Foglight for Databases vs Toad Data Modeler comparison

Foglight for Databases and Toad Data Modeler are both solutions in the Database Development and Management category. Foglight for Databases is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.5, while Toad Data Modeler is ranked #9 with an average rating of 9.0. Foglight for Databases holds a 3.4% mindshare in DDM, compared to Toad Data Modeler’s 3.1% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Foglight for Databases users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of Toad Data Modeler users who would recommend it.

Foglight for Databases

Read 20 Foglight for Databases reviews

3,671 Views
3,598 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Toad Data Modeler

Read 19 Toad Data Modeler reviews

2,385 Views
2,075 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Foglight for Databases

Toad Data Modeler

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 1, 2026

Toad Data Modeler and Foglight for Databases operate in the database software category, with Toad focusing on modeling and Foglight on monitoring and management. While Toad excels in design features, Foglight holds an advantage in terms of performance tracking and analytics.

Features:Toad Data Modeler offers comprehensive schema engineering, an intuitive interface for creating and managing database models, and effective tools for database schema generation and re-engineering. Foglight for Databases provides advanced monitoring tools, real-time diagnostics, and superior performance analytics, along with SQL PI for in-depth query analysis and the ability to monitor multiple database platforms.

Room for Improvement:Toad Data Modeler could benefit from enhanced real-time monitoring capabilities, a more detailed analytical suite, and integration with more diverse database environments. Foglight for Databases may improve by simplifying its UI, enhancing support for additional database systems, and reducing its initial complexity for new users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:Toad Data Modeler is known for its straightforward deployment and robust customer support, guiding users through installation with ease. Foglight for Databases, while offering extensive configuration options, may require more time for setup but is supported by comprehensive customer service for complex environments.

Pricing and ROI:Toad Data Modeler is competitively priced, often proving cost-effective for those focusing on efficient database modeling and schema management. Foglight for Databases, though more expensive upfront, justifies its cost with significant ROI for organizations needing detailed monitoring and analytics.

To learn more, read our detailed Foglight for Databases vs. Toad Data Modeler Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Foglight for Databases vs. Toad Data Modeler

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 896,942 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Foglight for Databases

Ranking in Database Development and Management

1st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Toad Data Modeler

Ranking in Database Development and Management

9th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Database Development and Management category, the mindshare of Foglight for Databases is 3.4%, down from 8.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Toad Data Modeler is 3.1%, down from 3.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Database Development and Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Foglight for Databases	3.4%
Toad Data Modeler	3.1%
Other	93.5%

Database Development and Management

Featured Reviews

Vijay Ram

Technical Engineer at Hitachi Systems, Ltd.

Centralized monitoring has simplified multi-database oversight and improved query analysis

Foglight for Databases is very useful; however, the negative side we face is that customer care support is not frequent. If any issues related to Foglight arise, we cannot reach customer care support as soon as possible. It takes much longer compared to other third-party tools, and that is a major issue we are facing with Foglight for Databases. Foglight for Databases is good for monitoring, and we can fetch problematic issues and queries. However, the only main drawback is the customer care support. It is available only during the general shift, so if any issue occurs after 6:00 p.m. or before 9:00 a.m., there is usually no one to handle it. I think there are only two or three people handling customer care for Foglight for Databases.

Read full review

KaiQuale

Senior engineer at a government with 201-500 employees

Creates intuitive diagrams with comprehensive control over relationships

1) When updating a model after generating a schema, if only a few tables are imported, the tool assumes you want to delete the rest. If you have a large model, you repeatedly have to clarify that you don't want to delete each one. 2) If one could view the same model on physical, logical, and conceptual levels while retaining all information specific to each level (including layout), that would be excellent.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's a great product, it's probably one of the best in this class and people should not hesitate getting on board with the product."

"Foglight has the effect of improving our overall productivity, reducing downtime, and increasing profits."

"For me, one of the most useful components has been Performance Investigator, because it completely helps with bottlenecks or performance problems quickly, evaluating whether the root is at the server level, at the development level, or at the database level."

"It enables you to pin down troubleshooting within 30 minutes to an hour, whereas before, you'd be pouring over reports or data from queries for days."

"I do not find anything I dislike about Foglight for Databases."

"One of the hardest things to do in database management is to evaluate performance deviation across time. The adaptive baseline that Quest is using is by far the most helpful. That doesn't necessarily mean I use it on a daily basis, but it is something that I have not been able to find in any other tool, at the same level."

"The platform is very stable."

"The most valuable feature is the in-depth capability SQL Performance Investigator provides. It allows you to drill down to the smallest detail that occurs on our platform. It does a highly detailed and atomic follow-up of what one wants to look for in relation to time and our different instances."

More Foglight for Databases pros

"The feature I really like is the graphical part, especially the control of the relationships, because you can move them around any way you want, which makes it easy to create a comprehensive and easy-to-understand diagram."

"The feature I really like is the graphical part, especially the control of the relationships."

"I don't know the financials, but I wouldn’t be able to do my job (build applications/databases) without it."

"This product is fast to learn and a user-friendly tool."

"The most valuable features are the database architecture, the good functionality, and the user interface."

"It's a must-buy, and both pricing and licensing is well in the range of every organization."

"Toad is 100% value for money product."

"With Toad, all the users have the same database on the server rather than local individual databases which creates a lot of duplication."

More Toad Data Modeler pros

Cons

"The system is not that stable. We have been facing a lot of issues. We built a new store environment of Foglight, an environment for monitoring the Lowe's store servers, which are all Db2 servers. The objective is to monitor 800 Db2 servers in each Foglight instance. Up to 150 Db2 servers, the environment was working fine. The moment it crossed 150 or 160, we started having a lot of stability issues."

"I don't find Foglight for Databases to be very scalable. There are other tools in the market that do the same for less money."

"When holding data for two years for 20 SQL Servers, the reporting becomes sluggish and unresponsive."

"The data model needs improvement when it comes to creating custom reports. That is an area where it needs a bit of improvement. Foglight gathers a lot of information around our databases as part of its monitoring. While I know all this information is in there, trying to pull the metric we want out for custom reports is sometimes hard to find. One nice thing about Foglight is that you can create custom dashboards, which you can easily convert to reports. We would be doing a lot more of that if it weren't for the challenging data model."

"With the latest version, we have had many crashes, sometimes it stops working entirely, and it can take days to restart the service."

"It would be amazing if they could enable the "Performance Investigator" functionality across all database platforms."

"I had problems with it for a long time, and it took a while before we could get it running with optimum performance."

"The version that I'm using is not the latest version, so there might have been some improvement, but the OS monitoring is a bit lacking, and the high-availability option is a bit complicated to set up and it doesn't work all the time."

More Foglight for Databases cons

"We sometimes have issues with multiple nested queries. They take a long time to run, and it would be nice to have them run faster."

"Reverse engineering the physical schema is complex and can be made easier."

"What could be improved in Toad Data Modeler is stability and the complex setup."

"It's way overpriced, even if it wasn't the buggy product it has become."

"When updating a model after generating a schema, if only a few tables are imported, the tool assumes you want to delete the rest, which is cumbersome."

"Better documentation would be a benefit."

"There were issues due to the databases connectivity."

"The one thing about it is that there are almost too many features and options; some we don’t even use."

More Toad Data Modeler cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This is like the "Cadillac" of performance monitoring software. It's not cheap... I am currently with a company that I was able to convince that the product is worth the cost."

"It is cost-effective. With our EA, it is really based on the scale of our database environment. We found the Quest team to be reasonable and flexible when it comes to pricing and scaling of licenses."

"The price of Foglight could be a little more competitive in Chile, and it should be lowered for long-time customers— at least by 20 percent. Sometimes the price is a limitation. We have seven instances and nearly 5 million users. If Quest Foglight could reduce its prices for the clients that have been with it for a long time, we would be able to have more instances."

"The price is worth it, if you have the time to go through the information."

"Compared to the other tools on the market, Foglight is okay in terms of pricing and licensing."

"Pricing is very reasonable. We were able to construct a pretty easy contract with Quest, who were very easy to work with and very amenable to what we are trying to do. It worked out well for us."

"Price-wise, the lesser it is, the better it is for me, especially in Egypt. I think that the licensing cost ranges from 1,000 to 9,000. Also, it includes maintenance and support for a year."

"Though I'm not involved in the licensing for Toad Data Modeler, I believe it's per user and not cheap."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Database Development and Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

896,942 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Government

10%

Manufacturing Company

Performing Arts

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Energy/Utilities Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	14

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	9

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Quest Foglight for Databases?

I have had a good experience with the licensing costs of Foglight for Databases, as we have a provider who has given us good prices, and so far we have not had any cost problems. Regarding configur...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Quest Foglight for Databases?

Primarily, given that Foglight for Databases is so multi-platform with different databases such as Oracle, SQL Server, and MySQL, the reports are very specific for each engine. An improvement could...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Quest Foglight for Databases?

Foglight for Databases serves multiple purposes in my organization, with the primary use being the multi-database aspect, where I can have the status and availability of all databases in a single v...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Toad Data Modeler?

Considering its functionality, I would rate its pricing as a seven out of ten. It could be cheaper yet is still pretty good.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Toad Data Modeler?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Toad Data Modeler?

There are two main use cases. One is reengineering an existing model and making changes from a database. The other is making a new model from scratch. These use cases involve all kinds of systems, ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Spotlight vs Foglight for Databases

Compared 15% of the time

Oracle Enterprise Manager vs Foglight for Databases

Compared 11% of the time

SolarWinds Database Performance Analyzer vs Foglight for Databases

Compared 10% of the time

Precisely Optimize DB2 vs Foglight for Databases

Compared 8% of the time

Oracle Coherence vs Foglight for Databases

Compared 3% of the time

More Foglight for Databases Competitors

IDERA ER/Studio vs Toad Data Modeler

Compared 10% of the time

IDERA SQL Defrag Manager vs Toad Data Modeler

Compared 8% of the time

IDERA DB Change Manager vs Toad Data Modeler

Compared 8% of the time

Oracle SQL Developer vs Toad Data Modeler

Compared 6% of the time

ScaleArc vs Toad Data Modeler

Compared 6% of the time

More Toad Data Modeler Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Foglight for Databases

May 2026

Download Foglight for Databases product report

Buyer's Guide

Database Development and Management

May 2026

Download Toad Data Modeler product report

Also Known As

No data available

Toad

Overview

Foglight for Databases offers comprehensive monitoring with real-time activity screens and adaptive baselines. It provides a 360-degree overview and efficient UI, requiring no custom scripts, aiding in proactive issue identification and resolution before impacting end users.

Foglight for Databases is a robust tool for monitoring across multiple platforms, including SQL and Oracle. It provides features like the "Morning Coffee" dashboard and SQL Performance Investigator, enabling effective workload analysis and historical investigation. Despite some challenges with sluggish performance on large data volumes and excessive non-critical alerts, it remains a preferred choice for its ability to support proactive management and resource planning. Users appreciate its centralized view of extensive database systems, enabling swift detection and resolution of issues in real-time.

What are the key features?

Comprehensive Monitoring: Provides cross-platform real-time monitoring, ensuring effective database management.
Adaptive Baselines: Adjusts to various workloads, enhancing monitoring accuracy.
SQL Performance Investigator: Offers detailed workload analysis without server impact.
Proactive Alerts: Delivers timely notifications, aiding in immediate issue resolution.
Efficient UI: Streamlines user interaction, minimizing the need for custom scripts.

What benefits and ROI should be considered?

Time Saving: Reduces time in root cause analysis, enhancing productivity.
Proactive Management: Detects issues before they affect end users, minimizing downtime.
Resource Planning: Aids in effective allocation planning for enterprise and cloud platforms.

Foglight is extensively implemented in industries managing extensive database systems, handling numerous servers to ensure availability and performance. It assists businesses in resolving blocking and locking deadlocks, crucial for maintaining smooth operations in production and development environments.

Quest Software

Toad Data Modeler is a versatile modeling tool with a robust GUI and an intuitive Query Builder, supporting a wide range of databases including flat-files. It facilitates seamless database schema generation and efficient administration for environments like Oracle, SQL Server, and Postgres.

Designed to meet the needs of database administrators and developers, Toad Data Modeler enables users to create, modify, and manage data models across heterogeneous databases. With features including SQL formatting, cross-database queries, and report automation, it provides comprehensive support for database tasks. Compatibility with Windows 10/11 and functionalities like auto-complete and script editing make it a preferred choice. However, users indicate challenges with performance issues such as crashes, slow query execution, and complex reverse engineering tasks. Improving documentation and interface usability are areas of potential enhancement. Compatibility with Python and better licensing procedures could also strengthen its position in the market.

What are the key features of Toad Data Modeler?

Robust GUI: Intuitive interface for ease of use across tasks.
Query Builder: Easy-to-use tool for constructing queries.
Heterogeneous Database Support: Compatible with various databases including flat-files.
SQL Formatting: Streamlines SQL coding processes.
Cross-database Queries: Facilitates combined database operations.
Report Automation: Automates report generation tasks.
Schema Generation: Helps in creating and modifying database schemas.
Auto-complete: Enhances script editing efficiency.
Windows 10/11 Compatibility: Supports the latest operating systems.
Graphical Relationship Management: Visualizes and manages database relationships.

What benefits should users expect in reviews?

Efficient Database Administration: Simplifies database management tasks.
Fast Learning Curve: Users can quickly become proficient.
Enhanced Query Optimization: Improves performance efficiency in database operations.
Data Comparison: Assists in maintaining data integrity.
Table Import/Export: Facilitates data movement between systems.

In industries like software development and data analytics, Toad Data Modeler is implemented to manage large data volumes, ensuring accurate and efficient database updates. Organizations use it for designing new models or re-engineering existing databases, which is vital for systems requiring high availability and consistent performance.

Quest Software

Sample Customers

CommitDBA

Zions Bancorporation

Buyer's Guide

Foglight for Databases vs. Toad Data Modeler

April 2026

Free Report: Foglight for Databases vs. Toad Data Modeler

Find out what your peers are saying about Foglight for Databases vs. Toad Data Modeler and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

896,942 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Foglight for Databases vs. Toad Data Modeler report.

See our list of best Database Development and Management vendors.

We monitor all Database Development and Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.