Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Fortify Software Security Center vs Parasoft SOAtest comparison

OpenText and Parasoft are both solutions in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category. OpenText is ranked #19 with an average rating of 9.0, while Parasoft is ranked #20 with an average rating of 8.7. OpenText holds a 1.3% mindshare in SAST, compared to Parasoft’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Parasoft users who would recommend it.
Fortify Software Security C...
Read 8 Fortify Software Security Center reviews
  • 1,316 Views
  • 1,263 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Parasoft SOAtest
Read 33 Parasoft SOAtest reviews
  • 2,949 Views
  • 1,032 Comparison Views
93% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Parasoft SOAtest and Fortify Software Security Center are both advanced solutions in the software testing and security domain. Fortify Software Security Center may have an edge in terms of comprehensive features despite Parasoft SOAtest's recognized strengths in pricing and support.

Features: Parasoft SOAtest offers robust and diverse testing capabilities focusing on API and web services validation. It allows detailed reporting and supports automation of complex test scenarios. Fortify Software Security Center provides extensive security analysis features, seamless integration capabilities, and supports code scans for multiple languages, making it especially valuable for users concerned with security.

Room for Improvement: Parasoft SOAtest users have flagged issues with its scalability, integration with certain environments, and limited support for some legacy systems. Fortify Software Security Center users highlight the necessity for enhancements in performance speed, simplification of complex configurations, and the need for more user-friendly interfaces.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Parasoft SOAtest is known for its straightforward deployment process and responsive customer support. Fortify Software Security Center receives mixed opinions on deployment complexity but is praised for its professional and responsive service, which helps to mitigate some deployment challenges.

Pricing and ROI: Parasoft SOAtest tends to offer better upfront costs and acceptable ROI, which appeals particularly to budget-conscious users. Fortify Software Security Center, though perceived as having higher setup costs, is valued for its long-term ROI, making it more appealing to organizations that prioritize comprehensive security features over initial expenditure.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Fortify Software Security Center vs. Parasoft SOAtest Report (Updated: March 2026).
Buyer's Guide
Fortify Software Security Center vs. Parasoft SOAtest
March 2026
Download the complete report
Helped 884,933 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Fortify Software Security C...
Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
19th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
4.6
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Parasoft SOAtest
Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
20th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
33
Ranking in other categories
Functional Testing Tools (16th), API Testing Tools (9th), Test Automation Tools (14th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of Fortify Software Security Center is 1.3%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Parasoft SOAtest is 0.7%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Static Application Security Testing (SAST) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Fortify Software Security Center1.3%
Parasoft SOAtest0.7%
Other98.0%
Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
 

Featured Reviews

Diego Caicedo Lescano - PeerSpot reviewer
Diego Caicedo Lescano
Chief Innovation Officer at SAGGA
Enables centralized analysis and improves governance through seamless tool integration
The main use case for Fortify Software Security Center is exceptional because we have governance and control through that console. You can centralize both static analysis and dynamic analysis, and correlate both analyses in one tool to get better results by combining those independent results from each solution. That is outstanding, and there is no tool I have seen on the market that offers these capabilities. I appreciate the interoperability with other solutions from Fortify Software Security Center. Because we are using Kiuwan, you can run Kiuwan analyses and integrate them with Fortify Software Security Center to get those results in a single console. That is a good console for centralizing things in one point. That is one of the best features of the on-premises Fortify.
Read full review
reviewer2772063 - PeerSpot reviewer
reviewer2772063
Quality Specialist 2A at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Has reduced manual testing effort with customization options but occasionally crashes during complex executions
One improvement would be to integrate it with modern technologies such as AI, so we can generate test cases by providing the details so that it can generate the structure, and later the person working can modify and enhance it. We can add more customized tools, and reporting can be enhanced. Currently, the reporting part is at a step level, and it does not give details for a particular test case, so improvements in those areas would be beneficial. There are performance issues where the tool crashes sometimes. In particular use cases with numerous steps, it experiences crashes. I have encountered stability and performance issues with it.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Fortify Analytics' AI function helps scan and provides more detailed explanations and recommendations about vulnerabilities."
"The reporting is very useful because you can always view an entire list of the issues that you have."
"I like the explanation of issues provided by Fortify Software Security Center."
"This is a stable solution at the end of the day."
"It's very important because they want to scan their source code every day, so we provide CICD integration to our customers so they can auto build and auto test every day, get reports, and fix issues."
"The overall rating for this tool is ten out of ten."
"You can easily download the tool's rule packs and update them."
"Software Security Center is highly customizable and helps me test all vulnerability data against the latest conventions like OWASP Top Ten, CVE Top twenty-five, and several other legal compliances."
More Fortify Software Security Center pros
"As an expert user, you can accomplish a lot with this tool."
"Automatic testing is the most valuable feature."
"Parasoft is a bundle of tools like FTP, Database, Web services, and Java, and with just one click I can access any of these utilities, which is currently saving lots of my time."
"Technical support is helpful."
"We can now test as early as possible, so we are achieving better control over our components."
"SOATest provided a platform for automated testing and creating an enriched automated regression suite."
"Parasoft SOAtest has improved the quality of our automated web services, which can be easily implemented through service chaining and service virtualization."
"They have a feature where they can record traffic and create tests on the report traffic."
More Parasoft SOAtest pros
 

Cons

"Improvements needed for Software Security Center include better aggregation views of datasets."
"The support for Fortify on-premises is the same as for the other products. I would say the support is not good and I would rate it a three out of ten."
"I am not satisfied with the percentage of false positives, which is around eighteen percent."
"This solution is difficult to implement, and it should be made more comfortable for the end-users."
"Fortify Software Security Center's setup is really painful."
"We are having issues with false positives that need to be resolved."
"Improvements needed for Software Security Center include better aggregation views of datasets."
"The product's overlap feature is restrictive and requires more customization efforts, which can be expensive."
"Performance issues if there are too many sessions open on your system."
"We noticed that our project workspace is sometimes corrupted without any reason."
"Work file [tst] gradually increases in size due to saving or updates of workspace. I can see a major improvement in that."
"The feedback that we received from the DevOps of our organization was that the tool was a little heavy from the transformation perspective."
"Parasoft SOAtest has an internal refresh function where you can refresh the software to show the changes you’ve made in your projects. Unfortunately this function does not work properly, because it often does not show the changes after you’ve hit te refresh button a few times."
"Yes, there were few issues, that caused the Memory out, but was resolved."
"The platform can become unstable as the memory usage increases."
"Compatibility with HTTP 1.1 and TLS 1.2 needs to be improved."
More Parasoft SOAtest cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is priced fair."
"This is a costly solution that could be cheaper."
"As a Fortify partner company providing technical support, I find the product expensive in our country, where local, inexpensive products are available."
"From what I understand, Parasoft SOAtest isn't the cheapest option. But it has a lot to offer."
"It is an expensive product, so think carefully about whether it fits your purposes and is the right tool for you."
"The license price is a little expensive, but it provides a better outcome in terms of the end-to-end automation process."
"I think it would be a great step to decrease the price of the licenses."
"The price is around $5,000 USD."
"We are completed satisfied with Parasoft SOAtest. The ROI is more than 95%."
"They do have a confusing licensing structure."
"The cost of Parasoft seems to have gotten higher with a projection that wasn't really stipulated for our company. They've done a tremendous job at negotiating those deals."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Government
9%
Computer Software Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
19%
Manufacturing Company
14%
Computer Software Company
8%
University
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise3
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business9
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise23
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Software Security Center?
The pricing for the on-premises Fortify is expensive.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Micro Focus Software Security Center?
In my opinion, there are no areas that could be improved with Fortify Software Security Center. I would say it is a good product and a mature product. However, the SAST has many improvement areas. ...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Software Security Center?
We have installed Fortify Static Code Analysis, SAST, in Ecuador in two customers. The Fortify ScanCentral includes three components: SAST, Fortify Software Security Center, and the WebInspect.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Parasoft SOAtest?
I am not involved in the pricing aspect, setup cost, or licensing cost of Parasoft SOAtest. Our dedicated tools and support teams handle those aspects.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Parasoft SOAtest?
One improvement would be to integrate it with modern technologies such as AI, so we can generate test cases by providing the details so that it can generate the structure, and later the person work...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Parasoft SOAtest?
We use Parasoft SOAtest for API testing and service virtualization with responder setup. Service virtualization is very helpful in our testing. When any downstream system is not available or we are...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Checkmarx One vs Fortify Software Security Center Logo
Checkmarx One vs Fortify Software Security Center
Compared 25% of the time
Checkmarx IaC Security / KICS vs Fortify Software Security Center Logo
Checkmarx IaC Security / KICS vs Fortify Software Security Center
Compared 13% of the time
SonarQube vs Fortify Software Security Center Logo
SonarQube vs Fortify Software Security Center
Compared 8% of the time
OpenText Core Application Security vs Fortify Software Security Center Logo
OpenText Core Application Security vs Fortify Software Security Center
Compared 7% of the time
More Fortify Software Security Center Competitors
Postman Enterprise vs Parasoft SOAtest Logo
Postman Enterprise vs Parasoft SOAtest
Compared 8% of the time
SonarQube vs Parasoft SOAtest Logo
SonarQube vs Parasoft SOAtest
Compared 8% of the time
ReadyAPI vs Parasoft SOAtest Logo
ReadyAPI vs Parasoft SOAtest
Compared 5% of the time
ReadyAPI Test vs Parasoft SOAtest Logo
ReadyAPI Test vs Parasoft SOAtest
Compared 5% of the time
Tricentis Tosca vs Parasoft SOAtest Logo
Tricentis Tosca vs Parasoft SOAtest
Compared 5% of the time
More Parasoft SOAtest Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
March 2026
Fortify Software Security Center reportDownload Fortify Software Security Center product report
Buyer's Guide
Parasoft SOAtest
March 2026
Parasoft SOAtest reportDownload Parasoft SOAtest product report
 

Also Known As

Micro Focus Software Security Center, Application Security Center, HPE Application Security Center, WebInspect
SOAtest
 

Overview

Software Security Center enables management, development, and security teams to work together to triage, track, validate, automate, and manage software security activities.
OpenText

Parasoft SOAtest delivers fully integrated API and web service testing capabilities that automate end-to-end functional API testing. Streamline automated testing with advanced codeless test creation for applications with multiple interfaces (REST & SOAP APIs, microservices, databases, and more).

SOAtest reduces the risk of security breaches and performance outages by transforming functional testing artifacts into security and load equivalents. Such reuse, along with continuous monitoring of APIs for change, allows faster and more efficient testing.

Parasoft
 

Sample Customers

Neosecure, Acxiom, Skandinavisk Data Center A/S, Parkeon
Charter Communications, Sabre, Caesars Entertainment, Charles Schwab, ING, Intel, Northbridge Financial, Capital Services, WoodmenLife
Buyer's Guide
Fortify Software Security Center vs. Parasoft SOAtest
March 2026
Free Report: Fortify Software Security Center vs. Parasoft SOAtest
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortify Software Security Center vs. Parasoft SOAtest and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.
DOWNLOAD NOW
884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Fortify Software Security Center vs. Parasoft SOAtest report.
See our list of best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.