Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Fortinet FortiADC based on the interviews we conducted with its users.
The top alternative solutions include Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, NetScaler, and F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM).
The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.
Fortinet FortiADC surpasses its competitors by delivering advanced application delivery features, integrated security protection, and seamless scalability, ensuring robust performance and improved traffic management for enterprise networks.
Fortinet Alternatives Report
Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Fortinet, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Fortinet FortiADC is attractive for its competitive pricing, flexible on-premises solutions, and responsive customer service. In comparison, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway offers superior scalability, seamless integration with Azure services, and a streamlined deployment process, beneficial for cloud-centric organizations seeking comprehensive solutions.
Fortinet FortiADC is known for its relatively high setup cost, whereas Microsoft Azure Application Gateway offers a more budget-friendly initial setup.
Fortinet FortiADC is known for its relatively high setup cost, whereas Microsoft Azure Application Gateway offers a more budget-friendly initial setup.
NetScaler offers comprehensive features, advanced traffic management, and flexible deployment, suitable for users needing integration with Citrix products. In comparison, Fortinet FortiADC is a budget-friendly solution, ideal for those prioritizing ease of use and straightforward load balancing in on-premises environments.
NetScaler's setup cost is higher, focusing on advanced features, while Fortinet FortiADC offers a more budget-friendly option aimed at businesses prioritizing cost efficiency.
NetScaler's setup cost is higher, focusing on advanced features, while Fortinet FortiADC offers a more budget-friendly option aimed at businesses prioritizing cost efficiency.
F5 BIG-IP LTM excels in performance with advanced scripting via iRules, ideal for large enterprises needing robust hardware support. In comparison, Fortinet FortiADC is affordable and simple, appealing to organizations seeking essential load balancing and security at a lower cost.
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) generally incurs higher setup costs, while Fortinet FortiADC offers a more cost-effective setup alternative, highlighting the price disparity between the two solutions.
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) generally incurs higher setup costs, while Fortinet FortiADC offers a more cost-effective setup alternative, highlighting the price disparity between the two solutions.
Fortinet FortiADC offers integration compatibility within Fortinet ecosystems, providing application-layer security and global server load balancing. In comparison, HAProxy excels with customizable configurations, high performance, and open-source flexibility, suitable for varying environments or those valuing tailored deployment solutions.
NGINX Plus offers simplicity with configuration and modularity, suitable for demanding environments. In comparison, Fortinet FortiADC provides robust features including SSL offloading and DNS intelligence. A tech buyer might choose NGINX for flexibility, while FortiADC is favored for integrated security features.
NGINX Plus has a straightforward setup cost, whereas Fortinet FortiADC involves a more complex and potentially higher initial setup process. NGINX Plus generally presents a more cost-effective option in terms of installation fees.
NGINX Plus has a straightforward setup cost, whereas Fortinet FortiADC involves a more complex and potentially higher initial setup process. NGINX Plus generally presents a more cost-effective option in terms of installation fees.
Radware Alteon offers strong security and load balancing, appealing to those requiring scalability and application protection. In comparison, Fortinet FortiADC is attractive for cost-effective solutions and supports global DNS, fitting large multi-center environments. Fortinet simplifies interfaces but lacks advanced security configurations.
Radware Alteon's setup costs are significantly higher compared to Fortinet FortiADC, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment option. Fortinet FortiADC is a preferred choice for cost-conscious buyers, while Radware Alteon targets premium pricing segments.
Radware Alteon's setup costs are significantly higher compared to Fortinet FortiADC, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment option. Fortinet FortiADC is a preferred choice for cost-conscious buyers, while Radware Alteon targets premium pricing segments.
Kemp LoadMaster is recognized for its user-friendly deployment with tailored templates for Microsoft applications, simplifying integration and configuration. In comparison, Fortinet FortiADC offers robust features with a focus on security and flexibility, appealing to buyers needing comprehensive traffic management solutions.
A10 Networks Thunder ADC offers an all-inclusive licensing scheme with comprehensive traffic management and security features, appealing for its cost predictability. In comparison, Fortinet FortiADC provides flexible integration with other Fortinet products, ideal for users seeking tailored feature access through variable licensing.
Fortinet FortiADC attracts with robust security and cost-effectiveness, appealing to budget-conscious buyers through competitive pricing and strong support. In comparison, VMWare Avi Load Balancer offers advanced analytics and seamless multi-cloud integration, justifying its higher cost with a strong long-term ROI.
Fortinet FortiADC typically has a lower initial setup cost compared to VMWare Avi Load Balancer, which often involves a higher initial investment. While Fortinet FortiADC offers cost-effectiveness, VMware Avi Load Balancer provides higher upfront expenses.
Fortinet FortiADC typically has a lower initial setup cost compared to VMWare Avi Load Balancer, which often involves a higher initial investment. While Fortinet FortiADC offers cost-effectiveness, VMware Avi Load Balancer provides higher upfront expenses.
Fortinet FortiADC emphasizes scalability and extensive features, ideal for integrated ecosystems. In comparison, LoadBalancer Enterprise offers straightforward load balancing, prioritizing simplicity and cost-effectiveness. Tech buyers may prefer FortiADC for comprehensive capabilities or LoadBalancer Enterprise for efficiency and ease of use.
Fortinet FortiADC features a complex setup with high initial costs, while LoadBalancer Enterprise offers a straightforward setup process at a lower cost.
Fortinet FortiADC features a complex setup with high initial costs, while LoadBalancer Enterprise offers a straightforward setup process at a lower cost.
Barracuda Load Balancer ADC offers competitive pricing and excellent support, making it ideal for those seeking quick deployment and ongoing assistance. In comparison, Fortinet FortiADC attracts buyers with its superior features, enhanced security, and scalability, justifying its higher initial investment for long-term benefits.
Array APV Series appeals to budget-conscious buyers with efficient performance and cost-effectiveness. In comparison, Fortinet FortiADC attracts those needing advanced functionalities and security, justifying a higher investment. Array offers easy deployment, whereas Fortinet focuses on comprehensive support for complex needs.
Array APV Series offers a lower setup cost compared to Fortinet FortiADC, highlighting its budget-friendly advantage. In contrast, Fortinet FortiADC demands a higher initial investment, reflecting its premium positioning.
Array APV Series offers a lower setup cost compared to Fortinet FortiADC, highlighting its budget-friendly advantage. In contrast, Fortinet FortiADC demands a higher initial investment, reflecting its premium positioning.
Fortinet FortiADC offers a cost-effective solution with strong security and load balancing capabilities, ideal for budget-conscious organizations. In comparison, A10 Networks Lightning ADC, despite a higher initial cost, attracts users with its advanced features, offering scalable analytics and automation for tech-savvy environments.
