

Fortinet FortiADC and LoadBalancer Enterprise compete in the load balancing and network traffic management space. Fortinet FortiADC appears to have the upper hand with its integration within Fortinet's security ecosystem and flexible pricing, though LoadBalancer Enterprise is favored for ease of use.
Features: Fortinet FortiADC is valued for its scalability, SSL offloading, and integration with Fortinet's security ecosystem. It offers Global Server Load Balancing for reliable network scaling and disaster recovery, along with robust firewall features. LoadBalancer Enterprise is appreciated for its straightforward load balancing, low latency handling, and simplicity of use, offering content caching and compression and a user-friendly interface.
Room for Improvement: Fortinet FortiADC users suggest enhancements in interface usability, SSL traffic handling, and more comprehensive documentation. Issues with technical support responsiveness and the need for integrated WAF features are also noted. LoadBalancer Enterprise users seek better complexity management and additional security features, indicating both products need improvements in support and ease of use for complex deployments.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both products are deployed on-premises with private cloud options. LoadBalancer Enterprise is noted for a simpler deployment experience. Fortinet FortiADC's deployment may be complicated due to its complexity. Customer service for Fortinet users face challenges with support responsiveness, whereas LoadBalancer users report consistent but improvable support experiences.
Pricing and ROI: Fortinet FortiADC is generally more affordable than competitors like F5, offering flexible licensing and a strong ROI for large organizations, although additional licensing costs raise concerns. LoadBalancer Enterprise pricing is competitive, appreciated for value, especially for smaller deployments, with a straightforward licensing structure appealing to budget-conscious buyers.
The alert system is efficient, sending alerts within a fraction of a second if any power issues arise.
There are very lesser downtimes in terms of my overall data, including software deployment, development, and testing cycles.
One of the reasons why we went for LoadBalancer Enterprise is because of losing revenue when services are not available.
The support team is knowledgeable and efficiently assists with automation and configuration problems.
It varies depending on the engineer assigned; in most cases, we resolve issues on the first attempt.
Fortinet technical support is very good, and they provide us with better support.
I can expect a response within fifteen to twenty minutes after I put in a ticket to release the license.
They respond immediately when we do reach out.
I would rate LoadBalancer Enterprise's customer support at nine out of ten.
For those opting for a SaaS or cloud solution, there is scalability and flexibility.
It is scalable for some versions, however, as components reach their end of support, upgrades are necessary to maintain scalability.
LoadBalancer Enterprise is easy to scale, maintain, and modify, which makes adding or removing servers a simple process.
LoadBalancer Enterprise ensures that it distributes the load properly so that the system is not broken.
I rate the scalability of LoadBalancer Enterprise as excellent since it adapts perfectly to increased traffic volume or the addition of new applications.
The support system is reliable when issues like automation or configuration arise.
Overall, it has been good; in the past it was very good, and now it is still performing well.
We have two applications in two ESXi hosts that I integrated into our ADC, and I created one virtual IP in the virtual server pool.
The regular health checks that LoadBalancer Enterprise performs using regular Jenkins jobs utilize all the functionalities of LoadBalancer Enterprise to make sure everything is working perfectly according to my design.
In 90% to 99% of cases, I can say it is seamless.
LoadBalancer Enterprise is stable.
Fortinet has been a pioneer for enterprise solutions, such as firewalls, SASE, ZTNA, and SD-WAN solutions, and they are in a leader quadrant.
The limitation of managing all components and the differing versions pose challenges.
If I need design help, they do not assist; they say it is a design issue they cannot support, and I must approach the system integrator.
If advanced features such as iRules are required, and complete detailed WAF monitoring is desired along with policies that can be learned and then implemented afterwards as you have in F5, then LoadBalancer Enterprise lacks these capabilities.
Documentation needs improvement because having information is essential for working with advanced configurations.
LoadBalancer Enterprise could work more on content caching by bypassing the back-end server more often and making the cache more accessible so that it gives better and more robust results.
This solution is quite expensive compared to Kemp.
The setup cost is cheap and licensing is also reasonably priced.
Regarding the pricing of LoadBalancer Enterprise, I only pay for a license, and whatever license I use doesn't require the same CAPEX investment as physical hardware.
The cost of LoadBalancer Enterprise is better and a bit cheaper compared to other products.
I use server load balancing and employ layer seven features, which provide more granular traffic shaping and detailed logs.
When integrated with FortiAnalyzer, it has much more significance.
The implementation process is straightforward, and cluster implementation is also very easy.
Now, we achieve about 99% availability across all servers thanks to the health check feature in the load balancer.
LoadBalancer Enterprise simulates production traffic profiles by using a realistic traffic generator that models different requests and transaction mixes such as reads and writes, leveraging replay traffic from sanitized production traces whenever possible.
LoadBalancer Enterprise has impacted my organization positively by making our applications and services available to all users across the globe.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Fortinet FortiADC | 8.3% |
| LoadBalancer Enterprise | 4.9% |
| Other | 86.8% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 13 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 7 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 13 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 19 |
Fortinet FortiADC offers reliable load balancing and server management with significant security features, ensuring streamlined traffic control. Its cost-effectiveness and integration with Fortinet platforms make it a compelling choice for businesses seeking scalability and enhanced network operations.
Fortinet FortiADC is designed to deliver streamlined application delivery and manage server traffic effectively. It integrates seamlessly with Fortinet technologies like FortiGate and FortiMail, enabling enhanced security features such as SSL offloading and certificate management. While its load balancing and traffic control are strong, improvements in algorithm precision and technical support are needed. The platform's licensing flexibility and high-level services like failover and redundancy underscore its scalability. However, revisions in configuration interfaces and performance optimizations indicate areas for future updates. A focus on automation and integration with existing FortiManager components could enhance usability.
What are the key features of Fortinet FortiADC?Industries implement Fortinet FortiADC to improve application and data access, especially where high reliability and secure delivery are critical. It supports local and global content management, efficiently handling disaster recovery and ISP link balancing tasks, crucial for sectors requiring continuous, high-performance connectivity.
LoadBalancer Enterprise offers a reliable, high-availability solution designed for efficient load distribution and a user-friendly interface, catering to teams with foundational network expertise.
LoadBalancer Enterprise enhances network performance through effective traffic routing, monitoring, and high availability. Users benefit from SSL termination with SNI and Layer 7 load balancing, ensuring seamless connections with reduced complexity compared to alternatives. While known for its user-friendly approach, improvements in configuration simplicity, scalable hardware upgrades, and enhanced notification systems are often discussed for better user experience. Additional demands include HTTP API access, automated configuration backups, DNS load balancing, and enhanced graphing data capabilities. Competitive pricing and heightened security for sensitive data are frequently requested. Interface refresh issues and Microsoft compatibility are noted among users, who deploy it for SSL/HTTP traffic management, redundancy, failover capabilities, web filtering, and cloud migration support.
What are LoadBalancer Enterprise's key features?LoadBalancer Enterprise is implemented across industries for managing SSL/HTTP traffic, enhancing network reliability, and providing failover capabilities. It supports web filtering, balances Exchange and application servers, facilitates cloud migration, and manages multiple ISP lines for optimal traffic distribution across web applications and services, including SIP provisioning. Industries also use it for enhancing security with web application firewalls, DNS sharing, and application publishing.
We monitor all Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.