Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

FortressIQ vs UiPath Process Mining comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 1, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

FortressIQ
Ranking in Process Mining
13th
Average Rating
0.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
UiPath Process Mining
Ranking in Process Mining
3rd
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
81
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Process Mining category, the mindshare of FortressIQ is 1.8%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of UiPath Process Mining is 5.5%, down from 7.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Process Mining Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
UiPath Process Mining5.5%
FortressIQ1.8%
Other92.7%
Process Mining
 

Featured Reviews

Sean Ammon - PeerSpot reviewer
Managing Director at CIBA
The product has good process mining capabilities, but it is very expensive
We are one of the three organizations across Europe and Africa that are certified implementers of FortressIQ. People who would like to use the solution must choose the right partner to implement. Some tweaking still needs to happen around the commercial model and the pricing structures. Even though the product is good, it's very difficult for customers to pay for it. It defeats the purpose if we have a good product but no one can afford to pay for it. Overall, I rate the tool a seven out of ten.
GS
Manager at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees
End-to-end visibility and transparency help remove bottlenecks
UiPath Process Mining impacts our company positively by providing us with a lot of insights. It helps us optimize our shared services operations. We can see where the process bottlenecks are and address them. It's useful for optimization and reducing bottlenecks across the business processes. UiPath Process Mining helps to free up staff's time for other projects. UiPath Process Mining helps save 10% to 12% of our time. UiPath Process Mining helps us reduce our total cost of ownership (TCO). It helps us reduce our TCO by approximately 5%. It has potential, but we are not using it fully. UiPath Process Mining takes two to three months to implement and another two to three months to adopt. We could see its value within four to six months. UiPath Process Mining comes with quite a few connectors and tools, so its integration capability is decent. UiPath Process Mining provides excellent end-to-end visibility as long as you have the right data source systems and quality. Many times, we struggle with data quality, but if you have good quality data, it provides you with good end-to-end results.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The support is responsive and reliable."
"The process mining capability of the solution is valuable."
"What I find good in UiPath Process Mining is that it integrates well with SAP."
"It's very useful in turning raw data into actionable information."
"The most valuable features of UiPath Process Mining are ease to use, the graphical user interface is good, and the level of detail it will bring on the board is beneficial. We will be able to visualize a wide variety of users, what are the bottlenecks, and where it's taking a long time to process."
"UiPath Process Mining's most valuable feature is its integration with RPA's bots."
"UIPath Process Mining is stable."
"There are other automation tools on the market but Uipath is the leader with many capabilities."
"This solution is very easy to use and implement as you are able to partner with a cloud enterprise and be on your way."
"It provides the visualization, the PI data, and all other information."
 

Cons

"The way the commercial model of the product is structured must be improved."
"Another aspect that needs improvement is the domain definition."
"Unlike scan.ai, UiPath Process Mining doesn't provide high-level insights. It isn't easy to integrate. They should stop selling and try to bring more value into the system. A person can have only 10 UiPath Process Mining licenses, but nobody uses them, so in hindsight, everybody feels like UiPath is a failed product."
"Within UiPath, AI Fabric is a valuable feature, but Process Mining can be further improved with AI. AI is booming. Once they improve the AI capabilities, more and more customers will come to UiPath."
"An area for improvement in UiPath Process Mining is that its pricing is too expensive, particularly when compared to Power Automate."
"While it is fairly stable, this is something that could be improved."
"This is not a perfect tool, as there are things that should be improved."
"Process mining could improve in optimization of resources."
"Instead of doing only UiPath bots, it should handle other bots as well. Then I can deploy automation anywhere on any other software. It should not be only UiPath. That's the future of it."
"That depends whether I can get the input information to explain why the exceptions are happening. Is it because of different policies or incorrect procedure being applied? If that information would also being integrated as part of it, it would make my life easier."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is reasonable."
"The solution is very expensive."
"The pricing is on the higher side."
"Our licensing for UiPath Process Mining and the various tools such as Studio Orchestrator is all paid for on an annual basis. However, with the Document Understanding feature, the licensing is per page. So if we're going to read some 20,000-30,000 pages, that becomes one separate licensing stack."
"Compared to other solutions such as Power Automate, UiPath is significantly more expensive, with its pro plan starting at $420 per month."
"It is extremely expensive."
"The licensing cost depends on the enterprise, and the discounts and offers available at the time. The price of the solution is reasonable."
"UiPath Process Mining is a bit overpriced for someone considering the solution without knowing for sure whether it will help them."
"The pricing of Process Mining is based on an annual subscription. The final cost per year depends on what clients are able to negotiate with their salesperson."
"UiPath Process Mining is better priced than Celonis, which we found to be on the costlier side."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Mining solutions are best for your needs.
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Computer Software Company
19%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Healthcare Company
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business34
Midsize Enterprise9
Large Enterprise42
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about UiPath Process Mining?
I would rate the stability of UiPath Process Mining a nine out of ten.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for UiPath Process Mining?
Regarding pricing and overall licensing cost, for existing UiPath customers, it is reasonable. However, for those solely interested in process mining without existing UiPath usage, Celonis is gener...
What needs improvement with UiPath Process Mining?
In future releases, better integration towards overall business process orchestration would be beneficial for UiPath Process Mining.
 

Also Known As

No data available
ProcessGold
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Lotte Corporation, LexisNexis Risk Solutions, Sunway Group, Deloitte, Heritage Bank
Find out what your peers are saying about FortressIQ vs. UiPath Process Mining and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.