diverse organizations.
Sentiment score
8.4
SentinelOne Vigilance is highly stable and reliable, with minor issues, praised for smooth automated features and dependable operation.
 

Room For Improvement

Enhancements needed include third-party integration, threat response, user interface, cloud support, communication, SIEM, DNS filtering, and compliance reporting.
SentinelOne Vigilance needs better integration, mobile support, pricing, AI features, forensics, documentation, and performance improvements with reduced false positives.
Pricing needed improvement, which was addressed by reducing the buying cost recently.
Regarding disadvantages of SentinelOne Vigilance, there is no local hub server that I can use to download the updates and signatures only once.
 

Setup Cost

Field Effect MDR is cost-effective with tiered pricing, offering value and efficiency, though budgeting can be challenging.
SentinelOne Vigilance is seen as valuable for its protection and deployment ease, though add-ons may increase costs.
Pricing was initially a concern, but the recent updates have resolved that by offering a more accessible buying cost.
The pricing, licensing, and setup costs in general are quite affordable.
 

Valuable Features

Field Effect MDR offers comprehensive security with advanced detection, automated responses, and proactive alerts, enhancing threat visibility and protection.
SentinelOne Vigilance offers advanced protection with scalability, real-time monitoring, low resource usage, and comprehensive threat insights through Storyline technology.
Field Effect MDR provides workstation coverage, user account protection with Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace, and on-premise device management for network security.
I am actually able to synthesize machine learning with human experience to manage complex threats in IRs.
 

Categories and Ranking

Field Effect MDR
Ranking in Managed Detection and Response (MDR)
3rd
Average Rating
9.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
30
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
SentinelOne Vigilance
Ranking in Managed Detection and Response (MDR)
6th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
21
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Managed Detection and Response (MDR) category, the mindshare of Field Effect MDR is 3.1%, up from 2.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SentinelOne Vigilance is 6.2%, down from 7.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Managed Detection and Response (MDR) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Field Effect MDR3.1%
SentinelOne Vigilance6.2%
Other90.7%
Managed Detection and Response (MDR)
 

Featured Reviews

Anmol Nagpal - PeerSpot reviewer
Effective MDR with great support and an easy setup
The feature I've found the move valuable is the 24/7 monitoring. We are a small organization that supports a LOT of endpoints and clients. Without this tool, it would be impossible for us to confidently tell clients that we are secure. Alongside this, the ability for Field Effect to make decisions on its own based on what it has learned from all the "training data" that we have provided in the past. It will only get better over time. We have had some false positives; for example, using a legitimate networking scanning tool from the terminal has been blocked. However, we were actually impressed when something so simple was caught!
Rahul Kate - PeerSpot reviewer
Improved efficiency with automated pricing and streamlined console
We are based in India, and we need to have these resources. We use it with smaller teams on security, leveraging expertise from SentinelOne The most valuable functions are automated pricing and ensuring the console is clean.  Additionally, it helps complete RC tasks and get the right information…
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed Detection and Response (MDR) solutions are best for your needs.
866,218 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
51%
Retailer
5%
Government
4%
Manufacturing Company
4%
Computer Software Company
18%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
6%
Comms Service Provider
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business31
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise1
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business15
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise6
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Field Effect Covalence?
It is very user-friendly. We have regular reports to see what is going on.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Field Effect Covalence?
Pricing was initially a concern, but the recent updates have resolved that by offering a more accessible buying cost.
What needs improvement with Field Effect Covalence?
Some resources lack experience, but issues can be escalated to more knowledgeable contacts. Pricing needed improvement, which was addressed by reducing the buying cost recently. Like any product, s...
What do you like most about SentinelOne Vigilance?
The best feature of this solution is the third-party management aspect. An external company oversees the tool's management and monitors the data it generates. If the EDR detects suspicious activity...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SentinelOne Vigilance?
The pricing, licensing, and setup costs in general are quite affordable.
What needs improvement with SentinelOne Vigilance?
Regarding disadvantages of SentinelOne Vigilance, there is no local hub server that I can use to download the updates and signatures only once. The solution is fully scalable, although the only poi...
 

Also Known As

Field Effect Covalence
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Norwegian Airlines, TGI Fridays, AVX, FIMBank
Find out what your peers are saying about Field Effect MDR vs. SentinelOne Vigilance and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
866,218 professionals have used our research since 2012.