Freshservice vs Red Hat CloudForms comparison

Freshworks and Red Hat are both solutions in the Cloud Management category. Freshworks is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.2, while Red Hat is ranked #37. Freshworks holds a 1.3% mindshare in CM, compared to Red Hat’s 1.8% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of Freshworks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of Red Hat users who would recommend it.

Freshservice

Read 40 Freshservice reviews

9,733 Views
1,363 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Red Hat CloudForms

Read 10 Red Hat CloudForms reviews

2,168 Views
2,146 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

Freshservice

Red Hat CloudForms

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Freshservice and Red Hat CloudForms are key players in IT service management and cloud infrastructure management, respectively. Freshservice appears to have an advantage due to its ease of use and quick deployment, making it appealing for diverse company sizes, while Red Hat CloudForms stands out in robust integration capabilities.

Features: Freshservice offers ease of use, swift setup, and a comprehensive incident management system including mobile apps and automation features. It supports integration and workflow automation, enhancing contract management. Red Hat CloudForms excels in integrating with diverse infrastructures and vendors through strong API support. Its capabilities in dynamic catalog creation and comprehensive asset management are notable.

Room for Improvement: Freshservice could improve its reporting, customizable user forms, and project management features. Refinement is needed in Linux and Microsoft Outlook integration, as well as offering more granular workflow automation for multi-cloud environments. Red Hat CloudForms needs enhanced user-friendliness and simplified plug-and-play functionality. Improved integration without extensive programming, better support for diverse cloud services, and streamlined updates management are desired.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Freshservice utilizes a public cloud deployment model, offering accessibility with generally responsive but occasionally inconsistent technical support. Red Hat CloudForms allows deployment across public, hybrid, and on-premises models, though users note complexities in hybrid deployments and seek improved support interactions.

Pricing and ROI: Freshservice provides various pricing plans with tier-based models, considered cost-effective with quick ROI upon deployment. Some regional pricing criticisms exist, but flexible pricing options make it widely accepted. Red Hat CloudForms has a higher price point, potentially cost-heavy for large deployments, yet cheaper than some competitors like VMware. Both solutions offer good ROI, with Freshservice being favored by diverse business sizes due to its pricing flexibility.

To learn more, read our detailed Freshservice vs. Red Hat CloudForms Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Freshservice vs. Red Hat CloudForms

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,800 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Freshservice

Ranking in Cloud Management

15th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Help Desk Software (7th), Project Management Software (12th), IT Asset Management (6th), IT Service Management (ITSM) (8th), Configuration Management Databases (5th), IT Alerting and Incident Management (15th), AI IT Support (5th)

Red Hat CloudForms

Ranking in Cloud Management

37th

Average Rating

6.4

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Cloud Management category, the mindshare of Freshservice is 1.3%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Red Hat CloudForms is 1.8%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Freshservice	1.3%
Red Hat CloudForms	1.8%
Other	96.9%

Cloud Management

Featured Reviews

Raja Farrar

IT Service Delivery Manager at Symposiam

Automation and AI have transformed our service delivery and have made IT support faster and more efficient

I always keep up with Freshservice's roadmaps and new features. Freshservice has been very good at listening to feedback and adding those feature requests into their next iterations. I wish they would offer more granular data export options for utilizing in Power BI, along with predictive analytics for capacity planning and SLA breaches to enable more proactive support management and reduce firefighting. While the dashboards are effective, some users find custom reporting limited compared to ServiceNow or Jira. I would also appreciate deeper integrations, especially for niche apps requiring development coding work to enable advanced orchestration. Native integrations for DevOps pipelines such as GitHub Actions and Jenkins, along with stronger API flexibility for complex workflows, would enhance functionality. Although the CMDB and asset management are solid, they do lack advanced dependency mapping compared to other enterprise tools. My wishlist includes automated impact analysis for changes and improved visualization of asset relationships, enabling quicker resolutions from an agent's perspective when alerts come in. I acknowledge that Device42 may enhance this, but it is an extra cost beyond what we already pay. While Freddy AI is excellent for triage and suggestions, some users desire more proactive automation, such as predictive ticket routing based on historical patterns and AI-driven capacity forecasting. Lastly, the pricing tiers might seem rigid for mid-sized teams, so a more granular add-on option for features such as Device42 or pay-per-use for orchestration workflows could be beneficial.

Read full review

Ilhami Arikan

Cloud Services Automation Technologies Manager at Garanti Teknoloji

A stable solution that helps to provision servers

We use the solution to provision servers. I am impressed with the product's ability to create dynamic catalogs. The solution's provisioning engine needs to be improved. I would rate the solution's stability an eight out of ten. I would rate the product's scalability a seven out of ten and…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"You can just register and within five to minute minutes, you are ready to go."

"Its ease of use is fantastic. It is just above and beyond, especially when you compare it to something like Cherwell, Salesforce, or anything like that. It is on its own level. It is so easy to administer. The way everything is organized and the way it builds its own documentation is very good."

"The tool is an easy, off-the-shelf product which allowed us to decommission our in-house system."

"Freshservice is more stable and easier to use; it's also less expensive, and for small and medium-sized organizations, it's quite good."

"The overall functionality of the product is excellent."

"What it's allowed us to do is bring everyone in our department into the journey of customer experience and customer service."

"The solution’s timely automated triggers increase our IT team’s productivity."

"The solution has been stable."

More Freshservice pros

"They are a very mature product."

"The optimization of the solution is quite interesting, as it means we can prepare a bunch of VMs with self-service provisioning."

"Red Hat CloudForms is a stable product. There is no issue with the stability."

"The stability of the solution is very good, and we haven't had any issues with it."

"The integration with other open-source tools is pretty good; it integrates particularly well with Kubernetes and Docker, and they are a very mature product."

"The most valuable features of Red Hat CloudForms are the benefit of the collective functionality."

"The solution is compatible and integrates with various infrastructures or providers."

"I am impressed with the product's reports."

More Red Hat CloudForms pros

Cons

"Asset management can definitely be improved because it doesn't pick up every single device on the network or every single piece of information. Some manual information still needs to be entered."

"The chat portal is not that great."

"The analytics could be better."

"There are some limitations in reporting. For example, I would like to have a report of conversations or replies."

"It's still a new product, so there are some areas that are a little frustrating."

"Some of the ways that tasks are reported on and shown can be better. You can't see tasks in your regular ticket list view. You can't see a combo view of tasks and tickets. It is a little bit difficult to get a solid overview of your list of things to do. You can only see them in separate views, instead of one single view."

"The ability to customize the user interface is a bit lacking, and the reporting is a bit lacking because they're very stringent upon what you can pull reporting-wise within Freshservice. They have a lot of built-in reports that are very nice, but when it comes to customizing these, they just provide you with certain data. When you try to build your own report wizard, you aren't able to go and select some of the data that is shown in some of the reports that come with Freshservice. This is something that we have brought up with our account representative, and we have suggested these as feature updates in the future. We're still waiting on them to go and implement something like that."

"There is room for improvement in reporting for project management."

More Freshservice cons

"The solution's provisioning engine needs to be improved."

"The problem is that the platform requires it to be maintained and updated. Also, a few cases are still pending with the Red Hat support team since they are not closed yet."

"Because the solution needs to integrate with other products that surround it, there is a lot of configuration required, and this can be quite complex. It's not as easy as it is with, for example, VMware."

"The solution is still quite immature."

"All of the areas of Red Hat CloudForms could improve. It doesn't do half of the things that it says it can do out of the box. It takes configuration to make any of it work, which is not uncommon for solutions similar to this. However, it is frustrating."

"Red Hat CloudForms could improve by allowing more customization of reports. We have to do a lot of coding to accomplish what we want. Additionally, the compatibility with the multi-cloud could improve. The latter versions of the solution removed Google support and the cost comparison between other clouds was high."

"Our clients had challenges or issues with the updates. Its updates should be better managed."

"Our clients had challenges or issues with the updates. Its updates should be better managed. They should provide quicker and more stable updates. Its stability can also be better. We initially faced ease-of-use and compatibility issues while integrating it. We had a lot of compatibility issues with other products. Our clients are concerned about whether it is under IBM or it is still Red Hat. Clients are not very clear about the support, and they're not really happy with it. Currently, they're getting support from Red Hat, but going forward, they're not really clear about what would be the life cycle of the product, which is a concern for them."

More Red Hat CloudForms cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I can't recall exactly how much we pay, but it is somewhere in the middle compared to the rest of the market. The more we purchase, the cheaper it becomes, and I think the solution offers good value for money."

"Freshservice is a fairly cheap solution. Though monthly payments can be made towards the licensing costs of the solution, my company prefers to make annual payments."

"One of the key benefits of Freshservice is license management. Asset management has the possibility to keep track of licenses and that's very useful. The price of the solution is very good."

"It is $34 per license, per agent. Currently, we don't see any add-ons at extra fees."

"The pricing information is on their website. It's my understanding that their Pro Plan, for example, is around $89/month."

"It is good for the price you pay. It has different plans. If you need all features, you need to go for a higher plan. Currently, with the second tier plan, you cannot completely separate the group of agents. So, the agent in each group can see another person's ticket. You also cannot modify the rules based on the viewable, readable stuff and cannot have a custom role in this plan. If you want to do that, you have to go for a higher plan. It works in our case because it doesn't matter if the other group can see our ticket because it doesn't contain anything sensitive. We also didn't need the project or change management features. That's why we didn't go with a higher plan."

"The solution may be around 20,000 euros a year."

"Its price is great. Its pricing is supposedly a lot less than ServiceNow and other alternatives."

More Freshservice pricing and cost advice

"It is definitely cheaper than VMware. Everything is included. There is no challenge there."

"The product's licensing is based on the number of servers."

"Red Hat CloudForms is a bit expensive."

"Red Hat CloudForms has a subscript-based pricing model. The cost is approximately $20,000 annually which allows you to use as many users as you want."

"The price of Red Hat CloudForms was not competitive, it was expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

University

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Construction Company

Transportation Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	24
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	16

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Large Enterprise	8

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Freshservice?

I cannot comment much on the pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Freshservice as it was already preset up in my company.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Freshservice?

I believe Freshservice can be improved by offering more advanced features and customizability. In terms of improvements, I suggest enhancing performance for larger networks and addressing workflow ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Freshservice?

In Freshservice, I typically use it for day-to-day tasks. A quick, specific example of how I use Freshservice in my daily work includes getting some incidents, working on service requests, and hand...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

ServiceNow vs Freshservice

Compared 11% of the time

Zendesk vs Freshservice

Compared 8% of the time

JIRA Service Management vs Freshservice

Compared 6% of the time

Samanage vs Freshservice

Compared 4% of the time

Device42 vs Freshservice

Compared 4% of the time

More Freshservice Competitors

VMware Aria Automation vs Red Hat CloudForms

Compared 9% of the time

Cloudify vs Red Hat CloudForms

Compared 6% of the time

IBM Multicloud Manager vs Red Hat CloudForms

Compared 5% of the time

IBM Service Delivery Manager vs Red Hat CloudForms

Compared 5% of the time

IBM Cloud Automation Manager vs Red Hat CloudForms

Compared 5% of the time

More Red Hat CloudForms Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Freshservice

August 2026

Download Freshservice product report

Buyer's Guide

Red Hat CloudForms

July 2026

Download Red Hat CloudForms product report

Also Known As

Flint

No data available

Overview

Freshservice specializes in user-friendliness and seamless integration, facilitating IT operations with AI-driven ticketing and flexible asset management, essential for diverse organizations.

Known for its comprehensive automation and integration with platforms like AWS, Freshservice enhances IT tasks with flexible workflows and intuitive dashboards. Its self-service portal and effective incident management promote efficient service delivery and SLA compliance, making it vital for IT teams. However, users seek enhanced customization and integration with Microsoft and Google, along with improved analytics and project management features.

What are the essential features of Freshservice?

User-friendliness: Simplifies IT processes with intuitive design.
Comprehensive automation: Optimizes operations through streamlined processes.
AI-powered ticketing: Enhances ticket management with intelligent solutions.
Seamless integration: Connects with platforms like AWS and SolarWinds for efficient workflows.
Flexible workflows and asset management: Adapts to diverse IT needs for better service delivery.

What benefits should users consider in Freshservice reviews?

Streamlined IT operations: Simplifies and speeds up service processes.
Improved SLA compliance: Enhances adherence to service level agreements through efficient management.
Increased service delivery: Boosts the quality and efficiency of services provided.
Visibility across departments: Provides clear tracking and management of service requests and assets.

Freshservice is widely implemented in IT service management, supporting ticketing, incident management, and change management. It assists in customer service, internal support, and integrates with Azure and AWS. Significant for HR service centers and knowledge bases, it enables workflow automation and reporting, centralizing service operations for enhanced visibility and tracking across departments.

Freshworks

Red Hat CloudForms is a robust management platform that integrates seamlessly with open-source technologies like Kubernetes and Docker. It offers flexibility with diverse infrastructures, scalability, and dynamic catalog creation.

Red Hat CloudForms supports service providers in UAE by offering a central console for infrastructure management. Known for its multi-tenancy and streamlined interface, it facilitates seamless integration with infrastructures like Nexus, Solaris, IBM, and VMware. Despite its strengths, challenges such as complexity and user-friendliness have been noted, with users requesting predefined modules, enhanced dashboards, and improved customization. The cost and platform lifecycle remain concerns, especially when compared to competitors like VMware. Permission refinement and provisioning engine improvements are also needed, as well as better cloud service integration and stability.

What features make Red Hat CloudForms stand out?

Seamless Integration: Works well with open-source components like Kubernetes and Docker.
Multi-Tenancy: Allows multiple users with separate environments.
Scalability: Designed to grow with infrastructure needs.
Dynamic Catalog Creation: Offers customized service delivery.
Report Capabilities: Provides in-depth analytics and reporting options.

What benefits and ROI should be evaluated?

Flexibility: Supports diverse infrastructures like VMware and IBM.
Self-Service Provisioning: Reduces time to deploy and manage VMs.
Automated Infrastructure: Automates code for more efficient management.
Integration Opportunities: Works with Ansible Tower for application management.

In industries, Red Hat CloudForms serves as a central hub for service providers, managing and orchestrating platforms like NETGEAR, KVM, Hyper-V, and VMware. Automation of infrastructure code, server management, and cloud infrastructure evaluation are core use cases, with users integrating technologies like Ansible Tower for daily task management and access delegation.

Red Hat

Sample Customers

Sinclair Broadcast Group, Western Carriers, Judson University, Golf Canada, Travix, Proxama, Paymentez, Ready Auto Transport

Cox Automotive, Penn State, FICO, G-ABLE, Seneca College, ITandTEL, The Paris Lodron University of Salzburg (PLUS), MyRepublic, Macquarie, The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, CBTS, Network Data Solutions (NDS)

Buyer's Guide

Freshservice vs. Red Hat CloudForms

August 2026

Free Report: Freshservice vs. Red Hat CloudForms

Find out what your peers are saying about Freshservice vs. Red Hat CloudForms and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Freshservice vs. Red Hat CloudForms report.

See our list of best Cloud Management vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.