FortiCNAPP vs Trivy comparison

Fortinet and Aqua Security are both solutions in the Container Security category. Fortinet is ranked #27 with an average rating of 7.8, while Aqua Security is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.6. Fortinet holds a 3.1% mindshare in Container Security, compared to Aqua Security’s 3.4% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Fortinet users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Aqua Security users who would recommend it.

FortiCNAPP

Read 13 FortiCNAPP reviews

7,443 Views
3,498 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Trivy

Read 12 Trivy reviews

6,259 Views
6,259 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

FortiCNAPP

Trivy

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 22, 2026

FortiCNAPP and Trivy are key competitors in the cybersecurity and DevOps software arenas. FortiCNAPP appears to have the upper hand due to its advanced anomaly detection and policy recommendations which enhance security measures comprehensively.

Features: FortiCNAPP stands out with robust network segmentation, automated policy recommendations, and SIEM integration, leveraging machine learning for anomaly detection. It also offers detailed compliance reports. Trivy is notable for its seamless CI/CD pipeline integration and extensive scanning coverage, including container images, Kubernetes, and Terraform. Its open-source nature enhances flexibility and ease of integration across environments.

Room for Improvement: FortiCNAPP could enhance user navigation and improve compliance metrics visibility. Its user interface and integration with external systems like Slack may require streamlining. Trivy lacks a user interface and advanced reporting, needing better export options and quicker image scanning. Users desire an extensive database and integrations with malware detection tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: FortiCNAPP offers strong deployment features integrations with DevOps tools, particularly in cloud environments, receiving positive feedback for its customer support. Trivy supports diverse environments from on-premises to cloud, but being open-source, it lacks in customer service feedback compared to FortiCNAPP.

Pricing and ROI: FortiCNAPP requires considerable investment, with users finding ROI in security and operational optimization. Its pricing is competitive for high-engagement customers. Trivy offers significant cost savings as an open-source tool, appealing to users needing essential functionality at no cost, significantly impacting ROI favorably for budget-conscious users.

To learn more, read our detailed FortiCNAPP vs. Trivy Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

FortiCNAPP vs. Trivy

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 893,221 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

FortiCNAPP

Ranking in Container Security

27th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Vulnerability Management (33rd), Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) (17th), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (21st), Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) (16th), Compliance Management (10th)

Trivy

Ranking in Container Security

4th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Container Security category, the mindshare of FortiCNAPP is 3.1%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trivy is 3.4%, down from 5.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Container Security Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Trivy	3.4%
FortiCNAPP	3.1%
Other	93.5%

Container Security

Featured Reviews

Mark Freeborough

Client Manager at MLL Telecom Ltd

Network segmentation has strengthened access control and now streamlines automated threat response

The most valuable features in FortiCNAPP include robust network segmentation and restricting access to network assets. It also supports security measures by leveraging security fabrics for better enforcement and policy enforcement. FortiCNAPP integrates with SIEM solutions, and we offer different SIEM options that work with Fortinet and AlienVault, among others, providing multiple scenarios.FortiCNAPP's automated policy recommendations significantly help improve security measures as part of an overall service wrap. When deploying a Fortinet SD-WAN or network, these tools provide greater visibility to vulnerabilities and enhanced security on the network. It functions as a proactive tool, enabling me to identify threats quickly and automate responses.

Read full review

Suryadev Chaudhary

Project Associate Engineer at a tech vendor with 501-1,000 employees

Using advanced scanning to detect vulnerabilities and provide solutions with ease in CI/CD pipelines

I use Trivy for scanning Docker images and containers, as well as the entire file system to collect reports. I configure it in CI/CD pipelines Trivy is most valuable for its ability to scan all repository files and dependencies. Whenever vulnerabilities are found, it automatically provides…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"For the most part, out-of-the-box, it tells you right away about the things you need to work on. I like the fact that it prioritizes alerts based on severity, so that you can focus your efforts on anything that would be critical/high first, moderate second, and work your way down, trying to continue to improve your security posture."

"The best feature, in my opinion, is the ease of use."

"Lacework is helping a lot in reducing the noise of the alerts. Usually, whenever you have a tool in place, you have a lot of noise in terms of alerts, but the time for an engineer to look into those alerts is limited. Lacework is helping us to consolidate the information that we are getting from the agents and other sources. We are able to focus only on the things that matter, which is the most valuable thing for us. It saves time, and for investigations, we have the right context to take action."

"The best feature, in my opinion, is the ease of use, as well as some levels of machine learning anomaly detection that they have that can detect pivotal anomalies faster."

"There are many valuable features that I use in my daily work. The first are alerts and the event dossier that it generates, based on the severity. That is very insightful and helps me to have a security cap in our infrastructure. The second thing I like is the agent-based vulnerability management, which is the most accurate information."

"The most valuable feature, from a compliance perspective, is the ability to use Lacework as a platform for multiple compliance standards. We have to meet multiple standards like PCI, SOC 2, CIS, and whatever else is out there. The ability to have reports generated, per security standard, is one of the best features for me."

"FortiCNAPP is a competitive and robust solution, the only one in the IT sphere that addresses all quadrants in the Gartner Quadrants."

"The machine learning capability in Lacework FortiCNAPP is used for threat detection, and automated policy recommendation helps to improve my security measures in general."

More FortiCNAPP pros

"Trivy is easy to integrate with CI/CD and can be installed on desktops to scan images."

"The most valuable feature of Trivy is its easy integration with the CI/CD pipeline."

"Trivy's open source nature and wide functionality are incredibly valuable."

"I appreciate Trivy for being open-source and not requiring any payment."

"Trivy is most valuable for its ability to scan all repository files and dependencies."

"I rate Trivy a nine out of ten."

"Trivy is very reliable and always has an up-to-date database to scan images and identify vulnerabilities."

More Trivy pros

Cons

"Visibility is lacking, and both compliance-related metrics and IAM security control could be improved."

"The biggest thing I would like to see improved is for them to pursue and obtain a FedRAMP moderate authorization... I don't believe they have any immediate plans to get FedRAMP moderate authorized, which is a bit of a challenge for us because we can only use Lacework in our commercial environment."

"A feature that I have requested from them is the ability to sort alerts and policies based on a security framework. Right now, when you go into alerts, you have hundreds and hundreds of them that you have to manually pick. It would be useful to have categories for CIS Benchmark or SOC 2 and be able to display all the alerts and policies for one security framework."

"The solution lacks a cohesive data model, making extracting the necessary data from the platform challenging. It uses its own LQL query language, and each database across different layers and modules is structured differently, complicating correlation efforts. Consequently, I had to create extensive custom reports outside Lacework because their default dashboards didn't communicate risk metrics. They're addressing these issues by redesigning their tools, including introducing the dashboard, which is a step closer to actionable insights but still needs refinement."

"However, the solution could be more user-friendly and intuitive."

"The configuration and setup of alerts should be easier. They should make it easier to integrate with systems like Slack and Datadog. I didn't spend too much time on it, but to me, it wasn't as simple as the alerting that I've seen on other systems."

"I would like to see a remote access assistance feature. And the threat-hunting platform could be better."

"Lacework lacks remediation features, but I believe they're working on that. They're focused on the reporting aspect, but other features need to improve. They're also adding some compliance features, so it's not worth saying they need to get better at it."

More FortiCNAPP cons

"Currently, the container image scanning is static. A dynamic scanning capability during runtime would be a significant advantage."

"Trivy generates many false positives, flagging non-existent vulnerabilities."

"The main area for improvement is in differentiating between OS and application-based vulnerabilities."

"Trivy generates many false positives, flagging non-existent vulnerabilities. Improvements could include better contextual analysis or granular filtering."

"The reporting could be a little better. When integrating Trivy with CI, the interpretation of the reports could be improved."

"The reporting could be a little better."

"One drawback I have observed with Trivy is the difficulty in building or integrating a UI, particularly for an operator in the NetSuite example."

"Trivy can improve by providing an output in PDF format."

More Trivy cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing fee was approximately $80,000 USD, per year."

"The pricing has gotten better. That scenario was somewhat unstable. They have a rather interesting licensing structure. I believe you get 200 resources per "Lacework unit." It was difficult, in the beginning, to figure out exactly what a "resource" was... That was a problem until about a year or so ago. They have improved it and it has stabilized quite a bit."

"It is slightly expensive. It depends on how big your environment is, but it is expensive. Right now, we are spending a lot of money. We have covered all of the cloud providers and most of our colocation facilities as well, so we cannot complain, but it is slightly expensive. It is not super expensive."

"My smaller deployments cost around 200,000 a year, which is probably not as expensive as Wiz."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Security solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Computer Software Company

11%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	9

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Lacework?

The pricing is a mediator compared to other products; it is not that much higher and not much lower than other products, making it a very affordable price.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Lacework?

Policy implementation is quite complex, and the stability will take more time for the solutions. There is definitely room for improvement in policy implementation.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Lacework?

FortiCNAPP is mainly used from a security point of view. Some VPNs charge for their solutions, but Fortinet provides a free-of-cost VPN solution, making it more reliable and cost-effective for clie...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Trivy?

Trivy's marketing and awareness need improvement. Not everyone knows about it, which isn't ideal given its capabilities. There's potential to integrate AI and machine learning for enhanced function...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Trivy?

I use Trivy ( /products/trivy-reviews ) to scan code for vulnerabilities before deployment. Our projects, which are developed by different developers, involve various dependencies and third-party c...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Trivy?

I recommend Trivy to others due to its powerful and useful features. However, I suggest increasing its marketing to raise awareness. I rate Trivy an eight out of ten.

See all answers

Comparisons

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security vs FortiCNAPP

Compared 5% of the time

Wiz vs FortiCNAPP

Compared 5% of the time

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs FortiCNAPP

Compared 5% of the time

Native vs FortiCNAPP

Compared 3% of the time

Tenable Cloud Security vs FortiCNAPP

Compared 3% of the time

More FortiCNAPP Competitors

JFrog Xray vs Trivy

Compared 18% of the time

Snyk vs Trivy

Compared 13% of the time

Kubescape vs Trivy

Compared 9% of the time

Wiz vs Trivy

Compared 8% of the time

SUSE NeuVector vs Trivy

Compared 7% of the time

More Trivy Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

FortiCNAPP

May 2026

Download FortiCNAPP product report

Buyer's Guide

Trivy

April 2026

Download Trivy product report

Also Known As

Polygraph, FortiCNP, Lacework

No data available

Overview

FortiCNAPP is a comprehensive cloud security platform focusing on ease of use and machine learning-driven anomaly detection. It offers robust compliance reporting, seamless integration, and continuous monitoring, making it an essential tool for organizations managing multi-cloud environments and security configurations.

FortiCNAPP provides significant capabilities in cloud security, compliance, and vulnerability management. Designed for organizations needing efficient monitoring, it enables detection of anomalies across cloud infrastructures while optimizing security posture and ensuring compliance with environments like AWS and GCP. The platform offers in-depth insights through scanning of IAC scripts, host systems, and cloud configurations. Recognized for effectively managing security posture, it safeguards Kubernetes and container environments, providing comprehensive threat detection and response. However, some areas like visibility, IAM security controls, and compliance metrics need improvement. Users face challenges with alert setup and lack intuitive design, alongside issues like FedRAMP authorization absence and complexity in the data model.

What are the key features of FortiCNAPP?

Ease of Use: FortiCNAPP simplifies security management for cloud environments.
Machine Learning Anomaly Detection: Automatically identifies and prioritizes threats.
Compliance Reporting: Streamlines compliance procedures and reporting.
Seamless Integration: Ensures smooth operation across multi-cloud environments.
Continuous Monitoring: Provides ongoing oversight of security vulnerabilities.
Multi-Cloud Integration: Enables swift response to misconfigurations and vulnerabilities.

What benefits should users expect when evaluating FortiCNAPP?

Time Efficiency: Reduces time spent on compliance and threat management.
Improved Security Posture: Enhances protection for cloud and container environments.
Valuable Security Insights: Provides in-depth analysis for proactive threat response.
Noise Reduction: Distills security logs to minimize alert fatigue.
Operational Effectiveness: Facilitates seamless multi-cloud security management.

FortiCNAPP is implemented extensively by industries needing reliable cloud security, such as finance, healthcare, and technology sectors. It supports organizations in enhancing cloud infrastructure protection, ensuring compliance, and strengthening vulnerability management. By integrating with platforms like AWS and GCP, businesses can optimize security posture in their cloud deployments.

Fortinet

Trivy offers comprehensive scanning for files, images, repositories, and infrastructure. It's open-source and integrates with CI/CD for vulnerability detection and security enhancement.

Trivy scans vulnerabilities in code, Docker images, containers, and infrastructure. It integrates seamlessly into DevOps pipelines, ensuring security in dependency management and open source vulnerabilities. This tool, lightweight and open-source, provides user-friendly reports and supports continuous vulnerability database updates, fostering ease of use across operating systems. Users benefit from its scanning capabilities, covering Kubernetes, AWS credentials, and GCP service accounts, effectively identifying vulnerabilities and misconfigurations.

What are Trivy's key features?

Comprehensive Scanning: Covers files, images, repositories, infrastructure, and sensitive data.
CI/CD Integration: Easily integrates into existing pipelines for seamless security checks.
Open-Source & Lightweight: Quick setup and fast scanning capabilities ensure rapid deployment.
Continuously Updated Database: Keeps vulnerability data current for effective threat detection.
User-Friendly Reports: Generates understandable and actionable security insights.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Enhanced Security: Provides in-depth analysis of vulnerabilities and misconfigurations.
Ease of Use: Designed for straightforward implementation and user interaction.
Compliance Support: Assists in meeting industry security standards and regulations.
Cross-Platform Use: Effective across different operating systems, enabling wide scalability.

In industries like technology and finance, Trivy is used extensively to secure applications, perform compliance checks, and offer security metrics visualization. It addresses microservices, container systems, and Kubernetes clusters security requirements, supporting DevOps teams and enhancing codebase analysis precision.

Aqua Security

Sample Customers

J.Crew, AdRoll, Snowflake, VMWare, Iterable, Pure Storage, TrueCar, NerdWallet, and more.

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

FortiCNAPP vs. Trivy

April 2026

Free Report: FortiCNAPP vs. Trivy

Find out what your peers are saying about FortiCNAPP vs. Trivy and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our FortiCNAPP vs. Trivy report.

See our list of best Container Security vendors.

We monitor all Container Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.