FortiMonitor vs IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) comparison

Fortinet and IBM are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Fortinet is ranked #21 with an average rating of 8.8, while IBM is ranked #40 with an average rating of 7.5. Fortinet holds a 0.7% mindshare in NMS, compared to IBM’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Fortinet users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of IBM users who would recommend it.

FortiMonitor

Read 15 FortiMonitor reviews

2,144 Views
1,501 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

IBM SevOne Network Performa...

Read 54 IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) reviews

4,565 Views
2,283 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

FortiMonitor

IBM SevOne Network Performa...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

IBM SevOne Network Performance Management and FortiMonitor compete in network performance management. IBM SevOne NPM has a slight edge in analytics, while FortiMonitor excels in flexibility and scalability.

Features: IBM SevOne NPM offers comprehensive analytics, in-depth network intelligence, and scalability for larger infrastructures. FortiMonitor provides strong cloud integrations, automated workflows, and simplicity in monitoring tasks.

Room for Improvement: IBM SevOne NPM may improve its cloud adaptability and reduce its complex deployment process and rapid integration abilities. FortiMonitor could benefit from enhancing analytics depth, offering better on-site integration options, and increasing server support for expansive infrastructures.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM SevOne NPM requires a detailed deployment model, allowing for tailored setups in complex environments, with comprehensive training resources. FortiMonitor has a simpler deployment, seamless cloud integration, and responsive customer support.

Pricing and ROI: IBM SevOne NPM has high initial setup costs with robust analytics that leads to substantial long-term ROI for data-driven operations. FortiMonitor offers a more cost-effective entry with quicker ROI through its cloud-centric model and lower operational costs.

To learn more, read our detailed FortiMonitor vs. IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

FortiMonitor vs. IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM)

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,757 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

FortiMonitor

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

21st

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

23rd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Alerting and Incident Management (12th), Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) (7th)

IBM SevOne Network Performa...

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

40th

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

40th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Server Monitoring (19th), Log Management (44th), Cloud Monitoring Software (29th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of FortiMonitor is 0.7%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) is 1.0%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
FortiMonitor	0.7%
IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM)	1.0%
Other	98.3%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

reviewer2677554

Network Engineer III at a energy/utilities company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Managing diverse networks with detailed alerts enhances device oversight

FortiManager is very helpful in managing our networks. We use it to manage 20 farms and various networks with hundreds of devices. The version we are using provides more detail than the older dashboard. We appreciate the alerting capabilities, which are integrated with SolarWinds to notify our team via SMS.

Read full review

reviewer1543041

Network monitoring engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Provides consistent infrastructure monitoring with excellent usability and support

The primary use case of IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) is network monitoring. It helps to maintain the infrastructure's availability and ensure that alerts are generated when needed The most valuable features of IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) are its stability,…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of FortiMonitor is the overall ability to monitor the health of the environment."

"The product's initial setup phase is easy."

"The most valuable feature of FortiMonitor is user monitoring. We are able to see if the user is following the policy or not from their system. Additionally, the solution integrates well with Fortinet FortiGate and has centralized management."

"Fortinet's customer support is very good."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is what the devices are used for. We have big backups for our Cradlepoint solutions, but FortiMonitor is a great routing device and we love working with them."

"With FortiMonitor, you can get all the logs of the traffic information of the destination or the source."

"The tool continuously improves, adapting to support new vendors and technologies. Importantly, it automates the process, triggering alerts when devices require attention, and eliminating the need for manual intervention."

"FortiMonitor offers comprehensive monitoring capabilities, allowing me to track network traffic in and out effectively."

More FortiMonitor pros

"I like SevOne's network flow reporting."

"Flexible architecture: You can extend the system and its capacity by attaching another cluster pair."

"It's given us the ability to create various real-time network performance reports and distribute them to any colleague who can access these reports immediately."

"It's a great solution for highlighting and discovering useful information regarding our network's elements."

"It also gives us the closest thing to real-time insight into network performance that we have, with just a 10-second delay. It's very important for us to know the health of the infrastructure very quickly."

"The automation feature is good because if your CMDB is OK and it is already in sync, then the automation part is good to go."

"One of the most valuable features is the graphs, which you can build instantly. I have used some open-source platforms in the past, but they are not as good. With SevOne, the sampling in the graph can be every few seconds, not just every few minutes, and that's really helpful. It's really fast."

"The out of the box reports and workflows are pretty good and they meet our requirements well."

More IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) pros

Cons

"FortiMonitor needs to improve its alert system."

"I think the current features are really good for me, nothing else comes to mind right now. Maybe some small improvements could be made in the customization and configuration part of the UI to make it easier or more intuitive. Customizable UI options, like we saw in the demo, could be helpful for everyone. But in our operational environment, having clear health status and system details is crucial for us system engineers. One feature I'd really like to see is a credential management system. It would help us keep track of who's logged in and how many times, which is important due to user restrictions. Sometimes, we need to manage logins more efficiently, like logging off other users to free up credentials. So having a feature like that would be really helpful."

"FortiMonitor's monitoring could be much better. It should be like, in Palo Alto."

"FortiMonitor could improve by having compatibility with other operating systems, such as Linux."

"Sometimes, we get corruption when upgrading from firmware to the new generation, causing a lot of issues."

". Enhancements in the dashboard, such as clearer alerting, maintenance window management, software version tracking, and better visualization, would be beneficial."

"There is room for improvement in the FortiMonitor report. It is not ideal for showcasing to tech customers or managers, especially when trying to display high CPU usage from logins within a specific range of months or the most recent month."

"The solution's initial setup process is time-consuming."

More FortiMonitor cons

"Some similar solutions offer end-to-end visibility."

"SevOne should work with the graphs legend functionality."

"There are a lot of pain points. My main problem is that we don't have a high availability system. There are 20 peers. We're going to lose the end-of-life appliances that are old. If we lose a peer and it doesn't come back, we lose all that data. The reason we don't have high availability is because it's double the charge."

"I would like to see live maps as an added feature. Also, build modules on AI and EML to provide better data insights that would proactively tell us what we should be looking after."

"The method of searching for SIP and the way to create the groups."

"You need to plan integrations. That has been the biggest bug with SevOne so far. For the things that SevOne pulls directly, those are easy to understand, modify, and put into the database. For things that need to use the Universal Collector or xStats, you need to plan that stuff well in advance."

"The reporting of NMS is good, but it could be better."

"SevOne could improve its flexibility because it isn't fully customizable and its out-of-the-box configuration doesn't cover all use cases."

More IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"In terms of licensing, while it may not be the most expensive option on the market, it's relatively cost-effective. You can obtain licenses at a lower cost, with the calculation being straightforward. For example, if you onboard around 5,000 devices, you'll need approximately 5,000 licenses, as each device typically counts as one license."

"FortiMonitor's price is very high."

"The tool's pricing model in Vietnam is a bit high. I rate the product price as an eight out of ten."

"There are additional costs needed for certain functionality, such as scalability."

"We have a large customer base for Fortinet, and the additional buying power got us really great discounts."

"Compared to other solutions, FortiMonitor is a very expensive solution."

"On a scale from one to ten, I rate the pricing a nine since it is a good solution that is available at a cheap price."

"The price of FortiMonitor is approximately $200 annually for 225 users. The price is competitive."

"A blocking point is the high upfront cost because it is challenging to get it accepted and the purchase approved."

"The pricing has not evolved with the market, which is one of the reasons we are moving to a new product."

"Although I don't have exact details in terms of cost, my experience has been that SevOne is willing to make a deal with the customer."

"Prices per license are not huge, but they exist."

"Have a bank of licenses, because it is about the number of objects (RAM, ports, CPU, etc.)."

"Many tools price things based on the number of KPIs that you're collecting around a device. In many cases, there could be hundreds of metrics that you need to collect. SevOne provides device-level pricing. That gives us the flexibility to turn on, and expand on, the metrics that we're collecting around those devices, without taking a financial hit."

"Choose a SevOne partner who can provide SevOne as a service and can deliver professional services and maintenance."

"The tool is not expensive. We were able to negotiate with SevOne on pricing."

More IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,757 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

Performing Arts

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	45

Questions from the Community

What is the best network monitoring software for large enterprises?

I have a clear bias because I work for Panopta. We aren't a fit for everyone, but I can confirm that Panopta is a lot less work to stand up and maintain. It's also a lot easier to use and onboard n...

See all answers

What do you like most about FortiMonitor?

In FortiMonitor, we're linked up with our Netgear, CactusServer, and NOC. It's really valuable because everything's migrating to one dashboard for us system engineers. We can keep an eye on traffic...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for FortiMonitor?

FortiMonitor does save time but not significantly on costs, as there are still expenses related to procurement, installation, and licensing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SevOne Network Data Platform?

There is room for improvement in the integration with different vendors and the reporting capabilities. It would be beneficial to have out-of-the-box integration with third-party vendors and improv...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SevOne Network Data Platform?

The primary use case of IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) ( /products/ibm-sevone-network-performance-management-npm-reviews ) is network monitoring. It helps to maintain the infrastru...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering SevOne Network Data Platform?

To compete with custom-built tools, IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) should accommodate the desired features and be timely in the delivery of feature updates. I would rate the overal...

See all answers

Comparisons

ThousandEyes vs FortiMonitor

Compared 14% of the time

SolarWinds Network Device Monitor vs FortiMonitor

Compared 10% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs FortiMonitor

Compared 7% of the time

Zabbix vs FortiMonitor

Compared 6% of the time

Datadog vs FortiMonitor

Compared 6% of the time

More FortiMonitor Competitors

Dynatrace vs IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM)

Compared 5% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM)

Compared 4% of the time

SolarWinds Hybrid Cloud Observability vs IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM)

Compared 4% of the time

Zabbix vs IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM)

Compared 4% of the time

SolarWinds Network Device Monitor vs IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM)

Compared 4% of the time

More IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM)

January 2026

Download FortiMonitor product report

Buyer's Guide

IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM)

January 2026

IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) report

Download IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) product report

Also Known As

Panopta

SevOne

Overview

FortiMonitor is a comprehensive, SaaS-based digital experience monitoring (DEM) platform that helps organizations modernize their performance-monitoring tools. It provides visibility into endpoint application performance and digital experience—no matter where the user resides or where the application is hosted.

Fortinet

The IBM® SevOne Network Performance Management (IBM SevOne NPM) solution helps you spot, address, and prevent network performance issues early with machine learning-powered analytics from a single source. Boost network performance and improve your user application experience by proactively monitoring your multivendor end-to-end network across enterprise, communication, and managed service provider networks.

Transform raw network performance data into intelligent and actionable insights. The IBM SevOne NPM solution goes beyond detection, combining industry-leading expertise and advanced technology to help your IT team plan and optimize your network and act on what matters: improving network performance to provide an exceptional customer experience.

For further information, please visit www.ibm.com/cloud/sevo...

IBM

Sample Customers

SONY, GoDaddy, HCL, ING, ARMOR, billboard

ATOS, Devereux, Spark New Zealand, Access4, Rogers Communication, Lumen (formerly known as CenturyLink)

Buyer's Guide

FortiMonitor vs. IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM)

February 2026

Free Report: FortiMonitor vs. IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM)

Find out what your peers are saying about FortiMonitor vs. IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,757 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our FortiMonitor vs. IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors and best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.