No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Qt Squish vs froglogic Coco Code Coverage comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

froglogic Coco Code Coverage
Average Rating
7.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Debugging (8th)
Qt Squish
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
20
Ranking in other categories
Test Automation Tools (13th)
 

Mindshare comparison

froglogic Coco Code Coverage and Qt Squish aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. froglogic Coco Code Coverage is designed for Debugging and holds a mindshare of 7.4%, up 4.4% compared to last year.
Qt Squish, on the other hand, focuses on Test Automation Tools, holds 2.4% mindshare, down 3.1% since last year.
Debugging Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
froglogic Coco Code Coverage7.4%
GDB10.0%
Sentry8.8%
Other73.8%
Debugging
Test Automation Tools Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Qt Squish2.4%
Tricentis Tosca11.0%
OpenText Functional Testing7.0%
Other79.6%
Test Automation Tools
 

Featured Reviews

AnirbanSarkar - PeerSpot reviewer
Head - Solution Management Group at Meteonic Innovation Pvt. Ltd.
Integrates well, highly scalable, but more programming langue support needed
If someone is already using Squish as a regression tool, froglogic Coco Code Coverage can be a very handy add-on to that. If somebody is already having some mechanism to write their unit test cases, froglogic Coco Code Coverage can be a very good tool for giving the code coverage. The solution overall is still in development, they need to polish a few things moving forward. I rate froglogic Coco Code Coverage a seven out of ten.
Luc Vangrunderbeeck - PeerSpot reviewer
Software Test Engineer at Infrabel
Testing solution supports Java testing with good reliability
There is nothing you can do for almost every application. If you do it for a single version, it is rather easy. However, if you want to run it for different versions of the software, then you need the Qt version of Java. You need to set up some special environment variables to be able to do that.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"If someone is already using Squish as a regression tool, froglogic Coco Code Coverage can be a very handy add-on to that."
"If somebody is using a kind of Squish as a regression testing tool, froglogic Coco Code Coverage can be used in parallel because these two particular products can communicate with one another."
"Squish's data-driven testing is very powerful, so it will never be stuck if the size of data is too heavy."
"It supports many platforms, which helps in getting automation solutions for most of the complex UI products."
"Stable automation framework with its own object library enabled us to move all of the tests to a Continuous Integration farm."
"The most important part is that it allows me to create black box tests faster and easier."
"It is very stable."
"Customer support was good; they work out of the box and are willing to add a new feature if we say and if it is feasible."
"Powerful and intuitive Integrated Development Environment (IDE) - I use this IDE daily for creating new tests, debugging tests and running tests."
"froglogic Squish is one of the most desired solutions if you are having a Qt as a framework and if you are looking at GUI regression testing. froglogic is a part of Qt as a company."
 

Cons

"Froglogic Coco Code Coverage could improve by adding more computer programming languages, it would be better. It only covers four languages."
"We have faced some difficulties in identifying canvas objects initially."
"I like it how it is, but it's not cheap."
"Robotics automation could be added with Squish."
"The platform could be improved by implementing some basic functionalities that are frequently used, such as login procedures and screen handling when multiple screens are used at the workplace."
"The only criticism I have is the IDE needed a bit of polish in version 5.2 (this may have been fixed in the latest versions)."
"The price could be better."
"It still requires better solutions for object identification and an enhancement to identify all the objects of the AUT before building the object map."
"There had been a lot of improvements with froglogic Squish already. There were some scenarios in which this particular solution was available in different flavors. They have pulled everything together in one solution. There were some monitoring systems, which were missing out from the solution earlier. They have a centralized dashboard for monitoring the test cases and their execution. It's a full-blown solution, there are not many glitches in terms of something missing out of the package."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The platform is highly-priced."
"The price could be better. I believe each developer license costs about 6000 or 7000 Euros per year."
"It is expensive."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Debugging solutions are best for your needs.
900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Manufacturing Company
22%
Healthcare Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Outsourcing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business10
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise9
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for froglogic Squish?
I'm aware of the price from three or four years ago, and it depends on the number of users. For the developer license, it is about $5200 a year.
What needs improvement with froglogic Squish?
There is nothing you can do for almost every application. If you do it for a single version, it is rather easy. However, if you want to run it for different versions of the software, then you need ...
What is your primary use case for froglogic Squish?
I am not really using the solution during development, however, for regression and automatic regression tests, I am using it. I use it to do visual Qt, which focuses on the GUI part of the applicat...
 

Also Known As

No data available
froglogic Squish
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Google, Nokia, Pfizer, Siemens, Synopsys, Airbus, Boeing, Mercedes Benz, Disney, Shell, Reuters, Vodafone, XILINX, GE, Ericsson
Google, Nokia, Pfizer, Siemens, Synopsys, Airbus, Boeing, Mercedes Benz, Disney, Shell, Reuters, Vodafone, XILINX, GE, Ericsson
Find out what your peers are saying about Sentry, MathWorks, GNU and others in Debugging. Updated: May 2026.
900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.