Celonis vs FortressIQ comparison

Celonis and FortressIQ are both solutions in the Process Mining category. Celonis is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.3, while FortressIQ is ranked #13. Celonis holds a 16.9% mindshare in PM, compared to FortressIQ’s 1.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Celonis users are willing to recommend the solution.

Celonis

Read 60 Celonis reviews

6,318 Views
2,969 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

FortressIQ

Read 2 FortressIQ reviews

347 Views
347 Comparison Views

0% willing to recommend

Celonis

FortressIQ

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 1, 2024

Celonis and FortressIQ compete in process mining and automation. FortressIQ seems superior for its comprehensive features, while Celonis is favored for its pricing and support.

Features: Celonis offers powerful analytical capabilities, diverse integration options, and deep operational insights. FortressIQ provides automation, real-time process discovery, and adaptive solutions, distinguishing itself in immediate process mapping and automation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Celonis provides cloud-based deployment facilitating system integration and offers robust customer support. FortressIQ has rapid on-premises implementation with streamlined support, focusing on direct user engagement.

Pricing and ROI: Celonis offers competitive pricing with an emphasis on early ROI, appealing to cost-conscious businesses. FortressIQ may have higher pricing, but its features hint at long-term value through detailed process enhancement.

To learn more, read our detailed Celonis vs. FortressIQ Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Celonis vs. FortressIQ

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Celonis

Ranking in Process Mining

2nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AI Data Analysis (6th)

FortressIQ

Ranking in Process Mining

13th

Average Rating

0.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Process Mining category, the mindshare of Celonis is 16.9%, down from 18.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of FortressIQ is 1.8%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Process Mining Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Celonis	16.9%
FortressIQ	1.8%
Other	81.3%

Process Mining

Featured Reviews

Ebin_Abraham

Data Engineer at Baker Hughes

Process mining has delivered major savings and now needs better automation and task mining

Collaboration with ERPs should be improved. Compared to SAP Signavio, Celonis is less competitive for BPMN modeling. Deployment flexibility needs enhancement, as on-premises support is not as strong as SaaS support. The most important area for improvement is the automation part. End-to-end automation capabilities are desired. Currently, workflows are being used, but actions should be able to go via email, task, APIs, and ultimately write back to the source. Adding RPA capability that can interact with required systems and write back to the source would greatly enhance Celonis. Task mining capabilities also require improvement. UiPath Process Mining and Microsoft Process Mining have better task mining capabilities compared to Celonis. Usability and support from Celonis need improvement. They should help clients find more value in the product. Cost is another significant concern, as Celonis is very expensive compared to other process mining tools. The license cost should be reduced. Celonis should establish partnerships with clients to find more use cases and maximize the value gained from Celonis.

Read full review

Sean Ammon

Managing Director at CIBA

The product has good process mining capabilities, but it is very expensive

We are one of the three organizations across Europe and Africa that are certified implementers of FortressIQ. People who would like to use the solution must choose the right partner to implement. Some tweaking still needs to happen around the commercial model and the pricing structures. Even though the product is good, it's very difficult for customers to pay for it. It defeats the purpose if we have a good product but no one can afford to pay for it. Overall, I rate the tool a seven out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The process mapping is most valuable to us."

"For the amount of information that it processes, it works relatively fast. I like the visual presentation and the interface is intuitive. I also like that Celonis has a learning academy."

"Technical support is really good. For me, the sales support matters more. When I'm in a sales cycle, the Celonis sales teams are very helpful. They reach out to me from day zero."

"Celonis' best feature is a new one called Action Flow, an enhanced version of earlier automation features with lots of integration options with other systems so you can access third-party systems and automate some actions there too."

"In my Celonis experience, it is easy to use and has higher AI capabilities."

"The process chart is valuable in identifying the bottlenecks."

"The documentation, multi-hop analysis, and SLA breaches are the most valuable features we have discovered."

"One of the vital features is the solution's easy integration with varying sources"

More Celonis pros

"The support is responsive and reliable."

"The process mining capability of the solution is valuable."

Cons

"It would help if they had more integrations and automation features."

"The support costs are very high."

"Celonis is good, but it is not comfortable for the India market. I am from India, and the Celonis CPM is not compatible with our country's cybersecurity policy."

"From a development perspective, I think there could be improvements in version control and deployment."

"I have noticed Celonis and Azure, as Infrastructure-as-a-service do not communicate well with each other. Since Celonis has recently acquired PAF they would try to synergize their operations with Microsoft tools. In the next couple of years, they should be more connected to the Microsoft ecosystems. In the long term, they should integrate more with SAP which is a partner of Microsoft. This would result in cost efficiencies."

"Celonis needs to improve the feature channel. They should incorporate more generative AI elements into their solution."

"For example, we would like to see improvement of the simulation capabilities to include a BPMN-compliant modeler. That is, we would like to be able to connect the simulation to the BPMN modeler. I think it's one of the features that is missing in Celonis."

"We would like this solution to be more flexible in how it interacts with other cloud-based database solutions, so that we can operate more seamlessly."

More Celonis cons

"The way the commercial model of the product is structured must be improved."

"Another aspect that needs improvement is the domain definition."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost of the software for us or the client is on the higher end."

"Celonis is the most expensive solution in the market"

"I rate Celonis' pricing a ten out of ten because it is expensive."

"Pricing-wise, Celonis is a five out of ten right now because my clients just started with the solution. When my clients start looking at scaling Celonis, the cost will grow. Every user has an additional charge, and every gig of data you bring in costs extra."

"The solution is quite expensive."

"Once we try to scale it up, the product becomes expensive."

"The cost would be a concern for a certain category of customers. Flexible cost models would help smaller players be able to adapt Celonis into their business operations."

"Celonis has the highest pricing in the process mining domain."

More Celonis pricing and cost advice

"The solution is very expensive."

"The pricing is reasonable."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Mining solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

16%

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Energy/Utilities Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	44

No data available

Questions from the Community

Which is better - Signavio Process Manager or Celonis?

SAP Signavio Process Manager is a very robust industrial-grade business process modeling tool. It is easy to use and does not require too much technological involvement. This solution has a collabo...

See all answers

What do you like most about Celonis?

Celonis, especially for high-risk finance-related processes, helped us make precise decisions and uncover hidden values within our architecture. It was one of the most significant values our busine...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Celonis?

I am not heavily involved in that particular aspect, but I have heard that Celonis is somewhat expensive.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs Celonis

Compared 55% of the time

SAP Signavio Process Intelligence vs Celonis

Compared 10% of the time

UiPath Process Mining vs Celonis

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft Power Automate vs Celonis

Compared 5% of the time

Bizagi vs Celonis

Compared 1% of the time

More Celonis Competitors

UiPath Process Mining vs FortressIQ

Compared 39% of the time

Bizagi vs FortressIQ

Compared 24% of the time

More FortressIQ Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Celonis

January 2026

Download Celonis product report

Buyer's Guide

Process Mining

December 2025

Download FortressIQ product report

Overview

Celonis is the global leader in execution management. Powered by its process mining core, Celonis has evolved from its beginnings as a Process Mining company into an execution management pioneer, enabling companies to unlock execution capacity and perform at full potential. Celonis offers advanced technology in data execution, combining real-time process data, the intelligence to make sense of that data, and the execution capacity to take immediate, decisive action. Celonis’ Execution Management System makes data work for its customers by identifying inefficiencies and weaving interconnected processes together – thereby eliminating billions in corporate inefficiencies, empowering better business decisions and triggering the right actions automatically. Celonis is headquartered in Munich, Germany and New York City, USA and has 15 offices worldwide.

Celonis

With FortressIQ, making strategic decisions for your business just got easier
Automated process discovery enables you to uncover insights at a scale and accuracy unattainable with more traditional methods. Confidently make decisions and strategically implement them across the enterprise, finally realizing the benefits promised by digital transformation.

FortressIQ

Sample Customers

Anheuser-Busch InBev, AXA, Bayer, Cisco, Deloitte, Deutsche Telekom, Hitachi, Kellogg's, Lufthansa, and Whirlpool

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Celonis vs. FortressIQ

December 2025

Free Report: Celonis vs. FortressIQ

Find out what your peers are saying about Celonis vs. FortressIQ and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Celonis vs. FortressIQ report.

See our list of best Process Mining vendors.

We monitor all Process Mining reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.