No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

FortressIQ vs Microsoft Power Automate comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 1, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

FortressIQ
Ranking in Process Mining
14th
Average Rating
0.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Microsoft Power Automate
Ranking in Process Mining
3rd
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
134
Ranking in other categories
Robotic Process Automation (RPA) (3rd), Agentic Automation (3rd), Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies (4th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Process Mining category, the mindshare of FortressIQ is 2.1%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Power Automate is 11.8%, down from 21.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Process Mining Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Microsoft Power Automate11.8%
FortressIQ2.1%
Other86.1%
Process Mining
 

Featured Reviews

Sean Ammon - PeerSpot reviewer
Managing Director at CIBA
The product has good process mining capabilities, but it is very expensive
We are one of the three organizations across Europe and Africa that are certified implementers of FortressIQ. People who would like to use the solution must choose the right partner to implement. Some tweaking still needs to happen around the commercial model and the pricing structures. Even though the product is good, it's very difficult for customers to pay for it. It defeats the purpose if we have a good product but no one can afford to pay for it. Overall, I rate the tool a seven out of ten.
Ayobami Shobaloju - PeerSpot reviewer
Customer Solution Provider at Wema Bank
Automating processes has saved time and improved communication
Something frustrates me concerning Microsoft Power Automate, and that is about the integration with Microsoft Forms and Excel. The issue now is that I don't get my responses synchronized automatically, and that frustrates me a lot. If the team could take this as feedback, the synchronization of the feedback responses from the forms and the Excel sheets should be seamless. This synchronization issue happens frequently, and it causes a lot of delays in the sense that the mails that ought to go out to the agents fail at some point. I have to reload these responses so that the agents can get their responses as when submitted. What I notice is that the responses don't go out without proper synchronization, so I reload the field responses, and this works afterwards. I would say probably a seamless walkthrough process for new users would be beneficial. For those using it for the first time, a seamless walkthrough process would be fine.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The process mining capability of the solution is valuable."
"The support is responsive and reliable."
"Although the solution is still new to me, from what I have experienced, I would recommend the solution to other organizations."
"This is definitely a product that I can recommend."
"We jumped onto this solution because it's very reasonably priced."
"Power Automate Desktop allowed me to quickly visually identify parts of a screen and record it. So I can see that I know I'm going to have to click this button here, this field there, and this tab here, and I can literally go and quickly just record all of them and identify them and have them in a list that I can see and say - there's my list of things."
"From my personal experience of using Microsoft Power Automate, I think that the automatic document processing feature is helpful for many organizations in streamlining administrative processes. It is a very good feature. It has helped many enterprises to process documents without spending much time on them."
"It is a low-code platform, easy to use, and good for automating small tasks such as expense approvals and timesheet approvals."
"The most valuable thing about the product is that it is simple."
"If people have a Microsoft Enterprise license, they could actually use the Power Automate tool to make their processes much more lean and efficient."
 

Cons

"The way the commercial model of the product is structured must be improved."
"Another aspect that needs improvement is the domain definition."
"Use it for basic workflows, but I wouldn't recommend it for anything that is mission-critical."
"Power Automate is too complicated - it forces you to go through extra tasks instead of streamlining your workflow."
"The licensing model is difficult to understand and is something that should be improved."
"It is challenging to scale the solution across multiple branches."
"If you don't have that level of support then you are basically on your own."
"Compared to other RPA solutions, there is a little bit of a feature gap."
"I have had some issues with stability where I received a surprising error message and still don't know why it happened."
"It can have customizations like enterprise solutions. In the approval section, there should be an option to reassign approval to some other employee."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is reasonable."
"The solution is very expensive."
"The free version is quite good."
"The licensing price should be more cost-effective."
"Due to the pricing model, the solution is more convenient than any other tools."
"My company switched to a monthly payment for the WinAutomation by Softomotive license. I don't have the exact figure, but it roughly amounts to 500 Euros a year which isn't bad."
"The license cost could be better."
"We have it on our system. I don't really know if we need a separate license."
"This solution is bundled with our Office 365, so there is no additional licensing fee."
"I believe one of the advantages of this device is its low cost."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Mining solutions are best for your needs.
893,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
14%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Computer Software Company
7%
Healthcare Company
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business50
Midsize Enterprise17
Large Enterprise67
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
RPA that Bots can run without centralized control?
Yes, Attended Bots which can run without centralized control Module. RPA Tools like Automation Anywhere, uiPath ,Power Automation they do support this.
How do I choose between UiPath and Microsoft Power Automate?
Microsoft‌ ‌Power‌ ‌Automate‌ ‌is‌ ‌intuitive‌ ‌and‌ ‌easy‌ ‌to‌ ‌integrate‌ ‌and‌ ‌use.‌ ‌I‌ ‌like‌ ‌that‌ ‌there‌ ‌is‌ ‌no‌ ‌coding‌ ‌experience‌ ‌necessary,‌ ‌and‌ ‌appreciate‌ ‌the‌ ‌automated‌...
How is Automation Anywhere compared to Microsoft Power Automate?
‌Neither‌ ‌solution‌ ‌requires‌ ‌any‌ ‌coding‌ ‌experience,‌ ‌and‌ ‌both‌ ‌are‌ ‌easy‌ ‌to‌ ‌use‌ ‌and‌ ‌have‌ ‌great‌ ‌drag-and‌ ‌drop‌ ‌functionality.‌ ‌The‌ ‌training‌ ‌and‌ ‌resources‌ ‌for‌ ‌A...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Power Automate, Microsoft Flow, MS Power Automate, WinAutomation by Softomotive, ProcessRobot by Softomotive, Minit
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
1. Coca-Cola 2. General Electric 3. Siemens 4. Accenture 5. Deloitte 6. Johnson & Johnson 7. Ford 8. Nestle 9. Procter & Gamble 10. IBM 11. Amazon 12. Google 13. Microsoft 14. Adobe 15. Cisco 16. Oracle 17. SAP 18. Intel 19. HP 20. Dell 21. Verizon 22. AT&T 23. T-Mobile 24. Walmart 25. Target 26. Home Depot 27. McDonald's 28. Starbucks 29. Nike 30. Apple 31. Facebook 32. Twitter
Find out what your peers are saying about FortressIQ vs. Microsoft Power Automate and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.
893,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.