Fortify Software Security Center vs HCL AppScan comparison

OpenText and HCLSoftware are both solutions in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category. OpenText is ranked #19 with an average rating of 9.0, while HCLSoftware is ranked #16 with an average rating of 7.5. OpenText holds a 1.5% mindshare in SAST, compared to HCLSoftware ’s 2.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 84% of HCLSoftware users who would recommend it.

Fortify Software Security C...

Read 8 Fortify Software Security Center reviews

2,178 Views
2,091 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

HCL AppScan

Read 44 HCL AppScan reviews

6,863 Views
4,941 Comparison Views

84% willing to recommend

Fortify Software Security C...

HCL AppScan

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

HCL AppScan and Fortify Software Security Center are leading software security tools. Fortify Software Security Center has the advantage with a comprehensive feature set offering superior interoperability and governance.

Features: HCL AppScan is noted for its integration into development processes and ease of use with fast web scan capabilities. However, it is criticized for false positives. Fortify Software Security Center centralizes static and dynamic analysis, enables comprehensive vulnerability management, and offers extensive customization options.

Room for Improvement: HCL AppScan users cite false positives and CI/CD integration challenges, with desires for better language support. Fortify Software Security Center needs improvements in dataset aggregation and better documentation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HCL AppScan offers flexible deployment options, though its customer service has mixed reviews post-IBM transition. Fortify Software Security Center is primarily on-premises with reliable support, despite a slow setup process.

Pricing and ROI: HCL AppScan is generally more affordable, offering significant cost savings and faster ROI. Fortify Software Security Center, while more expensive, justifies its cost through robust features and scalability, leading to improved ROI for many users.

To learn more, read our detailed Fortify Software Security Center vs. HCL AppScan Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Fortify Software Security Center vs. HCL AppScan

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,747 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Fortify Software Security C...

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

19th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

4.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

HCL AppScan

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

16th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (21st), Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of Fortify Software Security Center is 1.5%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of HCL AppScan is 2.6%, down from 2.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
HCL AppScan	2.6%
Fortify Software Security Center	1.5%
Other	95.9%

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

Featured Reviews

Diego Caicedo Lescano

Chief Innovation Officer at SAGGA

Enables centralized analysis and improves governance through seamless tool integration

The main use case for Fortify Software Security Center is exceptional because we have governance and control through that console. You can centralize both static analysis and dynamic analysis, and correlate both analyses in one tool to get better results by combining those independent results from each solution. That is outstanding, and there is no tool I have seen on the market that offers these capabilities. I appreciate the interoperability with other solutions from Fortify Software Security Center. Because we are using Kiuwan, you can run Kiuwan analyses and integrate them with Fortify Software Security Center to get those results in a single console. That is a good console for centralizing things in one point. That is one of the best features of the on-premises Fortify.

Read full review

Ravi Khanchandani

Founder Director at Techsa Services

Has improved identification of encryption and authentication issues across cloud and on-prem applications

During the learning curve of onboarding HCL AppScan, we learned that HCL has altered the portfolio and now offers HCL AppScan 360, which has a much better look and feel with an improved user interface. However, there is one feature called SCA, which stands for Software Composition Analysis, that could be improved. When I'm doing an application scan, HCL AppScan has the ability to generate information about what components are in use. For example, if I'm scanning a web application, it shows me the various components being used. It tells me whether I have Java libraries, .NET frameworks, or other log management libraries such as Log4j, and what versions of those specific components are present. I would like to see more detailed reports from the tool. Currently, you can find out the components belonging to a specific software, but if detailed reporting became available, you would be in a better position to identify vulnerabilities. For instance, I could identify that I had the Log4j vulnerability and know that I need to fix my application accordingly. If they add the features I'm describing, I would consider giving them a higher rating. However, I've only been experienced with the product for three months.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The main use case for Fortify Software Security Center is exceptional because we have governance and control through that console."

"I like the explanation of issues provided by Fortify Software Security Center."

"Software Security Center is highly customizable and helps me test all vulnerability data against the latest conventions like OWASP Top Ten, CVE Top twenty-five, and several other legal compliances."

"The overall rating for this tool is ten out of ten."

"This is a stable solution at the end of the day."

"You can easily download the tool's rule packs and update them."

"The reporting is very useful because you can always view an entire list of the issues that you have."

"It's very important because they want to scan their source code every day, so we provide CICD integration to our customers so they can auto build and auto test every day, get reports, and fix issues."

More Fortify Software Security Center pros

"It's a good product; its automated crawler identifies all URLs and performs security tests, and it has very rich test cases which ensure pretty good coverage in terms of security testing while the UI is user friendly and intuitive."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is Postman."

"IBM Applications Security has contributed to the maturity of our AppSec risk management program."

"AppScan seems to be very good at detecting reflected XSS vulnerabilities."

"Compared to other tools only AppScan supports special language."

"HCL AppScan has helped us improve our security posture, as we've been able to identify quite a few issues."

"It has certainly improved our organization in terms of quality of solutions that are developed."

"AppScan is within the top three or four static analyzers."

More HCL AppScan pros

Cons

"I am not satisfied with the percentage of false positives, which is around eighteen percent."

"The initial setup of this solution is very complex. Specifically, the integration between other parts of the solution is difficult."

"Improvements needed for Software Security Center include better aggregation views of datasets."

"We are having issues with false positives that need to be resolved."

"The product's overlap feature is restrictive and requires more customization efforts, which can be expensive."

"The support for Fortify on-premises is the same as for the other products. I would say the support is not good and I would rate it a three out of ten."

"This solution is difficult to implement, and it should be made more comfortable for the end-users."

"Fortify Software Security Center's setup is really painful."

"AppScan needs to improve its handling of false positives."

"The product has some technical limitations."

"The databases for HCL are small and have room for improvement."

"The solution often has a high number of false positives. It's an aspect they really need to improve upon."

"They have to improve support."

"Unfortunately, there is a big discussion if it is very expensive to use it or not, and there are competitors."

"IBM Security AppScan needs to add performance optimization for quickly scanning the target web applications."

"The solution's scalability can be a matter of concern because one license runs on one machine only."

More HCL AppScan cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is priced fair."

"As a Fortify partner company providing technical support, I find the product expensive in our country, where local, inexpensive products are available."

"This is a costly solution that could be cheaper."

"HCL AppScan is expensive."

"The price is very expensive."

"Pricing was the main reason that we went ahead with this solution as they were the lowest in the market."

"The product has premium pricing and could be more competitive."

"The solution is cheap."

"The solution is moderately priced."

"I rate the product's price a seven on a scale of one to ten, where one is low, and ten is high. HCL AppScan is an expensive tool."

"AppScan is a little bit expensive. IBM needs to work a little bit on the pricing model, decreasing the license cost."

More HCL AppScan pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Government

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	3

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	31

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Software Security Center?

The pricing for the on-premises Fortify is expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Software Security Center?

In my opinion, there are no areas that could be improved with Fortify Software Security Center. I would say it is a good product and a mature product. However, the SAST has many improvement areas. ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Software Security Center?

We have installed Fortify Static Code Analysis, SAST, in Ecuador in two customers. The Fortify ScanCentral includes three components: SAST, Fortify Software Security Center, and the WebInspect.

See all answers

What needs improvement with HCL AppScan?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for HCL AppScan?

I'm currently working with BigFix and HCL AppScan. At least three people in my company are using HCL AppScan. Since we are a reseller, we run it in both lab environments and live production applica...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HCL AppScan?

AppScan is considered more cost-effective than Veracode, although I have not updated the exact pricing details. Companies often choose based on budget constraints, with Veracode being on the higher...

See all answers

Comparisons

Checkmarx One vs Fortify Software Security Center

Compared 22% of the time

Checkmarx IaC Security / KICS vs Fortify Software Security Center

Compared 12% of the time

SonarQube vs Fortify Software Security Center

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs Fortify Software Security Center

Compared 7% of the time

Parasoft SOAtest vs Fortify Software Security Center

Compared 3% of the time

More Fortify Software Security Center Competitors

Veracode vs HCL AppScan

Compared 8% of the time

Checkmarx One vs HCL AppScan

Compared 7% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs HCL AppScan

Compared 7% of the time

SonarQube vs HCL AppScan

Compared 6% of the time

Acunetix vs HCL AppScan

Compared 6% of the time

More HCL AppScan Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

May 2026

Download Fortify Software Security Center product report

Buyer's Guide

HCL AppScan

June 2026

Download HCL AppScan product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus Software Security Center, Application Security Center, HPE Application Security Center, WebInspect

IBM Security AppScan, Rational AppScan, AppScan

Overview

Fortify Software Security Center offers comprehensive application security through a centralized console that integrates static and dynamic analysis, making it essential for organizations focused on robust security operations.

Fortify Software Security Center delivers extensive capabilities that facilitate application security testing, code audits, and bug fixes. Its centralized console enhances governance and control, while its interoperability with tools like Kiuwan and Azure strengthens its functionality. The dashboard's intuitive data customization, along with the ability to store and report data on-premises, further complements its integration capabilities. Although improvements in dataset aggregation, integration with tools like Jira, and resolution of false positives are required, its ability to scan and analyze source code to identify security violations is acknowledged.

What are the key features of Fortify Software Security Center?

Centralized Console: Streamlines governance and control through combined static and dynamic analysis.
Interoperability: Enhances functionality with tools like Kiuwan for comprehensive testing.
Customizability: Tailors vulnerability testing to standards such as OWASP Top Ten.
Macro Recording: Facilitates multi-factor authentication processes.
CI/CD Integration: Ensures seamless integration with development workflows.
Collaboration Module: Supports teamwork with clarification on issues.
Daily Scanning: Elevates code quality through regular evaluations.

Why should users consider Fortify Software Security Center for ROI?

Code Quality Enhancement: Improves coding practices through continuous deployment and daily scanning.
Seamless Deployment: Enhances implementation success and mitigates security threats effectively.
Customization Flexibility: Offers tailored solutions for overlapping features despite increased costs.
Collaboration Efficiency: Boosts teamwork through detailed issue explanations and analysis.

Fortify Software Security Center is adopted in software-driven industries for its robust application security capabilities. Users in technology sectors rely on its static code analysis for auditing and security testing. Its on-premises deployment model and integration with platforms like Azure make it ideal for storing and reporting data, providing customization that aligns with industry standards.

OpenText

HCL AppScan offers quick vulnerability detection with effective SDLC integration and is known for its user-friendly interface and seamless security integration.

HCL AppScan provides dynamic and static scanning to identify vulnerabilities like XSS and SQL injection. It integrates well into CI/CD pipelines, supports multiple languages, and offers web and dynamic scanning, helping businesses ensure security across development lifecycles. Users benefit from API coverage, Postman integration, and its ability to function in cloud and on-premise environments, facilitating a shift from DevOps to DevSecOps practices.

What features define HCL AppScan?

User-friendly interface: Simplifies navigation and usage.
Vulnerability detection: Quickly identifies issues like XSS and SQL injection.
Integration with SDLC: Seamlessly blends with development processes.
Dynamic scanning: Offers comprehensive security evaluations.
Multiple language support: Supports diverse programming environments.

What benefits should users consider?

Scalability: Adapts to growing needs and projects.
Low false-positive rates: Delivers accurate and reliable results.
Detailed reporting: Provides comprehensive vulnerability insights.
Effective integration: Enhances CI/CD pipeline security.

HCL AppScan is leveraged in sectors requiring rigorous security checks, such as finance and healthcare, where it conducts comprehensive scans and offers insights into potential vulnerabilities. Its robust scanning capabilities aid companies in maintaining compliance and security standards.

HCLSoftware

Sample Customers

Neosecure, Acxiom, Skandinavisk Data Center A/S, Parkeon

Essex Technology Group Inc., Cisco, West Virginia University, APIS IT

Buyer's Guide

Fortify Software Security Center vs. HCL AppScan

June 2026

Free Report: Fortify Software Security Center vs. HCL AppScan

Find out what your peers are saying about Fortify Software Security Center vs. HCL AppScan and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Fortify Software Security Center vs. HCL AppScan report.

See our list of best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.