FlutterFlow vs GeneXus comparison

Read 14 GeneXus reviews

1,013 Views
709 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

FlutterFlow

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

GeneXus and FlutterFlow are two competing products in the app development space. User reviews indicate that GeneXus excels in deployment ease and customer service, whereas FlutterFlow is favored for its features and cost-efficient pricing model.

Features: Users praise GeneXus for its advanced integration capabilities, extensive support for multiple programming languages, and high scalability. FlutterFlow stands out for its intuitive drag-and-drop design interface, a wide variety of customizable templates, and smoother animation transitions.

Room for Improvement: GeneXus users highlight the need for improvements in debugging tools, documentation clarity, and the user interface of its development environment. FlutterFlow users point out areas for better performance with larger apps, more advanced customization options, and enhancements in collaboration features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GeneXus is commended for its straightforward deployment process and highly responsive customer service, which helps reduce implementation time. FlutterFlow also offers a relatively easy deployment process but receives mixed reviews regarding its customer service.

Pricing and ROI: GeneXus has higher setup costs, which can be a barrier for smaller enterprises, but users believe the investment is worth it due to the quality of support and deployment. FlutterFlow offers more affordable pricing with satisfactory ROI, making it an attractive option for cost-conscious users.

To learn more, read our detailed FlutterFlow vs. GeneXus Report (Updated: December 2025).

Download the complete report

FlutterFlow vs. GeneXus

December 2025

Helped 881,707 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

FlutterFlow

Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms

16th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

GeneXus

Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms

20th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mobile Development Platforms (12th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Low-Code Development Platforms category, the mindshare of FlutterFlow is 1.4%, down from 2.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GeneXus is 0.9%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Low-Code Development Platforms Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
FlutterFlow	1.4%
GeneXus	0.9%
Other	97.7%

Low-Code Development Platforms

Featured Reviews

Bibhu Sahu

Senior VP Technology at HDFC Bank

Simplifies integrations, accelerates development timelines, and offers a good MVP

We integrate FlutterFlow into our app development process by first developing the code using the enterprise ID. Once the code is ready, we preview it and then download it. We have built a CI process where the code, once pushed to the gate, is processed by CI actions to generate the appropriate output, whether it is an IPA or APK file. While FlutterFlow currently focuses on website development, we write the code in a way that allows us to adapt it for mobile apps as well. We maintain a unified codebase for all three platforms, ensuring consistency and efficiency in our development workflow. FlutterFlow accelerated my development timeline on a project where I needed a simple website with basic navigation and form submissions. While it lacks advanced design pattern options and some features are still maturing, it simplifies integration and speeds up development. FlutterFlow's UI design capabilities have significantly impacted my app development by allowing me to communicate marketing concepts more effectively through visual flow. Every feature in FlutterFlow, from screen design to integrations, has been valuable for my development efforts. However, having better support for multiple design patterns and ensuring compatibility with custom changes would greatly improve the development experience. Overall, I would rate FlutterFlow as an eight out of ten.

Read full review

XavierEspinoza

Internal System Coordinator at Red CEDIA

Offers a simplified architecture with outstanding integration capabilities

The integration capabilities of GeneXus are highly valuable for our organization. The metadata obtained within the logic of different systems is also vital. Due to the solution, our company team doesn't have to work with multiple languages and integrations can be made with C Sharp. JavaScript can also be used with GeneXus, the tool takes charge of all the rest and has a simple architecture. The solution can be used out of the box without facing any issues and nothing much needs to be done with frameworks. In our case we need to use Python with GeneXus, we use Ironpython to embed python code in C# .

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I like the simplicity of making panels with Flutter."

"The most valuable features of FlutterFlow are the integrations and workflows."

"It allows you to create fragments that look good and work on both mobile and web environments."

"FlutterFlow offers a lot, but one feature that really helps me is the debugging features that allow me to test everything on the spot. This is really helpful."

"The solution provides ease of programming and the speed of delivery of demands."

"In Knowledge Base, being able to model the workflow before developing the screens is great. We first work with the tables or the transactions using GeneXus and then we work on the screens."

"The integration capabilities of GeneXus are highly valuable for our organization"

"The integration module is the most valuable feature of this solution for our business, as it allows our clients to create new systems based on their outdated databases, across all API's."

"I like that it's very compatible with other tools. The most important feature is getting the developer to focus on the project's business case. It's not about focusing on how I can command this or how I can develop a front end, or how I can work with the advantages. The developer should focus on the business case of the project. No need to focus on connecting the database to the server or connecting the server and the front end. The developer can concentrate on the views."

"I find the implementation process of GeneXus to be easy."

"It is fast in creating systems and connects to the database quickly."

"With the solution, I can work a normal day. I can plan my work and any other activities for days ahead."

More GeneXus pros

Cons

"There is room for improvement in advanced functionality so it could cater to more complex app development needs."

"Scaling depends on project requirements."

"I am trying to see how it can be integrated with the backend. That said, I haven't gotten there yet."

"The UI components could be more standardized. Sometimes, for certain properties, I have to search more than I do with other platforms. With other platforms, once you know one, you know all. But with FlutterFlow, sometimes you have to look around for what you need."

"Code generation is highly time-consuming for GeneXus"

"It's expensive for a company."

"GeneXus is a wonderful tool for the backend. It's the best in the world, but for the frontend, GeneXus needs to improve. There should be easier steps for managing various aspects, such as alerts and messages to show to the end-users."

"It would be better if GeneXus had a wiki. The developer needs some experience to work with the tools. It would be better if they could improve the community. If we have some problem, I open a ticket that takes us to a board, and I have to describe my issue in detail. If the tools have a general community for us to explore with some videos or some articles, I think that that may help the developer."

"We would like to see more extensions and more user controls added to the front-end of this solution, in order to help developers manage the website."

"Documentation is always an issue. In order to develop with GeneXus, there is very little documentation. The documentation is not clear enough in order to develop a great tool."

"It would be helpful to have additional assisted processing with training."

"The front-end with GeneXus is not as good as the back-end."

More GeneXus cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would rate the licensing costs a three out of ten, with ten being expensive and one being cheap. Currently, I use the free version."

"I don't know about the price because I am an employee, but I hear it's cheaper than other tools."

"People tend to work with GeneXus if it's cheap, but GeneXus does have licensing policies...Moreover, the cost of resourcing work in GeneXus may make it more expensive than other programming languages."

"It's expensive. I'd rate it a four out of ten in terms of pricing."

"This solution offers multi-plan licenses, depending on the size of the company and the features required, as opposed to being priced per user/device."

"The tool's price is good."

"I give the cost of the solution a four out of ten."

"The cost of a GeneXus license is extremely high. At the same time, one person using the solution can do the work of three Java or data developers. I think that's why they charge so much. It's too expensive, which is one reason it isn't widely used."

"I know that its licenses are generally per year, and in the past, the license for GeneXus was around $5,000, but I don't know what's the current price of the GeneXus license."

More GeneXus pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Low-Code Development Platforms solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

12%

Media Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Educational Organization

Comms Service Provider

Energy/Utilities Company

Manufacturing Company

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about FlutterFlow?

FlutterFlow offers a lot, but one feature that really helps me is the debugging features that allow me to test everything on the spot. This is really helpful.

What needs improvement with FlutterFlow?

Right now, I think it's a good tool. It's easy to understand when you know Dart. It helps create applications, and I am trying to see how it can be integrated with the backend. That said, I haven't...

What is your primary use case for FlutterFlow?

Currently, I am using Flutter to make a dashboard.

What needs improvement with GeneXus?

GeneXus needs to be more consistent in functionality without any errors. Code generation is highly time-consuming for GeneXus, but in some cases, it saves time as well. Some errors will take too lo...

What is your primary use case for GeneXus?

Our company uses the latest version of GeneXus. The solution is used in our company to develop various enterprise systems, and GeneXus is used as an integrator, which further facilitates low-cost d...

What advice do you have for others considering GeneXus?

The tool's use case depends upon the requirements. The solution is ideal for integrations to modernize systems. GeneXus is also used in a site to develop systems with functional programming for big...

Microsoft Power Apps vs FlutterFlow

Comparisons

Lovable vs FlutterFlow

Compared 65% of the time

Compared 11% of the time

Mendix vs FlutterFlow

Compared 7% of the time

OutSystems vs FlutterFlow

Compared 5% of the time

Appery.io vs FlutterFlow

Compared 3% of the time

More FlutterFlow Competitors

Magic xpa Application Platform vs GeneXus

Compared 15% of the time

Microsoft Azure App Service vs GeneXus

Compared 15% of the time

ServiceNow Now Platform vs GeneXus

Compared 13% of the time

OutSystems vs GeneXus

Compared 12% of the time

Mendix vs GeneXus

Compared 11% of the time

More GeneXus Competitors

Product Reports

Low-Code Development Platforms

January 2026

Download FlutterFlow product report

Download GeneXus product report

January 2026

Overview

FlutterFlow is used for developing mobile applications quickly and efficiently, ideal for building prototypes, MVPs, and full-fledged applications without extensive coding experience. It supports cross-platform development, enabling simultaneous deployment on Android and iOS.

FlutterFlow's visual development tools and integrations streamline the app creation process, making it perfect for startups and developers looking to launch their apps faster. Its comprehensive drag-and-drop interface, pre-built components, and templates facilitate rapid app development. Integration with Firebase simplifies backend connections, and the robust documentation and tutorials support quick learning. Real-time collaboration features improve teamwork, enhancing the development experience.

What are the most important features of FlutterFlow?

Comprehensive drag-and-drop interface accelerates app development.
Pre-built components and templates streamline design processes.
Integration with Firebase simplifies backend connections.
Robust documentation and tutorials support rapid learning.
Real-time collaboration enhances teamwork.

What benefits or ROI should be looked for when evaluating FlutterFlow?

Quick app development with a visual interface.
Reduction in development costs and timelines.
Ease of integrating backend services.
Enhanced team collaboration during development.

FlutterFlow can be particularly useful in industries that require fast app iterations, such as startups and tech companies. Its support for cross-platform development is beneficial for companies targeting both Android and iOS markets. The ease of use and comprehensive support make it an appealing choice for businesses looking to launch functional apps quickly, without extensive coding knowledge. Though improvements in stability, performance, customization, debugging, and customer support are needed, FlutterFlow's overall features present a strong front for efficient app development.

FlutterFlow

What is GeneXus? GeneXus™ is the best Low-Code Platform that you don't know yet.

It's a Software Development Platform that simplifies and automates the tasks of creating and evolving enterprise applications and multi-channel user-experiences. Great Advantages:

- Higher productivity, with automatic maintenance & evolution
- Multi-Experience, we continuously create new code generators
- Agile, incremental approach, with fully functional prototypes
- Easier to learn, one single language to cover all technologies
- Future-proof, we've been around for 30 years, evolving for you

Key Differentiators against the competition:

- No runtime fees, we charge by developer
- Best theoretical framework, which allows us to evolve
- Best coverage in the market: Most technologies, most languages, most markets and industries
- We run on-premise or on the cloud
- Multiple starting points depending on the type of company you work in, with products for Students, Startups, ISVs, Corporate Development, and SAP technologies

GeneXus uses Artificial Intelligence techniques to create software, enabling truly incremental development of apps, providing a low-code, future-proof development platform for the leading execution platforms and languages, and the most popular DBMS.

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Canal de Panamá, Gerdau, Coca-Cola, Mercado Libre, DHL, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, TECNISA, Mexican Polak Group, Ferrovalle, Canon, Azteca, KPMG, TURBUS, Santander, BBVA