No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Qt Squish vs froglogic Coco Code Coverage comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

froglogic Coco Code Coverage
Average Rating
7.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Debugging (8th)
Qt Squish
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
20
Ranking in other categories
Test Automation Tools (13th)
 

Mindshare comparison

froglogic Coco Code Coverage and Qt Squish aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. froglogic Coco Code Coverage is designed for Debugging and holds a mindshare of 7.4%, up 4.4% compared to last year.
Qt Squish, on the other hand, focuses on Test Automation Tools, holds 2.4% mindshare, down 3.1% since last year.
Debugging Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
froglogic Coco Code Coverage7.4%
GDB10.0%
Sentry8.8%
Other73.8%
Debugging
Test Automation Tools Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Qt Squish2.4%
Tricentis Tosca11.0%
OpenText Functional Testing7.0%
Other79.6%
Test Automation Tools
 

Featured Reviews

AnirbanSarkar - PeerSpot reviewer
Head - Solution Management Group at Meteonic Innovation Pvt. Ltd.
Integrates well, highly scalable, but more programming langue support needed
If someone is already using Squish as a regression tool, froglogic Coco Code Coverage can be a very handy add-on to that. If somebody is already having some mechanism to write their unit test cases, froglogic Coco Code Coverage can be a very good tool for giving the code coverage. The solution overall is still in development, they need to polish a few things moving forward. I rate froglogic Coco Code Coverage a seven out of ten.
Luc Vangrunderbeeck - PeerSpot reviewer
Software Test Engineer at Infrabel
Testing solution supports Java testing with good reliability
There is nothing you can do for almost every application. If you do it for a single version, it is rather easy. However, if you want to run it for different versions of the software, then you need the Qt version of Java. You need to set up some special environment variables to be able to do that.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"If someone is already using Squish as a regression tool, froglogic Coco Code Coverage can be a very handy add-on to that."
"If somebody is using a kind of Squish as a regression testing tool, froglogic Coco Code Coverage can be used in parallel because these two particular products can communicate with one another."
"Our previous, haphazard approach to testing was not effective, and using Squish has led us into an organized mode of testing."
"I like the dashboard. It's virtual, and you can see the customer results. I can do it at night and in the morning. I think it also automatically emails results."
"Powerful and intuitive Integrated Development Environment (IDE) - I use this IDE daily for creating new tests, debugging tests and running tests."
"Stable automation suites; it is cheaper than most of other vendor automation tools, it supports a wide range of tool-kits, even embedded solutions, one tool for all your products."
"Squish saved our time and money by creating reusable operating system independent test scripts."
"Customer support was good; they work out of the box and are willing to add a new feature if we say and if it is feasible."
"If you are looking for simple, not expensive, with nice support and for Qt-application tool – I think, it’s the best one."
"Stable automation framework with its own object library enabled us to move all of the tests to a Continuous Integration farm."
 

Cons

"Froglogic Coco Code Coverage could improve by adding more computer programming languages, it would be better. It only covers four languages."
"Anyhow, we can't automate the applications which are completely built on C/C++ without using Qt."
"ID could be improved with suggestions of names, variables or class."
"Features like recovery scenarios can be added as an improvement Reporting can be improved."
"It still requires better solutions for object identification and an enhancement to identify all the objects of the AUT before building the object map."
"You need to set up some special environment variables."
"I like it how it is, but it's not cheap."
"Squish is lagging in handling swing objects, but I believe Squish will overcome this shortly."
"Recording tests with Squish IDE creates quite ugly code and it is very difficult to maintain tests that have been recorded."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The price could be better. I believe each developer license costs about 6000 or 7000 Euros per year."
"It is expensive."
"The platform is highly-priced."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Debugging solutions are best for your needs.
900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Manufacturing Company
22%
Healthcare Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Outsourcing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business10
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise9
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for froglogic Squish?
I'm aware of the price from three or four years ago, and it depends on the number of users. For the developer license, it is about $5200 a year.
What needs improvement with froglogic Squish?
There is nothing you can do for almost every application. If you do it for a single version, it is rather easy. However, if you want to run it for different versions of the software, then you need ...
What is your primary use case for froglogic Squish?
I am not really using the solution during development, however, for regression and automatic regression tests, I am using it. I use it to do visual Qt, which focuses on the GUI part of the applicat...
 

Also Known As

No data available
froglogic Squish
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Google, Nokia, Pfizer, Siemens, Synopsys, Airbus, Boeing, Mercedes Benz, Disney, Shell, Reuters, Vodafone, XILINX, GE, Ericsson
Google, Nokia, Pfizer, Siemens, Synopsys, Airbus, Boeing, Mercedes Benz, Disney, Shell, Reuters, Vodafone, XILINX, GE, Ericsson
Find out what your peers are saying about Sentry, MathWorks, GNU and others in Debugging. Updated: May 2026.
900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.