GitLab vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing comparison

GitLab and OpenText are both solutions in the DevSecOps category. GitLab is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.3, while OpenText is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.0. GitLab holds a 11.6% mindshare in DSO, compared to OpenText’s 5.8% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of GitLab users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

GitLab

Read 86 GitLab reviews

18,203 Views
546 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

OpenText Dynamic Applicatio...

Read 22 OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing reviews

3,107 Views
559 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

GitLab

OpenText Dynamic Applicatio...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 19, 2025

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing and GitLab serve different needs in application security testing and DevOps pipelines. GitLab generally has an advantage due to its extensive features and support, while OpenText offers competitive pricing and strong customer service.

Features: OpenText focuses on automated vulnerability detection, secure code quality, and security enhancements. GitLab integrates CI/CD tools, collaboration capabilities, and extensive repository management, offering a holistic development environment.

Room for Improvement: OpenText could enhance integration features and streamline reporting processes. GitLab might improve on reducing complexity in its feature set and providing more targeted support for smaller teams. Both products can focus on simplifying user interfaces to facilitate ease of use.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText offers robust support with thorough documentation and direct service channels, ensuring smooth deployment. GitLab relies on community support and online resources, which are helpful but may extend deployment times for users unfamiliar with its systems.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText has competitive pricing with lower initial costs, appealing to security-focused organizations. GitLab’s higher cost reflects its comprehensive DevOps features, providing significant ROI for those needing an all-in-one development tool.

To learn more, read our detailed GitLab vs. OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

GitLab vs. OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 868,759 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GitLab

Ranking in DevSecOps

1st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (11th), Build Automation (1st), Release Automation (2nd), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (7th), Rapid Application Development Software (11th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (5th), Enterprise Agile Planning Tools (2nd), Fuzz Testing Tools (3rd)

OpenText Dynamic Applicatio...

Ranking in DevSecOps

8th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the DevSecOps category, the mindshare of GitLab is 11.6%, up from 10.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing is 5.8%, down from 10.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

DevSecOps Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
GitLab	11.6%
OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing	5.8%
Other	82.6%

DevSecOps

Featured Reviews

Rohit Kesharwani

Manager, Engineering at 7-Eleven

Improved agility and time to market with CI/CD enhancements

The CI/CD pipelines in GitLab are highly valuable. Another important feature is the single source of repository, allowing efficient repository management and source code management. GitLab provides manageability by allowing us to manage source code effectively through separate repositories. Additionally, GitLab enables the creation of individual CI/CD pipelines for each repository, making software more agile. By integrating GitLab as a DevOps platform, we have enhanced agility, improved our time to market, and different teams can work collaboratively on various projects.

Read full review

Navin N

Global ISO 27001 Program Lead at DXC Technology

Effective scanning of diverse file extensions with fast reporting and issue resolution

We develop software packages for clients, and these clients are mostly in the BFSI sector. The packages need to be scanned, and we engage Fortify WebInspect for this. Customers typically perform their own application pen tests, but in some cases, we have engagements where customers want us to scan…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I like GitLab from the CI/CD perspective. It is much easier to set up CI/CD and then integrate with other tools."

"The scalability is good."

"The user interface is really good so that helps with huge teams who need to collaborate."

"The CI/CD pipeline with Helm has significantly improved deployment speed and efficiency."

"I find the features and version control history to be most valuable for our development workflow. These aspects provide us with a clear view of changes and help us manage requests efficiently."

"Their CI/CD engine is very mature. It's very comprehensive and flexible, and compared to other projects, I believe that GitLab is number one right now from that perspective."

"The most valuable features of Gitlab are integration with CIE and the ability to rapidly deploy solutions, projects, and applications. It is very easy to use, and there are no complaints."

"GitLab is very useful for pipelines, continuous integration, and continuous deployment. It is also stable."

More GitLab pros

"It's a well-known platform for doing dynamic application scanning."

"The solution is easy to use."

"The transaction recorder within WebInspect is easy to use, which is valuable for our team."

"It is easy to use, and its reporting is fairly simple."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is the ability to make our customers more secure."

"The solution is able to detect a wide range of vulnerabilities. It's better at it than other products."

"Good at scanning and finding vulnerabilities."

"Guided Scan option allows us to easily scan and share reports."

More OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing pros

Cons

"I would like configuration of a YML file to be done via UI rather than a code file."

"GitLab would be improved with the addition of templates for deployment on local PCs."

"GitLab can improve the integration with third-party applications. It could be made easier. Additionally, having API control from my application could be helpful."

"The integration and storage capabilities could be better."

"I'm new to GitLab, so I would appreciate more documentation about the code and commands."

"Their RBAC is role-based access, which is fine but not very good."

"We would like to have easier tutorials. Their tutorials are too technical for a user to understand. They should be more detailed but less technical."

"It has fewer options, and its UI is not so user-friendly."

More GitLab cons

"Fortify WebInspect could improve user-friendliness. Additionally, it is very bulky to use."

"It took us between eight and ten hours to scan an entire site, which is somewhat slow and something that I think can be improved."

"The main area for improvement in Fortify WebInspect is the price, as it is too high compared to the market rate."

"Creating reports is very slow and it is something that should be improved."

"I'm not sure licensing, but on the pricing, it's a bit costly. It's a bit overpriced. Though it is an enterprise tool, there are other tools also with similar functionalities."

"The scanner could be better."

"The installation could be a bit easier. Usually it's simple to use, but the installation is painful and a bit laborious and complex."

"We have often encountered scanning errors."

More OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We are using the free version of GitLab."

"GitLab is an open-source solution."

"The price of GitLab could be better, it is expensive."

"In total, I believe we have more than 300 licenses spread over about 100 users, though I can't comment on the costs involved."

"GitLab is cheap."

"We are using the open-source version."

"The initial setup cost is excellent and you can add the premium features later."

"In terms of the pricing for GitLab, on a scale of one to five, with one being expensive and five being cheap, I'm rating pricing for the solution a four. It could still be cheaper because right now, my company has a small team, and sometimes it's difficult to use a paid product for a small team. You'd hope the team will grow and scale, but currently, you're paying a high license fee for a small team. I'm referring to the GitLab license that has premium features and will give you all features. This can be a problem for management to approve the high price of the license for a team this small."

More GitLab pricing and cost advice

"Our licensing is such that you can only run one scan at a time, which is inconvenient."

"Fortify WebInspect is a very expensive product."

"This solution is very expensive."

"The price is okay."

"It’s a fair price for the solution."

"Its price is almost similar to the price of AppScan. Both of them are very costly. Its price could be reduced because it can be very costly for unlimited IT scans, etc. I'm not sure, but it can go up to $40,000 to $50,000 or more than that."

"The pricing is not clear and while it is not high, it is difficult to understand."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which DevSecOps solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

868,759 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

14%

Government

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Government

15%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Computer Software Company

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	35
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	42

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	15

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitLab?

I find the features and version control history to be most valuable for our development workflow. These aspects provide us with a clear view of changes and help us manage requests efficiently.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitLab?

We are currently using general GitLab, not GitLab Premium.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitLab?

GitLab needs to improve the CI/CD functionality because it is not compatible with Jenkins and other tools, as it is not that efficient. Security-wise, we have security features enabled in GitLab fo...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Fortify WebInspect?

While I am not directly involved with licensing, I can share that our project's license for 1-9 applications costs between $15,000 to $19,000. In comparison, Burp Suite costs approximately $500 to ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Fortify WebInspect?

WebInspect works efficiently with Java-based or .NET based applications. However, it struggles with Salesforce applications, where it requires approximately 20-24 hours to crawl and audit but produ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Fortify WebInspect?

I am currently working with several tools. For Fortify, I use SCA and WebInspect. Apart from that, I use Burp Suite from PortSwigger. For API testing, I use Postman with Burp Suite or WebInspect fo...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs GitLab

Compared 38% of the time

GitHub CoPilot vs GitLab

Compared 12% of the time

TeamCity vs GitLab

Compared 5% of the time

Tekton vs GitLab

Compared 5% of the time

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs GitLab

Compared 3% of the time

More GitLab Competitors

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

Compared 18% of the time

OWASP Zap vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

Compared 11% of the time

Veracode vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

Compared 9% of the time

HCL AppScan vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

Compared 8% of the time

SOON DAST vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

Compared 3% of the time

More OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GitLab

September 2025

Download GitLab product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

September 2025

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing report

Download OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing product report

Also Known As

Fuzzit

Micro Focus WebInspect, WebInspect

Overview

GitLab offers a secure and user-friendly platform for CI/CD pipeline management, code repository control, and collaboration, enhancing development speed and efficiency. It facilitates automation with extensive customization and tool integration, ideal for DevOps processes.

GitLab supports source code management, version control, and collaborative development. It's frequently used in CI/CD processes to automate builds and deployments while integrating DevOps practices. GitLab allows companies to manage repositories, automate pipelines, conduct code reviews, and maintain development lifecycles. The platform supports infrastructure and configuration management, enabling efficient code collaboration, deployment automation, and comprehensive repository handling. Many organizations commit and deploy developed code using GitLab's capabilities.

What are GitLab's most valuable features?

CI/CD Pipeline Management: Streamlines development through automated testing and deployment.
User-Friendly Interface: Ensures ease of collaboration and task automation.
Code Merging and Branching: Facilitates smooth code integration and version control.
Security Platform: Provides strong security features for safe development.
Tool Integration: Enhances functionality with diverse tool integration.

What benefits should users evaluate?

Development Speed: Accelerates processes through automation.
Collaboration Ease: Simplifies team interactions and workflow.
Customization Options: Offers extensive personalization for specific needs.
Comprehensive Documentation: Provides detailed guidance for users.
Secure Platform: Maintains integrity with robust security features.

In specific industries, GitLab serves as a backbone for source code management and CI/CD implementation. Companies leverage its capabilities for infrastructure management and deployment automation, thus streamlining project delivery timelines. Its ability to handle configuration management and code repositories effectively aids in maintaining development lifecycles, making it a preferred choice for organizations committed to enhancing their DevOps practices.

GitLab

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing offers robust scalability, ease of use, and high accuracy in scanning, making it a valuable tool for enterprises.

This security testing platform is known for its centralized dashboard, guided scans, and comprehensive reporting. It integrates seamlessly with tools like Fortify code scanner and supports extensive vulnerability detection and analysis, enhancing efficiency in security management. Despite its strengths, users suggest improvements in cloud integration, cost-effectiveness, and installation processes. Faster scans, reduced false positives, and improved mobile testing features are also desired.

What are the key features of OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing?

Scalability: Easily adapts to changing enterprise needs.
Ease of Use: User-friendly interface with guided scans.
Comprehensive Reporting: Detailed vulnerability analysis and reporting.
Integration Capabilities: Works with Fortify code scanner and user authentication scanning.
Wide Vulnerability Detection: Identifies extensive security vulnerabilities.

What benefits should users expect from reviews?

Efficient Vulnerability Management: Streamlines security management in development environments.
Detailed Analysis: Provides in-depth insights into security issues.
Quick Setup: Easy to deploy within existing systems.
Enterprise Preference: Supports enterprise environments efficiently.

In industries like BFSI, OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing is employed for performance network application testing, dynamic and static application security testing, and code checks. Security and QA teams use it in development processes to ensure application security prior to release, proving integral in both enterprise and testing environments.

OpenText

Sample Customers

1. NASA 2. IBM 3. Sony 4. Alibaba 5. CERN 6. Siemens 7. Volkswagen 8. ING 9. Ticketmaster 10. SpaceX 11. Adobe 12. Intuit 13. Autodesk 14. Rakuten 15. Unity Technologies 16. Pandora 17. Electronic Arts 18. Nordstrom 19. Verizon 20. Comcast 21. Philips 22. Deutsche Telekom 23. Orange 24. Fujitsu 25. Ericsson 26. Nokia 27. General Electric 28. Cisco 29. Accenture 30. Deloitte 31. PwC 32. KPMG

Aaron's

Buyer's Guide

GitLab vs. OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

September 2025

Free Report: GitLab vs. OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab vs. OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

868,759 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GitLab vs. OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing report.

See our list of best DevSecOps vendors.

We monitor all DevSecOps reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.