

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing and Fortra's Beyond Security BeSTORM compete in the application security arena. OpenText initially seems to have the upper hand due to its pricing and customer service, while BeSTORM is favored for its feature superiority.
Features: OpenText offers comprehensive security coverage, automated testing capabilities, and adaptability to various development environments. BeSTORM excels with superior protocol support, advanced fault injection techniques, and extensive test cases that integrate well into enterprise environments.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Fortra's BeSTORM integrates seamlessly with existing security systems and provides robust customer support. OpenText has slightly better response times and more intuitive deployment processes, facilitating quicker initial setup.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText offers a more affordable option, delivering good ROI through cost-effective testing. Fortra's BeSTORM involves a higher initial expense but promises greater long-term ROI thanks to its comprehensive security features and detailed vulnerability assessments, making it appealing to those emphasizing thorough protection.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing | 10.6% |
| Fortra's Beyond Security BeSTORM | 1.6% |
| Other | 87.8% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 7 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 15 |
BeSTORM is a dynamic application security testing (DAST) tool with a black box fuzzing option. BeSTORM's DAST uses a combination of injection attacks that are calculated attack methods. These guided attacks are designed to uncover known vulnerabilities within an application. BeSTORM can also engage black box fuzzing, without access to an application's source code, overwhelming an application with randomized code injection attack techniques.
BeSTORM has an extensive list of testing protocols, with over 250+ prebuilt modules and the option for proprietary or custom ones to be added. Dynamic testing and black box fuzzing are used during the developmental stage, minimizing any vulnerabilities once an application is launched, reducing downtime, compliance penalties, and costly post-deployment remediation efforts.
OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing offers robust scalability, ease of use, and high accuracy in scanning, making it a valuable tool for enterprises.
This security testing platform is known for its centralized dashboard, guided scans, and comprehensive reporting. It integrates seamlessly with tools like Fortify code scanner and supports extensive vulnerability detection and analysis, enhancing efficiency in security management. Despite its strengths, users suggest improvements in cloud integration, cost-effectiveness, and installation processes. Faster scans, reduced false positives, and improved mobile testing features are also desired.
What are the key features of OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing?In industries like BFSI, OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing is employed for performance network application testing, dynamic and static application security testing, and code checks. Security and QA teams use it in development processes to ensure application security prior to release, proving integral in both enterprise and testing environments.
We monitor all Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.