GDB vs froglogic Coco Code Coverage comparison

Qt Group and GNU are both solutions in the Debugging category. Qt Group is ranked #7, while GNU is ranked #2. Qt Group holds a 9.2% mindshare in D, compared to GNU’s 11.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Qt Group users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of GNU users who would recommend it.

froglogic Coco Code Coverage

Read 1 froglogic Coco Code Coverage review

219 Views
188 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

GDB

Read 1 GDB review

228 Views
226 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

froglogic Coco Code Coverage

GDB

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between GDB and froglogic Coco Code Coverage based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Sentry, GNU, MathWorks and others in Debugging.

To learn more, read our detailed Debugging Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Debugging

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

froglogic Coco Code Coverage

Ranking in Debugging

7th

Average Rating

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

GDB

Ranking in Debugging

2nd

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Debugging category, the mindshare of froglogic Coco Code Coverage is 9.2%, up from 4.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GDB is 11.1%, up from 10.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Debugging Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
GDB	11.1%
froglogic Coco Code Coverage	9.2%
Other	79.7%

Debugging

Featured Reviews

AnirbanSarkar

Head - Solution Management Group at Meteonic Innovation Pvt. Ltd.

Integrates well, highly scalable, but more programming langue support needed

If someone is already using Squish as a regression tool, froglogic Coco Code Coverage can be a very handy add-on to that. If somebody is already having some mechanism to write their unit test cases, froglogic Coco Code Coverage can be a very good tool for giving the code coverage. The solution overall is still in development, they need to polish a few things moving forward. I rate froglogic Coco Code Coverage a seven out of ten.

Read full review

it_user1158

Developer at a tech company with 51-200 employees

A very good open source debugger, can be run on various platforms, and supports debugging many programming platforms.

- One of the best open source debuggers that are suitable for debugging a code base written in C/C++, Java, Fortran, etc., on a lot of platforms, including Linux. - It has the feature of debugging the Operating System kernel code base, which is not possible on other debuggers. - It can also be used to debug code base or executables on a remote machine. - It can be very easily scripted to automate the debug process and gather debug information, which can prove to be quite handy - It can be used to examine memory footprint and can be used to change variable values during the debug process itself.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Debugging solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparisons

Polyspace Bug Finder vs froglogic Coco Code Coverage

Compared 32% of the time

Qt Squish vs froglogic Coco Code Coverage

Compared 27% of the time

More froglogic Coco Code Coverage Competitors

GNU DDD vs GDB

Compared 36% of the time

Rogue Wave TotalView vs GDB

Compared 22% of the time

More GDB Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Debugging

January 2026

Download froglogic Coco Code Coverage product report

Buyer's Guide

Debugging

January 2026

Download GDB product report

Overview

The Coco code coverage tool is a complete, cross-platform, cross-compiler tool chain allowing to analyze the test coverage of C, C++, C# and Tcl code.

Coco is used to

Find and highlight untested code sections
Find redundant tests (i.e., tests that merely duplicate others)
Find unreachable code
Compute the optimal order of test execution that will maximize the overall coverage
Compare the test coverage of two application versions or test executions.

Qt Group

GDB, the GNU Project debugger, allows you to see what is going on `inside' another program while it executes -- or what another program was doing at the moment it crashed.

GNU

Sample Customers

Google, Nokia, Pfizer, Siemens, Synopsys, Airbus, Boeing, Mercedes Benz, Disney, Shell, Reuters, Vodafone, XILINX, GE, Ericsson

Information Not Available

Find out what your peers are saying about Sentry, GNU, MathWorks and others in Debugging. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Debugging vendors.

We monitor all Debugging reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.